Trump extends his political power with 'big, beautiful' win in U.S. Congress
In the end, after days of intense behind-the-scenes pressure from the White House, Congress proved no match for a president at the peak of his power.
Trump secured the biggest legislative victory of his second term in office on Thursday when the House of Representatives passed his sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, sending it to the Republican president for his signature by his dictated deadline of Friday's Independence Day holiday.
The measure will give Trump billions of dollars and new legal avenues to press forward with his domestic agenda, ramping up migrant deportations and cutting taxes while rolling back health benefits and food assistance.
One-by-one, major U.S. institutions from the Supreme Court, law firms, universities, media outlets and beyond have given way for Trump to push the bounds of presidential authority in his first five months in office. With its narrow passage of Trump's self-styled "big, beautiful bill," Congress, too, delivered the president a victory that will further extend his power.
"There's no question that it's a capstone to what has been a very strong last few weeks for President Trump,' said Lanhee Chen, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, a think tank, and a former adviser to Republicans Mitt Romney and Marco Rubio.
In acceding to Trump's wishes, Republican lawmakers pushed past their nonpartisan budget office and Senate parliamentarian, mega-donor Elon Musk, bond market fears about U.S. debt and their personal doubts about whether the bill's benefit cuts could shorten their constituents' lives or their own political futures.
Nonpartisan forecasters say the legislation will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt, a prediction many Republicans contend overlooks future economic growth from business tax cuts.
The bill isn't popular with many Americans: 49% oppose the legislation, while only 29% favor it, according to recent polling by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center. Pew said majorities expressed concern that the legislation would raise the budget deficit and hurt lower-income people while benefiting the wealthy.
The White House disputed the polling data, insisting that internal polls across the country had found great support for many specific provisions of the law.
Republican voters do want Trump to rule with little interference from lawmakers. Some 64% of Republicans polled by Reuters/Ipsos in June agreed with a statement that the country needs a strong president who can rule without too much interference from Congress or the courts. Only 13% of Democrats agreed.
"It's the rare piece of legislation that can both at the same time be a big victory for one side but also present some political traps for that same victorious side," Chen said.
Trump spent recent days wooing small groups of Republican lawmakers from the Senate and House who stopped by the Oval Office or his Sterling, Virginia, golf course.
He handed out branded merchandise and encouraged them not to give Democrats the satisfaction of handing Trump a major defeat, according to people familiar with the outreach. He vented frustration, privately and then publicly, at the idea that Republicans might break ranks.
"FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE,' Trump posted on Truth Social after midnight Thursday as the bill struggled to gain sufficient votes to clear a procedural hurdle. "RIDICULOUS!!!'
A senior White House official told reporters after the final vote on Thursday that Trump was deeply involved in the production of the legislation, going over it line-by-line with senior advisers including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and working through "endless" late-night phone calls with members of Congress.
Trump started working the phones at 5:30 a.m. on Thursday in the run-up to the vote, leveraging relationships built during dinners and engagements at the White House and at his Florida estate in Palm Beach, the official said.
Ultimately, only two House Republicans ended up joining Democrats to vote against the bill.
Hyma Moore, a Democratic strategist, said Trump will pay little political price in the long-term for pushing an unpopular bill because he is a term-limited president. Republicans seeking future office may have to deal with the consequences, however.
Deep cuts to Medicaid and food assistance, along with growing U.S. government debt, are certain to figure in the 2026 midterm elections, when Democrats hope to take advantage of the longstanding tendency of voters to hand the opposition party more control of Congress.
Two Republicans, Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, have already announced their retirements in recent days after clashing with Trump, potentially giving Democrats an easier path to pick up those seats.
"He's a lame duck, there's not much of a price he can pay at this point,' Moore said of Trump. "Next step is more GOP (Republican) in-fighting as the primaries shape up.'
