logo
Which Cars Are Really American?

Which Cars Are Really American?

Miami Heralda day ago
Some media outlets, such as Cars.com, define American cars based on final assembly location, percentage of U.S. and Canadian parts, country of origin for the engine and transmission, and the size of the automaker's U.S. manufacturing workforce. Despite this classification, it's hard to consider a Kia EV6 an American car, no matter how much of it is made here. Given it's the July 4th weekend, it's time to choose true American cars based on their place in our hearts, not our manufacturing footprint. Oh, and by the way, all are built in America.
While no longer America's top-selling vehicle, a designation it held for 42 years, it remains America's favorite pickup truck, and with good reason. Despite being outsold by the Toyota RAV4, the Ford F-150 remains America's modern-day Conestoga, with a variety of configurations that are just right for so many American car buyers. Offered in three cab sizes and three bed lengths, it can be everything from a barebones work truck (XL trim), lavish luxury hauler (King Ranch), urban warrior (Lobo), off-road warrior (Tremor), off-road Racer (F-150 Raptor), or concerned environmentalist (F-150 Lightning). It can be powered by a V-8, twin-turbo V-6, hybrid, or battery electric powertrains, and its cred as an American icon is undisputed, since the F-Series debuted during the Truman Administration. Few American cars have such heritage or offer so much choice. Yet it's still much like America itself: outsized, overbuilt, and running on 87-octane unleaded.
Just as America was an offshoot of England, so too was America's most iconic vehicle. What would become the Jeep was designed by American Bantam of Butler, PA as a reorganized version of American Austin, a 1930s-era attempt to popularize the British brand stateside. When Austin pulled out, the remnants of the company soldiered on, answering the U.S. military's request for a light reconnaissance vehicle. Since American Bantam had already built tiny cars, creating the new diminutive Jeep was a snap.
They completed their prototype in 49 days, whereupon their plans were given to Willys-Overland and Ford Motor Company, who ultimately won the government contract. A civilian version of the Jeep arrived at war's end, built by Willys, then Kaiser Jeep, then American Motors Corporation, then Chrysler Corporation, then Daimler-Chrysler, then Fiat-Chrysler Automobiles, and now Stellantis. It single-handedly created the SUV segment, now the dominant vehicle type in the U.S. market. It might as well be a four-wheel constitutional amendment. While it lacks the refinement of its competitors, the Jeep Wrangler remains a reminder that vehicles are tools, not tech gadgets with cup holders.
Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, Lincoln, Chevrolet, and Buick no longer build sedans. Cadillac still does, but the CT4 and CT5 are strikingly off-key for Cadillacs, and the Celestiq EV looks more like a Citroen SM than a Cadillac. That leaves the Lucid Air and Tesla Model S and 3. The Lucid Air makes a compelling case as to why sedans still matter. Designed in California and built in Arizona, its look is elegant and unmistakable, like a Scandinavian who went to finishing school. It boasts some of the fastest recharge times of any EV, delivers the sort of incredibly quick acceleration you'd expect from the world's premier sports cars, and has a cabin that's opulently well-dressed. It indulges you in a way few cars can, with enough comfort and athleticism to deliver a driving experience of the first order. Yet there's little to be guilty of, as it signals that your soul is green and you are doing your part and care about the planet, but not enough to take the bus. Its combination of technology, design, and extravagance makes it the ultimate American sedan.
Corvette partisans may take issue with this choice, but the Ford Mustang remains true to its heritage and design. There's a clear design lineage from its very start, and the basics of the car remain much the same as they did the day it was born. That's something that can't be said of the Corvette, although we do love it. The Mustang is the approachable, everyday pony car, one that spawned a whole class of imitators and which remains the only one left standing. As always, it can be equipped from mild (315-hp four-cylinder EcoBoost) to wild (500-hp supercharged V-8 Dark Horse) and can still be had with the ultimate anti-theft device, one that proves to be amazingly fun as well, aka a six-speed manual. But you can get it with a ten-speed automatic transmission as well, should you prefer it. Offered as a fastback coupe and soft-top convertible, it retains the same lighthearted, party persona it was born with 61 years ago. Thank goodness for that.
