logo
If not now, then when? Silica dust has been a problem for decades

If not now, then when? Silica dust has been a problem for decades

Yahoo01-05-2025
Hawk's Nest Tunnel during construction in 1930. Workers had to drill through rock that contained high levels of silica, making workers sick within months. (National Park Services photo)
As the West Virginia Legislature wound up its less than stellar session this year, the titled words to this commentary, rooted in the teachings of Hillel the Elder, a Jewish sage who lived in the first century CE, echoed in my mind, reaching an even greater, fevered pitch knowing that JFK and John Lewis were known to echo the phrase often in the context of political and social activism. The power in those five words resounds loud and clear to each of us — at least we can hope they do.
While state legislators were tasked with a number of vital pieces of legislation, I honed in on the continued and shameful disregard for the certain and necessary protections of West Virginia's coal miners whose lives continue to be threatened from the inhalation of silica dust particles, which is the leading cause of black lung disease, along with lung cancer, kidney disease, COPD and cardiovascular illnesses.
In learning that a federal appeals court issued a temporary stay on the implementation of what advocates have called a long overdue industry rule that would have limited how much silica dust coal miners are exposed to, I recalled one of the nation's worst industrial tragedies — the building of the Hawks Nest Tunnel in Fayette County, West Virginia, in the early 1930s, when an economic depression plagued this country. Stop for a minute to consider the incredulity of a period of time fighting the same issue that spans nearly one hundred years. It's outrageous.
In the fall of 1990, shortly after completing my graduate work, I wrote a piece for Goldenseal titled, 'Hawks Nest, the Novel.' Since my graduate thesis focused on the history of early West Virginia authors, it would not have been complete without a discussion of Hubert Skidmore's controversial work. Still, after all these years, the same threat to every coal miner's life continues. It's unfathomable that this is still an issue. In fact, it's obscene. The silica rock that the builders of the Hawks Nest Tunnel drilled through — completely unprotected — is being breathed by Appalachian coal miners today, in 2025.
The tunnel workers developed horrendous coughs and had trouble breathing, ending their shifts covered in a thick blanket of dust. Some died and were buried in unmarked graves in a field in Summersville, often before their families were informed of their death. The only time the dust was abated was when the foreman announced the arrival of the mine inspector and turned on the water to keep the dust down. Once the mine inspector left, the water was turned off and remained off. A reviewer for the New York Times reported in 1941, 'It is a story of crass injustice to make the reader's blood boil.'
Fast forward decades later and the problem persists. Why? The answer is simple — money. Imposing regulations in order to keep the related diseases caused by the breathing of silica dust at bay cost money, and coal operators/owners don't want their bottom lines (i.e., profits) affected negatively. Valuing profits over people's lives is incomprehensible. How can basic, decent concern for your fellow man, the very men who risk their lives to line your pockets with even more profit, be ignored?
Yes, we are a country that is divided at every turn, wrestling with politicians who, on one side, fight for the worker and who, on the other, quite simply don't. Corporate profits versus tighter safety measures for coal miners has a long history, none more obvious than in West Virginia.
Are we going to be writing this same story in yet another decade from now? Are we going to leave it to the next generation to tackle? At what point are we going to say, 'Enough!'
Theodore Roosevelt issued these resounding words: 'There can be no life without change, and to be afraid of what is different or unfamiliar is to be afraid of life.'
I don't think it's inherent in the human spirit to belittle the worker and be concerned only with corporate greed. I think that the latter is a conscious choice that must certainly plague the conscience of those who choose to put their own interests above everything that is inherently decent and good about mankind. I often wonder what events, experiences led someone to toss aside respect and decency and concern for their fellow man and prioritize only their own agenda. I guarantee there is a reason, for to suggest that the workers' concerns are irrelevant is a clear example of pure disregard for those who built this country, brick by brick and shovel by shovel, asking only that they be protected as they reaped enough to provide the basic necessities for their families, while the industry barons rode their backs all the way to the banks, not feeling the least bit responsible for the price paid by the workers. It was unacceptable then, is now, and always will be unacceptable. Yet still, it continues.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Long Island mayor quits after jacking up taxes 87%, costing village nearly $1.5M over antisemitism lawsuit
Long Island mayor quits after jacking up taxes 87%, costing village nearly $1.5M over antisemitism lawsuit

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Long Island mayor quits after jacking up taxes 87%, costing village nearly $1.5M over antisemitism lawsuit

