
Fewer jury trials could take place to prevent 'total system collapse' of UK's courts
Sir Brian Leveson, chairman of the independent review of the criminal courts, has also recommended more cases should be settled out of court as he unveiled plans to shake up the structure of the system and reclassify offences.
The recommendations are part of a bid to cut the backlog where some cases are listed for 2029.
It comes as the crown court backlog in England and Wales passed 75,000 cases for the first time, rising to 76,957 at the end of March.
Sir Brian's recommendations have been modelled to save approximately 9,000 sitting days in the crown court each year, by diverting cases to magistrates' courts or to the proposed Crown Court Bench Division for trials to be heard by judges.
Juries would be reserved to hear the most serious cases, and there would be a greater use of cautions to divert more cases away from court.
Sir Brian said: "It is well recognised that justice delayed is justice denied but the record and rising court backlog means victims, witnesses and defendants are waiting months, sometimes years, for cases to come to trial - unable to move on with their lives.
"This situation is simply unacceptable.
"The recommendations I have put forward represent a cohesive package of reforms designed to transform our courts into a system that provides appropriate and fair decision-making.
"It also takes a proportionate approach to trial processes while maintaining the fundamental right to a fair trial.
"These are not small tweaks but fundamental changes that will seek to make the system fit for the 21st century."
Either way, offences with a maximum custodial sentence of two years or less, such as possession of drugs, bike theft and voyeurism, could face lower penalties of 12 months imprisonment or less.
Defendants in cases for offences including assault of an emergency worker, stalking and possessing an indecent photograph of a child would also no longer be able to choose a jury trial.
A new Crown Court Bench Division, made up of two magistrates and a judge would deal with less serious offences, as well as complex cases such as fraud.
Sir Brian also suggested the threshold for criminal damage being dealt with as a summary only offence be increased from £5,000 to £10,000.
The review report published on Wednesday made up the first part of Sir Brian's recommendations, with a second report focusing on court efficiency expected to be published later this year.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said ministers will now consider the recommendations and will respond ahead of legislating changes in the autumn.
The Lord Chancellor said: "I have already lifted courts funding to record levels, funding 4,000 more court sitting days than under my predecessors.
6:48
"But swifter justice requires bold reform, and that is what I asked Sir Brian Leveson to propose.
"As part of our Plan for Change, I will do whatever it takes to bring down the backlog and deliver swifter justice for victims."
Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said: "As Sir Brian rightly identifies, criminal justice in this country runs the risk of 'total system collapse' unless we take the radical steps needed to reverse years of decline.
"It cannot be right that in London more than 100 trials listed are for 2029. This is intolerable for victims and all parties who rely on a properly functioning court system to provide closure from what are often traumatic experiences, made worse by persistent delays.
"I welcome this report and look forward to working with partners across government to deliver the bold reforms that are now a necessity, not an option."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rayner backs down in Islamophobia free speech row
Angela Rayner has backed down on 'secretive' plans for a new definition of Islamophobia after free speech campaigners threatened legal action. The Deputy Prime Minister has expanded and extended a public consultation over the proposals, which critics fear will rubber-stamp a controversial definition. The consultation will now run for an extra week and a link for responses to the plans has been made public. The move followed complaints by the Free Speech Union (FSU), which said the new definition was being drawn up behind closed doors. The FSU wrote to Ms Rayner expressing concern that the process would enshrine a definition which treats Islamophobia as a type of racism. The definition has been criticised for being so expansive that it could threaten free speech, act as a de facto blasphemy law and stifle legitimate criticism of Islam as a religion. In his letter, Lord Young, the general secretary of the FSU, said the consultation questions appeared to be 'heavily weighted' in favour of a 'predetermined outcome', endorsing a definition 'closely aligned' with that put forward by the all party parliamentary group (APPG) on British Muslims. The APPG definition was adopted by Labour and stated that 'Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness'. Lord Young said key groups that might challenge the definition over its impact on free speech and provide alternative views had not been invited to submit evidence. He listed Christian Concern, the Christian Institute, the Adam Smith Institute, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Ms Rayner's department has extended the deadline to July 20 and widened the consultees. Lord Young said it needed to give sufficient time to take on board all the responses to the plan. Lord Young said: 'I'm glad the working group has abandoned its plans to confine its consultation to a small group of hand-picked activists in response to my letter. 'But given that the group will now be carrying out a proper consultation and extending the deadline, I trust it will delay coming up with a definition of Islamophobia until it has had a proper chance to consider all the responses. 'Hoping to complete its work within a couple of months is now completely unrealistic.' A spokesman for Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'The independent working group is listening to a broad range of views and perspectives. 'The call for evidence will enable them to build on the extensive consultation already undertaken, ensuring the advice provided to Government reflects diverse experiences and opinions, while also safeguarding our vital and unwavering right to freedom of speech.'


Sky News
37 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ex-Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry defects to Reform
Former Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry has defected to Reform, in the latest blow to the Conservatives. The former MP for Rossendale and Darwen, who served as Northern Powerhouse minister under Boris Johnson, said he had defected to Nigel Farage's party because the Tories had "lost their way".


The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
BMW secretly followed, filmed and then sacked worker over injury claim
A disabled BMW worker was discriminated against and unfairly dismissed after managers authorised covert surveillance, believing he was exaggerating his back pain, a tribunal has found. Mohamed Kerita, who worked in the firm's manufacturing factory, had suffered with back pain from 2017, the Reading tribunal heard. In March 2023, a physiotherapist emailed absence manager Richard Darvill to say Mr Kerita had been signed off work by his GP for two months. The physiotherapist stated he could not explain the level of pain Mr Kerita was experiencing and why he remained unfit for work. Following this, Mr Darvill and HR manager Akhil Patel instructed security firm G4S to carry out surveillance of Mr Kerita, a move Employment Judge Hawksworth described as a "highly unusual step". A G4S operative filmed Mr Kerita from behind, walking around three miles in about an hour and a half, despite the claimant never having stated he could not walk. In a report, they said that there was 'no indication whatsoever that the claimant had lower back, leg or shoulder pain or was experiencing sickness or dizziness', despite not filming Mr Kerita's face. Mr Darvill later approached a senior manager to get more funding for further surveillance to ensure a 'robust outcome', the tribunal heard. In May 2023, Mr Kerita was dismissed for gross misconduct, including a fraudulent claim of company sick pay and unacceptable levels of absence. During a disciplinary meeting, he had said that he was in the wrong area and needed light duties but his managers told him there were none and sent him home, the tribunal heard. The tribunal found that Mr Kerita's back pain met the definition of a disability under the Equality Act 2010. Judge Hawksworth said it could be inferred that managers 'had a level of distrust or hostility towards associates with back conditions, and were unwilling to take their word for it that they had a back problem, or were quick to conclude that a person with a back condition was not being honest about their symptoms'. The judge added: 'We have found that the respondent made assumptions about what the claimant had told them about his ability to walk and about the G4S surveillance film.' Mr Kerita's claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments, disability discrimination and unfair dismissal succeeded.