'Crash test dummy': Police chief says Jackson will set tone on enforcing MS homeless laws
The state laws that passed earlier this year and went into effect on July 1 were: House Bill 1197, the "Safe Solicitation Act," which requires those panhandling to get a permit that can cost up to $25 per day; HB 1200, the "Real Property Owners Protection Act", which expedites the process of removing squatters; and HB 1203, which prohibits camping on public property.
Violating the policies could result in hundreds of dollars in fines and months-long jail sentences.
"I want to make sure our people are properly training as we roll that out because we know this is a major issue," Wade said on Thursday, July 24, at a Real Time Command Meeting. "I want to make sure that we are not violating anybody civil rights or constitutional rights as we enforce these three new state laws."
Wade previously told the Clarion Ledger on June 24 that he tasked the department's legal team with training all 265 officers on the new state laws while developing a policy to uphold an individual's rights. As of July 24, the policy is still incomplete.
Enforcing the encampment law may prove challenging, as the bill allows law enforcement to issue a 24-hour notice for homeless people to vacate a public area not designated for camping before removing individuals, the campsite and any other materials.
City of Jackson responds to subpoena: Federal judge seeks answers on where funds in Jackson, MS, $89.8M Siemens settlement went
At the Thursday meeting, Wade said he is working closely with the legal team to determine the best approach to that matter. Wade said while these laws impact all law enforcement agencies from DeSoto County to Harrison County, Jackson police will be the "crash test dummy" as it relates to implementing the legislation.
"What I mean by that is as we go out and start enforcing the bill, I'll be the first one to get sued," Wade said. "My organization, my city, my officers will be the first one to be sued because I have not heard of anybody else going out and enforcing these laws just yet.
"I want to make sure I check all the boxes: policy, training, educating the public (and) educating the homeless population before we take any type of enforcement action. Right now, we're communicating with them, we're encouraging them to move on, but if they don't, we're not putting them in handcuffs (and) hauling them off to the jail. We're not at that point. I do not feel comfortable until my officers are properly trained and that we have a policy governing how we deal with these new laws and how we enforce these new laws."
Back in early July, Wade spoke directly to some of the city's homeless population inside Stewpot Community Services kitchen on the laws. At the time, Wade said he felt a "moral obligation" to educate and speak to those directly impacted by the new laws, adding it would be "inhumane" to "threaten" individuals facing personal struggles.
Former Mississippi state senator dies: Former Mississippi state Sen. Johnny "John" Morgan warned not to fly before fatal crash, NTSB final report says
Wade also told those in attendance at Stewpot that the department was committed to protecting unhoused people's rights. And at Thursday's meeting, that sentiment remained.
Wade said arresting homeless individuals is not a viable solution to the broader issue, noting the jail system is already "strained." With the Raymond Detention Center housing more than 800 people, Wade questioned, "Where are we going to put (homeless people)?"
Wade said the department has to be "good stewards" and "smart" about how they enforce these laws.
"My heart goes out to some of our homeless population," Wade said. "I've had opportunity to talk to them one-on-one, face-to-face. Some are suffering from medical conditions. Some are suffering from mental health conditions and issues in our community. Incarceration is not the answer. Health and resources are the answer."
