EU eases gas storage rules to prevent price spikes
The agreement was announced by the European Commission on Tuesday.
The EU's gas storage rules were introduced in 2022 to ensure EU countries had a buffer of stored fuel during winter, after Russia cut gas deliveries following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, sending Europe's gas prices soaring.
But governments backed plans in April to soften the rules before winter, over concerns the requirement to fill storage to 90% capacity by November 1 inflates prices, by telling the market European buyers needed to buy large amounts of gas ahead of this deadline.
The deal allows the EU's member states to achieve this 90% filling target at any point in time between October 1 and December 1, taking into account the start of the member states withdrawal period. Once the 90% target is met, it should not be required to maintain that level until 1 December.
The EU's member states should also have the possibility to deviate by up to ten percentage points from the filling target in case of difficult market conditions, such as indications of speculation hindering cost-effective storage filling.
'The European Union needs stable energy supplies at affordable prices to prosper. Gas storage is a key contributor to our security of supply and market stability. It also protects us from Russia's energy weaponisation and market manipulation,' said EU energy commissioner Dan Jorgensen.
'In the current geopolitical context, this agreement shows that the EU remains determined to shield its citizens and businesses from any risk of supply disruption and price spikes,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
EU chief von der Leyen heads to Scotland for trade talks with Trump
FILE PHOTO: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen speaks at a press conference following the 25th EU-China Summit in Beijing, China July 24, 2025. REUTERS/Florence Lo/File Photo BRUSSELS/EDINBURGH (Reuters) -EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen headed to Scotland on Saturday ahead of a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday afternoon, commission spokespeople said, as EU officials said the two sides were nearing a trade agreement. Trump, in Scotland for a few days of golfing and bilateral meetings, told reporters upon his arrival on Friday evening that he was looking forward to meeting with von der Leyen, calling her a "highly respected" leader. He repeated his view that there was a 50-50 chance that the U.S. and the 27-member European Union could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to "make a deal very badly". If it happened, he said it would be the biggest trade agreement reached yet by his administration, surpassing the $550 billion accord agreed with Japan earlier this week. The White House has released no details about the planned meeting or the terms of the emerging agreement. The European Commission on Thursday said a negotiated trade solution with the United States was within reach, even as EU members voted to approve counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods in case the talks collapse. To get a deal, Trump said the EU would have to "buy down" that tariff rate, although he gave no specifics. EU diplomats say a possible deal between Washington and Brussels would likely include a broad 15% tariff on EU goods imported into the U.S., mirroring the U.S.-Japan deal, along with a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminum. The broad tariff rate would be half the 30% duties that Trump has threatened to slap on EU goods from August 1. It remains unclear if Washington will agree to exempt the EU from sectoral tariffs on automobiles, pharmaceuticals and other goods that have already been announced or are pending. Combining goods, services and investment, the EU and the United States are each other's largest trading partners by far. The American Chamber of Commerce in Brussels warned in March that any conflict jeopardized $9.5 trillion of business in the world's most important commercial relationship. (Reporting by Andrew Gray and Andrea ShalalEditing by Nick Zieminski)
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
ICJ advisory gives legal firepower to climate activists
THE world's top court may not be able to compel polluting states to halt planet-warming emissions, but experts say its momentous climate decision gives potent legal and political firepower to countries and campaigners on the frontlines. An advisory opinion like the one issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) last week is not binding and so is not directly enforceable, but that does not mean it has no weight. By saying that all countries are firmly bound to a swathe of legal obligations under existing laws and treaties, experts say the ruling will influence courts, climate negotiations and policy decisions across the world. The ICJ "couldn't have been clearer" on the binding nature of a range of climate duties, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, professor of law and director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University. He said the ruling, which was responding to questions on countries' climate responsibilities from the UN General Assembly, was "as strong as we could have imagined". "The consensus among the judges is fully behind the conclusion that international law establishes clear and binding obligations for states not to cause massive harm to the environment in general and not to harm the climate system in particular," he said. These included ensuring national climate