logo
Medtronic wins US appeal to overturn $106.5 mln heart-valve patent verdict

Medtronic wins US appeal to overturn $106.5 mln heart-valve patent verdict

Reuters21-07-2025
July 18 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday overturned a jury's verdict that medical device maker Medtronic (MDT.N), opens new tab owes competitor Colibri $106.5 million for infringing a patent related to heart valve technology.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined, opens new tab that a California judge should have ruled before the trial that Minneapolis-based Medtronic's devices did not violate Colibri's patent rights.
Medtronic said in a statement that the decision "affirms our longstanding position that Colibri's patent infringement claims lacked merit." Spokespeople and an attorney for Colibri did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Colorado-based Colibri alleged in a 2020 lawsuit that Medtronic's Evolut devices for replacing heart valves in heart disease patients infringed a Colibri patent related to deploying artificial heart valves.
The patent relates to Colibri's competing heart valve implant system. Colibri said in the lawsuit that company officials shared information about its patented technology with Medtronic in 2014, before Medtronic introduced its Evolut system.
A jury found in 2023 that Medtronic's devices infringed Colibri's patent. A three-judge Federal Circuit panel overturned the verdict on Friday, agreeing with Medtronic that the district court judge should have ruled for the company before the case went to a jury trial.
The case is Colibri Heart Valve LLC v. Medtronic CoreValve LLC, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 23-2153.
For Colibri: Jeffrey Lamken of MoloLamken
For Medtronic: Greg Castanias of Jones Day
Read more:
Medtronic hit with $106.5 mln U.S. verdict in heart-valve patent case
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over US firms
Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over US firms