While Republican lawmakers in tough districts fight to keep their jobs, the bill they just passed will empower Trump to govern as freely as ever.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
2 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
OPEC+ speeds up oil output hikes in August
LONDON (Reuters) -- OPEC+ agreed on Saturday to raise production by 548,000 barrels per day in August, further accelerating output increases at its first meeting since oil prices jumped - and then retreated - following Israeli and U.S. attacks on Iran. The group, which pumps about half of the world's oil, has been curtailing production since 2022 to support the market. But it has reversed course this year to regain market share and as U.S. President Donald Trump demanded the group pump more to help keep gasoline prices lower. The production boost will come from eight members of the group - Saudi Arabia, Russia, the UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Iraq, Kazakhstan and Algeria. The eight started to unwind their most recent layer of cuts of 2.2 million bpd in April. The August increase represents a jump from monthly increases of 411,000 bpd OPEC+ had approved for May, June and July, and 138,000 bpd in April. OPEC+ cited a steady global economic outlook and healthy market fundamentals, including low oil inventories, as reasons for releasing more oil. The acceleration came after some OPEC+ members, such as Kazakhstan and Iraq, produced above their targets, angering other members that were sticking to cuts, sources have said. Kazakh output returned to growth last month and matched an all-time high. OPEC+, which groups the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies led by Russia, wants to expand market share amid growing supplies from rival producers like the United States, sources have said. With the August increase, OPEC+ will have released 1.918 million bpd since April, which leaves just 280,000 bpd to be released from the 2.2 million bpd cut. On top of that, OPEC+ allowed the UAE to increase output by 300,000 bpd. The group still has in place other layers of cuts amounting to 3.66 million bpd. The group of eight OPEC+ members will next meet on August 3.
Japan Times
5 hours ago
- Japan Times
Data centers and small reactors could change Asia's nuclear dynamic
Notice how hot your cellphone gets when it multitasks on a steamy day? It doesn't take much to make me put my keitai down and worry about it overheating. Multiply that heat by, say, infinity, and you've got the biggest problem that data centers face in an increasingly digital world. An estimated 402.74 million terabytes of data are created each day and storing and processing all that information creates virtual volcanoes. The rise of artificial intelligence is compounding the problem. In a much-cited report released earlier this year, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimated that electricity demand from data centers worldwide will more than double by 2030 to around 945 terawatt-hours, an amount that exceeds Japan's current entire electricity consumption. By 2035, global data center electricity consumption will increase again by one-third to around 1,200 TWh. (Goldman Sachs reached roughly similar conclusions in reports issued last year.) Data center electricity consumption has grown 12% a year since 2017 — more than four times the rate of total electricity consumption — and last year accounted for around 1.5% of the world's electricity consumption in 2024, or 415 TWh. The U.S. accounted for 45% of that amount, followed by China (25%) and Europe (15%). It's estimated that a typical AI-focused data center consumes as much electricity as 100,000 homes and the largest ones currently under construction will consume 20 times that amount, or the equivalent of 2 million households. A huge part of that demand comes from the cooling systems critical to their operation. New technology such as graphics processing units, needed for increasingly complex computation, consume more power and generate more heat than the central processing units that are more widely used today. It's estimated that cooling systems can account for as much as 40% of a data center's power consumption. The IEA sources 85% of global data center power consumption — and hence data centers — to the U.S., China and Europe. In Japan, data centers account for less than 20 TWh of electricity consumption (about 2% of the total, roughly equivalent to that of Europe). That will change. The transition to Society 5.0, with its deep integration of digital services into daily life, will accelerate demand for computing power. In addition, the Japanese government has made data centers a core component of efforts to increase foreign direct investment in the country to ¥100 trillion by the end of 2030. Japan is already scheduled to add more than 500MW to power its data centers, bringing total capacity for those facilities to 1.5 GW. Consistent with those plans, the IEA concluded that data centers will be responsible for more than half the growth in electricity demand in Japan. The rest of the world accounts for about 10% of total data center electricity generation, with Southeast Asia and India prominent. In many ways, Southeast Asia may be the most interesting — and concerning — place to watch. A BCG report last year anticipated that data center capacity in Southeast Asia would triple by 2030, reaching between 5.2 GW and 6.5 GW, which would make it the world's third hub for such services, behind the U.S. and China. This will, reports the IEA, double electricity demand in the region. As one example, the agency forecast that data centers would be responsible for as much as 20% of the increase in Malaysia's national power demand by 2030. Ambitious politicians, such as Thaksin Shinawatra, Thailand's eminence grise, hope to emulate Japan and use that demand to entice foreign investment. 