logo
Why those born in the 1990s could face a state pension age of 74... here's how to protect yourself

Why those born in the 1990s could face a state pension age of 74... here's how to protect yourself

Daily Mail​a day ago
Sticking with raising the state pension according to the popular 'triple lock' while keeping the bill affordable could be bad news for people in their 30s and younger.
A high profile think tank report last week included a reminder about government modelling on how to limit public spending on the state pension to below 6 per cent of national income,
To achieve this AND retain the triple lock guarantee - by which payments are increased by at least 2.5 per cent a year - the state pension age would have to rise to 69 by 2048–49, and then jump to 74 by 2068–69.
The new pension review from the Institute for Fiscal Studies called on the Government to promise to never means-test the state pension.
It's view is that the state pension age should only rise as longevity at older ages rises, but by less than that - meaning the average time spent receiving the state pension would increase.
So how likely are drastic state pension age rises, and how do you protect your savings and get them on the path to a comfortable retirement.
Savings plan: Opting out of pensions when you're young has an outsize impact on your eventual fund, because you miss out on compound growth - scroll down to find out more
What are current plans for raising the state pension age?
The state pension is currently almost £12,000 a year if you have paid enough in to receive the full amount.
The qualifying age is 66, and between 2026 and 2028 it will rise to 67 - but the next rise to 68 is still up in the air.
Officially, it is not scheduled until the mid 2040s, which would affect those born on or after April 1977.
The Government is required by law to review the state pension age periodically. However, the last two reports in 2017 and 2023 recommended speeding up the increase to 68 - and then went ignored.
The next review isn't due until spring 2029, but Labour might take as little notice of any findings as the Tories.
Denmark's government recently moved to hike its retirement age to 70 by 2040, reigniting the debate about what might happen here.
Money experts pointed out raising the state pension age was going to carry on being a political hot potato, and future changes would have to be carried out with care.
One noted that raising the state pension age risks hitting those most dependent on it the hardest.
Meanwhile, the minimum pension age for accessing workplace and other private retirement savings is due to rise from 55 to 57 from April 2028.
Governments have in the past tended to keep the state pension and private pension ages roughly 10 years apart, so any future increases could well continue to happen in tandem.
What does the IFS say about the state pension age?
In its influential new pensions report, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said the state pension age should be linked to rises in longevity.
But it suggested that the qualifying age is raised by less than that, so the average time people receive the payments for would go up.
It notes that longevity at older ages during the late 20th century and early 21st century increased dramatically.
It adds: 'Increasing the state pension age is a reasonable way for a government to control the increased public finance pressures arising from rising longevity at older ages.
'Our modelling shows that increasing the state pension age by one year would save the exchequer around £6billion per year.'
But it points out the 'different distributional effect' of using age rises to control the rising cost of the state pension.
'Retaining the triple lock while raising the state pension age would hit poorer people more because the loss of a year of state pension income is more important for those with lower life expectancy (which poorer people tend to have), as they spend fewer years above the state pension age.
'On the other hand, those with a higher life expectancy benefit relatively more from the triple lock, as they are more likely to be receiving a generously indexed state pension in their 90s and beyond.'
The IFS says its stance of only raising the state pension age as longevity at older ages rises leaves room to prioritise increasing, or holding down, the state pension age to different extents.
It is also consistent with keeping the ratio of adult life spent above the state pension age constant, it says.
'The current government should clearly set out a plan for when we will get to a state pension age of 68 – and specifically whether this should be brought forward.
'This is particularly timely and important now, as both independent reviews of the state pension age have sensibly recommended that any changes to the state pension age be communicated to people at least 10 years in advance.
'The government should promptly conduct a new review of the state pension age, using the latest projections of longevity, and make a swift decision on when (not if) these increases should come in.'
Looking ahead: Don't opt out of pensions unless you are suffering serious hardship, despite other financial pressures and priorities
In your 30s or younger? What should you do to plan ahead
Auto enrolment means younger workers are nudged into saving minimum amounts towards retirement, which should generate a fund that combined with the state pension provides an adequate but not luxurious lifestyle.
It's important not to opt out unless you are suffering serious hardship, despite other pressures and priorities like buying a property and starting a family.
This is not just because you are harming your future finances, but delaying or pausing pension contributions while you are young has an outsize impact on your eventual retirement fund.
The stark reality was shown in a recent study by Standard Life, which found putting off starting a pension for five years in your 20s can create a £40,000 hole in your savings - see below.
That is because you miss out on the power of compound growth, which is hugely beneficial if you start young because it has more time to work.
Compound growth means because any investment return stays in your pot, you then make a return on that higher amount, and then a return on that even larger sum, and so on over and again.
You might start with a small contribution to a pension, but making returns on your returns will still have an exponential effect in the longer run.
How much delaying pension saving can cost you
Under auto enrolment, the minimum contribution is 8 per cent of your earnings that fall between £6,240 and £50,270. But this is split three ways, with you putting in 4 per cent, your employer contributing 3 per cent, and the Government adding 1 per cent in tax relief.
If you put in more, many employers will increase their contributions too.
Dean Butler of Standard Life offers the following tips to young people on saving a decent pension.
1. Make sure you're taking advantage of all the benefits of your pension plan and of the support offered by your employer - a higher contribution matching scheme, for example.
2. If you get a bonus, receive overtime pay, get a pay rise or have a little extra savings, think about paying more into your pension.
3. Keep an eye on your investments, and the returns they're giving you. Higher-risk investments potentially see more growth over the long term, but their value might be more volatile.
In your 20s, you might feel happier with some higher-risk investment, as your pension has more time to potentially recover from dips in the market – but this won't be right for everyone.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fewer jury trials could take place to prevent 'total system collapse' of UK's courts
Fewer jury trials could take place to prevent 'total system collapse' of UK's courts