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over US firms

LONDON/NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs are meant to boost domestic manufacturing. But in the chocolate industry, they're doing the opposite: ramping up the cost of importing already-pricey cocoa and hurting the competitiveness of local factories versus Canadian and Mexican outfits that supply the U.S., according to conversations with 11 industry executives, representatives, experts and traders. Under the United States-Mexico-Canada free trade pact (USMCA), which the Trump administration has confirmed remains in place, Canada and Mexico can export chocolate to the U.S. tariff-free no matter where they sourced their inputs of cocoa - a tropical crop that does not grow in the United States. Canada also has zero tariffs on imports of raw and semi-processed cocoa like butter and powder, while Mexico grows its own beans, meaning factories both north and south of the U.S. border can produce more cheaply than those domestically who now have to pay tariffs of between 10-25% on cocoa inputs. The rates could rise to 35% on August 1. A government official said that the White House continues to monitor trends in trade and commerce and listen to industry feedback to deliver on Trump's economic agenda. Top U.S. chocolate maker Hershey, which mainly makes chocolate in the U.S. but has plants in Canada and Mexico, has estimated it would face $100 million in tariff costs in its third and fourth quarters if the levies remain in place. Smaller firms like Somerville, Massachusetts-based Taza Chocolate, which produces chocolate from scratch using imported cocoa, have no alternatives to U.S. manufacturing. Taza in May had to pay $24,124 in duties on a container of cocoa from Haiti, subject to the blanket 10% tariff imposed by Trump, a Customs and Border Protection invoice showed. Taza faces a customs cheque of more than $30,000 to release its next container of cocoa from the Dominican Republic, founder and CEO Alex Whitmore said. "For a company our size, that's our profit margin gone so the immediate thought is OK, the rules have changed, we just need to create the most cost-effective solution for the consumer," said Whitmore. He initially explored offshoring part of Taza's manufacturing to Canada to benefit from USMCA terms, but decided against it given the significant investment of both money and time that would require, in a volatile business environment. "Right now, the environment is so uncertain that we're just hunkering down and hoping this will pass," Whitmore said. "A lot of us business owners are kind of frozen." Customs data compiled for Reuters by Trade Data Monitor (TDM) shows Canada's chocolate exports to the U.S. grew by 10% in volume terms in the five months to end-May, indicating some Canadian manufacturers are taking advantage of the opportunity created by tariffs. Companies benefiting are mostly Canadian and Mexican contract chocolate makers, or multinational contractors like Barry Callebaut (BARN.S), opens new tab that have a significant footprint in Canada and Mexico, industry sources said. Barry Callebaut, which has just under half its North America chocolate factories in Canada and Mexico, declined to comment. Its CEO Peter Feld said at its July post-results conference call: "On tariffs ... we have operations in the U.S., we have operations in Canada, we have operations in Mexico. So we can actually navigate this environment in the right way." Contract chocolate firms produce raw chocolate that U.S. factories add ingredients to and sell as American chocolate. Tariffs - a pillar of Trump's "America First" economic agenda - come at a delicate time for U.S. chocolate makers as consumers are already buying less after absorbing double-digit inflation over the past several years. In chocolate specifically, prices have risen sharply as cocoa , tripled in value to hit record highs in the first four months of last year, and remains well above historical averages because of adverse weather and disease in top growers Ivory Coast and Ghana. Under pressure from rising input costs, Hershey (HSY.N), opens new tab earlier this month rolled out double-digit price hikes across its confectionary products like Reese's cups to retailers like Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab and Kroger (KR.N), opens new tab. Cocoa accounts for about 30-50% of the cost of a bar of chocolate. Hershey said its recent price hikes were not related to tariffs. Taza has raised its wholesale prices by 10% since a year ago, and the price of its chocolate bars on its website rose in June to $6.99 from $5.99 previously, but Whitmore also said tariffs would cause further price hikes. Because cocoa can't be sourced domestically, Hershey said in May it is "engaging with the U.S. government to seek an exemption" for cocoa. It declined to comment on whether it was counting on imports from its Canada and Mexico plants to help mitigate tariff costs. M&Ms maker Mars, which said Tuesday it is investing $2 billion in its U.S. manufacturing, including chocolate, has not changed its sourcing structure and continues to make 94% of its U.S. products locally. A Lindt (LISN.S), opens new tab spokesperson said the Lindor truffle maker will decide on possible changes to its sourcing after August 1. Paolo Quadrini, director general of Mexican chocolate and candy association Aschoco Confimex, said U.S. tariffs are "creating new opportunities for Mexican companies." "The sentiment among companies and entrepreneurs, as well as requests from U.S. chocolate companies to manufacture in Mexico, is real and has been increasing," he said. The chocolate market in the U.S., the world's top chocolate consumer, is worth $25-30 billion, according to investment bank TD Cowen, and imports from top supplier Canada account for about 10% of that total, while those from No. 2 supplier Mexico account for some 2.5%. Tareq Hadhad, CEO of mid-sized Nova Scotia-based chocolate maker Peace by Chocolate said tariffs had largely prompted Canadian and American firms to opt for locally produced goods but that contract chocolate makers in Canada had benefited from the new trade dynamic. "It's an advantage for them," he said. ​

Revolut to become title partner of Audi F1 team
Revolut to become title partner of Audi F1 team

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Revolut to become title partner of Audi F1 team

LONDON, July 30 (Reuters) - British financial technology giant Revolut will become title partner of the Audi Formula One team from next season in a "monumental" multi-year deal, both parties announced on Wednesday. The fast-growing London-based fintech company was valued at $45 billion last year through a secondary share sale to new and existing investors. Swiss-based Sauber are becoming the factory Audi team in 2026, when Formula One starts a new engine era with major rule changes and an 11th team on the grid with the arrival of Cadillac. Jonathan Wheatley, principal of the Audi team, said the deal had been put together in less than four months and had obvious benefits for both sides. "If you imagine we need to engage with our fans, we need a partner that's going to help us do that," Wheatley told Reuters in a video call. "We need to expand hugely into this incredible global space that Formula One is in at the moment, and we need to become the most attractive team in Formula One." Wheatley said the deal reflected Audi's brand strength and was a "good news story for Formula One." "It's the Audi magnet that's drawing a lot of people here right now," he said, speaking from the team headquarters in Hinwil, Switzerland. Revolut has more than 55 million customers but has no physical branches. It gained a banking licence in Britain in 2024, after a three-year wait, and has global expansion plans. Antoine Le Nel, Revolut's chief marketing officer, gave no financial details of the F1 partnership but said the company was in for the long run with Audi and aiming for 100 million customers by 2027. He said Revolut had been looking for a platform to help the company build on its expansion. "I think we have a true opportunity to really bring F1 to a huge audience," he told Reuters. "From a retail perspective as well as a business perspective, I think there's going to be a lot of opportunities for us to connect the fan base to the sport through the Revolut platform." Le Nel said Audi taking on the established teams in Formula One was like Revolut competing against traditional banks. "If you look at Audi, very premium German brand dominating its market, it's where we want to be," he said. "It's a way for Revolut to elevate and get to where Audi has been for such a long time." Audi said Revolut Business would be extensively integrated into the team's financial operations. Sauber are sixth in the 10 team championship ahead of this weekend's Hungarian Grand Prix and have scored in their last five races. German driver Nico Hulkenberg celebrated his first F1 podium at Silverstone this month, finishing third in the British Grand Prix in a major boost for the team.

