Freshman politicians go to first day of 'Senate school'
The politicians will get to know the ins and outs of the upper chamber through a three-day crash course often referred to as "Senate school".
Senate President Sue Lines, wearing in a suit that matched the chamber's colours, welcomed the new cohort on Wednesday while impressing the importance of punctuality.
"Standing up and saying 'I'm really sorry I was late' is not going to cut it," she told them from the Senate floor.
"You're probably going to cop a lot of jeering."
But she also encouraged the Senate newbies to ask questions, repeating the old adage "there is no such thing as a dumb question".
For some, like Australia's youngest-ever senator Charlotte Walker, there will be a lot to learn.
The 21-year-old was not expected to win a Senate seat after she was pre-selected in the usually unwinnable third spot on Labor's South Australian ticket.
However, the strength of Labor's landslide win in May propelled her into the upper chamber and she showed up dressed for the part in a pink silk suit jacket and an eagerness to take it all in.
For others, like Liberal Leah Blyth who filled a vacated Senate seat earlier in 2025, the program would allow her to become even more familiar with parliamentary procedure.
Meanwhile, Labor politician Michelle Ananda-Rajah will have to learn a whole new set of rules after she switched from the House of Representatives to the Senate following the abolishment of her electorate.
Unlike the lower house, the government does not have a clear majority and the chamber president cannot eject members, which means the Senate can get rowdier and more chaotic than the House of Representatives.
Senator Lines also welcomed Tyron Whitten, Warwick Stacey, Corinne Mulholland, Ellie Whiteaker, Jessica Collins, Richard Dowling to the chamber.
Parliament will resume sitting on July 22.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Never mind the economy, climate change is bad for the health
Your article (' Pocock springs test on fate of future children ', July 31) quotes Anthony Albanese, saying that rejecting any moratorium on new fossil fuel projects is 'disastrous for the economy'. Try telling that to the Greeks, or to the 33 million victims of the Pakistani floods in March, or to the flood and fire victims of the eastern half of Australia over recent years. Not only were these events 'disastrous for the economy', but at what cost to human health and welfare and to the environment? Bring on the moratorium. We cannot afford not to. Hugh Barrett, Sanctuary Point May the noise made by the main parties not drown out the sane and sensible discussion in federal decision-making. Changed thinking and behaviours are needed about the approval and assistance provided to fossil fuel projects. When community and expert concern and worsening outlooks concerning 'global boiling' are being raised time and time again, stronger federal leadership is needed. The public values considerations that go well beyond party-political eyes being focused on getting past the next election and maintaining sources of donations, and the current yet still modest 2030 and 2050 emissions reduction targets. Sue Dyer, Downer (ACT) Pocock's bill to force legislators to consider the impact on future generations of new fossil fuel licences will be unpopular with Labor if it threatens new coal and gas, which Labor relies on for revenue and to contain energy prices. It throws up in stark relief whether future generations must be considered against winning the next election. It seems surprising that it needs legislation. I was under the naive assumption that governments should consider all our welfare in any legislation anyway. Or is it only those who can afford lobbyists who are considered? The independents are doing a good job of forcing government to face up to difficult issues. Gary Barnes, Mosman Pocock says we have a 'moral duty to young people and future generations'. The burden on the youngest members of our society is not just logistical, it is an overwhelming emotional burden. Today's children and young people with whom I work as an occupational therapist are more anxious (scared, fearful, despondent) than this group have been in the last thirty years – and it is over climate. The rest of the article makes it clear that the federal Labor government is trying to shrink the scale of the task in our eyes. Their attempt to displace the emotional burden they promised to take up when they entered office is hurting our children right now. Jo Jackson King, Gidgegannup (WA)
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Dire flaw in Labor's student fee cut plan
A flat $5500 reduction of HELP debt would deliver better uniform relief for Australians with student debt, with analysis of Labor's signature policy finding that the cost-of-living relief would currently largely help high-income earners. The research, released by not-for-profit research body e61 Institute on Thursday found the policy as is, doesn't meaningfully speed up debt repayment, and unfairly benefits students who graduated in 2024. Instead of a 20 per cent cut to balances, e61 said the relief would be better targeted if Australia's with student debt were given a flat $5500 cut. The figure also represents the average amount set to be wiped across all HELP accounts. e61 said that a $5500 reduction would help 35 per cent of account holders make their final repayment in an earlier year, or 15 per cent more debt holders than a 20 per cent discount. New analysis from e61 urged Labor to consider a flat $5500 cut to student debts, instead of a 20 per cent cut. NewsWire/ Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire e61 Research Economist Matthew Maltman said the benefits of a straight cut was important factor due to the policy's $16bn price tag, which equals the annual cost of Jobseeker. 'Most HELP debt is held by university graduates, who have much higher lifetime incomes than the average taxpayer. And even if you look within graduates, those with more costly degrees tend to go on to earn higher incomes in the future,' he said. 'You could make the argument that we need to provide debt relief to humanities students in a targeted way because of Job Ready Graduates. 'But the current policy isn't at all targeted and that means it's going to give a very large amount of debt relief to future lawyers, dentists and doctors who are going to go on to enjoy very high lifetime incomes.' Labor says its 20 per cent cut to student debt will be the first piece of legislation it will pass once parliament resumes on July 22. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia University students who finished their degrees in 2024 will also receive twice as much relief as people who left in 2020, and two and a half times more than students who are currently in their first year of a three year degree. e61 Senior Research Economist Jack Buckley said this would create a debt relief lottery. 'If you cut 20 per cent of each individual's balance, it means two very similar people will receive very different amounts of debt relief simply because one finished their degree in 2024 and the other finished a few years earlier or later,' said Mr Buckley. Anthony Albanese has repeatedly said the 20 per cent cut to HELP debts will be the first piece of legislation passed when parliament returns on July 22, with the changes backdated to account balances as of June 1. Labor is also set to increase the debt repayment threshold from $56,156 to $67,000, repayments of payment will also be lowered.
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's friendship was ‘never going to end well'
Liberal Senator Hollie Hughes says Donald Trump and Elon Musk are 'two alpha males' who were bound to clash. Donald Trump has threatened DOGE and deportation against billionaire Elon Musk amid their ongoing feud over the US President's 'Big Beautiful Bill' which passed the Senate. Ms Hughes said it was 'never going to end well' between the pair.