Sky News

time28 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Fewer jury trials could take place to prevent 'total system collapse' of UK's courts

Fewer jury trials could take place as part of proposed reforms to prevent a "total system collapse" of the UK's courts and tackle a record-high backlog of cases. Sir Brian Leveson, chairman of the independent review of the criminal courts, has also recommended more cases should be settled out of court as he unveiled plans to shake up the structure of the system and reclassify offences. The recommendations are part of a bid to cut the backlog where some cases are listed for 2029. It comes as the crown court backlog in England and Wales passed 75,000 cases for the first time, rising to 76,957 at the end of March. Sir Brian's recommendations have been modelled to save approximately 9,000 sitting days in the crown court each year, by diverting cases to magistrates' courts or to the proposed Crown Court Bench Division for trials to be heard by judges. Juries would be reserved to hear the most serious cases, and there would be a greater use of cautions to divert more cases away from court. Sir Brian said: "It is well recognised that justice delayed is justice denied but the record and rising court backlog means victims, witnesses and defendants are waiting months, sometimes years, for cases to come to trial - unable to move on with their lives. "This situation is simply unacceptable. "The recommendations I have put forward represent a cohesive package of reforms designed to transform our courts into a system that provides appropriate and fair decision-making. "It also takes a proportionate approach to trial processes while maintaining the fundamental right to a fair trial. "These are not small tweaks but fundamental changes that will seek to make the system fit for the 21st century." Either way, offences with a maximum custodial sentence of two years or less, such as possession of drugs, bike theft and voyeurism, could face lower penalties of 12 months imprisonment or less. Defendants in cases for offences including assault of an emergency worker, stalking and possessing an indecent photograph of a child would also no longer be able to choose a jury trial. A new Crown Court Bench Division, made up of two magistrates and a judge would deal with less serious offences, as well as complex cases such as fraud. Sir Brian also suggested the threshold for criminal damage being dealt with as a summary only offence be increased from £5,000 to £10,000. The review report published on Wednesday made up the first part of Sir Brian's recommendations, with a second report focusing on court efficiency expected to be published later this year. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said ministers will now consider the recommendations and will respond ahead of legislating changes in the autumn. The Lord Chancellor said: "I have already lifted courts funding to record levels, funding 4,000 more court sitting days than under my predecessors. 6:48 "But swifter justice requires bold reform, and that is what I asked Sir Brian Leveson to propose. "As part of our Plan for Change, I will do whatever it takes to bring down the backlog and deliver swifter justice for victims." Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said: "As Sir Brian rightly identifies, criminal justice in this country runs the risk of 'total system collapse' unless we take the radical steps needed to reverse years of decline. "It cannot be right that in London more than 100 trials listed are for 2029. This is intolerable for victims and all parties who rely on a properly functioning court system to provide closure from what are often traumatic experiences, made worse by persistent delays. "I welcome this report and look forward to working with partners across government to deliver the bold reforms that are now a necessity, not an option."

Springfield predicts surge in demand for homes in Highlands
Springfield predicts surge in demand for homes in Highlands

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Springfield predicts surge in demand for homes in Highlands