Climbing inside a Cadillac Escalade SUV will evoke a reaction from everyone who remembers Cadillac's heyday that only those who have lived through it can understand. The Escalade's job is essentially the same, despite the fact that cars are very different nowadays. In other words, full-size comfort, all the mod cons, easy V8 power, and an extravagant appearance that makes it obvious you've made it.
Overfed, arrogant, and possessing the aerodynamic profile of a garden shed, the high-performance variant, the Escalade V, sprints from 0 to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds. It's a 6,200-pound middle finger to subtlety, nuance, and everything that smells of quinoa. It's no wonder this car is the newfound favorite of black car services nationwide. It's The Incredible Bulk, a rolling fortress of indulgence with a 38-inch OLED display screen that's large enough to be put to work on Times Square. It can yank 7,000 pounds of your favorite plaything and carry up to 121 cubic feet of lifestyle debris. Whether you're driving or being driven, Super Cruise, Cadillac's hands-free driving system, lets the Escalade drive itself, indulging our willingness as Americans to let someone else do the heavy lifting. It's the anti-Puritan aesthetic that makes the Cadillac Escalade the ultimate, indulgent, modern American road servant.
It's hard to consider the Tesla Model Y, the brand's bestselling model, without considering the man who runs the company. Regardless of what you think of Elon Musk personally, he has managed to pull off what once seemed impossible. He made electric cars a desirable item by burnishing them with a tech-like sheen, allowing them to appeal to our longing for something truly different. Its Bauhaus design sensibility is little surprise given its origins in the nerdy world of Silicon Valley.
Neither is its Spartan interior with a sizable screen to feed your tech ego and cupholders capacious enough to hold your $7 organic kombucha. The Model Y will run anywhere from 227 to 337 miles, depending on the model. While that's fairly standard in the EV world these days, it's still more than acceptable, and Model Ys generate anywhere from 295 to 456 horsepower. Despite looking like a jellybean on a keto diet, it offers 106 cubic feet of passenger volume and 30 cubic feet of cargo volume, expanding to 76 cubic feet with the second row folded. It may not be your first choice in an EV, given the CEO's political shenanigans, but the Tesla Model Y earns its accolade due to its ability to lure consumers to buy electric cars, despite not ever having truly wanted them. It also came from an American automotive startup, the first to succeed since Kaiser-Frazer was formed in 1945.
An American car emits a certain feeling, one that clearly separates it from its Asian or Old-World competition. There's a brashness, a sense of overstatement and overachievement that renders them so seductive. And that's what makes them truly American.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What If the Cost of Gas Went Up to $20 per Gallon?
What If the Cost of Gas Went Up to $20 per Gallon?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What If the Cost of Gas Went Up to $20 per Gallon?

An abrupt jump in price per gallon for gasoline would have a significant impact on household budgets, the economy and beyond. Read Next: Find Out: To start, inflation would spike incredibly fast as fuel costs pass through to all goods and services, meaning consumer spending would fall. In turn, businesses would face 'significant bankruptcies and store closings,' as one economist warned during a previous surge. Jobs in travel, retail and hospitality would evaporate as households juggled massive new fuel bills. Now imagine $20 at the pump. Each penny increase in gas already costs U.S. consumers ~$1 billion annually. A jump to $20 would add over $5,000 in fuel costs per driver, and most families simply couldn't absorb it. S. David Freeman, former head of the L.A. Board of Harbor Commissioners, wasn't shy when asked what $200-a-barrel oil would mean for everyday Americans: 'The purchasing power of the American people would be kicked in the teeth so darned hard… they won't have the ability to buy much of anything.' Over time, necessity would require the economy to reorganize around high transportation costs. Vehicle miles driven would drop and telecommuting would become the norm. Housing patterns would shift towards urban, transit-accessible areas. Freight routes would shorten, favoring local production. And GDP growth would likely fall well below trend until EVs, public transit and renewable infrastructure catch up. The auto industry would have to change dramatically. Internal combustion (gas) vehicle sales would collapse, and EV and hybrid demand would surge. In California, EV sales respond 4-6 times more to gas price hikes than electricity price changes. Legacy automakers would also face severe financial strain as plants focused on large vehicles would shutter, while battery and EV assembly lines race to keep up. In turn, supply chains for batteries and rare minerals would most certainly