Foreign aid nod to Maharashtra: Finance Minister K.N. Balagopal slams Centre for unfair treatment
Responding to the Centre's decision, Mr. Balagopal said here on Sunday that Kerala had been denied permission to accept aid from outside the country in the aftermath of the devastating 2018 floods. The Union government had denied permission despite the offers for assistance from abroad, he recalled.
Mr. Balagopal said that Kerala was not against Maharashtra receiving foreign aid, but it was important that the Union government saw all States on an equal footing.
Discrimination
He said that it would not be surprising if Keralites felt that even in moments of great crisis, there was discrimination among States. 'Any State receiving aid in a crisis is a good thing. Giving permission to accept the aid is also a good thing. But the Centre's approach gives room for doubt that the decision is driven by political bias,' he said.
Mr. Balagopal said it was quite unbecoming of administrators when politics became the yardstick and not the magnitude of disasters. Such approaches also failed to uphold federal principles, he said.
The Kerala Finance Minister's remarks come close on the heels of the Union Ministry of Home Affairs granting the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 2010, registration to Maharashtra's CMDRF, thereby enabling it to receive foreign donations for 'social' programmes.
No aid post-landslides
Mr. Balagopal also recalled that, following the 2024 landslides in Wayanad, Kerala had expected Prime Minister Narendra Modi to announce assistance on two occasions—during his visit to the disaster sites and later when he dedicated the Vizhinjam port to the nation. On both occasions, the State was disappointed, he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
31 minutes ago
- The Print
MHA starts vacating North Block, shifting to new CCS-3 building
The office of Union Home Minister Amit Shah is yet to be shifted but a process is underway, they added. While Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan and a few joint secretary and additional secretary-level officers and their staff have already shifted to the newly-constructed CCS-3 building, the remaining officers and other employees will shift in the next few days, sources said on Wednesday. New Delhi, Jul 23 (PTI) The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has started vacating the British-era North Block located in the Raisina Hills and shifting to a new building along the Kartavya Path, near India Gate, as part of the Narendra Modi government's Central Vista plan to refurbish the heart of the capital. The MHA has been allocated nearly 350 rooms in the new building. The red-sandstone building in the North Block has been home to the MHA for about 90 years. The identical buildings — North Block and South Block — housing key offices like the Prime Minister's Office and the ministries of home, finance, defence and external affairs will completely be vacated once the new buildings are ready. According to the government's plan, a mega museum — Yuge Yugeen Bharat — will come up in the North Block and the South Block once the offices are vacated. It will be one of the largest museums in the world with an area of 1.55 lakh square metres and 950 rooms. British architect Herbert Baker had designed the secretariat buildings, including the North Block and the South Block, along with the Parliament House and many bungalows. Baker had collaborated with Edwin Lutyens on the overall plan for New Delhi. As a part of the Central Visa project, the Centre had proposed a CCS of 10 office buildings and a conference centre along the Kartavya Path to accommodate all ministries. The first three of these office buildings have been constructed. According to a government order, CCS-3 will house the office of the principal scientific adviser and the ministries of external affairs, petroleum and natural gas, micro, small and medium enterprises, rural development and the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), besides the MHA. PTI ACB RC This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rs262cr allotted to acquire land for Bagmati bridge: Minister
Patna: The Centre has already allocated Rs 262 crore to acquire land for a bridge on Bagmati river and has approved several railway projects in Bihar. In a written reply to questions in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, the Union minister for railways, information & broadcasting and electronics & IT, Ashwini Vaishnaw said this. Responding to the question of Sheohar MP Lovely Anand, the minister said the tender for the Bagmati bridge has been done to connect Dekuli Dham. He said Rs 557 crore had been sanctioned for the Sitamarhi-Sheohar new railway line project and the work was going on at a fast pace. "As on April 1, 2025, 52 projects (31 new lines, 1 gauge conversions and 20 doubling) of a total length of 4,663 km worth Rs 86,107 crore, falling fully/partly in Bihar, are sanctioned, out of which 1,014 km length has been commissioned with an expenditure of Rs 29,353 crore up to March 2025," the minister said. He said 20 Vande Bharat and 10 out of 14 Amrit Bharat Express trains in the country were catering to Bihar. Ashwini said 558 ROBs/RUBs had been completed in Bihar during 2014-25 and 218 ROBs/RUBs at a cost of Rs 6,014 crore were sanctioned for the state. "Bihar is a very important state and projects pending for many years have been completed under the leadership of PM Modi. New bridges were built in Munger and Patna. The Kosi bridge, which was approved by Atal ji, was completed by PM Modi," he said and added that 98 railway stations were being redeveloped in Bihar. He said eight Vande Bharat, five Amrit Bharat and one Namo Bharat trains are running in the state and l,218 platforms and underpasses have been built.
The Hindu
33 minutes ago
- The Hindu
J&K leaders demand Statehood, decry Pulwama, Pahalgam ‘security failures'
Jammu and Kashmir deputy chief minister Surinder Kumar Choudhary said on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) that the Pahalgam terror attack took place even though the former State has been governed by the Union government for the past 11 years. 'How did Baisaran [Pahalgam] happen? How did Pulwama (2019 terror attack) happen? Why has corruption not stopped yet? When the same government which snatched our Statehood has been governing J&K for the past 11 years,' Mr. Choudhary said while speaking at a public meeting – Statehood Now, organised by The Forum for Human Rights in Jammu and Kashmir. As many as 26 civilians were killed at Baisaran meadow in Pahalgam on April 22 in a terror attack. The terrorists who carried out the attack are yet to be arrested. Former J&K Chief Minister and National Conference president Farooq Abdullah said that the 'silent majority' should speak for J&K's Statehood. Referring to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, Mr. Abdullah said, 'You are disenfranchising Muslim, Dalits and Adivasis in Bihar Where is Gandhi's Bharat? They look at us through the lens of religion and language. This is not my India. I want India where we all exists as people, irrespective of religion, language and area one comes from. People in power want us to bow before them, we are not here to beg. Restore our Statehood,' Mr. Abdullah said. Congress MP Manish Tewari said that the Supreme Court verdict essentially said that the procedure which was adopted to abrogate Article 370 was wrong but the abrogation was correct. 'This is a very strange idea and I am not making this up. This is the SC judgment which I have read,' Mr. Tewari said. Sajjad Kargili of Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA) said that Ladakh has been 'cheated and disenfranchised.' 'The J&K Reorganisation Act should be reversed, our land is under threat, Mr. Kargili said. The special status of J&K under Article 370 of the Constitution was revoked by the Parliament on August 5, 2019 and the former State was split into two Union Territories- J&K and Ladakh. The Assembly elections were held in the Union Territory of J&K in September 2024 but restoration of Statehood, an assurance given by the Union Government to the Supreme Court, is yet to be done. Former Union Home Secretary G.K Pillai said that the Supreme Court should have taken a view on restoring Statehood and not merely left the decision to the government.
