US aid cuts halt HIV vaccine research in South Africa, with global impact
Stop all work, it said. The United States under the Trump administration was withdrawing all its funding.
The news devastated the researchers, who live and work in a region where more people live with HIV than anywhere else in the world. Their research project, called BRILLIANT, was meant to be the latest to draw on the region's genetic diversity and deep expertise in the hope of benefiting people everywhere.
But the $46 million from the U.S. for the project was disappearing, part of the dismantling of foreign aid by the world's biggest donor earlier this year as President Donald Trump announced a focus on priorities at home.
South Africa hit hard by aid cuts
South Africa has been hit especially hard because of Trump's baseless claims about the targeting of the country's white Afrikaner minority. The country had been receiving about $400 million a year via USAID and the HIV-focused PEPFAR.
Now that's gone.
Glenda Grey, who heads the Brilliant program, said the African continent has been vital to the development of HIV medication, and the U.S. cuts threaten its capability to do such work in the future.
Significant advances have included clinical trials for lenacapavir, the world's only twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV, recently approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. One study to show its efficacy involved young South Africans.
"We do the trials better, faster and cheaper than anywhere else in the world, and so without South Africa as part of these programs, the world, in my opinion, is much poorer," Gray said.
She noted that during the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, South Africa played a crucial role by testing the Johnson & Johnson and Novavax vaccines, and South African scientists' genomic surveillance led to the identification of an important variant.
Labs empty and thousands are laid off
A team of researchers at the University of the Witwatersrand has been part of the unit developing the HIV vaccines for the trials.
Inside the Wits laboratory, technician Nozipho Mlotshwa was among the young people in white gowns working on samples, but she may soon be out of a job.
Her position is grant-funded. She uses her salary to support her family and fund her studies in a country where youth unemployment hovers around 46%.
"It's very sad and devastating, honestly," she said of the U.S. cuts and overall uncertainty. "We'll also miss out collaborating with other scientists across the continent."
Professor Abdullah Ely leads the team of researchers. He said the work had promising results indicating that the vaccines were producing an immune response.
But now that momentum, he said, has "all kind of had to come to a halt."
The BRILLIANT program is scrambling to find money to save the project. The purchase of key equipment has stopped. South Africa's health department says about 100 researchers for that program and others related to HIV have been laid off. Funding for postdoctoral students involved in experiments for the projects is at risk.
South Africa's government has estimated that universities and science councils could lose about $107 million in U.S. research funding over the next five years due to the aid cuts, which affect not only work on HIV but also tuberculosis -- another disease with a high number of cases in the country.
Less money, and less data on what's affected
South Africa's government has said it will be very difficult to find funding to replace the U.S. support.
And now the number of HIV infections will grow. Medication is more difficult to obtain. At least 8,000 health workers in South Africa's HIV program have already been laid off, the government has said. Also gone are the data collectors who tracked patients and their care, as well as HIV counselors who could reach vulnerable patients in rural communities.
For researchers, Universities South Africa, an umbrella body, has applied to the national treasury for over $110 million for projects at some of the largest schools.
During a visit to South Africa in June, UNAIDS executive director Winnie Byanyima was well aware of the stakes, and the lives at risk, as research and health care struggle in South Africa and across Africa at large.
Other countries that were highly dependent on U.S. funding including Zambia, Nigeria, Burundi and Ivory Coast are already increasing their own resources, she said.
"But let's be clear, what they are putting down will not be funding in the same way that the American resources were funding," Byanyima said.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
6 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
A Clinic Blames Its Closing on Trump's Medicaid Cuts. Patients Don't Buy It.
