General Education Minister V Sivankutty orders probe into Pocso case accused's presence at school event
The minister directed the deputy director of education, Thiruvananthapuram, to conduct an inquiry and submit a report.
The incident came as a major embarrassment to the government that had recently taken stern action against Pocso-accused teaching and non-teaching staff and even removed a few of them from service.
Vlogger Mukesh M Nair was roped in as one of the guests of the event held at Fort High School, West Fort.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 minutes ago
- The Hindu
32-year-old man sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment under POCSO Act in Coimbatore
A 32-year-old man from Ukkadam in Coimbatore city has been sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment by a special POCSO court. M. Rizwan, a resident of Al Ameen Colony in Ukkadam, was arrested in 2021 by the Race Course police in connection with a complaint filed at the All-Woman Police Station (West). The case was registered under Sections 7 read with 8 of the POCSO Act and Section 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code. On Friday, the POCSO Special Court, presided over by Judge T. Bagavathiammal, convicted Rizwan under the POCSO Act and sentenced him to seven years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,000. Rizwan had earlier evaded custody after appearing for trial. When police attempted to detain him, he allegedly threatened self-harm, resulting in a separate case for preventing public servants from discharging their duty. He was later arrested on July 13, 2025 and remanded.
News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
UP: 2 minor girls abducted at gunpoint, raped; accused absconding
Muzaffarnagar(UP), Jul 26 (PTI) Two minor girls, who are cousins, were allegedly gang-raped after being abducted at gunpoint from their home in the Budhana area, officials said on Saturday. A case was registered against the two accused, identified as Pradeep and Gaurav, under sections of the BNS and the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act, Circle Officer (CO)Gajendra Pal Singh said, adding that both men are currently absconding and two police teams have been formed to arrest them. The incident came to light when the minors, aged 15 and 16, returned home and informed their family members about the alleged rape. According to the complaint lodged by the victims' family, Pradeep and Gaurav, also from the same village, arrived on a motorcycle and abducted the girls at gunpoint on Friday. The sisters were taken to another location where the alleged rape occurred. The minors have been sent for medical examination, the police said. PTI COR CDN SHS SHS MPL MPL Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
4 hours ago
- News18
Despite DNA Match With Child, Karnataka HC Refuses To Overturn Acquittal In POCSO Rape Case
The court said while the DNA test confirmed the man was the child's father, absence of supporting oral evidence, especially from the victim, rendered the case legally insufficient The Karnataka High Court recently declined to interfere with the acquittal of a man accused of raping a minor, holding that a DNA match proving paternity does not automatically establish guilt under criminal law. The state had approached the Dharwad Bench of the High Court seeking to overturn the August 2021 acquittal of a 24-year-old man from Belagavi district, who was tried under Section 376(2) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. However, the high court refused to do so, reasoning that while the DNA test confirmed he was the father of the child born to the victim, the absence of any supporting oral evidence, especially from the victim herself, rendered the prosecution's case legally insufficient. The prosecution case was that in January 2015, the accused, then working as a daily wage labourer, allegedly entered into a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl in a remote area near Kyadagi forest, Uttara Kannada. The girl later became pregnant. However, it was only a year later that she lodged a police complaint after the accused began to avoid her. A medical examination confirmed her pregnancy, and a DNA test later matched the accused as the biological father of the baby. But at trial, the victim, along with her close family members, turned hostile, denying that any sexual contact had taken place. With 22 witnesses examined and 37 documents submitted, the prosecution pinned its case almost entirely on medical and forensic evidence. The trial court, however, found the evidence inadequate to meet the threshold of 'beyond reasonable doubt" and acquitted the accused. Challenging this, the state contended that the DNA evidence alone was conclusive of the offence. The high court disagreed. In its judgment delivered on July 10, the bench of Justices R Nataraj and Rajesh Rai K underlined that scientific evidence such as DNA tests must be evaluated in the broader context of all available facts and testimonies. 'The victim herself firmly stated that the accused did not have any sexual intercourse with her. She is not aware who the father of her child is. Even her parents and relatives also deposed similarly. In such circumstance, the DNA report cannot be solely relied to convict the accused," the bench observed. The court drew upon precedents from both the Supreme Court and other high courts, emphasising that DNA profiling is rooted in statistical probability and cannot be treated as infallible. It also warned against treating such reports as conclusive in the absence of procedural safeguards around collection, preservation, and contamination. Citing the principle that appellate courts should not lightly interfere with acquittals where the trial court has taken a plausible view, the high court declined to re-evaluate the trial court's findings. The appeal was dismissed. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