bottleneck. Freight companies would pass on fuel surcharges or cut routes. Ocean shipping increases would be comparable to a 15% tariff on imports and global supply chains would shrink. Jet fuel costs would ground flights and raise fares which would mean routes would be slashed and air travel demand would collapse. On the ground, public transit ridership from buses to trains, would soar. With household budgets gutted, non-essentials would suffer. Consumer spending would tank, and small businesses would eventually close. Farmers would face skyrocketing diesel and fertilizer prices. Food costs would rise sharply, worsening inflation. Tax holidays, SPR releases or gas rebates would offer only minor relief. Long-term, you could expect big public spending on EV tax credits, electric buses, transit infrastructure and renewable energy. Governments might ease drilling rules but also ramp up conservation campaigns and fuel efficiency mandates. High gas prices in the U.S. would also have a ripple effect globally. Oil exporters would enjoy windfall profits, while import-dependent countries face inflation, trade deficits and slower growth. Shipping costs would spike, food insecurity would worsen and pressure to decarbonize would intensify worldwide. If gas prices were ever to jump to such a high amount, the impact would be detrimental to the U.S. and global economies. As industries are forced to pivot shipping and manufacturing processes, the cost of goods would jump wildly across the board making even the most basic necessities unaffordable to most people. More From GOBankingRates 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on What If the Cost of Gas Went Up to $20 per Gallon? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tesla robotaxi incidents spark confusion and concerns in Austin
Tesla robotaxi incidents spark confusion and concerns in Austin

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla robotaxi incidents spark confusion and concerns in Austin

Two weeks into Tesla's robotaxi prototype rollout on the streets of Austin, Texas, a string of viral videos showing apparent mishaps and the severely limited access to the service have caused a cloud of confusion and concern around the vehicles and their safety. Tesla launched its Austin service on June 22. People who've gotten an invitation, a group that appears to be composed largely of influencers adjacent to and acolytes of CEO Elon Musk, use an app to call for a ride, similar to ride-hailing apps Uber and Lyft. Each ride costs $4.20, a cannabis-associated number that Musk frequently uses. The service is somewhat of a prototype. Although no human is in the driver's seat, each car has a company employee in the front passenger seat who can stop the car with a button if there are safety concerns. Tesla says its experimental software is driving the vehicles. Experts in the field of autonomous driving say it's too early to judge the success or failure of the venture. Federal regulators and some local and state politicians say they're concerned about several incidents — documented on camera and shared on social media — where the cars appeared to break traffic laws or put people in danger. Some people who've used competing robotaxi services, such as Google spinoff Waymo, yawned at what they considered old technology. Even the stock market shrugged off the launch, with no lasting imprint on Tesla's share price. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment on how the service is going. Several key metrics, such as how many miles it has driven and how often Tesla employees need to intervene with the driving software, remain mysteries. Because the service operates only in Texas, where there are currently minimal rules surrounding autonomous vehicles, the company is not required to report such information to regulators at any level of government. In the first days of the rollout, videos of Tesla robotaxis appearing to violate traffic laws or behave oddly proliferated online. In one, a Tesla dropping off a passenger did so in the middle of an intersection. In another, a Tesla drives on the wrong side of a double yellow line. In at least two videos, its robotaxis are traveling faster than the posted speed limit. And in several examples, the Tesla cars brake suddenly and passengers say they were confused as to why. In all, NBC News found 13 instances in videos online where a Tesla appeared to break the rules or otherwise make a mistake. In each case, NBC News contacted the people who made the videos but did not hear back. Some elected officials in Austin said they're worried about the incidents. 'There are just a lot of errors,' said Vanessa Fuentes, a member of the Austin City Council and the mayor pro tempore, meaning she runs council meetings when the mayor is absent, in a phone interview. 'They have proven that the technology they have is unsafe for Austinites.' And while other autonomous vehicle companies such as Waymo or former General Motors unit Cruise have been documented on camera making embarrassing or illegal maneuvers, Fuentes said that she doesn't believe Tesla has coordinated enough with the city government — which Tesla is not legally required to do, but she said would build trust. 