Siddaramaiah's flashpoint, tribunal relief spark talk of political overreach in police ranks
Siddaramaiah
appeared to raise his hand at him during a public event — have left the govt red-faced and reignited concern over mounting political intrusion into policing.
Together, the twin episodes have deepened disquiet within the force and sparked debate over the erosion of operational independence. The broader concern being raised is whether the police force in Karnataka is buckling under sustained political overreach.
"With a deterioration in standards of public life and public conduct, there is a corresponding fall in the conduct of political functionaries," said ST Ramesh, former DGP.
"It is not uncommon for political functionaries to address officials rudely. This steady deterioration in standards of interaction between political functionaries and police officers has led to the emasculation of the police force."
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
Ramesh, who served the force for 35 years, pointed to the constitutional separation of power. "Just as there is a separation of power among the judiciary, legislature, and executive, there exists such a line between powers of the political dispensation and the administrative executive.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Secure your family's future!
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
These are clear lines, but partly out of ignorance and partly because they think that they can get away with anything, the boundaries are crossed," Ramesh said.
Advocating police autonomy, he said: "Broad guidelines and policy statements are in order, but not interference in day-to-day functions. This is not the first incident, nor is it going to be the last."
However, labour minister and Dharwad in-charge Santosh Lad defended Siddaramaiah while attempting to downplay the Baramani episode.
"All of us, including politicians, have faced these public humiliations. The incident involving the CM was unintended," Lad said.
He also denied any pattern linking CAT's ruling and Baramani's decision to opt for voluntary retirement. "CAT's decision is a procedural and legal matter," he said, while refusing to comment further.
Another retired senior police officer flagged "politicisation of postings". "The department is facing serious concerns with more and more appointments being made based on political influence… If the CM appoints someone, then the district minister is unhappy.
And if the district minister is happy, then local MLAs have to be pleased as well," the officer said.
Serving officers observed that Siddaramaiah's current term is unlike his earlier stint in 2013. "The CM is under pressure," said an officer. "Baramani being persuaded by Siddaramaiah and home minister Parameshwara to return to work was aimed at damage control."
Ramesh said such unsavoury incidents could lead to a drop in morale. "Once that happens, service delivery is bound to deteriorate, impacting citizens," Ramesh said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor was 'finest example' of commitment to defend 'Swaraj': Amit Shah
Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Friday said India's armed forces and the leadership are committed to defend 'Swaraj' or sovereignty of the country, and it was demonstrated very well during Operation Sindoor . Speaking after the unveiling of an equestrian statue of Maratha statesman and general Peshwa Bajirao I at the National Defence Academy ( NDA ) here, the BJP leader also said whenever he is plagued by negative thoughts, he thinks of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Bajirao. The NDA was the most appropriate place for Bajirao's memorial as it is an institution where military leadership is trained, Shah said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo "Whenever negative thoughts come to my mind, I usually think about 'Bal' (young) Shivaji and Peshwa Bajirao, thinking that they were able to establish a 'Swaraj' (self-rule or sovereign state) amid adverse conditions," he said. The responsibility to defend the Swaraj now lies with 140 crore Indians, Shah added. Live Events "When it was time to put up a fight to establish a Swaraj, we did it. When fighting will be required to defend the Swaraj, our forces and leadership will definitely demonstrate it, and Operation Sindoor was its finest example," he said. Paying tributes to Bajirao I (1700 to 1740), Shah said if the battle for independence started by Shivaji Maharaj and taken forward by the Peshwas for 100 years not been fought, "India's basic structure would have ceased to exist." "In his life of 40 years, Peshwa Bajirao scripted immortal history which no other person could write," he added. Bajirao, who became 'Peshwa' or prime minister of the Maratha state at the age of 19, is credited with the expansion of the Maratha rule in central and northern India. After the event, Shah also interacted with NDA cadets.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
India and Trump are haggling over the same constituency
