China's first homemade aircraft carrier sails into Hong Kong in a show of military prowess
Shandong, escorted by three other homemade warships, kicked off a five-day stop in the semi-autonomous Chinese territory on Thursday. Shandong is named after the eastern coastal province where the country's first aircraft carrier is based, according to the state-run newspaper People's Daily.
Commissioned in 2019, the carrier is China's first warship fully built and designed in the country. Its flight deck is about the size of two standard soccer pitches, and it is as tall as a 20-story building.
With a displacement of over 60,000 tons, Shandong can carry dozens of carrier-based fighter jets and various types of helicopters.
China has the one of the world's largest navies with an active-duty force of 300,000 personnel, according to a 2023 report affiliated with the country's Ministry of Veteran Affairs.
Hong Kong leader John Lee hailed the 'historic' and 'inspiring' visit of the aircraft carrier as the city marked the fifth anniversary of a Beijing-imposed national security law decried by critics as profound infringement of human rights and civil liberties.
Speaking at a welcoming ceremony, Lee said the visit demonstrated that national security is 'rock-solid.'
The warships 'fully demonstrate to the outside world' the achievement of the Chinese military, said Col. Zhang Junshe, a senior colonel for the People's Liberation Army Navy.
The display showcased China's combat readiness and will 'naturally deter some forces with ulterior motives,' Zhang told state-backed nationalist tabloid Global Times.
claims over the self-governing island of Taiwan and conflicts with the Philippines in the South China Sea.
warned that China was developing military technologies and capabilities at a pace and scale never before seen.
The visit, which runs through Monday, is the first time China opens up the Shandong to the public.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Patel and Ratcliffe try to bolster claims that FBI and CIA conspired against Trump
The release of formerly classified FBI and CIA documents this week illustrates how President Donald Trump's appointees at both agencies are trying to use the levers of government to prop up his long-standing assertions that intelligence agencies conspired against him. The FBI released emails on Tuesday that purport to show an effort by the bureau's leaders in 2020 to cover up a source's claim that there was a Chinese plot to throw the presidential election to Joe Biden. In a statement to the Daily Mail, Trump's FBI director, Kash Patel, said the emails reveal that bureau leaders 'chose to play politics and withhold key information from the American people.' And CIA Director John Ratcliffe released an internal agency analysis related to the 2020 election that he argue d showed that Democratic appointees 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump.' Patel's and Ratcliffe's claims went beyond the information contained in the released documents. The documents do not describe definitive evidence that any official acted out of political motive or engaged in anything beyond the good-faith debate that is typical of the intelligence verification and analysis process. The emails do show that at least one FBI official raised the concern that the report conflicted with congressional testimony at the time by Director Christopher Wray, who said the FBI was not aware of any Chinese attempt to interfere in the presidential election. A former FBI official told NBC News that Wray does not recall being made aware of the report. A former senior FBI official said he was not aware of the report either. The former official, who requested anonymity, noted that the bureau produces hundreds of reports every day based on such tips, which do not always pan out. Patel also promoted an article by the right-wing journalist John Solomon than mentioned that U.S. Customs and Border Protection had seized fake licenses that were arriving mostly from China and Hong Kong around the time the FBI received the tip. According to a 2020 news release from CBP, 20,000 fake licenses were seized in Chicago between January and June. It said 'most were for college-age students,' a population that has historically sought licenses with fake birthdays so underage students can purchase alcohol. Dozens of judges, including Trump appointees, have found no evidence of widespread or systemic voter fraud affecting the 2020 election, despite allegations promoted by Trump and his allies since he lost that year's presidential race. The day after Patel released the emails, though, Trump appeared to mention them during a press conference where he talked about 'China and the license plates' and claimed that 'tens of thousands of cards' were used to vote in the 2020 election. Concerns about reliability of tip The emails released by Patel offer a window into the deep concern among senior career FBI analysts about an intelligence report from an agent in the Albany field office based on a single, unvetted source making a historic allegation: that the Chinese government sent thousands of fake IDs to help people fraudulently vote for Biden. The report was ultimately withdrawn over concerns about its veracity. Two FBI officials familiar with the matter told NBC News that the tip was not credible intelligence and never should