'Tesla has had no regard for public input or working with our city, and unfortunately, I'm not OK having this done at the expense of Austinites' safety,' she said. She said she embraces autonomous vehicles in the city as a general matter but would like to see Tesla's service halted for now. Zo Qadri, an Austin City Council member whose district overlaps with the Tesla robotaxi service area, said he is hearing from people in his district who are worried. 'We've been seeing chaos unfold. We have a lot of constituents who are very angry,' he said. He said the situation reminded him of problems associated with Cruise robotaxis in Austin in 2023, when residents complained that Cruise cars were making unsafe turns and being a nuisance. Cruise shuttered last year. Qadri said he has not heard similar complaints from constituents about Waymo, which also operates there. It's not clear whether Tesla could face local consequences for such incidents, such as traffic tickets, for breaking any laws. Fuentes said the process in Austin for ticketing a robotaxi is more complicated than simply writing a ticket for a driver: A police officer must draft a complaint affidavit, send it to a lieutenant, and then have the affidavit witnessed and sent to a municipal court. The Austin Police Department said in a statement: 'As with any company operating autonomous technology on public roadways, when a potential legal or safety concern is brought to our attention, we promptly share it with the company. These concerns are then addressed through our regular meetings, where we follow up on the issue and review the steps taken to resolve it. Our priority is to maintain public safety while supporting innovation in transportation,' the department said. Federal regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also took notice of the safety incidents, saying in a statement June 23 that the agency 'is aware of the referenced incidents and is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information.' Texas state Rep. Vikki Goodwin, a Democrat whose district includes part of Austin, said she wants Tesla to proceed cautiously. 'I think that it's in their interest to make sure safety is top of mind and that nothing goes wrong. Otherwise, that could really derail their plans for launching it fully,' she said. Goodwin was one of seven Texas lawmakers who sent a letter to Tesla on June 18 asking for the company to delay the launch of its robotaxis until Sept. 1 — the day a new law regarding autonomous vehicles is set to go into effect. Tesla did not delay its launch, but Goodwin said the company did respond to their letter, saying it would update its policies to ensure that it would be compliant with the new law. Goodwin said part of her desire for caution comes from owning a Tesla herself and experiencing unexpected maneuvers while using the company's driver-assistance software. 'I've had personal experience with using cruise control and having the car brake for me, which can be very disturbing,' she said. 'I've had that experience on a number of occasions, and it just leads me to believe that it really is important to have a person in the vehicle.' Tesla is aiming to compete with Waymo, which says it has about 1,500 robotaxis on the road in several cities including Los Angeles, San Francisco and Phoenix. Musk said Tesla's service would start small with 10-20 vehicles and try to grow over the next several months, although how quickly it could expand is not clear. Tesla's stock price soared the day after its service launched on a Sunday, jumping more than 9% on the following Monday. But the stock, which is often volatile, retreated over the following days as it became clear how many hurdles Tesla faces in trying to scale up the service. The public knows about the safety incidents involving Tesla robotaxis mainly because Tesla sent many of the initial invitations to use the service to online influencers, including people with YouTube channels or similar video platforms. The invitations were so scarce that at least one Tesla influencer, a person named Omar who goes by the pseudonym Whole Mars Catalog, offered to share rides for $10. 'Take a Tesla Robotaxi ride round trip with Omar. Includes two rides, there and back,' the person's sponsorship page said. The $10 would be more than the combined cost of two $4.20 rides. The account did not respond to a request for comment. Eliana Sheriff was among the early riders. A video creator with a YouTube channel focused on Musk's rocket company SpaceX, she said she came away a fan of the robotaxi service. 'I was totally trusting of the technology,' she said in a YouTube video on her channel, 'Ellie in Space.' She did have one complaint. After she reached her destination in the robotaxi, a storm appeared overhead and she wanted to stay in the car to shelter. A Tesla customer service agent called into the car's audio system to say that she couldn't. She exited and called a second ride to take her back to where she started. (Some posts online said erroneously that Tesla kicked her out midride, but she said in an interview that she did reach her destination.) Sheriff said that despite some concerns in the automotive and tech industries over whether Tesla's technology is good enough to deploy robotaxis, she has faith in Musk to pursue the best approach. 