Hedge fund tycoon Hosking says rival Telegraph bid "ready to go"
Hedge fund tycoon Hosking says rival Telegraph bid "ready to go"

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Hedge fund tycoon Hosking says rival Telegraph bid "ready to go"

The hedge fund founder enlisted to back a bid for The Daily Telegraph says the offer is "ready to go" if a takeover of the broadsheet title involving sovereign Gulf money runs into further regulatory problems. Sky News has learnt that Jeremy Hosking, the prominent City figure who co-founded Marathon Asset Management, is pledging to inject £100m of his own money into the newspaper group if the self-styled 'British bid' of which he is part is successful. Mr Hosking, who now runs Hosking Partners, has been working with Dovid Efune, the owner of the New York Sun, in an effort to gain control of the Telegraph for several months. They have been thwarted, though, by an agreement reached with RedBird Capital Partners, the US-based investment firm, to buy the titles for £500m following a two-year battle which has plunged the Telegraph into a protracted state of limbo. RedBird's bid includes tens of millions of pounds of funding from IMI, a state-backed Abu Dhabi vehicle, which cleared a key hurdle last week when the House of Lords voted against a 'fatal motion' which would have blocked the sovereign investment. The outcome of the vote was not without fierce debate, with 155 peers supporting the ban. IMI is controlled by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the vice-president of the United Arab Emirates and ultimate owner of Manchester City Football Club. Speaking through Mr Efune, Mr Hosking said in a statement on Wednesday morning: "We have been following the latest developments closely and with the best outcome for all Telegraph stakeholders front of mind. "We understand from the Lords debate last week that there is now a legal requirement for the government to formally investigate all the foreign government ties that may result in influence over the current preferred buyer. "Should the buyer be deemed unsuitable, our "British Bid" is ready to go. "We believe our current capitalization is more than adequate to replace the controlling shareholder's portion of the deal. "My own personal commitment is £100m in equity capital." Further details of the financing lined up by Mr Efune's consortium remain unclear, including the level of debt attached to his prospective offer. The RedBird-led acquisition of the Telegraph remains subject to investigations by both Ofcom and the Competition and Markets Authority, which are likely to delay completion of the deal into next year. Sky News previously revealed that Sir Leonard Blavatnik, owner of the DAZN sports streaming platform, and Daily Mail proprietor Lord Rothermere were preparing to buy minority stakes as part of the RedBird transaction. Gerry Cardinale, the RedBird executive, who has spearheaded the latest iteration of its acquisition, has described the firm as "the right owner at the right time". RedBird said in May that it was "in discussions with select UK-based minority investors with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of the Telegraph". The Telegraph titles' parent company was forced into insolvency proceedings in 2023 by Lloyds Banking Group, which ran out of patience with the Barclay family, their long-standing owner. RedBird IMI, a joint venture between the two firms, paid £600m several months later to acquire a call option that was intended to convert into ownership of the Telegraph newspapers and The Spectator magazine. That objective was thwarted by a change in media ownership laws - which banned any form of foreign state ownership. Some peers argued last week that a 15% threshold was too high and that the legislation to permit it was dangerously ambiguous because it could allow for more than one state investor to aggregate their holdings in British newspapers. A further statutory instrument will need to be approved in order to address this issue. The Spectator, which had also been part of the same group, was sold last year for £100m to Sir Paul Marshall, the hedge fund billionaire, who has installed Lord Gove, the former cabinet minister, as its editor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store