The road ahead after NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings
The hot topic, of course, was the influx of changes both threatening and beneficial for schools across the country. According to NCAA President Charlie Baker, approval of the settlement may be the biggest change in college sports history. On July 1, schools that opt in to the settlement will embark on a new era of revenue sharing, changing the game both on and off the field. Rewards
A handful of convention attendees breathed a sigh of relief on Friday night when U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken announced her decision. It's a quick turnaround and a period of trial and error is anticipated, but Division I athletic directors welcomed the news.
"The best thing is clarity," UCLA athletic director Martin Jarmond said. "The best thing about July 1 is we now have clarity on the rules of engagement, what we're allowed to do, how we can move forward. Does it solve everything? No, it doesn't. But when you have clarity, you can operate more efficiently and effectively."
Kentucky athletic director Mitch Barnhart was relieved to get the agreement in hand.
"We've been trying for so long to be part of this," Barnhart said. "Maybe, just maybe, on July 1, we'll sort of all know where we are on this one."
Barnhart added that the College Sports Commission, an entity that will enforce compliance and set market value for NIL deals, will be a major positive.
"The College Sports Commission and the way that is coming around gives us guardrails and enforcement in a way that we can move forward collectively, together, for college sports," Barnhart said. Risks
In a settlement where high-revenue sport athletes have the most to gain, Title IX has emerged as a topic to watch.
The 75-15-5-5 formula has emerged as a popular revenue-sharing formula, meaning that schools are likely to allocate 75% of revenue-sharing funds to football, 15% to men's basketball, 5% to women's basketball and the remaining 5% dispersed to other programs. If a school spent the full $20.5 million allowed this coming year, that would mean a breakdown of $15.4 million for football, $3.1 million for men's hoops and about $1 million each for women's hoops and everyone else.
Montoya Ho-Song, an attorney for Ackerman LLP who specializes in higher education issues, expects Title IX lawsuits to come, just like one filed this week by eight female athletes. The area has shifted again under President Donald Trump, with guidance suggesting the federal government won't hold schools to rigid requirements to distribute proceeds equitably between men and women.
"There are definitely going to be legal challenges related to this revenue-sharing model," Ho-Song said. "I always tell my clients, look, your student athletes' perceptions are their reality. If they think that they are not being treated equally, they will raise those concerns."
She warned that the 75-15-5-5 formula shouldn't be a one-size fits all and suggested dividing revenue based on how it comes in isn't a valid argument. The majority of rev-share funds going to football and basketball programs, especially when coupled with losing records, will inevitably stir the pot.
"Just because there is a 75-15-5-5 budget breakdown, that does not mean that that's going to work on all campuses," she said. "The analysis under Title IX is making sure that it is available and everyone has the same type of access to non-grant funds. So, you do have to figure out a way to creatively divvy up those funds, but always keep in mind, if someone feels as if they're not being treated correctly, then that is always a legal risk."
Attorney Mit Winter, a college sports law specialist with Kennyhertz Perry, said it is paramount that athletic departments present an organized, united front.
Since the launch of name, image, and likeness (NIL) compensation four years ago, Winter said, he has encountered several instances where athletic departments are giving conflicting statements and numbers to current and prospective athletes. That can lead to legal headaches, too.
"You need to have a plan that everyone is on board with and that everyone knows," Winter said. "As a school, you don't want to have a situation where five different people are talking to an athlete about how much they're going to pay him or her. I think that needs to be much more formalized. The coach, assistant coaches, [general managers], everybody needs to be on the same page."
St. Bonaventure men's basketball general manager Adrian Wojnarowski and coach Mark Schmidt know exactly what their roles are — and aren't.
"I will never talk to a player or a parent or an agent about playing time, their role," Wojnarowski said. "During the season, if someone is disappointed in playing time and they call, the only conversation I'm having with a family member is supporting the head coach, supporting the coaching staff. And in the end, that's a conversation for their son to have with the head coach. Then economically, we have to have one clear message in negotiations and finances." Impacts
There are concerns that the revenue-sharing era will have multiple impacts on college rosters.
Few athletic directors were willing to talk in any detail about plans for their campuses, but some of the moves have already begun in the search for more money to fulfill the details of the NCAA settlement: UTEP dropped women's tennis, Cal Poly discontinued swimming and diving, Marquette added women's swimming and Grand Canyon shuttered its men's volleyball program. The athletic director at Cal noted the school expects to lose about 100 athletes.
Just how many of the so-called non-revenue sports — the ones that often feed U.S. Olympic teams — will be affected is also a concern. And many programs will need to find a niche that works for them, even if that means not consistently contending for national championships.
Reporting by The Associated Press.
