
Number Of 'Trumpugees' Leaving America Continues to Rise
A week ahead of a crucial Supreme Court decision on Monday, which delivered yet another blow to the United States' transgender community, Grover Wehman-Brown was at "the bitter end of packing" ahead of their big move to Europe.
Wehman-Brown, a transgender writer and consultant, read the writing on the wall long before the country's top court threw out judicial decisions favoring trans people and sided with states that have introduced bans on youth transgender care, like Tennessee.
In the years since President Donald Trump's first mandate, Wehman-Brown had noticed that things were changing in the country. Last year, in the lead-up to the presidential election, they became sure: the U.S. was no longer a country where their non-traditional, LGBTQ+ family could thrive, or even feel welcome.
They are hardly the only people to feel that way. The past few months have seen a surge in the number of Americans looking into leaving the U.S. or seeking dual citizenship because of the political climate gripping the country, especially LGBTQ+ individuals and families.
A recent survey conducted by Harris Poll found that four in 10 U.S. adults (42 percent) have considered or plan to relocate outside the country to improve their quality of life or financial position. Among younger generations, these numbers were even higher, at 63 percent among Gen Zers and 52 percent among millennials.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva
One company helping Americans relocate to the Netherlands, GTFO Tours, reported a 200 percent increase in inquiries from U.S. nationals in the days following Trump's decision to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to quell anti-deportation protests in Los Angeles last month. The company refers to them as "Trumpugees."
"I think a lot of Americans have sort of been waiting to see how things are going, but they just keep getting worse," Bethany Quinn, a relocation coach working for GTFO Tours, told Newsweek.
Since January, there has been a series of crucial "moments" that have been identified with a spike in interest among U.S. nationals to relocate abroad.
"The inauguration was one of the moments, where on the first day Trump issued 30 different executive orders that reversed 60+ years of progress that people have made," Quinn said. "And then, I think, the fact that Trump took control of the military to attack U.S. citizens [in Los Angeles] was also deeply deeply concerning."
That might have been the moment when many Americans realized that even living in a blue state couldn't keep them away from the conservative wave sweeping the country.
"I think in the past, there have been a lot of very wealthy people who have sort of moved around depending on when and where the tax laws are," Quinn said. "And I think there is probably an increase in folks doing that too now, but a lot of Americans are just looking to have a peaceful life. They just wanna live their lives and they don't want to worry about their safety. They don't wanna worry about their government collapsing."
'I Don't Want To Shrink Again'
Wehman-Brown is originally from rural Ohio, but has moved with their wife to many different cities and regions around the U.S. for the 14 years they have been together, "trying to find the right mix of things we need in our life."
That includes LGBTQ+ friendly places with strong economies and job opportunities, access to nature and greenery, a good environment to raise kids, and that are neither too hot nor too expensive.
For the past decade, they have been moving back and forth between the San Francisco Bay Area and western Massachusetts, where they lived until last week. But even these places, regarded among the most liberal in the country, did not offer Wehman-Brown's family the safety and stability they were seeking.
"I have been working in social justice communications and tracking the news very closely, both in terms of housing costs and housing unaffordability and the increasingly fraying social net. And I was seeing that crisis continue to get worse and worse," Wehman-Brown told Newsweek.
"I was also working for an organization tracking and responding to white supremacy; and as I was tracking the rise of the right, I started talking very seriously with my wife about considering making life elsewhere."
Grover Wehman-Brown (inset). Main: Wehman-Brown's family during a visit to the Netherlands ahead of their move from the United States.
Grover Wehman-Brown (inset). Main: Wehman-Brown's family during a visit to the Netherlands ahead of their move from the United States.
Grover Wehman-Brown/EPLi
Wehman-Brown became increasingly aware that LGBTQ+ people in the U.S. were facing a political and legal backlash. "I found myself becoming more and more isolated again as I was assessing increased risk," they said.
"I'm trans and I'm visibly gender non-conforming and I grew up in the 90s in rural Ohio and experienced a lot of violence, people running me off the roads, job discrimination, people slamming me into lockers, people threatening to kill me or assault me for being in a straight bar," they said.
"That kind of constant threat and vigilance is what I came out into, and it feels like we've returned to a time where some of those tensions are present again in my life," they said, even though they were living "in one of the most liberal and queer-affirming states in our country."
Wehman-Brown decided they didn't want to "shrink" again, and they wanted their kids, aged 10 and 12, to live the best lives possible.