The July 9 deadline looms large over the India-US trade talks which have stretched into weeks as both sides try to work around each other's hard stances. In April, US President Donald Trump had temporarily reduced the tariff rate for most countries to 10% to allow time for negotiations through July 9. An announcement on the trade deal is expected no later than the midnight of July 4-5, as per an ET report based on information from people in the know. The deal could be unveiled in phases. For days, there appeared to be a stalemate in the trade talks, with India hardening its position on offering duty concessions on agricultural products. What has been holding up the trade talks is the same interest group that matters to India as well as the US -- the farmers. The US has been pushing its agriculture and dairy products to promote its farmers, a politically powerful section in the US, while India has been resisting offering tariff concessions on these goods to protect its farmers from low-priced American agriculture and dairy products flooding the Indian market which can drastically bring down prices, thus harming Indian farmers. American farmers, an influential political bloc by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Remember Him? Sit Down Before You See What He Looks Like Now 33 Bridges Undo Trade negotiations are rarely just about economics. They are deeply entangled with domestic political imperatives. In the US-India trade talks under the Trump administration, one of the key undercurrents is the political weight of American farmers. Trump, elected in part due to strong support from rural America, has prioritised the interests of the US agricultural and dairy sectors in trade policy. His administration's push for greater market access to India for American agricultural and dairy products is not merely an economic strategy. It's a calculated political move shaped by the influence of the powerful farm lobby. American farmers, particularly those in the Midwest, represent a formidable political force. They are a critical part of Trump's base, having overwhelmingly supported him in the 2016 and 2020 elections. These regions hold significant sway in shaping the national conversation on trade and rural development. Live Events You Might Also Like: Why are farm goods holding up the India-US trade deal? America's most farming-dependent counties overwhelmingly backed Trump in last year's election by an average of 77.7%, as per independent news outlet, Investigate Midwest. Not only did Trump increase his support among farming-dependent counties, but more than 100 of those counties supported him with at least 80% of their vote. In a speech before Congress in march, Trump said that his new trade policies would "be great for the American farmer" even as he acknowledged that there "may be a little bit of an adjustment period." "Our farmers are going to have a field day right now," Trump said. He also claimed that farmers could compensate for any losses by selling more domestically. "Nobody is going to be able to compete with you," he said enthusiastically. Over the years, American farmers have grown increasingly dependent on exports due to domestic overproduction and changing consumption patterns. Major agricultural states like Iowa, Wisconsin and Nebraska rely heavily on foreign markets for commodities such as soybeans, corn, dairy and meat. Therefore, securing new or expanded trade deals that boost agricultural exports directly serves both the economic interests of these states and Trump's political interest. During Trump's previous term, government payments to farmers rose to historic levels as the Trump administration handed out cash to farmers to compensate for the financial losses from his tariff wars India is worried about its own farmers India's own political and economic considerations -- protecting its domestic farmers, adhering to food safety norms and maintaining strategic autonomy -- clash with American demands for duty concessions on agricultural and dairy products. Agriculture and its allied areas contribute just 16% to India's $3.9 trillion economy, but sustain nearly half of the country's 1.4 billion population. As farmers remain the most powerful voting bloc, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government was forced into a rare retreat four years ago when it tried to push through controversial farm laws. You Might Also Like: India may allow GM animal-feed imports from US in trade deal The prospect of cheaper imports from the United States threatens to drive down local prices, handing the opposition a fresh opportunity to attack the government. New Delhi has traditionally kept agriculture out of Free Trade Agreements with other nations. Granting market access to the US could force India to extend similar concessions to other trading partners. The average Indian farm comprises just 1.08 hectares, compared to 187 hectares in the United States. In dairy, the average herd size in India is two to three animals per farmer, compared to hundreds in the US. This difference makes it difficult for small Indian farmers to compete with their U.S. counterparts. The US is pressing India to open its markets to a wide range of American products, including dairy, poultry, corn, soybeans, rice, wheat, ethanol, citrus fruits, almonds, pecans, apples, grapes, canned peaches, chocolates, cookies, and frozen French fries. While India is willing to grant greater access to US dry fruits and apples, it is holding back on allowing imports of corn, soybeans, wheat, and dairy products. India does not allow genetically modified (GM) food crops, while most US corn and soybean production is GM-based. Dairy remains a sensitive issue in India, where cultural and dietary preferences strongly influence food choices. Indian consumers are particularly concerned that cattle in the US are often fed with animal by-products, a practice that conflicts with Indian food habits. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has cautioned that permanent reduction of agricultural tariffs in the India-US free trade agreement could result in subsidised US grains overwhelming Indian markets during global price downturns. Historical evidence shows that global grain prices plummeted between 2014 and 2016, with wheat prices falling under $160 per tonne, devastating African farmers. "India must retain policy space to manage food stocks, support rural incomes, and respond to global shocks. In today's geopolitically unstable world, food security must remain sovereign," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava was quoted as saying by PTI. At present, the government doesn't allow cultivation of GM food crops, even though varieties can aid yields. The commercial release of GM mustard has been stalled due to a legal challenge in the country's top court, and in 2010, the government rejected a GM variety of brinjal. Still, India already meets about 60% of vegetable-oil demand through imports, including soy and canola oils from GM crops. The country is also the second-largest cotton grower, with more than 90% of that crop genetically modified. You Might Also Like: Import duty cut on US farm goods under trade pact could undermine India's food security: GTRI The way out of the deadlock While India remains firm on not giving concessions in market access in the sensitive dairy and agricultural sectors, India is looking to allow imports of certain GM-based farm products used in animal feed, ET has reported based on information from sources. Talks on the deal are nearing conclusion with some last minute fine-tuning, a person privy to the development told ET, adding it could be announced well before the July 9 deadline when the US government's moratorium on reciprocal tariffs ends. "Sensitive agriculture and dairy products are out of the deal. There could be some farm products such as apples where limited concessions are being worked out," said an official, adding that concessions for US-made automobiles are high on priority list. India may agree to inbound shipments of some products used in animal feeds, such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles, a byproduct of corn-based ethanol production, people familiar with the matter, who asked not be identified as the information isn't public, told Bloomberg. You Might Also Like: Modi-govt must hold the line on food and fuel trade when dealing with Trump
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
India escaped major damage in Operation Sindoor, but army warns: Be ready for next time's triple threat
At an event on 'New Age Military Technologies' organised by FICCI, Deputy Chief of Army Staff (Capability Development & Sustenance), Lieutenant General Rahul R Singh made some strong remarks about how Operation Sindoor played out, and what it taught India about future threats. Talking about the lessons from the operation, the Deputy COAS stressed the urgent need to strengthen India's air defence. 'Air defence and how it played out during the operation was important. This time, our population centres were not directly targeted, but next time, we need to be ready,' he warned. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Khám phá nhà tiền chế giá rẻ tại Đường Hiệp Bình Nomad's Notebook Nhấp vào đây Undo Read more: 3 adversaries, one border: Dy Army chief points to China-Pakistan-Turkey nexus during Operation Sindoor — ANI (@ANI) Operation Sindoor: Lessons and strategy Lt Gen Singh praised the armed forces for their precision strikes on terrorist bases. He said that 21 potential targets were identified using a mix of technology and human intelligence. Out of these, nine were chosen for the final strikes. 'The decision to hit these targets was taken just hours before the operation,' he said. Live Events He credited leadership for sending a clear strategic message and highlighted that the plan used a tri-services approach, involving the Army, Navy and Air Force, to show India's strength as an integrated force. Lt Gen Singh said that while India had the capability to escalate further, it made a wise choice to end the conflict after meeting military objectives. 'War is easy to start but very hard to control,' he said. 'So stopping it at the right time was a masterly stroke.' China gave Pakistan live updates Lt Gen Singh said that during the operation, Pakistan was not acting alone. 'We had one border and two adversaries, actually three,' he said. 'Pakistan was in front. China was providing all possible support. About 81% of Pakistan's military hardware is Chinese.' He went further to add that China was giving live updates to Pakistan during DGMO-level talks, allowing it to track India's military movements. 'China is able to test its weapons against others, so it's like a live lab for them,' he said. He also named Turkey as another country that played a role. 'Turkey provided the kind of support it did, which made a difference,' Singh noted. Inputs from agencies