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily !
recommended
Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Gavin McKenna, Top 2026 NHL Draft Prospect, Reportedly Set To Leave WHL For Penn State
Per reports, Gavin McKenna of the WHL's Medicine Hat Tigers will be playing NCAA Hockey for Penn ... More State during his 2025-26 draft year. (Photo by) As NCAA Div. I hockey teams prepare to include players with Canadian Hockey League experience on their rosters for the first time this fall, top undrafted prospect Gavin McKenna looks set to join the exodus. Per multiple reports, McKenna will announce his commitment to Penn State University as early as Tuesday. Cam Robinson of Elite Prospects was first with the news. The 17-year-old left wing, who is widely believed to be the front-runner to be selected first overall in the 2026 NHL Draft, is coming off a 129-point regular season with the WHL's Medicine Hat Tigers. He followed up with a playoff run that saw him collect 38 points in 16 games as the Tigers captured the WHL championship, then reach the final of the CHL's Memorial Cup before falling to the London Knights of the Ontario Hockey League. His haul of individual awards included the WHL and CHL player of the year honors, as well as a spot on the Memorial Cup all-star team Those are all heady achievements for a draft-minus-one prospect skating in a league with players who are up to 21 years old. Along the way, McKenna also amassed a 54-game point streak that carried over from the regular season into the playoffs — a CHL record for the 21st century. A native of Whitehorse in Canada's Yukon Territory, McKenna is a small-town kid who left home at 13 to play in the Rink Hockey Academy program in Kelowna, B.C. His talent was no longer a secret by the time he was selected first overall by the Tigers in the 2022 WHL draft at age 14, and his stock has only risen from there. When McKenna chose the CHL route barely three years ago, he and his family would have assumed that he'd closed the door on playing NCAA hockey. In recent years, some top Canadian talents like Macklin Celebrini (No. 1 in 2024) and Adam Fantilli (No. 3 in 2023) had elected to go the college route, but that required careful planning through their development stages and forgoing the CHL entirely due to the NCAA's eligibility requirements at the time. By the spring of 2024, there was talk that the landscape might be changing. And last November, the Div. I Council approved the changes that would allow CHL players to suit up for NCAA clubs starting in 2025-26. At first, representatives from the CHL's three leagues — the Western Hockey League, Ontario Hockey League and Quebec Maritime Junior Hockey League — said they welcomed the change and the opportunity for their graduating players to continue their journeys in the NCAA after completing their WHL commitments. But backroom chatter suggested that some of the leagues' top stars could make the jump before completing their CHL eligibility, and that has proven to be the case. Players who have already signed their NHL entry-level contracts after being drafted still lose their NCAA eligibility, which is the case for most of the top prospects from 2024. But McKenna's Medicine Hat teammate Cayden Lindstrom, who was selected fourth overall by the Columbus Blue Jackets a year ago, is not signed and will also make the jump to college hockey next season, at Michigan State. According to Robinson, Michigan State was the other school in the running for McKenna's services. Three-time national champions, the Spartans are a more established hockey program than Penn State, which earned its Div. I status in 2012. The Nittany Lions have made four NCAA Tournament appearances to date, and reached the Frozen Four for the first time in 2025. The team's recruiting class for next season also includes defenseman Jackson Smith, who was selected 14th overall by the Columbus Blue Jackets at last month's 2025 NHL Draft. The Calgary native spent last season with the WHL's Tri-City Americans. Another WHL first-round pick, center Cole Reschny, was selected 18th overall by the Calgary Flames after a breakout season with the Victoria Royals. Both Reschny and his Victoria teammate, hulking defenseman Keaton Verhoeff, have comitted to the University of North Dakota. Listed at 6-foot-4 and 212 pounds and a coveted right shot who turned 17 on June 19, prospect experts are suggesting that Verhoeff's impressive development could see him challenge McKenna for top spot in the draft next spring. If there's a head-to-head matchup between the two along the way, it will be now be at the 2026 NCAA Tournament rather than in WHL play. The NCAA route offers top talents the opportunity to experience campus life before starting their pro careers, and to earn significant cash through NIL programs. According to Robinson, Penn State delivers on both counts, and the proof is in the pudding with the recruits they've attracted to date. 'Penn's operation is one of the best in college hockey,' Robinson quoted one NCAA source. 'They've built an environment that's very competitive financially, but also a highly attractive experience for the student-athlete.' Gavin McKenna's decision reportedly came after recent campus visits to both Michigan State and Penn State.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida State Under Fire for NIL Era's Dirty Secret
Florida State Under Fire for NIL Era's Dirty Secret originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The most dangerous contract isn't the one you read. It's the one you're told to trust. Over the past week, leaked details from Florida State's proposed revenue-sharing agreements have raised eyebrows and alarms. Legal clauses that allow the university to unilaterally extend a player's contract, renegotiate deals after injury, and impose multi-thousand-dollar fines have been quietly circulating among athletes. The response from agents, lawyers, and insiders has been swift, according to CBS Sports. Advertisement 'That's not normal.' 'That would never fly in pro sports.' 