"They are at a very specific time in their lives, where what happens in the next 10 years is going to set the stage for their life," they said.
Making Life Elsewhere
About three weeks into the second Trump administration, when Elon Musk started mass layoffs and cuts at federal agencies, Wehman-Brown and their wife decided to move their family to the Netherlands.
"I had gone to the Netherlands once 15 years ago, and I really liked the short amount of time I spent there, so I was like, 'this is really a lovely place where everybody seems busy and purposeful, but cooperating well together and things are running smoothly,'" they said.
Free health insurance, well-funded schools and the widespread use of English in Dutch society sealed the deal. However, despite numerous perks to look forward to, it has been challenging to take the step to leave the U.S., potentially for good.
"Emotionally, it's just been very hard to unwind the connections and community relationships we've built here," Wehman-Brown said.
"And I also love the land we live on, our house. It's sad to walk away from caring for it," they added.
"Logistically, we were pretty worried about finding a house, because we've heard it's been really challenging," they said.
But working with a company that helps expats find housing in the Netherlands, Wehman-Brown and their family have found a "really great apartment" to rent, which also allowed them to get a Dutch-American Friendship Treaty (DAFT) visa.
This visa, aimed at American entrepreneurs, "is one of the easiest ways for Americans to move to Europe," Quinn said. "A lot of other countries have start-up visas, but they tend to have higher capital requirements, and they also are pickier about what kind of industry you can work in," they added.
"But in the Netherlands, you can really do pretty much any kind of freelancing. I know a guy who sells brownies at the market and has a very successful business," they said.
Wehman-Brown hopes to continue working in writing and consulting, while their kids have luckily found a spot in an international school in the Netherlands. Despite their disillusionment with how things are going in the U.S., Wehman-Brown has not given up on the country entirely yet.
"I still believe that this country is full of mostly amazing, brave, creative people who ultimately want to live peacefully together," they said. "And I'm hopeful that the U.S. in 15 or 20 years might be a place where I want to spend large chunks of my life again."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
16 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump pleads ignorance after using antisemitic slur
President Trump on Friday morning said he was unaware that the word "Shylock" is considered by some to be antisemitic, after using it during a Thursday night rally in Iowa. What to know: Shylock, the villain of Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice," was written as a greedy and vengeful Jewish moneylender who eventually is forced to convert to Christianity. What Trump said at the rally: "Think of that: no death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker. And in some cases, Shylocks and bad people." What the Anti Defamation League said via X: "The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible. It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States." What Trump said the next day to reporters: "I've never heard it that way. To me, Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way, you view it differently than me. I've never heard that." Flashback: In 2014, then-Vice President Biden used the term "Shylocks" to refer to rapacious bankers, after which he apologized for his "poor choice of words."

CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
Russia welcomes Trump's cut to Ukraine's military aid but it could be deadly for Kyiv
The reactions to the Trump administration's decision to pause some weapons shipments to Ukraine couldn't be more illustrative of the conflict: welcomed by the Kremlin, branded 'inhumane' by Kyiv. The Pentagon said on Wednesday that it was pausing some aid because it needs to review whether the assistance that is provided to Ukraine is aligned with US President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. But the move could have deadly consequences for Ukraine as the halt on shipments includes missiles for Patriots, the US-made air defense systems that are currently protecting millions of Ukrainian civilians from Russia's increasingly massive daily aerial attacks. Kyiv endured the biggest ever attack overnight into Friday, with 13 dreadful hours of explosions and buzzing overhead as Russia launched a record 539 drones towards the Ukrainian capital and 11 cruise and ballistic missiles, according to the country's air force. As the smoke began to clear over the city, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky praised the military for shooting down or jamming the majority of the Russian drones and missiles. 'It is critically important that our partners continue to support us in defending against ballistic missiles. Patriots and the missiles for them are true protectors of life,' he said – a remark clearly aimed at trying to persuade Trump to reconsider the pause. Zelensky got a chance to make the case directly to Trump when the two spoke by phone on Friday. A readout of the call from Zelensky's office said the two leaders 'agreed that we will work together to strengthen protection of our skies.' 