Rachel Reeves's £39bn housing promise will condemn us all to tents
Now, it may have escaped people's attention, but in the Spring Statement, Labour announced a £2bn investment in social and affordable housing that would fund the delivery of 18,000 new homes.
I'll do the maths for you – £2bn for 18,000 homes works out at £111,111.11 each. Using that yardstick, when you tot it all up, £39bn will buy precisely 351,000 new homes.
But there is a proverbial fly in the ointment with these figures – they are spread over 10 years. That means unless that number is inflation adjusted, what you'll be buying with £39bn a decade from now, or even five years, will be considerably less than right now.
The other rhino in the room is immigration. These paltry figures are far short of the 1.5 million homes (by the end of Parliament) Labour promised us a year ago.
Lest we forget, in the last decade alone, the UK has seen a net gain of 2.2 million people. And over the next 10 years, between mid-2022 and mid-2032, the population of the UK is projected to increase by 4.9 million.
I wish I could feel more optimistic about Labour's housing plan, but I'm really struggling.
Not only will the money not be enough to buy an already inadequate number of homes for the existing population, but we're facing a skills crisis. We need tens of thousands of tradesmen to build these homes, and we don't have them.
To make things worse, according to the latest S&P Purchasing Managers' Index monthly survey of leading firms, UK construction firms shed staff at the fastest rate in March since the pandemic. This is against the backdrop of high profile names such as ISG, a major construction firm at the time, folding last year.
Amongst all this bad news, you also have the ongoing farce of the social housing sector which is in a state of what the Housing Ombudsman generously called 'managed decline'.
With a five-fold increase in complaints about substandard living conditions between 2019-20 and 2024-25, I don't see the social sector as the solution.
This doesn't even take into account the continued impact of the Right to Buy scheme and the fact homes are still being sold in England every year despite Labour's plan to ban sales, as has happened in Scotland and Wales.
I hate to be quite so pessimistic about the state of housing in this country, but I can at least share one bright spark with you. Angela Rayner has announced it will no longer be a criminal offence to sleep on a pavement – hurrah!
In preparedness, I've hauled myself a few patio slabs into a wheelbarrow (you can't be too presumptuous about the availability of paving), and I've got myself a stockpile of tents from Argos on order before the panic buying begins.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Goldilocks' is ignoring the three bears, Wall Street analysts say
Markets are mostly maintaining their all-time highs despite Trump's tariffs, threats to Fed independence, and analysts reducing their expectations for U.S. GDP growth. Investors are instead enjoying a 'Goldilocks scenario,' Goldman Sachs says. Barclays agrees: 'Another week, another tariff salvo, and another market shrug.' S&P 500 futures are barely moving this morning after the index itself hit an all-time high yesterday, poking its head above 6,300 for the first time ever and closing at 6,305.6. In Asia and Europe, there was a small amount of profit-taking earlier today but nothing to be concerned about—equities remain mostly near their record peaks globally. There is no excuse for this behavior, arguably. There are three bearish indicators that ought to be scaring investors right now: The U.S. is imposing a trade tax on the entire planet; President Trump has threatened the independence of the Federal Reserve; and Goldman Sachs just moved down its forecast for U.S. GDP in the second half of the year (to 1.1%). But, as Goldman's Christian Mueller-Glissmann told clients in a recent note seen by Fortune, the markets appear to be ignoring this and enjoying a 'Goldilocks scenario' instead. 'Another week, another tariff salvo, and another market shrug,' Barclays analyst Christian Keller et al. told their clients. 'Resilient US consumer data and robust Q2 earnings for now dominate over initial signs of tariff effects on CPI, continuing threats of tariff escalations and increasing political pressures on the Fed.' There are reasons to worry that stocks might be overpriced. Deutsche Bank's Henry Allen pointed out recently that the Fed Funds futures speculators are betting in a way that suggests they expect an upcoming recession. 'If we look at Fed funds futures as of last night's close, we can see that just over 100bps of cuts are priced in over the next year to August 2026. That comes on top of 100bps already delivered between Sep-Dec 2024. So, if realised, that would be just over 200bps of cuts in two years. But historically, getting 200bps of cuts in two years has almost always required a recession,' he wrote in a research note. Maybe. It's worth remembering that the Fed Funds futures market changes daily, sometimes moving quite dramatically. These investors may not literally be pricing in a recession. But they are certainly betting that Fed Chair Jerome Powell will deliver cuts to interest rates sooner or later. More cheap money is good for stocks, and that's what stocks seem to be reflecting right now. Here's a snapshot of the action prior to the opening bell in New York: S&P 500 futures were off 0.13% this morning after the index hit a new high, at 6,305.60, up 0.14% yesterday. The S&P has never been above 6,300 before. The UK's FTSE 100 was clinging on above 9,000, at 9,008.61 in early trading. STOXX Europe 600 was down 0.44% in early trading. Japan's Nikkei 225 was down 0.11%. China's CSI 300 Index was up 0.8%. Bitcoin is still above $118K. This story was originally featured on