The company boosted its balance sheet in February by selling a portfolio of sites that it said were primarily located across Central Scotland for £64m to giant rival Barratt Redrow. Springield said then that the proceeds from the land sale would be used to reduce the company's bank debt and 'capitalise on the significant growth opportunities emerging in the North of Scotland'. In an update on trading in the year to May 31 issued yesterday, Moray-based Springfield underlined its confidence in the wisdom of that judgement. READ MORE: As Chevron closes Aberdeen office, what now for North Sea jobs? The company said: 'Springfield's strategic focus going forward is on the North of Scotland where the Board believes substantial opportunities exist driven by incoming UK Government-financed net zero infrastructure development. 'The net zero infrastructure development will require new housing for the thousands of additional workers that are needed to deliver and operate the projects as well as the long-term growth in population as a result of the economic stimulus to the region.' Springfield's chief executive Innes Smith reckons the development of net zero infrastructure is well underway in the area the company is targeting. Springfield is working with the infrastructure providers, the Scottish Government and the Highland and Moray councils to address the need for housing. The net zero investment does not appear to have allowed Springfield to outperform the market in recent months, amid concerns about the outlook for the broader economy. The company said: 'In private housing … sales during the year continued to be impacted by subdued market conditions.' The group's portfolio includes the Dawn Homes, Walker Group, Tulloch Homes and Mactaggart & Mickel businesses, which it has acquired in the last seven years. READ MORE: Scale of SNP Government climate change failings underlined by experts Springfield highlighted apparent caution on the part of existing homeowners, who may be less eager to complete deals that first time buyers. The company noted: 'The Group experienced a lengthening of the sales cycle, particularly from existing homeowner buyers. Therefore, while reservation rates have remained steady, private housing completions have been slightly lower than anticipated.' Pressure on private home sales has been offset by an increase in affordable housing revenues accompanied by a significant improvement in the related gross profit margin. Springfield said the margin returned to double digits. On its website, Springfield says its Partnerships division works with councils, housing associations, and registered social landlords across Scotland. In the update the company said the improvement in gross margin was primarily due to it having completed its low-margin legacy contracts at the end of the preceding year. The contracts delivered in the latest financial year were agreed on 'much stronger commercial terms'. READ MORE: Shoppers flock to Sainsbury's amid supermarket price wars The land sale deal agreed with Barratt Redrow also provided a boost to profits. Springfield told investors: 'The Group's land sales were highly profitable and, as a result, the Group expects to report a substantial increase in profit before tax for the year, in line with current market expectations.' The group said it is in talks about other potential land sales without providing details. Springfield expects to be able to use the proceeds of the deal agreed with Barratt Redrow to fund investment in its preferred areas and to be able to clear its bank debt. The deal covered the sale of six sites, five of which have completed. The sale of the sixth site is expected to complete in coming weeks. The group reduced bank debt to £21m at the end of the latest year, from £39.9m at the end of the preceding period. In the year to May 31 2024 Springfield made £9.7m profit before tax on sales of £267m. Springfield is still active in the central belt market. It is working with Barratt Redrow on plans for a big development near Stirling under a deal agreed in June last year. Figures from Halifax suggest the Scottish market has been in better shape than much of the UK in recent months. On Monday the latest house price index from the lender showed the average house price rose by 4.9% in Scotland in the year to June 30, to £214,891. The average price rose by 2.6% across the UK, to £296,665. In a first quarter trading update issued in April, Barratt Redrow said it had delivered a solid private reservation performance. The company said: 'The fundamentals for our industry remain strong, with a clear need for new homes across all tenures and a national focus on accelerating delivery.' Barratt Redrow will publish its next trading update on July 17. Shares in Springfield Properties closed up 2.5p, at 103p, on the main market of the London Stock Exchange.

Scottish Labour MP to vote against welfare reforms despite Keir Starmer climbdown
Scottish Labour MP to vote against welfare reforms despite Keir Starmer climbdown

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Scottish Labour MP to vote against welfare reforms despite Keir Starmer climbdown

EXCLUSIVE: Brian Leishman warned the UK Government is "still proposing enormous cuts" to welfare. A Scottish Labour MP is still to vote against the UK Government's welfare reforms despite a drastic U-turn last week. Brian Leishman said his party's government "is still proposing enormous cuts" and said it was "telling that no disability charity or organisation has come out and backed the new Bill." ‌ The Alloa and Grangemouth MP was one of four Scottish Labour representatives who voted against the government on the issue last week. ‌ Leishman said: "The welfare Bill is still proposing enormous cuts of £2 billion to some of the most vulnerable people in our society. "After the shambles of last week in the Chamber where concessions were being offered and MPs didn't know where the government was at, it is telling that after all that, that no disability charity or organisation has come out and backed the new Bill. "I cannot support it in its current deeply flawed format. I still think the government should withdraw it and start again." Last week's other Scots rebels - Irene Campbell, Tracy Gilbert and Euan Stainbank - are yet to say how they will vote. MPs backed the disability benefit changes by 335 votes to 260 after the UK Government U-turned on the main part of its plans. DWP minister Stephen Timms announced just 90 minutes before the vote that it would delay plans to limit who is eligible for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) until after a review. The change had been due to come into force in November 2026. ‌ The late concession came as the Government faced a possible defeat in the House of Commons. It followed an earlier U-turn where the Government announced the changes to PIP would only apply to new claimants and rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit. This was caused by an attempt to kill the bill which had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters - including a dozen Scottish MPs. ‌ Most Scots on disability benefits are on the devolved Adult Disability Payment (ADP), rather than PIP. The Scottish Government has said it will not cut ADP.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store