Putin's chilling plot to march 10,000 troops into ANOTHER European nation revealed by its PM… & it could spiral into WW3
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
RUSSIA reportedly plans to deploy 10,000 troops into a breakaway region of another Eastern European nation - igniting fears of Putin's war spilling further across the continent.
Moldova's Prime Minister has warned the Kremlin wants to march troops into Transnistria - a Moscow-friendly enclave that's internationally recognised as part of Moldova.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
7
Cars wait in line at the crossing point between the self-proclaimed republic of Transnistria and Moldova
Credit: AFP
7
Moldovan Prime Minister Dorin Recean speaks during a press conference
Credit: EPA
7
Russian troops have been based in Transnistria since 1992
Credit: Reuters
7
Russian servicemen walking along at an area in the Kursk region, Russia
Credit: EPA
7
The small landlocked region, sandwiched between Ukraine and the rest of Moldova, has been controlled by separatists for 33 years.
Transnistria receives significant economic and military support from Moscow, and the region's politicians have voiced their intent for it to become part of Russia.
The region's location between the pro-Europe governments in Moldova and Ukraine make it impossible for Putin to get soldiers in at present.
While Moldova currently has an EU-friendly government, its PM has said Russia is meddling in its upcoming election this September.
Prime Minister Dorin Recean told the FT this is likely in the hope that a more pro-Kremlin government might allow for Russian troops to be sent to Transnistria.
"This is a huge effort to undermine Moldovan democracy," he told the paper.
"They want to consolidate their military presence in the Transnistrian region."
Russian troops have been based in Transnistria since 1992, when the Kremlin supported the region in its war of independence from Moldova.
However, the numbers have substantially wound down over the years, with there currently only being about 1,500 soldiers fighting under the Russian banner.
But only a few of these will have actually been sent by Moscow, with most being locals who signed up.
Deranged Putin lays out wish list of 'surrender demands' for Ukraine… despite being humbled by Russia's 'Pearl Harbour'
Transnistria isn't internationally recognised as an independent state, and is not a member of the UN.
Think tank The Institute for the Study of War forecast last October that Russia might use its ties to Transnistria "to establish long-term influence over Moldovan domestic and foreign policies".
Recean further highlighted the ominous military threats to Ukraine and NATO that could arise from extra Russian troops in the region.
Its location to Ukraine's southwest could raise fresh headaches for Kyiv if Russia used Transnistria to open up a new front in the war.
"You can imagine with 10,000 troops, what the leverage and pressure would be on the southwestern part of Ukraine," he said.
But Recean also noted the area's proximity to Romania, which is a NATO country.
If Russian forces threatened or attacked Romania - or any other NATO member - then the entire alliance would be obliged to come to its aid.
NATO Article 5 sets out that an attack on one member state is an attack on all, meaning Russian attacks against a NATO country could quickly spiral into all-out war.
Transnistria's history
Transnistria is a tiny slither of land along Moldova's border with Ukraine
The region has been controlled by Russian backed separatists for decades following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
It declared independence in 1990, which was followed by a war that saw Russia support Transnistria's independence.
Moscow has maintained a strong military presence in the territory since 1992.
Many of Transnistria's political leaders have long voiced their intent for the region to become a part of Russia.
But it still remains internationally recognised as part of Moldova - a country that seeks closer co-operation with the EU.
Transnistria has a population of around 465,000.
Fears of a war between the West and Russia over Transnistria have been amplified by the separatist region's leader Vadim Krasnoselsky.
He told the Russian TASS news agency: "A war in Transnistria would mean a direct conflict between Russia and NATO.
"I don't have the slightest doubt about it. Everything is closely intertwined here.
"Both Romania, a NATO member, and the Russian Federation have interests here."
Recean added that the 10,000-troop figure was based on intelligence assessments.
"Currently, their forces there are almost meaningless," he said.
"But with a higher military presence in Transnistria that a Russia-leaning government can allow for, they can consolidate."
Moldova was part of the Soviet Union before its collapse in 1991.
In recent years, it has sought to pursue closer ties with the European Union, and became an official candidate to join the EU in 2022.
A referendum held last year committing Moldova on its path to EU membership passed by just 0.7% of the vote amid what was widely believed to be a Russian interference campaign.
Recean told the FT that Russia spent the equivalent of 1% of Moldova's GDP on influence campaigns in 2024.