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
The energy sector has been lagging, but Wolfe says this dividend payer is about to break out
The energy sector is lagging the S & P 500 this year, but Wolfe Research spotted a couple of stocks that could be poised to gain. Oil prices have been soft this year, with West Texas Intermediate crude futures off about 9% per barrel, and Brent crude futures down 8%. Supply of the commodity has remained plentiful, and eight members of the OPEC+ cartel agreed earlier this month to lift production by 548,000 barrels a day. Similarly, the performance of energy stocks has been lackluster, with the S & P 500 sector only up by about 1% in 2025 versus 8% for the broad market index. Nevertheless, there are some gems in the space, according to Rob Ginsberg, technical analyst at Wolfe. "The landscape of the sector remains in the favor of stock pickers with outperformers being few and far between," he wrote in a report Monday, highlighting a "compelling" name that's on the verge of breaking out. Peabody Energy St. Louis-based coal miner Peabody Energy turned up on Ginsberg's radar, showing "one of the most convincing charts within energy." Ginsberg said that the stock's 200-day moving average at $18 is the next level of resistance as momentum continues to build. BTU 3M mountain Peabody Energy in the past three months "We expect it to be tested in coming weeks, with a breakout through that level likely to follow," the chart watcher said. Peabody closed Tuesday at $17.34, and the stock pays a dividend yield of 1.7% — fatter than the S & P 500 yield of 1.18%. Though shares have had a rough year thus far, down 17% in 2025, Peabody has recently seen a resurgence. The stock has soared 42% in the past three months, and 28% in July alone. Peabody's hot streak coincides with President Donald Trump's moves to take a lighter approach toward environmental regulations and his administration's support for the coal industry to help power the growth of artificial intelligence . Earlier this month, the president granted two years of regulatory relief to coal plants, taconite iron ore processing facilities and some chemical manufacturers. Peabody shares are well liked on Wall Street, with most analysts covering the St. Louis-based coal producer rating it a buy or strong buy, according to LSEG. But Wall Street's consensus price target calls for just 2% upside from where the stock has recently traded. —CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed reporting
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
The typical employee would have had to start working before the Revolutionary War to match average CEO's 2024 pay
The pay gap between America's corporate leaders and their workers grew even larger in 2024, according to the AFL-CIO's annual Executive Paywatch report, released Wednesday. CEOs at the nation's 500 largest public companies took home $18.9 million last year, or 285 times as much as the typical US worker's paycheck of $49,500. That's up from a ratio of 268 to 1 a year earlier, according to the AFL-CIO, a powerful federation of labor unions representing 15 million workers. The typical employee would have had to start working in 1740 to earn what the average CEO received in 2024, the report noted. CEO pay increased 7% in 2024 from the prior year. It topped the prior peak of $18.3 million in 2021, though the ratio was 324 to 1 that year. The typical private sector worker's raise last year was 3%, the AFL-CIO said, citing Bureau of Labor Statistics data. In its report this year, the AFL-CIO highlighted that the sweeping tax and spending cuts package that President Donald Trump signed into law on July 4 will provide CEOs with far bigger tax breaks than workers. The average CEO will receive a tax cut of nearly $490,000 from the permanent extension of the lower individual income tax rates, which were initially reduced in Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the report found. That compares to a $765 tax break for the typical US worker. Unlike workers, salaries are not the largest component of CEOs' compensation. Nearly half of the top executives' total pay was restricted stock awards, and another $4 million were bonuses. The highest-paid CEO of an S&P 500 company was Patrick Smith of Axon Enterprise, which manufactures Tasers and other weapons for law enforcement and the military. He received a package of nearly $165 million. The report listed Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol as making 6,666 times more than the company's typical worker, the largest pay gap in the S&P 500. (Niccol took over the company's helm last September. The AFL-CIO annualized his compensation, listing it as nearly $98 million, compared to the typical Starbucks worker's pay of less than $15,000.)
