Hedge fund tycoon Hosking says rival Telegraph bid "ready to go"
Sky News has learnt that Jeremy Hosking, the prominent City figure who co-founded Marathon Asset Management, is pledging to inject £100m of his own money into the newspaper group if the self-styled 'British bid' of which he is part is successful.
Mr Hosking, who now runs Hosking Partners, has been working with Dovid Efune, the owner of the New York Sun, in an effort to gain control of the Telegraph for several months.
They have been thwarted, though, by an agreement reached with RedBird Capital Partners, the US-based investment firm, to buy the titles for £500m following a two-year battle which has plunged the Telegraph into a protracted state of limbo.
RedBird's bid includes tens of millions of pounds of funding from IMI, a state-backed Abu Dhabi vehicle, which cleared a key hurdle last week when the House of Lords voted against a 'fatal motion' which would have blocked the sovereign investment.
The outcome of the vote was not without fierce debate, with 155 peers supporting the ban.
IMI is controlled by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the vice-president of the United Arab Emirates and ultimate owner of Manchester City Football Club.
Speaking through Mr Efune, Mr Hosking said in a statement on Wednesday morning: "We have been following the latest developments closely and with the best outcome for all Telegraph stakeholders front of mind.
"We understand from the Lords debate last week that there is now a legal requirement for the government to formally investigate all the foreign government ties that may result in influence over the current preferred buyer.
"Should the buyer be deemed unsuitable, our "British Bid" is ready to go.
"We believe our current capitalization is more than adequate to replace the controlling shareholder's portion of the deal.
"My own personal commitment is £100m in equity capital."
Further details of the financing lined up by Mr Efune's consortium remain unclear, including the level of debt attached to his prospective offer.
The RedBird-led acquisition of the Telegraph remains subject to investigations by both Ofcom and the Competition and Markets Authority, which are likely to delay completion of the deal into next year.
Sky News previously revealed that Sir Leonard Blavatnik, owner of the DAZN sports streaming platform, and Daily Mail proprietor Lord Rothermere were preparing to buy minority stakes as part of the RedBird transaction.
Gerry Cardinale, the RedBird executive, who has spearheaded the latest iteration of its acquisition, has described the firm as "the right owner at the right time".
RedBird said in May that it was "in discussions with select UK-based minority investors with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of the Telegraph".
The Telegraph titles' parent company was forced into insolvency proceedings in 2023 by Lloyds Banking Group, which ran out of patience with the Barclay family, their long-standing owner.
RedBird IMI, a joint venture between the two firms, paid £600m several months later to acquire a call option that was intended to convert into ownership of the Telegraph newspapers and The Spectator magazine.
That objective was thwarted by a change in media ownership laws - which banned any form of foreign state ownership.
Some peers argued last week that a 15% threshold was too high and that the legislation to permit it was dangerously ambiguous because it could allow for more than one state investor to aggregate their holdings in British newspapers.
A further statutory instrument will need to be approved in order to address this issue.
The Spectator, which had also been part of the same group, was sold last year for £100m to Sir Paul Marshall, the hedge fund billionaire, who has installed Lord Gove, the former cabinet minister, as its editor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Closed Much Wenlock 16th Century inn could be set to reopen
A closed 16th Century inn in Shropshire could be set to reopen after new plans were drawn application for a new premises license was submitted for the Inn at Harley, formerly the Plume of Feathers, off the A458 near Much venue was set to reopen two years ago and an Instagram post in May 2023 said it was in the early stages of renovation, offering nine en suite Harley View Limited, which owns public houses and bars, is hopeful in the application that the building could reopen. The proposal said the hours of operation would be from 07:00 to 01:30, with the supply of alcohol from 10:00 to 01: also want to be able to host live and recorded music indoors, as well as serving late-night consultation period has ended, with a decision to be made in due course by Shropshire Council. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I have a £900,000 pension pot, how much income will I be able to get in retirement?
I have a defined contribution pension that I built up through my working life and apart from a few years at the start of my career, I've never had a final salary scheme. My pot is worth £900,000 and I am 59 and hope to retire in two years. How much retirement income can I safely expect to get from my pension pot - and if I died would my wife face inheritance tax on it? Rob Morgan, of Charles Stanley Direct, replies: When you decide to retire you'll have two main options for your pension pot. Keep investing and draw a regular or flexible income out or buy an annuity – guaranteed income for life from an insurance company. An annuity is the safer but less flexible option. Once you have bought it you can't reverse the decision, and for lots of people 61 is too soon for an annuity purchase unless they are especially risk averse. Annuity rates are lower when purchased at a younger age meaning you lock in a less favourable income for life, and you lose flexibility. However, to give you an idea, a 61-year-old today could secure an annuity income of 6.82 per cent on a level basis and 4.44 per cent on an inflation linked basis assuming a 5-year guarantee period and 50 per cent per cent spouse's pension. So that's £46,021 a year or £29,961 a year, respectively, on a £900,000 pot after taking the maximum tax-free cash of £225,000 which could also be used to generate an income on top. Drawdown is a riskier alternative, but it can keep your pot growing further than inflation levels and therefore give you a better outcome, especially if you plan on leaving the pension pot to your wife should she outlive you. Although you can build in a spouse's pension and other guarantees into an annuity, the flexibility of leaving all the remaining pot to her is potentially good financial planning. Plus, should you unfortunately die before 75 she can also take all the money out tax-free. The good news is there would be no inheritance tax (IHT) consequences of passing the pot to your wife. There is no IHT on assets left to spouses, so she can inherit the pot and enjoy the same retirement options with it. How much can you safely take out of your pension? That then leaves the question of how have much can you safely withdraw from the pension pot in drawdown. The 'classic' answer to this is about 4 per cent, which I would also extend to any tax-free cash you invest – ideally most of it in Isas to grow your money and pay income tax free. Using the '4 per cent rule' means you could 'safely' generate £36,000 a year before tax, rising with inflation. Why 4 per cent? It's a level thought be 'safe' enough for your money to last 30 years, based on historical stock and bond returns – even through relatively poor periods. However, arguably there is no such thing as a 'safe' rate. Asset class returns significantly lower than historical averages could present difficulties, especially in the event of a market crash in the early years of retirement – a concept known as 'sequence of returns risk'. This is why some advisers suggest 3-3.5 per cent as a more conservative level, or suggest dynamic strategies where withdrawals are based partly on market performance. It's also possible that you may be able to increase the rate of withdrawals if your investments do well. You will also need to consider your pattern of spending. Expenditure in retirement is often described as 'smile' shaped. Typically, the earlier years are more active, and costly, and later years less so, before spending rises again in the case of care needs. > Read Charles Stanley Direct's guide: How to combat drawdown risk It's not an all or nothing affair? It's also worth noting that you can mix and match an annuity and drawdown and you don't have to choose one or the other. Many people like to use an annuity to match their essential spending and use drawdown for top up or more discretionary spending – and accept that they may need to be flexible about withdrawals to help preserve the pot in the event of poor investment performance. Also factor in that your State Pension will begin at 67, which serves as a guaranteed income stream increasing at present by the triple lock, which is the higher of 2.5 per cent, inflation or average wage increase, in which case you can potentially take a bit more from your pension in the early years of retirement in the knowledge you can dial back once that comes on stream. > Is it worth deferring state pension? Read Charles Stanley Direct's guide Don't forget tax There's tax to consider too. Many people automatically take their maximum tax-free pension lump sum in one go, and in many circumstances this can be a good strategy. You can use the cash in the early years of retirement, pay off any mortgage or use it to make Isa contributions to maximise tax efficiency. However, there are alternative ways of drawing on the pot to consider, notably the UFPLS – or 'uncrystallised funds pension lump sum'. This involves slicing off part of your pension and leaving the rest untouched. Every time you take money from your pension pot as an UFPLS, 25 per cent of the amount is tax-free with tax payable at your highest marginal rate of income tax on the other 75 per cent, and this can sometimes be more tax efficient and therefore offer more income. How Charles Stanley Direct can help With lots of moving parts it is hard to decide which is the right course of action, so I would encourage you to speak to a financial professional to help weigh up your options and decide what is right in your circumstances. Charles Stanley Direct offers a free, no commitment, 15-minute call with a qualified professional to discuss your needs. You can then decide whether further financial coaching or more in-depth and specific financial advice would be useful. An adviser can look at all your assets, model different scenarios and help you understand the risks and opportunities around different courses of action, as well as potentially add significant value from a tax perspective.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Tipping a hat to Scotland's social entrepreneurs
Research by American Express earlier this year found that Generation Z business leaders are pioneering a new approach with purpose, profit, and wellbeing at the forefront of their ventures. Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Research by American Express earlier this year found that Generation Z business leaders are pioneering a new approach with purpose, profit and wellbeing at the forefront of their ventures. The study of UK entrepreneurs and senior leaders aged 18-27 revealed that while 88 per cent see hitting profit targets as the key measure of business success, 85 per cent said it's important for their business to solve problems that others don't, and 82 per cent of the sample considered their business to be 'purpose driven'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, what does 'purpose driven' actually mean? Respondents of the survey defined this as a business which 'makes a positive difference to a significant environmental or social issue' (31 per cent), a business 'using its mission and values to guide decision-making' (22 per cent) or one with 'clear ethical credentials' (17 per cent). Leaving a positive legacy was crucial in the study, with 93 per cent of respondents wanting to 'build something that their family will be proud of'. Inmates in Glasgow are being taught the trade of making bread For me, when you see a bona fide purpose-driven business out on the coalface you know – as they say, when you know you know. Back in 2017, I met entrepreneur Matt Fountain, who had given up the chance to study a PhD in the economics of art at Oxford in order to set up social enterprise Freedom Bakery in Low Moss prison near Glasgow. Training inmates to make artisan bread for sale to cafes, restaurants and stores, CEO Fountain said at the time, in a national newspaper report we helped organise: 'We incarcerate people as punishment for a crime, but when they get released they get incarcerated again by society'. Chapeau Matt, chapeau. This week, we handled a press announcement for an initiative which aims to boost the creation and growth of Scottish tech businesses with a social or environmental mission. Techscaler – the Scottish Government's programme for creating, developing and scaling tech startups run by CodeBase – partnered with The Ventures Lab, a global organisation on a mission to support early stage social entrepreneurs, with a view to strengthening the pipeline of impact-driven startups in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Kate Smith, CEO and founder of Edinburgh-based ProfessorMe, is one of the purpose-driven companies already receiving support from the partnership. Having developed what the company describes as 'the world's first AI professor', she talks about improving the educational experience for students across the world, including in countries with disrupted education systems. Nick Freer applauds the rise of purpose-driven businesses As Kate, a former journalist, puts it: 'As a world-positive business, we want to reach learners no matter their personal circumstances or location. Research shows that if a woman receives a university education, it positively impacts her family for the next five generations.' 'We share a vision', says Smith, 'that a better world is possible'. I guess that gets to the heart of things when it comes to social entrepreneurs and purpose-driven businesses. The Matt Fountains and Kate Smiths of the world should be applauded and feted. Social entrepreneurs of the world, unite and take over!