Pam Dankins is the breaking news reporter for the Clarion Ledger. Have a tip? Email her at pdankins@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Homeless people laws: Jackson MS police chief talks about enforcement
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
'Crash test dummy': Police chief says Jackson will set tone on enforcing MS homeless laws
Jackson Police Chief Joseph Wade shared that officers will begin mandatory training next week on how to enforce new state laws targeting solicitation, squatters and homeless encampments. The state laws that passed earlier this year and went into effect on July 1 were: House Bill 1197, the "Safe Solicitation Act," which requires those panhandling to get a permit that can cost up to $25 per day; HB 1200, the "Real Property Owners Protection Act", which expedites the process of removing squatters; and HB 1203, which prohibits camping on public property. Violating the policies could result in hundreds of dollars in fines and months-long jail sentences. "I want to make sure our people are properly training as we roll that out because we know this is a major issue," Wade said on Thursday, July 24, at a Real Time Command Meeting. "I want to make sure that we are not violating anybody civil rights or constitutional rights as we enforce these three new state laws." Wade previously told the Clarion Ledger on June 24 that he tasked the department's legal team with training all 265 officers on the new state laws while developing a policy to uphold an individual's rights. As of July 24, the policy is still incomplete. Enforcing the encampment law may prove challenging, as the bill allows law enforcement to issue a 24-hour notice for homeless people to vacate a public area not designated for camping before removing individuals, the campsite and any other materials. City of Jackson responds to subpoena: Federal judge seeks answers on where funds in Jackson, MS, $89.8M Siemens settlement went At the Thursday meeting, Wade said he is working closely with the legal team to determine the best approach to that matter. Wade said while these laws impact all law enforcement agencies from DeSoto County to Harrison County, Jackson police will be the "crash test dummy" as it relates to implementing the legislation. "What I mean by that is as we go out and start enforcing the bill, I'll be the first one to get sued," Wade said. "My organization, my city, my officers will be the first one to be sued because I have not heard of anybody else going out and enforcing these laws just yet. "I want to make sure I check all the boxes: policy, training, educating the public (and) educating the homeless population before we take any type of enforcement action. Right now, we're communicating with them, we're encouraging them to move on, but if they don't, we're not putting them in handcuffs (and) hauling them off to the jail. We're not at that point. I do not feel comfortable until my officers are properly trained and that we have a policy governing how we deal with these new laws and how we enforce these new laws." Back in early July, Wade spoke directly to some of the city's homeless population inside Stewpot Community Services kitchen on the laws. At the time, Wade said he felt a "moral obligation" to educate and speak to those directly impacted by the new laws, adding it would be "inhumane" to "threaten" individuals facing personal struggles. Former Mississippi state senator dies: Former Mississippi state Sen. Johnny "John" Morgan warned not to fly before fatal crash, NTSB final report says Wade also told those in attendance at Stewpot that the department was committed to protecting unhoused people's rights. And at Thursday's meeting, that sentiment remained. Wade said arresting homeless individuals is not a viable solution to the broader issue, noting the jail system is already "strained." With the Raymond Detention Center housing more than 800 people, Wade questioned, "Where are we going to put (homeless people)?" Wade said the department has to be "good stewards" and "smart" about how they enforce these laws. "My heart goes out to some of our homeless population," Wade said. "I've had opportunity to talk to them one-on-one, face-to-face. Some are suffering from medical conditions. Some are suffering from mental health conditions and issues in our community. Incarceration is not the answer. Health and resources are the answer." Pam Dankins is the breaking news reporter for the Clarion Ledger. Have a tip? Email her at pdankins@ This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Homeless people laws: Jackson MS police chief talks about enforcement Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
27-07-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
No, California is not guaranteed to remain an abortion haven
The sudden closure of five Planned Parenthood clinics in Northern California last week reveals a sad, stark truth: California is not the national 'haven' for abortion rights that it has aspired to be since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. No state could be under Republican rule in Washington, or while federal law trumps state law, the Supreme Court majority opposes abortion rights and clinics are reliant on federal money to survive. There are few options to fix this problem, even in California, the world's fourth-largest economy. The state barely covered its budget deficit this year, and it has holes to fill as federal funds for public universities, education, transportation and other sectors were slashed in the recently passed budget. Plus, the state needs federal dollars to help rebuild Los Angeles after the devastating wildfires there earlier this year. Ten million Americans are expected to lose their health insurance because of nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Meanwhile, the wealthiest Americans will receive a disproportionate share of the tax cuts funded by those reductions, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. 'It's an illustration of the limits on what any state can do (on abortion access) if the federal government is hostile,' said Mary Ziegler, a professor of law at UC Davis and leading scholar on abortion rights. 