'We are ready for direct projects with the United States and believe this is critically important for security, especially when it comes to drones and related technologies,' the readout said. No other air defense system can match the Patriots in its effectiveness – but their power comes at a huge cost, their production is limited and the demand for them is growing rapidly around the world, especially in areas deemed by the Trump administration to be more strategically important – such as the Middle East or, southwest Asia and South Korea. The announcement by the US sent shockwaves through Ukraine, with presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak saying it would be 'very strange' and 'inhumane' to stop supplying missiles that are used to protect civilians. But despite the panicked reaction, the move was not entirely unexpected. Trump has threatened to withdraw Ukraine's support in a bid to force Kyiv to the negotiating table, and he has previously briefly paused shipments of aid. While the US was for a long time Ukraine's biggest supporter, singlehandedly covering about 40% of Ukraine's military needs, it has not announced any new aid to Ukraine since early January, when Trump returned to power. Meanwhile, European countries have stepped up their support of Ukraine. According to the German Kiel Institute, which monitors aid to Ukraine, Europe has now surpassed the US as the biggest donor – having supported Ukraine to the tune of 72 billion euro ($85 billion) in total military aid since the start of the full-scale invasion to the end of April, compared to 65 billion euro ($76.6 billion) from the US. But the numbers don't tell the whole story. 'Ukraine has a lot of different needs, and some of them can be filled by other suppliers, but some can only be filled by the United States,' Daniel Byman, director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), told CNN. 'For ballistic missiles in particular, only the US can provide this. A cut off in those leaves a huge gap in Ukraine and air defenses. And given the kind of daily and horrible Russian attacks, that's very consequential.' Russia has ramped up its airborne attacks against Ukraine in recent weeks. Ballistic missiles pose the deadliest threat and, according to Ukrainian officials, Russia fired as many as 80 of these in June alone. While Ukraine managed to shoot some of them down, likely with the Patriot system, the ones that slipped through caused unimaginable suffering. One ballistic missile strike killed 21 people in Dnipro last week. The week before that, 21 people were killed when a ballistic missile hit an apartment building in Kyiv. Deadly attacks like this will become more frequent if Ukraine loses access to the Patriots, which are widely considered to be among the best air defense systems available. They are capable of bringing down cruise and hypersonic missiles, short-range ballistic missiles and aircraft. According to analysts, the Ukrainian military has been using them in an extremely effective way, shooting down missiles that Moscow claimed were impossible to intercept, such as the Kinzhal ballistic missiles. At an estimated cost of about $1.1 billion for each system, the Patriots are by far the most expensive piece of equipment sent by allies to Ukraine. According to the CSIS, missile rounds for the Patriot come in at roughly $4 million each – an incredibly high price tag. But even if Ukraine had the cash to purchase these systems, which it doesn't, it would find it difficult to source them. 'The production pace of Patriot missiles is low. Not because the US doesn't want to produce more, but because it's very sophisticated – you can't produce thousands a year, you can produce hundreds and you have allies all over the world who need them,' Pavel Luzin, a senior fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, said Thursday during a discussion at the NEST Center, a think tank. Lockheed Martin, which manufactures the Patriot missiles for the US Army, has been ramping up production to record levels – but even so, it is only able to make just over 500 per year, with a plan to increase production to 650 a year by 2027. A major $5.5 billion deal between US and German companies to begin manufacturing the Patriot missiles outside of the US for the first time was approved last year following a NATO order of up to 1,000 rounds – but the first deliveries are not expected until several years from now. Germany, which has donated several of its Patriot systems to Ukraine in the past, is looking into the option of purchasing some missiles for Ukraine from the US, the spokesperson for the German government said in a news conference on Friday. Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a UK-based defense think tank, said that while global stockpiles of Patriot missiles are not 'critically low,' there are some grounds for concern about shortages. 'The requirement for Patriots, particularly in the Indo-Pacific, is growing significantly,' he said. He said that given that some of the missiles initially meant for Ukraine were diverted to other allies, including Israel, it was likely that the US wanted to – or even had contractual obligations to – deliver interceptors to countries who are, in some cases, located within range of Iranian missiles. Still, Kaushal said the US itself is highly unlikely to face any kind of urgent shortage of missiles. 'While the US has sent a considerable number of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine it has replenished stocks through buy-back schemes from Japan and more recent shipments were diverted from export customers rather than the US' own inventory,' he said in a note emailed to CNN. Zelensky said previously that Ukraine would need some 25 Patriot batteries to defend its airspace effectively. It has roughly half a dozen at the moment, although the exact numbers and their locations are closely guarded secrets. What is known, though, is that the Ukrainians are very worried about running out of the munitions – especially because the latest US pause doesn't concern future aid but impacts deliveries that have been approved and funded and were on their way to Ukraine, where the military was counting on receiving them in the very near future. 