'We want to be competitive in data centers and AI,' Thaksin said earlier this year. Bangkok has already reportedly secured billions of dollars in investment commitments by technology giants like Amazon and Alibaba. The big question is where they will get their juice. Rising demand is pushing tech giants such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon to invest in nuclear power. This shift, from governments to big companies, as the primary drivers of nuclear power development, has powerful implications that we have been slow to consider. Big nuclear projects remain problematic, with government policies and regulations inhibiting — if not blocking — the sector's development. There is only one nuclear power plant in Southeast Asia — in the Philippines, built 40 years ago but never commissioned. It has never produced a single watt of energy. Yet, in a report issued late last year, the IEA concluded that nuclear power would become part of the region's energy mix by 2035, with installed nuclear capacity ranging from 6 GW to 13 GW by 2050, depending on the scenario. The development of small modular reactors is the wild card. SMRs have a capacity of under 300 MW (small, most conventional reactors produce about 1,000 MW) and their components can be mass-produced and assembled on site (modular). They are also considerably cheaper than traditional nuclear power plants: They cost about $2 billion while conventional reactors can cost more than $10 billion. Thus far, only Russia and China have commercially operable reactors, although the U.S. and Japan are working on the technology. According to the IEA, there are plans to build as much as 25 GW of SMR capacity to supply data centers worldwide, almost all in the U.S., with the first projects expected to go online after 2030. But does the readiness of tech giants to acquire their own nuclear capability change the regional dynamic? SMRs are intended to sidestep the big issues surrounding nuclear power, namely the huge costs required to build the plant and the accompanying grid as well as looming and rightly concerning safety and security issues. SMRs can be installed into an existing grid or remotely off-grid, reducing or even eliminating the infrastructure concerns. They're also thought to be safer and more secure. While those reactors will still be subject to national regulatory frameworks, it seems obvious to me that moving the locus of decision-making away from governments to companies could accelerate the adoption process. Especially when those companies are pursuing business objectives that align with national economic goals — promoting investment and the development of high-tech industries. Companies can move more quickly than governments. Their readiness to assume regulatory and financial burdens helps shift the decision-making dynamic. I checked in with Carl Baker, my colleague at Pacific Forum who has been running programs that explore regional thinking about nuclear energy for nearly two decades. He agreed that 'the potential availability of SMRs has had an impact on thinking about the viability of nuclear technology, especially in Southeast Asia.' But, he added 'the conversation regarding the introduction of nuclear energy as a source of electrical power is still in its early stages and has not gotten into the specific issues related to governance and other regulatory considerations.' He is less sanguine than I about the impact of the private sector's enthusiasm for SMRs. The idea that tech giants can change the prevailing mindset 'is not really an issue in countries that have not developed the national regulatory framework for use of nuclear power as an energy source.' Moreover, 'conglomerates are not going to be able to avoid the bottlenecks and roadblocks any more than large power companies have been.' Finally, Baker said, 'the impetus for accommodating specialized applications is coming primarily from the U.S at this point' and regulators there have been pretty reluctant to let go of overly stringent safety requirements. He is probably right. But in a recent conversation in Southeast Asia about nuclear power and accompanying concerns, local participants approached the problem from the traditional perspective — big nukes, national infrastructure and government bottlenecks. Those are powerful forces but I can't help but wonder if that paradigm is ready for revision. After all, things are heating up. Brad Glosserman is a senior adviser at Pacific Forum and the author of "Peak Japan." His upcoming book on the geopolitics of high-tech is expected to be released by Hurst Publishers this fall.
Asahi Shimbun
6 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Trump says tariff letters to 12 countries signed, going out Monday
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media on board Air Force One on the way to New Jersey on July 4. (REUTERS) U.S. President Donald Trump said he had signed letters to 12 countries outlining the various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the United States, with the "take it or leave it" offers to be sent out on Monday. Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he traveled to New Jersey, declined to name the countries involved, saying that would be made public on Monday. Trump had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the United States, though the date has now shifted. In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some ranging as high as 50%. However, all but the 10% base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher - ranging up to 70% - with most set to go into effect August 1. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump said, when asked about his plans on the tariff front. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." Trump and his top aides initially said they would launch negotiations with scores of countries on tariff rates, but the U.S. president has soured on that process after repeated setbacks with major trading partners, including Japan and the European Union. He touched on that briefly late on Friday, telling reporters: "The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter." He did not address his prediction that some broader trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline. The shift in the White House's strategy reflects the challenges of completing trade agreements on everything from tariffs to non-tariff barriers such as bans on agricultural imports, and especially on an accelerated timeline. Most past trade agreements have taken years of negotiations to complete. The only trade agreements reached to date are with Britain, which reached a deal in May to keep a 10% rate and won preferential treatment for some sectors including autos and aircraft engines, and with Vietnam, cutting tariffs on many Vietnamese goods to 20% from his previously threatened 46%. Many U.S. products would be allowed to enter Vietnam duty free. A deal expected with India has failed to materialize, and EU diplomats on Friday said they have failed to achieve a breakthrough in trade negotiations with the Trump administration, and may now seek to extend the status quo to avoid tariff hikes.