'It's more of a reminder that there isn't really a real sanctuary. California has limited power over a lot of this.' It is the latest example of how California is in the political crosshairs of what President Donald Trump's former top adviser Steve Bannon famously described as his 'muzzle velocity' philosophy of launching a lot of disruptive policies and spurious attacks simultaneously. California is withering under the incoming fire. The people hurt most by the closure of those clinics will be the poorest Californians, as 80% of the people who used services at those clinics were Medicaid recipients, according to Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, the umbrella organization for the shuttered clinics. Planned Parenthood doesn't just provide abortion services. The majority of people go to Planned Parenthood clinics for contraceptive services, sexually transmitted infection testing, pregnancy testing and gynecological services. One in 10 (11%) female Medicaid beneficiaries ages 15 to 49 who received family planning services went to a Planned Parenthood clinic in 2021, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. California has the highest percentage (29%) of Medicaid recipients in the country who go there for health care. This wasn't the way it was supposed to go. California was supposed to be a haven for abortion rights after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Shortly after the decision, Gov. Gavin Newsom joined the governors of Washington and Oregon to create what he called 'the West Coast offensive. A road map for other states to stand up for women.' A diverse coalition of abortion rights advocates formed the California Future of Abortion Council. It proposed more than 50 recommendations for policymakers to improve abortion access in the state. In the year after the decision, Newsom and the Democratic-controlled Legislature created more than a dozen new laws and invested more than $200 million to increase access across the state. In November 2022, 67% of California voters supported a ballot measure enshrining abortion rights in the state Constitution. Newsom spent $100,000 from his campaign coffers to plant billboards in seven states with some of the nation's most restrictive laws: 'Need an abortion?' reads one billboard. 'California is here to help.' 'What you do in California sets the standard for everyone else,' Mini Timmaraju, national president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said at a 2022 fundraiser for Proposition 1 in San Francisco that Hillary Clinton attended. 'I want to take that package of legislation and this proposition and see it copied nationwide.' Ultimately, all those California laws and all that state funding weren't enough to keep the Mar Monte clinics open. They never could be as long as there isn't the national right to an abortion that Roe provided and as long as women's health clinics are reliant on federal funds to remain open. Planned Parenthood estimates that 200 clinics nationwide could close. To meet this reality, California needs a new 'West Coast offensive.' It needs to draw up a new 'road map for other states to stand up for women.' It would be best if clinics were funded privately, insulating them from partisan federal cuts. But that is harder now. California is the state with the most millionaires and billionaires. Now is the time for wealthy individuals and foundations to stand up and backfill these losses so clinics can continue to provide access to women's health care. But will those individuals step forward? Or will they be cowed like the wealthy law firms and Ivy League universities that have bowed to Trump's intimidation? Even if they do step up, is there enough private money in California to keep federally funded women's health clinics open until Democrats regain control of at least one lever of power in Washington and can curb his fascistic policies? That possibility looks bleak. For starters, it would probably require hundreds of millions of dollars, said Shannon Olivieri Hovis, former NARAL Pro-Choice California director who is now vice president of public affairs at Essential Access Health. 'I think the honest answer is, we don't know yet. We're talking about a huge hole.' Theresa Cheng, a professor of emergency medicine at UCSF and a member of the school's Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, said it will be difficult for the private sector to patch up all the new holes punctured in the social safety net by the Trump administration. 'That's going to be really difficult because the Trump administration has cut so broadly in so many social systems,' said Cheng, who is in touch with private donors through her work with several nonprofit organizations. 'Food insecurity. Homelessness. Immigration. There are a lot of needs out there now.' Relying on private donations isn't going to help clinics across California's chasm of wealth inequality, Ziegler said. 'If you're depending partly on individual donors, that's going to look very different in Beverly Hills or Marin County than it is in Gilroy or other areas where there are few people to give private donations,' Ziegler said. Until political change happens in Washington, Cheng urged Californians to 'stay stalwart in protecting reproductive health. So much of this will have to be settled out in the courts. That will at least buy us some more time.'
The Hill
25-07-2025
- The Hill
1 in 3 Americans lack confidence in Supreme Court, primarily Democrats: Poll
Public confidence in the Supreme Court has ticked up slightly since it plummeted after the nation's highest court overturned federal abortion rights protections in 2022, according to a new survey. The AP-NORC Research Center poll, unveiled Friday, found that 1 in 3 adults in the U.S. remain wary of the Supreme Court — chiefly driven by Democratic skepticism. Roughly 67 percent of those surveyed said they had at least 'some' confidence in the court — up from 56 percent in a poll conducted just after the decision three years ago upended the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling. The same poll in 2020 — before the historic Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health case was decided — found 86 percent of people overall said they had confidence in the high court. The most dramatic swings in public confidence over the three polls from 2020 to this year were seen on the Democratic side: About 80 percent said they had at least some confidence in the court in the 2020 poll, but that number plunged to 35 percent in 2022. The latest poll found about 43 percent of Democrats expressed confidence in the justices. Meanwhile, Republicans surveyed in the latest poll were overwhelmingly more supportive of the court than in previous years, which has tracked conservative since President Trump appointed three justices to the bench during his first term. About 90 percent of GOP respondents said that they have 'some' or a 'great deal of' confidence in the justices, showing only a slight shift from 2020 when about 95 percent of Republicans said the same. Attitudes among independents has fluctuated some since 2020, but not as pointedly as the views among Democrats surveyed. More than three-quarters of independents polled in 2020 said they had 'some' or a 'great deal of' confidence in the Supreme Court. The number dipped to 52 percent in 2023 but bounced to 67 percent in the 2025 results. The AP-NORC poll surveyed 1,347 adults across the country from July 10-14 and has a margin of error of 3.6 percentage points.