7
A billboard reading 'Russia in our hearts' sits on the side of a road in the town of Tiraspol, the capital of Transnistria
Credit: AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Keir Starmer says trans ruling must be enacted ‘as soon as possible'
Hospitals and government departments refusing to implement the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman must do it 'as soon as possible', Sir Keir Starmer has said, as public bodies continue to defy the law. The prime minister said guidance on how to interpret the court's decision must be 'consistent with the ruling', after reports civil servants and some public bodies were attempting to ignore the judgment that the definition of a woman was to be based on biological sex. The prime minister told reporters he 'accepted the ruling; welcomed the ruling, and everything else flows from that as far as I'm concerned'. He said: 'All guidance of whatever kind needs to be consistent with the ruling and we need to get to that position as soon as possible.' Every organisation in Britain was told to revisit their equality policies after the country's highest court ruled that transgender women were not legally women in reference to the Equality Act in April. However, The Times revealed last month that Whitehall was refusing to implement single-sex spaces in government departments until the equality regulator intervenes. Human resources and staff networks have advised civil servants that the policies remain in effect while they are under review, despite many advising that transgender people are able to use whichever facilities they feel most comfortable with. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is drawing up new guidance that will help public bodies and organisations implement the ruling. The regulator said the guidelines should only be seen as a tool to implement the law and the Supreme Court's judgment 'is effective immediately'. The Times also reported that hospital managers ignored official guidance and said that policies would not change until NHS England responded to the ruling. Maya Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters, said: 'This is an important intervention from the prime minister, given the huge number of public bodies failing to implement the Supreme Court judgment and operating outside the law. Political leadership is essential if women whose rights are being stolen are not to be forced to turn to the courts, where public bodies will end up losing, at great expense to taxpayers. 'It's no coincidence that the private sector has been faster to bring their policies in line with the judgment, recognising what is at stake for the bottom line. Meanwhile most NHS, university and civil service leaders are sitting on their hands. 'The law is clear and there is no need to wait for further guidance from the EHRC or anyone else. Unlike the small businesses and services for which the regulator's guidance is intended, public sector organisations have access to specialist legal advice, as well as extra statutory obligations under the public sector equality duty.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Chris Mason: Labour still has a big persuasion job ahead
"I've not had as much quality time with my colleagues since the Brexit wars," a minister told me with a wry smile.A remark that gets to the heart of this benefits row within the Labour Party: this is a government with a big majority, that has already performed a big U-turn and yet is still involved in a big persuasion is not meant to happen, one year into government, with a working majority of prime minister himself will be getting stuck into some persuading today, making the case that these changes are, as he sees it, not only in keeping with Labour values but essential to ensure the long-term stability of the welfare if Monday's Commons statement from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall was intended to reassure Labour MPs, it is an open question as to whether it worked."It turned a fair few colleagues off. I think it will get through, but it'll be close," said one MPs press Kendall on rollout of benefit changesWelfare cuts: What are the Pip and universal credit changes?What has been driving the rise in disability benefit claims?Faisal Islam: How much will U-turn on disability benefits cost?There has been plenty of talk of there being 40 to 50 Labour MPs who are opposed, but things remain the size of the working majority, rebels would need to amass around 80 of their colleagues to vote against the government to defeat them, everything else being a key factor could be how many choose to abstain in the vote on Tuesday Prof Philip Cowley of Queen Mary University of London notes that the biggest backbench rebellion Sir Keir Starmer has suffered so far is largest rebellion in Tony Blair's first year in Downing Street was 47 and also on the welfare state - over lone parent largest backbench rebellion for any governing party in 200 years was in 2003, over the Iraq the heart of plenty of the concern over these benefits changes is what is being proposed for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) at the end of next November 2026, the plan is the eligibility criteria for the main disability benefit will be Labour MPs and ministers had hoped a review of Pip, conducted by Work and Pensions Minister Sir Stephen Timms and involving disabled people, would reassure colleagues the government's intentions were something they could over and over again in the Commons concerns were raised that the timeframe of the review - itself due to report in the autumn of next year - would mean it would be too late to have an influence on the eligibility criteria for Pip beginning that beneath that there is an underlying critique: that the reason the plans for late next year remain in place is because that way it makes it (a bit) easier for Chancellor Rachel Reeves' numbers to add up - and, to use the jargon, for the measures to be "scored" by the Office for Budget Responsibility when it produces its forecasts, which are so central to the government's management of the plenty of Labour MPs this is wrong-headed, topsy turvy and an increasingly hard-to-defend approach to it is also worth emphasising, as it always is when there is a debate dominated by noisy people, that there are quieter Labour MPs, many keeping their heads down right now, who find this whole row gratuitous and fundamentally naive - and, they argue, it is Labour's duty to grapple with a spiralling benefits Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves have long argued that Labour being seen as credible custodians of the economy is the building block upon which everything else is Chief Whip, Sir Alan Campbell, in charge of winning the vote for the prime minister, has issued a plea for unity - something that only happens when there isn't a surplus of it - and told Labour MPs they should "act as a team". The party, he said, would have to come back together after this difficult vote for will debate the plans all over again later, and the vote is expected early this even if the government does win, that won't be the end of the arguments and votes are expected in the next few weeks.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer has no energy, vision or strategy for Britain on the world stage. He offers only weakness, decline and a disregard for the sovereignty of this nation: NILE GARDINER
Keir Starmer has been a disaster as British Prime Minister. Don't just take my word for it. In the week of the first anniversary of Starmer moving into No 10, the polling guru Sir John Curtice said that he has had 'the worst start for any newly-elected Prime Minister, or Conservative'. By this he means the Starmer government has suffered the biggest fall in public support for a new administration in history.