'Elon must have a reason for why he believes in that,' she said. She's not alone. Since the robotaxi launch, the legions of Musk and Tesla fans have proclaimed their enthusiasm for the service across the internet: on X, the social media app that Musk owns, and on other apps such as Reddit and TikTok. And they've employed a wide variety of superlatives to describe the robotaxis: 'flawless,' 'seamless' and 'history-making.' But because the service is invite-only, with only a handful of cars on the road, almost no consumers who aren't Tesla fans have gotten to use the service firsthand. Musk and his fans have described the service as futuristic and groundbreaking, but the rollout has succeeded mainly in preaching to Tesla's already-converted choir of supporters. Brad Templeton, a consultant in the autonomous vehicle industry who worked for Google's self-driving car project from 2010 to 2013 before it became Waymo, said Tesla's most enthusiastic fans are 'all fairly convinced that it's just on the cusp of being ready, and they get really annoyed when other people don't see it.' Like other experts, Templeton said the only measure for robotaxis that counts is whether they're safe over the very long term, measured in the tens of millions of miles driven. 'What matters is not individual demonstrations. It's statistics,' he said. Many of the Tesla and Waymo fans clash head-to-head on Reddit, where the message board r/SelfDrivingCars has been heating up with competition between the two sides. Waymo boosters regularly argue on the site that the company is years ahead of Tesla in experience: Waymo had paying customers in its first market, Phoenix, while still using safety drivers in December 2018 — six and a half years ago. Waymo began 'rider only' rides in 2019. Lately, some Tesla fans have been pushing back by highlighting videos of what they considered to be Waymo vehicles driving poorly, including stopping in standing water. One Reddit user, in a popular recent post, vented that the r/SelfDrivingCars message board was being 'flooded with Tesla apologist propaganda and disinformation. … The astroturf army is out in full display these past couple weeks.' The top comment on the post asked for a truce. 'I want to see progress by both companies,' the Reddit user Juice805 wrote. 'Waymo is doing great and is quite far ahead in their rollout and Tesla just made a huge first step in theirs.' 'I just want cars to drive themselves,' they wrote. They did not respond to a request for comment. This article was originally published on

Top 10 Ford Mustangs of all time: A legendary ride through history
Top 10 Ford Mustangs of all time: A legendary ride through history

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Top 10 Ford Mustangs of all time: A legendary ride through history

Over the course of history, American muscle has come in a ton of different flavors, but perhaps one of the most longstanding and iconic is the Ford Mustang. Introduced at the 1964 New York World's Fair, the Mustang was an immediate sales hit thanks to its affordable price and great looks. More than six decades later, Ford has produced countless Mustang models and variants, each unique and distinct. What's fascinating is they haven't always adhered to a consistent formula, but the execution has always been the same: to give much higher-dollar and more exotic sports cars a run for their money. That's what we call a democratization of performance and power. Below, we've made the difficult choice of narrowing down our favorite Mustangs to the 10 listed in chronological order. Did your favorites make it? Keep reading to find out. 1964.5 Ford Mustang Here's how confident Ford was in the brand-new, first-ever Mustang when it made its debut in 1964: It had journalists take the test cars on a 750-mile trip from Westchester County, New York, back to its headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, for what was clearly intended to be a reliability test. Ultimately, Mustang sales quadrupled what Ford estimated them to be. Part of that, surely, was because of the sheer number of options offered. Not only were there 15 exterior paint colors to choose from, but there were also five different selections for vinyl seat upholstery. Convertibles and hardtops were available side by side, and convertible customers could have either white or black fabric roofs, while hardtops could be had with either white or black vinyl tops. Then there were the engine options. You could get the first Mustang with either a 2.8-liter inline-six with 101 hp, a 4.3-liter V-8 with 164 hp, a 4.7-liter V-8 with 210 hp, or a special, high-compression version of the 4.7-liter that kicked power up to 271. The six-cylinder and 4.3-liter V-8 came standard with a three-speed manual, and the 4.7-liter V-8 had a four-speed manual. Everything except the high-compression 4.7-liter could be fitted with Ford's three-speed automatic. 