have been sent out in an intelligence report. The CIA analysis cited by Ratcliffe found procedural faults with how the agency crafted its assessment that Russia tried to denigrate Hillary Clinton and help Trump get elected in 2016. But it didn't question that broad conclusion — one echoed by two exhaustive congressional investigations. Yet Trump appointees and allies quickly argued the documents vindicated Trump's long-running claims that he had been wronged by intelligence agencies investigating foreign election interference. The CIA review found that 'Obama's Trump-Russia collusion report was corrupt from start,' read the headline of a New York Post piece by conservative columnist Miranda Devine. A press release from the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, said the 'bombshell' FBI emails showed 'FBI headquarters interfered with [an] alleged Chinese election interference probe' to shield then-Director Christopher Wray 'from political blowback.' A new unnamed source The FBI emails show that senior career public servants at the bureau had concerns about the reliability of information from a confidential human source who claimed that the Chinese Communist Party planned to use fake IDs to cast ballots for Biden in the 2020 election. The information came from a source that an FBI agent based in Albany, New York, had just met, who in turn got it from a separate unnamed source. The emails say the source in Albany also repeated a claim made on social media that the Chinese government was intentionally spreading Covid in the U.S. — an allegation that has never been corroborated. One email released by the FBI said the information had not been verified through other intelligence-gathering methods. The emails say top bureau intelligence analysts Nikki Floris and Tonya Ugoretz ordered the intelligence report recalled because it lacked corroboration. Floris was forced out of the FBI earlier this year, and Ugoretz — who was promoted to become the FBI's top intelligence official — was recently placed on leave. The FBI has not said why. Floris and Ugoretz did not respond to requests for comment. The emails lay out an internal debate over the reliability of the intelligence, which former FBI agents say is typical. The Albany office, backing its agent, sought to prevent the report from being recalled. Senior FBI officials, meanwhile, pushed for corroboration of the source's allegations. In a Sept. 25, 2020, email, an assistant section chief in the Criminal Intelligence Branch said the claim about Chinese election interference was 'getting a lot of attention from all HQ divisions.' The assistant section chief added, 'We know that the source is first contact and hasn't been re-interviewed. Are you considering recalling the [intelligence report] until you can track the source down and re-interview? Everything election is getting scrutiny, and we just want to be sure we have reliable sourcing.' In a Sept. 28 email, another official noted that the allegation that China was trying to influence the election in favor of Biden, as well as previous seizures of fake driver's licenses imported from China, 'were all documented in some fashion on open sources.' The official added that 'Given the lack of specifics we received in the initial reporting, my first opinion was that the [confidential human source] wants to help and is probably supplementing his reporting via open sources.' Ultimately, the emails show, an FBI official who specializes in Chinese foreign interference instructed the Albany office that 'we have not approved a re-issue' of the report 'specifically because of our concerns that the reporting is not authoritative.' Election denier at FBI The new head of the FBI's Office of Congressional Affairs is Marshall Yates. A former Republican aide on Capitol Hill, Yates has ties to figures that have long backed Trump's false claim that the 2020 election was stolen. Yates was chief of staff to former Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., on Jan. 6, 2021, when Brooks spoke at Trump's rally in support of efforts to overturn his election loss. Yates then went on to work for the Election Integrity Network, a project headed by Republican lawyer Cleta Mitchell, a key figure in the efforts to overturn the 2020 election. In a 2022 speech in New Mexico, Yates said the 'election objection did not go as we wanted in 2020, on Jan. 6,' but that 'luckily' it had 'sparked a grassroots movement across the country for election integrity.' Yates did not respond to a request for comment. The FBI declined a request for comment regarding Yates' involvement or Patel's statements about the emails. A nuanced CIA analysis The internal review released by Ratcliffe last week examined how the CIA put together a 2017 intelligence assessment that concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. The review found some deviance from standard procedures, but it defended the assessment's overall findings. The report disclosed that two senior leaders of a CIA mission center focusing on Russia objected to the conclusion that Russia's goal was to help secure Trump's victory but agreed that Putin hoped to denigrate Clinton and undermine the U.S. democratic process. The review also cited complaints by some CIA officers that they felt rushed by a tight deadline to produce the assessment. The CIA director at the