'They have all the leverage, and the terms go too far.' But here's the real issue: FSU didn't invent this model. They just got caught. And if we're being honest, the number of programs drafting similarly aggressive terms, silently, systematically, and without public scrutiny, is likely higher than most fans (and players) would ever imagine. Athletes fought for years to reach this moment. The NCAA settlement promised direct pay, institutional clarity, and a new chapter in player empowerment. For once, the system appeared to be moving in the right direction. But the moment schools gained permission to cut checks, they also began quietly writing their own rules and burying them in legalese. Advertisement Florida State Seminoles helmet during the Spring Showcase at Doak S. Campbell Stadium.© Melina Myers-USA TODAY Sports Florida State's contract reportedly includes a clause that allows them to void or revise a deal if an athlete's injury materially impacts their NIL value. Another gives the school the ability to extend a player's contract without renegotiating, regardless of performance. Penalties for lost equipment or behavioral violations run as high as $2,500. In theory, these protections serve the university. In practice, they put every athlete at risk of being turned into a line item on a risk management spreadsheet. Imagine a wide receiver who earns his way into a starting role, only to get sidelined with a broken foot. Under these terms, his deal, once celebrated, can be restructured, devalued, or canceled outright. No agent. No union. No oversight. Just a document, signed in good faith, now turned against him. Advertisement It's hard to blame athletes. Most of them don't have contract managers. Many don't even have proper NIL reps. They're often handed a document by someone they're taught to trust and told, 'This is standard.' That phrase, 'this is standard,' might be the most quietly corrosive phrase in the entire NIL era. Nathan Ray Seebeck-Imagn Images Here's the truth: there is no standard. Not yet. What FSU's contract exposes isn't just one school's overreach. It is the systemic lack of accountability in college sports' new financial ecosystem. Athletes are being told they're professionals now. But professionals have agents, lawyers, and clauses designed to protect their interests. Most college athletes have a parent, a coach, and a pen. Advertisement And this is where it gets messy: how many of these 'partnerships' are actually one-sided power grabs dressed up as opportunity? If FSU's contract terms hadn't leaked, would anyone be asking questions? Would any athletes even know what they signed? Because if this is what we know from one school's draft, imagine what's hidden in the fine print at the end. This isn't about whether Florida State is out of bounds. It's about the quiet erosion of trust happening behind closed doors, where contracts are crafted with the kind of language that assumes athletes won't ask questions. Where leverage is baked into clauses, and the benefit of the doubt always tilts toward the institution. Advertisement If this is the version that got leaked, what didn't? Schools aren't just offering deals. They're building systems to control outcomes. The very power athletes were promised is being repackaged and handed back in a form that looks official, but reads like a trap. It's not enough to say athletes are finally getting paid. Not if the price is autonomy. Not if the paperwork gives the school a way out and leaves the player holding nothing. This is what the new era looks like when no one's watching. And now that we've seen a piece of it, we should start asking who else is hoping we don't. Related: How NIL Spending Is Reshaping College Football's Competitive Landscape This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jay Paterno Lays Out The Reality of College Football and NIL (Exclusive)
Jay Paterno Lays Out The Reality of College Football and NIL (Exclusive) originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Jay Paterno sees college football at a crossroads. With new NIL guidelines being implemented, the Penn State Board of Trustees member and son of legendary coach Joe Paterno weighed in on the current dark side of sport and the need for a "constitutional congress." He spoke candidly with the 'Unphiltered Truth' Podcast about what schools around the nation are about to embark on in a short period of time. Advertisement The NCAA fought to keep money for itself all the way up until it was forced into a shared revenue situation with the players who earned it. College football has always moved the needle since its inception. They say money is the root of all evil and has ruined the sanctity of the game we fell in love with. While the product on the field has evolved, how the major players do business has to as well. The intertwining of online sports betting has forced change and not all for the better. Network television deals and super-conferences have brought us into the "Wild Wild West" of college sports. Coaches still may spend every minute of everyday finding ways to gain advantages over the system. Paying the players through various unconventional means has always been prevalent at least by schools that value winning above all else. Now, schools have salary caps but roster limits. Are student-athletes strictly players now? Transfer portal turnover rates and NIL opportunities are now key driving forces behind recruitment. Essentially, all players enter recruitment with the intention of negotiating their salaries and finding the best financial perks associated with schools. Revenue sharing with players would make them employees of the university in nearly all states by definition. Active student-athletes have access to university assisted healthcare benefits that the majority of students do not. Related: Florida State Under Fire for NIL Era's Dirty Secret What no one is asking is when are the players supposed to go to class? How long do players get to stay? Employees on the other hand, are free to come and go as they please. Whether it be due to at-will employment, termination of contracts, or a better opportunity elsewhere. Advertisement Related: How NIL Spending Is Reshaping College Football's Competitive Landscape Without NCAA regulation who is going to enforce rules. Lawsuits are going to be coming in abundance, for any number of reasons. The questions continue to mount about how to operate and that is why Paterno says college football needs to have a clear and well-defined framework to operate within. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 4, 2025, where it first appeared.