CURTIS, Nebraska – The only health clinic here is shutting down, and the hospital CEO has blamed Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's signature legislation. But residents of Curtis – a one-stoplight town in deep-red farm country – aren't buying that explanation. 'Anyone who's saying that Medicaid cuts is why they're closing is a liar,' April Roberts said, as she oversaw lunch at the Curtis Area Senior Center. The retirees trickling in for fried chicken and soft-serve ice cream will be hit hardest when the clinic closes this fall, Roberts fears. Seniors who sometimes go in multiple times a month to have blood drawn will have to drive 40 miles to the next nearest health center. Sick people, she worries, will put off checkups and get sicker. Arriving for lunch, retired Navy veteran Jim Christensen said he'd read an op-ed that 'tried to blame everything on Trump.' 'Horse feathers,' he said, dismissing the idea. Curtis has become an early test case of the politics of Trump's agenda in rural America, where voters vulnerable to Medicaid cuts in Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' law are reluctant to blame the president or congressional Republicans who approved it. Many people in Curtis have directed their frustration at their hospital system instead of their representatives in Washington. Democrats and health care advocates are pointing to the town – population 806 in the last census – as a first casualty of Republicans' health care overhaul. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and others have referred to the town on social media as a model of what's to come for rural hospitals around the country. Close to half of rural hospitals nationwide already lose money, and analysts expect Trump's tax and spending law to add more strain. Community Hospital, the nonprofit that runs the clinic known as the Curtis Medical Center and a couple of other facilities in the region, plunged into the center of that national story when it announced on July 2 – one day before the bill's passage – that a confluence of factors had made its Curtis outpost unsustainable. It cited years-long financial challenges, inflation and 'anticipated federal budget cuts to Medicaid,' the public health insurance program for lower-income and disabled Americans. On Thursday morning, 73-year-old Sharon Jorgensen was scared the clinic had already shut its doors: She called and couldn't get someone to pick up. She needed a blood draw, so she went to the health center to see if someone was still there. It was open, after all. And now staff had a date for the closure. 'We have until Sept. 30,' Jorgensen told another local, 63-year-old Jo Popp, on her way out of the small brick building. 'I have to find a doctor. I don't have a doctor!' Popp would have to start taking a day off work for checkups, because of the drive. But she said she would try to follow the clinic's nurse practitioner – one of three people on staff – wherever she went. 'She knows us,' Jorgensen said. 'Right,' Popp said. 'She listens to us.' The clinic has been here longer than many people in town can remember, and people are struggling to make sense of the shutdown. The changes coming for Medicaid are complicated, and some won't take effect for years, which makes the timing even harder for residents to understand. Many know that Trump's bill will impose work requirements for Medicaid recipients, which seems reasonable to them, and some think – inaccurately – that the legislation was designed to end Medicaid coverage for undocumented immigrants. (An earlier version of the bill penalized states for using their own funds – separate from Medicaid – to insure the undocumented; that provision was stripped from the final bill on a technicality). Community Hospital was already losing money, and officials said they are trying to make sure they remain financially viable for the 30,000 people they serve throughout their facilities. But the timing of their decision to announce the Curtis closure has stoked suspicions in the town, leaving some residents convinced their health provider was using the president as a scapegoat. Popp, a three-time Trump voter, thought the president was cutting wasteful spending and didn't think he caused the closure. Jorgensen, a registered Republican who never voted for Trump, was frustrated that so few of her neighbors believed the Medicaid cuts played a role. 'They're huge Trumpers … and so it doesn't matter what he does – there's an excuse for it,' Jorgensen said. The retired corn and cattle farmer was used to being the odd one out in Frontier County, where 86 percent of the vote went to Trump last fall. One of those Trump supporters walked out of the clinic. 'My heart's good,' he told Jorgensen. 'Yay!' Jorgensen said. Trump repeatedly promised this year that he would not cut Medicaid. He expanded the GOP tent to include more low-income voters without college degrees, and some Republicans warned that any reduction in benefits would undercut their pitch that they are the new party of the working class. But Trump and Republican lawmakers needed to offset some of the enormous cost of the tax cuts, deportations and other campaign promises in their tax and spending law. So they turned to Medicaid. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that about 12 million people will lose health coverage because of the law, which is nonetheless projected to add trillions to the federal debt over the next decade. Republicans say that changes like work requirements will reduce fraud and ensure Medicaid is available for those it was originally intended to serve, including pregnant women and the disabled. But researchers warn those requirements will create onerous paperwork that, in practice, will prevent eligible people from getting their benefits. Other changes in the law will disadvantage the vast majority of states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, according to hospital groups and policy analysts, and will reduce payments to rural hospitals by reining in a financing mechanism they have long relied on to boost federal funds. KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research organization, estimates the bill would cause federal Medicaid spending in rural areas to drop by $155 billion – more than the $50 billion lawmakers set aside in the legislation to shore up rural hospitals. It's not fully clear how that $50 billion will be divided, adding to providers' uncertainty. Community Hospital declined to comment in detail on its financial picture but said in a statement that 'to ensure long-term sustainability, we must prioritize what lies ahead.' 