1964.5 Ford Mustang specs 1965 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 It didn't take long for the iconic Mustang to reach a new stratosphere of iconic with the 1965 Shelby GT350. Built for the track, the first GT350s ignored comfort in favor of lap times. Turning the Mustang into a bona fide Corvette-killer proved no easy task, as the Ford Falcon platform underpinning the car wasn't exactly motorsport material. Engineers had to keep costs down, too. 'The decision to go with the live axle was okay with Ford,' we wrote in a retrospective from 2017, 'as Klaus Arning estimated the development of the [independent rear suspension] would cost upwards of $85,000. The Shelby G.T. 350 utilized the Galaxie station wagon rear end equipped with a towing package with Ford's largest rear brakes at 10 inches in diameter with 2.5-inch-wide sintered metallic brake linings. Best of all, this axle bolted right into the Mustang chassis with very little modification.' The result? Something very good: 'At Interstate speeds, the GT350 is rough and ready,' Donald Farr wrote in 2010. 'It's not a luxury car by any stretch of the imagination. The suspension is stiff, wind whooshes by the open side windows, and header heat rises off the floor pans. The car even smells fast. And did I mention that it's loud? At 65 mph and 3,000 rpm, the blown-out glasspacks drown out any attempt at passenger conversation.' 1965 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 specs 1967 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Super Snake Once upon a time, there was a Mustang with the heart of a GT40. As the story goes, Carroll Shelby was hired to showcase some new Goodyear tires. The Super Snake that resulted was a one-off GT500 prototype that used a monstrous 427 V-8 like one found in the Ford GT40 race car. A Shelby test diver took the car 500 miles around Goodyear's oval test track and averaged 142 mph, thus showing the Goodyears were more than up to snuff. Plans to build more of the GT500 Super Snakes were scrapped, so this is the only one in existence. It might very well be the most valuable Mustang ever. Half a century later, Shelby finally created a 'continuation run' of cars built on real 1967 Mustangs and given all the GT500 Super Snake hardware. The cars are not technically from the time, but they're also not new cars, either. Regardless, when a '67 Super Snake rides again, everyone wins. 1967 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Super Snake specs 1968 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR With plenty of spoilers and scoops, the GT500KR was the nastiest Mustang of its age. Knowingly, KR stood for 'King of the Road.' With just 933 fastbacks built, the GT500KR wears the beautiful, elongated lines that define '60s car design. 'The KR does its talking underhood, though,' we wrote in a 2001 comparison against a 1999 Mustang SVT Cobra. 'In mid-1968, Ford spanked the competition with a surprise of its own: the Bob Tasca Ford–inspired 428 Cobra Jet FE-series big-block in the GT500. Period road tests prove the 428 Cobra Jet could rocket the Shelby Mustang through the quarter mile in 14 seconds flat with 3.91:1 gears; with 3.50:1 cruising gears, 14.5 seconds. This makes the GT500KR a formidable competitor for the SVT Cobra. In perfect tune with a seasoned drag racer at the wheel, the KR will stay flush with the more high-tech Cobra.' We won't spoil the rest. 1968 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR specs 1984 Ford Mustang SVO As a response to fuel shortages and high gas prices of the '70s, the Mustang underwent some market-demanded changes but emerged to usher in the '80s with the Fox body. And one of the coolest of the Fox-bodied Mustangs was the 1984 Mustang SVO. The SVO implemented a ton of Mustang firsts, including disc brakes at all four wheels and intercooled turbocharging for its small-displacement four-cylinder. Because it saved 150 or so pounds over the 5.0-liter Mustang GT, the SVO wound up being quite the handling athlete, with us calling it 'the best-driving street Mustang the factory has ever produced' at the time. It proved you didn't need a giant engine and massive power to make a Mustang fun. Sometimes you just need lightness. Maybe that Colin Chapman guy did know a thing or two about cars. Plus, the SVO was better on gas, which, with ever-shifting fuel prices, is something that's always a plus. 1984 Ford Mustang SVO specs 2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R It pretty much goes without saying that if you see an 'R' anywhere in a car's name, chances are it'll be awesome. The 2000 Mustang SVT Cobra R was no exception. With a quoted top speed of 170 mph, the R version of the Cobra had a 5.4-liter, 385-hp V-8, a lowered suspension setup, bigger brakes and wheels, stickier tires, exterior aero bits, and Recaro bucket seats. Oh, and it came with a manual transmission, too. Only 300 were built. 'Our acceleration tests revealed steam catapult-like launches with 60 mph arriving in just 4.4 seconds and the quarter taking 12.9 seconds at 110.8 mph,' we reported in a 2004 road test. 