time, John Brennan, was a Democratic political appointee who has since become an ardent Trump critic. In a second post on X, Ratcliffe argued that the complaints about the process were evidence the 'assessment was conducted through an atypical & corrupt process under the politically charged environments' of Brennan and then-FBI Director James Comey. The CIA declined to comment when asked to explain the basis for Ratcliffe's accusation. A special counsel appointed during the first Trump administration looked extensively into how the CIA crafted its assessment but filed no criminal charges and reported no clear evidence that political bias tainted the process. A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation in 2020 concurred with the 2017 intelligence assessment and found no reason to dispute its conclusions.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Hong Kong code of conduct will oblige legislators to ‘sincerely support' Beijing
A new code of conduct in Hong Kong will require legislators to 'sincerely support' Beijing's jurisdiction on the city and the chief executive, and prohibits anything that might 'vilify' the government. The proposal for the new code, introduced on Wednesday, included tiered penalties for legislators who breach the code, including suspension without payment for the most serious offences. It stipulated that legislators must 'sincerely support the central government's overall jurisdiction while securing the Hong Kong SAR's [special administrative region's] high degree of autonomy', as well as the principle of 'patriots administering Hong Kong', referring to election reforms which ensure that only pro-Beijing candidates can run. 'They should not intentionally vilify the governance credibility of the chief executive and the SAR government, nor should they deliberately undermine or weaken the effectiveness of executive-led governance,' it said. The president of the legislative council of Hong Kong, Andrew Leung, told media the new rules wouldn't restrict legislators from speaking up, but they must be careful to 'not cross the red line', Hong Kong Free Press reported. Hong Kong's governance system has undergone major overhauls in recent years, after a crackdown on the city's pro-democracy movement and politicians saw major interventions by the government in Beijing. Every major democratic party has disbanded or begun the process of disbandment, and thousands of people – including politicians and activists – have been prosecuted under national security laws. A separate proposal this week flags new prison rules which include only allowing visits pre-approved by the correctional services department, would empower the department to consider restrictions on clergy visits, and seek rulings to bar visits by specific legal representatives to imprisoned clients. 'In the past, some people have abused the visiting mechanism and conducted visits in the name of 'humanitarian support',' said the amendment proposal. 'In fact, they are using soft means to influence prisoners, intending to incite them to resist the supervision of the correctional services department, arouse their hatred towards the central government and the SAR government, and even make them become potential risks to national security and public safety after returning to society.' The crackdown on Hong Kong's pro-democracy population has been widely criticised by human rights and legal groups. Senior foreign judges have left or resigned from Hong Kong's appeal court, with several specifically citing concerns over the new environment. Hong Kong authorities reject the claims. In an interview published by an academic journal this week, the UK's Brenda Marjorie Hale, who quietly declined an offer to extend her post on the Hong Kong court in 2021, said she was now 'all the more convinced that it was the right thing to do'. 'Because, as things have developed, the National Security Law has taken over the Basic Law,' she said, referring to Hong Kong's mini constitution. 'Even though the foreign judges are not likely to be asked to sit on national security cases, they are being asked to give respectability to a system that despite the best efforts ... are not going to succeed.' Additional research by Lillian Yang and Jason Tzu Kuan Lu
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Albanese heads to China as Trump upends the global order. The PM may wish he lived in less interesting times
Anthony Albanese watched on from the opposition benches when Xi Jinping addressed a joint sitting of federal parliament back in 2014. In Australia for the G20 summit, and hosted by Tony Abbott, China's president told MPs he had visited the country five times over 30 years, spending time in every state and territory. Xi said the friendship between Australia and China would be as 'strong and everlasting' as Uluru and the Great Wall of China. As he prepares to meet Xi later this month, Albanese may be forgiven for wishing the friendship and stability the Chinese leader talked about that day in Canberra had come to pass. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Both men's stations have shifted dramatically in the intervening decade. Xi changed party rules to become China's president for life, and Albanese, a leadership rival to Bill Shorten, has entered the pantheon of Labor greats, securing two election victories and the party's biggest win since the second world war. It has fallen to Albanese as prime minister to negotiate a newfound stability in the relationship with Beijing after an acrimonious period which has included a years-long trade and diplomatic deep freeze, lingering bad blood from the Covid-19 pandemic and persistent interference in Australian society. Albanese and his foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, have succeeded in returning things to a more even keel, promising the two governments will cooperate where they can and disagree where they must. That has meant resisting some public criticism of China, or taking a more measured approach than the media and some commentators demand, including when Chinese warships circumnavigated the country earlier this year, running a live fire exercise that caused dozens of commercial flights to be rerouted. Cooperation with disagreement is a formulation which the government might be privately retrofitting to Australia's other most pressing international priority: managing Donald Trump. Usually a rock solid partnership regardless of which party is in power in Washington or Canberra, Trump's incredible restoration to the Oval Office has disrupted relations with Canberra. A mix of the Republican's unconventional style and fractious events in the Middle East has meant even the straightforward task of locking in a meeting between the prime minister and the president has become one of the major political challenges since the government's return to power. Albanese needs to seek assurances from Trump on the future of the Aukus nuclear submarines deal, explain his position on America's demands for Australia to spend 3.5% of GDP on defence and make the case for preferential treatment under the Trump tariff regime, but has been left hanging on when talks will actually take place. For Labor, the problem is something between a scheduling snafu and an emerging foreign policy flashpoint. The Coalition describes it as a major failure, saying the government should have anticipated Trump's win and laid better diplomatic groundwork. The opposition is continuing to demand the prime minister go to the White House and meet with Trump, as if Albanese is somehow sitting at Canberra airport refusing to get on the plane. In reality, an invitation will only be issued when a time of mutual agreement can be secured. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion After her meeting with the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and their Quad counterparts in Washington this week, Wong confirmed the Americans are eager for a meeting to take place as soon as possible. A September visit to the United Nations general assembly or the Quad leaders' summit in India later in the year are the most likely timing windows, guaranteeing Albanese will hold his second round of face-to-face talks with Xi before he meets Trump for the first time. Labor has been careful to keep its response to the tariffs in check in recent weeks. Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement turned into an unlikely positive for Albanese during the federal election campaign, and government sources say being included in the list of countries at the 10% baseline rate is as good as things are likely to get. Purported major deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam might be more hype than substance and Labor won't be the only government hoping Trump might cave on his 9 July deadline and extend the pause on most of the tariffs. Albanese has described the tariffs as an act of economic self-harm, warning American consumers will pay the price for Trump's inflexible belief in import duties. He will stress Australia has a trade surplus with the United States, even as he says the imposition of tariffs is not the act of a friend. Labor sources say privately the government won't push for any major new deal that could undercut the 20-year-old US-Australia free trade agreement. But, as with Xi – described this week by Simon Case, the former head of the UK's civil service, as a 'dictator' intent on causing conflict over Taiwan – careful criticism of Trump may not stand the test of time. He is ramping up extra judicial deportations, going after perceived enemies in the media, abusing political rivals and the leaders of friendly nations, and cutting social programs including health insurance and food stamps to fund the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill. Now law, it is replete with tax cuts for the richest Americans and big corporations and will add trillions to national debt. No one should forget Trump tried to overturn a democratic election, goading his supporters to deadly violence as he attempted to cling to power. If Trump uses the 30-day snap review of Aukus to pull out of the deal, even after Australia has sent about $800m to support the US defence industrial base, Albanese will have a major political crisis on his hands. Australia has structured its defence and foreign policy around the United States alliance for decades and any move by Trump towards his own isolationist instincts would be bad news for allies in the Indo-Pacific and good news for Xi. For Albanese and Labor, cooperating with both Xi and Trump, while disagreeing when Australia must, might be the only good approach. Tom McIlroy is Guardian Australia's chief political correspondent