'One thing is not having future sales approved; another is stopping what is already in the pipeline. And so that's a very negative shift that is harmful for the future defense of Ukraine and the effect is going to be pretty quick. The Russian attacks are happening daily, and Ukraine relies on these systems to counter them,' Byman said. The pause in shipments is likely to give yet another boost to Russia. 'It's part of (the Russians') strategy. They believe that without the US support, Ukraine is more likely to collapse or at least make concessions… so it certainly increases the incentives for Russia to keep military pressure on Ukraine,' Byman said. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a US-based conflict monitor, said that previous delays in deliveries of aid to Ukraine have invariably accelerated Russian gains on the battlefield. When the US dragged its feet on military aid in late 2023 and early 2024, Russia pushed forward in Avdiivka in eastern Ukraine. When the US paused intelligence sharing with Ukraine in March, Russian forces advanced in Kursk. 'The suspension of US aid to Ukraine will reinforce Russian President Vladimir Putin's theory of victory that posits that Russia can win the war of attrition by making slow, creeping advances and outlasting Western support for Ukraine,' the ISW said. The pause in shipments will likely reinforce Putin's belief that time is on Russia's side – and that if he can delay negotiations for long enough, his troops will eventually outlast Western assistance to Ukraine. For Ukrainians, who have sacrificed so much trying to defend their country against a bigger, stronger aggressor, the absence of US military aid is not just yet another setback – it's potentially a disaster. CNN's Svitlana Vlasova, Kosta Gak and Victoria Butenko contributed reporting.


Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom Is Heading to a Key 2028 State
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom is heading to South Carolina, likely to be a key Democratic primary state, amid speculation he plans to run for president in 2028. Newsweek reached out to Newsom's office for comment via email. Why It Matters Newsom has long been believed to be a potential presidential candidate for Democrats, and his trip to early-voting South Carolina is likely to continue to fuel that speculation. Newsom has cast himself as a leading rival to President Donald Trump amid his second term in office. Several prominent Democrats are expected to jump into the race. While the primary is still more than two years away, potential candidates are already making early moves with the goal of giving themselves an advantage among Democratic primary voters. What to Know The South Carolina Democratic Party (SCDP) announced a multi-county tour with Newsom across some of the most "economically challenged and environmentally vulnerable rural counties in South Carolina" next week. Several of these counties have experienced "hardship" from job loss, wildfires and hurricanes, the SCDP wrote in a statement, adding that the rural areas have been "left behind" by Republican leaders in the state. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference on March 26, 2025 in Los Angeles. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference on March 26, 2025 in Los Angeles. Frazer Harrison/WireImage via Getty Images It will also give Newsom the opportunity to engage with voters in what is likely to be an early-voting state. South Carolina voted first in the 2024 primary but has long been among the four first states to vote—along with Iowa, Nevada and New Hampshire. Whether the schedule may change remains unclear at this point. The statement, however, makes no mention of his potential 2028 ambitions. SCDP Chair Christale Spain wrote in a statement that Newsom "leads the largest economy in America and the fourth largest in the world" and is "coming to meet folks in towns that have been hollowed out by decades of Republican control." "This is about building partnerships, uplifting communities, and showing rural voters they aren't forgotten," Spain wrote. Gavin Newsom's Chance of Winning 2028 Primary—Polls Newsom has been among the leading candidates in most polls of the 2028 primary, along with former Vice President Kamala Harris, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The latest Morning Consult poll of the potential 2028 field showed that Newsom's standing doubled after the Los Angeles protests over Trump's immigration policies and mass deportations. Eleven percent said they planned to support him, up from 5 percent in March. Still, 34 percent said they leaned toward Harris. Seven percent said they planned to vote for Buttigieg and Ocasio-Cortez. The poll surveyed 1,000 Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents from June 13 to June 15, 2025. An Emerson College poll last month showed Newsom with 12 percent support, compared to 16 percent for Buttigieg, 13 percent for Harris and 7 percent for Ocasio-Cortez. The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters from June 24 to June 25, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. What People Are Saying Spain wrote in the press release: "Our strategy isn't about chasing cable news coverage, it's about showing up and building trust, town by town, county by county, that is our path back to power. We're proud of the gains we are making but we're even more focused on what's ahead." Newsom told The Wall Street Journal in June: "I'm not thinking about running, but it's a path that I could see unfold." What Happens Next Typically, most candidates do not begin announcing presidential runs until after the midterm elections. Newsom has not confirmed plans to run for president.