'That compares favorably with the Corvette's 4.8-second run to 60 and 13.3 at 108.6 through the quarter mile. To more reliably and efficiently handle the 5.4's extra muscle, Ford specified beefier axle shafts, a 3.55:1 axle ratio, and a Gerodisc hydromechanical differential with speed and torque sensitivity. But, of course, these goodies would be useless if the suspension couldn't keep the rubber on the ground most of the time.' 2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R specs 2001 Ford Mustang Bullitt Whether you believe Steve McQueen's 1968 movie Bullitt delivers either the greatest car chase scene in cinematic history or is the most boring hyped-up movie to date, the first Mustang Bullitt deserves to be on this list simply because of how great it looks. Dark metallic green is a lovely shade on any car, but it's extra special here. We were even able to look past the fake hood scoop. 'Except for balls-to-the-wall acceleration, the Bullitt is by far the best GT ever,' we wrote in 2002. 'The handling is flatter, the styling better and the braking shorter than any non-Cobra that's come before it. The interior is totally cool, and Team Mustang obviously sweat the details with the aluminum trim, red rotors, etc.' We just really, really didn't like the fact that the modified engine made just 5 hp more than stock. Ultimately, we deemed the first Bullitt Mustang had a ton to love but also needed work. 2001 Ford Mustang Bullitt specs 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302 The fifth-generation Mustang caught a lot of heat for its continued use of a solid rear axle. But before retiring the technology on the Mustang for good in favor of an independent rear suspension, Ford made it the best version of itself in the 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302. In our first drive from 2011, we called it 'the best of all the current Mustangs.' Jason Cammisa wrote, 'It's the best expression of a modern muscle car and, frankly, it's the best all-around sports car to wear a Mustang badge. Unburdened with the extra weight and disproportionate thrust of the supercharged GT500, unafflicted with the GT's cushy suspension, and unfettered by the V-6's incorrect soundtrack, the Boss 302 is, to us, exactly what a Mustang should be.' The Laguna Seca version lost the rear seats and replaced them with a cross brace and added a 1.0mm larger anti-roll bar, Torsen limited-slip differential, stiffer rear springs, and 1.0-inch-wider rear wheels with R-compound Pirelli Corsa tires. Cool in concept, but unless you're tracking it often, we didn't know if the reduction in practicality was ultimately worth the $6,995 premium. 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302 specs 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 Perhaps this author's favorite Mustang of all time is the 2016 Shelby GT350. As a tribute to the original GT350, it's a very fitting one. From the 5.2-liter naturally aspirated flat-plane Voodoo V-8 with an 8,250-rpm redline came the music of the gods. Perfectly paired with a Tremec six-speed manual transmission, the 2016 GT350 was a delight both on and off track. 'The engineering effort translates into a Mustang that is ridiculously fun and easy to drive at speed,' we wrote in a first drive. 'The readiness of the chassis and suspension gives drivers confidence and a variety of driving situations. Stability, feel, and control have been taken to a new level. The body remains flat during all phases of cornering, and when braking, you'll sense virtually no nose dive or nervousness in the rear. Turn-in occurs immediately, almost as if your thoughts, rather than your hands, are connected to the wheel. The steering is the most precise we've seen from a production Mustang. Save for a touch of understeer, the balance was spot on.' 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 specs 2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse The Shelby GT350 is no more, but fans of the current-generation Mustang can get their fix with the Dark Horse, which was a finalist in our recent Performance Vehicle of the Year event. Though there's the 5.0-liter Coyote V-8 under this hood instead of the berserk Voodoo engine, you still get a Tremec six-speed manual if you so choose. Plus, the automatic-equipped Dark Horse currently holds MotorTrend's shortest braking-distance record (from 60 mph to a standstill) to date at just 86 feet. This means it beat out all the Ferraris, Porsches, and other high-performance stuff we've tested. 'When you put the spurs to the Dark Horse, a tuned version of Ford's naturally aspirated Coyote V-8 pushing an even 500 horsepower howls through a standard active exhaust,' we wrote in our PVOTY review. 'In our testing, we hustled a manual-transmission-equipped model like the one we had at Chuckwalla to a 0–60-mph time of 4.1 seconds. (We got it down to 3.7 in an automatic-equipped car.)' 2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse specs Photos by manufacturer, MotorTrend staff, Ryan Lugo

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store