A Long Island suburb found itself suddenly without a mayor — or nearly any government at all — when almost all the town's top officials resigned Thursday after raising property taxes 87%. Atlantic Beach's longtime Mayor George Pappas abruptly stepped alongside his Deputy Mayor Charles Hammerman barely two months after causing a firestorm with a nearly 90% property tax hike — and just days after a nearly $1 million legal settlement was approved by the village board of trustees. The massive payout was part of a federal discrimination lawsuit against the municipality by Chabad Lubavitch of the Beaches — a Jewish organization that purchased a former Capital One bank in 2021 to serve as a synagogue and community center they said is being antisemitically stonewalled by the local government. Advertisement 3 Atlantic Beach's longtime Mayor George Pappas quit after jacking up property taxes by 87%. Village of Atlantic Beach The resignations leave Atlantic Beach temporarily in the hands of just three trustees, but two of them, Patricia Beaumont and Nathan Etrog, are out the door next Monday when newly elected trustees Joseph B. Pierantoni and Laura Heller are sworn in. The pair won their seats in last month's village elections. That means by next week, just one member of the current board — Barry Frohlinger — will remain in office, effectively leaving the village's leadership in a state of near-collapse as residents demand answers over how things spiraled so quickly. Advertisement Calls for Pappas' resignation have been brewing since May, when village officials blindsided homeowners with an 87% spike in property taxes — a move they blamed on decades of flawed assessment practices by Nassau County. But the county pushed back hard, and told The Post the village itself was at fault for improperly billing commercial properties for years, essentially linking the hike to a years-long administrative goof-up. 'Nassau County is not responsible for the Village of Atlantic Beach budget or tax levy, nor do we calculate, bill, collect or distribute village taxes,' said County Assessor Joseph Adamo. Advertisement 3 Deputy Mayor Charles D. Hammerman also resigned from his position. Village of Atlantic Beach Some residents suspect the sky-high tax hike was less about assessment errors and more about covering the legal fees from the village's bitter and expensive legal fight with the Chabad. When village leaders first learned of the plan to build the Chabad, they swiftly moved to block it, launching eminent domain proceedings to seize the building for a village-run facility, leading to a lawsuit the village has largely been on the losing end of by the organization accusing officials of religious discrimination. Earlier this week, the board quietly approved a $950,000 settlement with the Chabad on top of the more than $500,000 the village has already spent in legal fees — and within 48 hours, both the mayor and his deputy were gone. Advertisement 3 East Atlantic Beach, New York has found itself with nearly any government at all. jrossphoto – 'We shouldn't be footing the bill for their antisemitism,' one resident fumed to the The Post. The village's board did not respond to a request for comment.

Donald Trump Calls Bankers 'Shylocks'
Donald Trump Calls Bankers 'Shylocks'

Newsweek

time6 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Calls Bankers 'Shylocks'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump used a term long viewed as an antisemitic slur when referring to unscrupulous bankers during a speech on Thursday. It came as he was touting the impact of his One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed by Congress hours earlier, during a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. "No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases, Shylocks and bad people," he said. "They destroyed a lot of families, but we did the opposite." Shylock refers to the villainous Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice, who demands a pound of flesh from a character unable to repay a loan. It has long been considered a slur. Asked about his use of the term on Thursday night, Trump told reporters that he had "never heard that" it could be considered antisemitic. "To me, a Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates," he said. President Donald Trump speaking at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on Thursday. President Donald Trump speaking at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on Thursday. Alex Brandon/AP This is a developing news story. Updates to follow.

Torres to introduce resolution condemning Ogles over Mamdani, Jeffries comments
Torres to introduce resolution condemning Ogles over Mamdani, Jeffries comments

The Hill

time10 hours ago

  • The Hill

Torres to introduce resolution condemning Ogles over Mamdani, Jeffries comments

Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) said Thursday he is planning to introduce a resolution condemning Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) for using offensive language towards fellow lawmakers, including comments he made against New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. 'I have profound differences of opinion with Assemblymember Mamdani, but we had a mutually respectful conversation last weekend, and we're committed to building a relationship and continuing the dialogue,' Torres said during a Thursday appearance on MSNBC's 'The Briefing Room with Jen Psaki.' 'But I have a deeply felt obligation to speak out against hate, whether it's anti-Jewish bigotry or anti-Muslim bigotry,' he added. Ogles previously accused Mamdani of supporting terrorism and urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to denaturalize and deport him. A week later, the Tennessee lawmaker referred to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) as the 'dollar store Obama' in a social media post on X. 'Dollar Store Obama has been hysterically rambling for over three and a half hours, whining about tax cuts for working Americans, bonuses for our brave law enforcement, and mass deportations of illegals,' Ogles wrote on Thursday. 'He's still droning on like a broken record… Hakeem needs to get off the House floor, take a drug test, and start putting America first – not last.' Torres said the comments are unacceptable and the behavior should not be condoned in the lower chamber. 'That kind of bigotry has no place in the United States of America. America is and should be a multiracial, multiethnic, multireligious democracy whose creed is e pluribus unum,' he told Psaki. 'That's what we should be celebrating on Independence Day.' The Hill has contacted Ogles for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store