plans reflect the highest possible ambition to stay within the Paris agreement's safer global warming cap of 1.5°C above pre-industrial times — a level that the world could reach this decade. If those obligations are not met, the court said states may be obliged to repair damaged infrastructure or ecosystems — and if that is not possible, they could face compensation claims. This will ripple into future litigation, said Markus Gehring, professor of European and international law at the University of Cambridge. "We are a far cry from a contentious case between two countries, where someone is demanding liability for past and present climate change damage, but in theory, the court lays out an avenue towards such claims," he said. Major petrostates like the United States may take little heed of the court's warning that expanding production of oil, gas and coal could constitute an "internationally wrongful act". But Gehring said countries could choose to ignore ICJ advisory opinions "at their peril". He cited the court's 2019 advice that the United Kingdom should end its occupation of the Chagos islands. After Britain initially rejected the ruling, a UN General Assembly resolution demanded it cede the islands to Mauritius, which it eventually did last year. Gehring said that while the court's climate decision is not directly binding on individual states, it would be indirectly binding through subsequent domestic or international court action and through UN institutions. The move by US President Donald Trump to withdraw from the Paris deal also would be unlikely to absolve the country from its duties, Gehring added, because the obligation to address climate change is now "crystal clear in international law". "So, even leaving the Paris Agreement and the climate treaty regime does not eliminate those obligations," he said. ICJ judge Sarah Cleveland said countries' "significant responsibilities" to protect the climate system may also affect interpretation of international investment law. The ruling was "a decisive legal vindication" for Vanuatu — which spearheaded the push for an ICJ opinion — the country said in a legal analysis of the decision. The Pacific island nation, which is at risk from rising seas, said the court's conclusions would strengthen its hand in global climate negotiations, helping it demand greater climate ambition and attract financial support for countries suffering climate loss and damage. It could also open the way for legal action against countries and possibly companies that have by their actions and omissions caused climate harm, the statement said. "For Vanuatu, the opinion is both shield and sword: a shield affirming its right to survival and a sword compelling the world's major emitters to act in line with science and justice," it added. Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, former president of the UN COP20 climate conference in Peru and now WWF Global Climate and Energy lead, said he expects the ICJ ruling to "move the needle strongly". "The timing is so fantastic because we are in difficult times in the climate debate, so to have that opinion in the current time, it is showing that we should never lose our hope," he said.
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Hungary's Orban vows to block EU budget over frozen funds
BUDAPEST: Hungary's government will not support the European Union's new seven-year budget unless Brussels unlocks all suspended EU funds, Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Saturday. In the past 15 years, the nationalist leader has clashed with Brussels over his policies on migration, curbing LGBTQ rights and what critics see as eroding democracy in Hungary. The EU has suspended billions of euros in funds earmarked for Hungary while a rule-of-law dispute drags on. 'The approval of the new seven-year budget requires unanimity and until we get the remaining (frozen) funds, there won't be a new EU budget either,' Orban said in a speech at a summer university in the Romanian town of Baile Tusnad. He also criticised the EU for supporting Ukraine and accused Brussels of planning to install a 'pro-Ukraine and pro-Brussels government' in Hungary at next year's national vote. He also said the EU's current leadership has put the bloc on a track that would lead to a trade war that Europe 'cannot win.' 'The current leadership of the EU will always be the last to sign deals with the United States and always the worst deals,' Orban added, urging a change in the bloc's leadership. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will meet U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday in Scotland after EU officials and diplomats said they expected to reach a framework trade deal this weekend. The European Commission earlier this month proposed a 2 trillion euro EU budget for 2028 to 2034, with a new emphasis on economic competitiveness and defence. Then Orban said 'globalist bureaucrats' were plotting to 'drain Europe's money into Ukraine' while 'our farmers are rising up to defend their future'. Budget debates are among the most difficult in EU politics, bringing to the fore political and economic divisions among member countries. Orban, who swept the last four elections, faces a tough new opposition challenger in 2026, whose Tisza party has a firm lead over the ruling Fidesz party in most polls, at a time when the economy is stagnating. But Orban looked confident in his speech and said according to his party's internal data Fidesz would win in 80 out of Hungary's 106 constituencies if elections were held on Sunday. - Reuters