'They're projecting where they're going to be at over the next couple of years, and if it's between jeopardizing the hospital or closing down a clinic, they're going to close a clinic,' said Jed Hansen, the executive director of the Nebraska Rural Health Association, who expects about 100,000 Nebraskans to lose health care as a result of the law. Rural health care facilities run on thin margins to serve small communities in far-flung locations. And they tend to have more patients on Medicaid, many of them self-employed farmers, small business owners and seasonal workers more likely to need public insurance. Hospital groups and executives have warned that some rural hospitals that long operated at a loss won't be able to stay open much longer, now that the Medicaid cuts have been voted in. Nationwide, far more people oppose Trump's bill than support it in polling, and Democrats hope the legislation will cost the GOP control of the House in the 2026 midterms. Even in Curtis, some unease at the Medicaid cuts is percolating. 'I'm not in agreement with this bill,' said 61-year-old Brenda Wheeler, a Republican who voted for Trump in 2016 but then soured on him and sat out last year's election. She was thinking about changing her registration to independent, upset at the cuts to Medicaid. 'When we talked about making America great again, I don't think this is what we all had in mind,' she said, as she stopped by the clinic. Down the road on the town's main street lined with American flags, Kerri Kemp said she didn't like the Medicaid cuts either. The 47-year-old got Medicaid coverage after Nebraska voters chose to expand eligibility for the program in 2018, adopting an optional part of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul. But it was hard to document all her work as a bartender, county worker and rancher, and recently she'd struggled to submit the paperwork. Now she is uninsured. Work requirements could make it harder to qualify when they take effect in 2027, just after the 2026 midterms. But Kemp, a lifelong Republican and Trump supporter, doesn't hold that against Trump and suggested he might change course. 'I really think he's gonna do something,' she said. Sitting at his desk across the street – next to a miniature Trump head and a small red punching bag labeled 'Obama stress reliever' – Curtis Mayor Brad Welch called Community Hospital's comments on federal funding 'irresponsible.' 'I don't think the signing of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' had one thing to do with the closure of this clinic,' Welch said. Community Hospital officials said they had tried to find another group to take over the clinic, without luck. But the city administrator, Andrew Lee, was still hopeful. Roberts, the senior center director, wondered if a hospital 40 miles to the north could be persuaded. 'Maybe we need to talk to Andrew about really going and schmoozing them and trying to get them to come down here,' she told a senior who stopped by the counter to get some fried chicken to take home. 'Do something,' the woman echoed. 'I mean, it's really too bad.'
The Mainichi
a day ago
- The Mainichi
US aid cuts halt HIV vaccine research in South Africa, with global impact
JOHANNESBURG (AP) -- Just a week had remained before scientists in South Africa were to begin clinical trials of an HIV vaccine, and hopes were high for another step toward limiting one of history's deadliest pandemics. Then the email arrived. Stop all work, it said. The United States under the Trump administration was withdrawing all its funding. The news devastated the researchers, who live and work in a region where more people live with HIV than anywhere else in the world. Their research project, called BRILLIANT, was meant to be the latest to draw on the region's genetic diversity and deep expertise in the hope of benefiting people everywhere. But the $46 million from the U.S. for the project was disappearing, part of the dismantling of foreign aid by the world's biggest donor earlier this year as President Donald Trump announced a focus on priorities at home. South Africa hit hard by aid cuts South Africa has been hit especially hard because of Trump's baseless claims about the targeting of the country's white Afrikaner minority. The country had been receiving about $400 million a year via USAID and the HIV-focused PEPFAR. Now that's gone. Glenda Grey, who heads the Brilliant program, said the African continent has been vital to the development of HIV medication, and the U.S. cuts threaten its capability to do such work in the future. Significant advances have included clinical trials for lenacapavir, the world's only twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV, recently approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. One study to show its efficacy involved young South Africans. "We do the trials better, faster and cheaper than anywhere else in the world, and so without South Africa as part of these programs, the world, in my opinion, is much poorer," Gray said. She noted that during the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, South Africa played a crucial role by testing the Johnson & Johnson and Novavax vaccines, and South African scientists' genomic surveillance led to the identification of an important variant. Labs empty and thousands are laid off A team of researchers at the University of the Witwatersrand has been part of the unit developing the HIV vaccines for the trials. Inside the Wits laboratory, technician Nozipho Mlotshwa was among the young people in white gowns working on samples, but she may soon be out of a job. Her position is grant-funded. She uses her salary to support her family and fund her studies in a country where youth unemployment hovers around 46%. "It's very sad and devastating, honestly," she said of the U.S. cuts and overall uncertainty. "We'll also miss out collaborating with other scientists across the continent." Professor Abdullah Ely leads the team of researchers. He said the work had promising results indicating that the vaccines were producing an immune response. But now that momentum, he said, has "all kind of had to come to a halt." The BRILLIANT program is scrambling to find money to save the project. The purchase of key equipment has stopped. South Africa's health department says about 100 researchers for that program and others related to HIV have been laid off. Funding for postdoctoral students involved in experiments for the projects is at risk. South Africa's government has estimated that universities and science councils could lose about $107 million in U.S. research funding over the next five years due to the aid cuts, which affect not only work on HIV but also tuberculosis -- another disease with a high number of cases in the country. Less money, and less data on what's affected South Africa's government has said it will be very difficult to find funding to replace the U.S. support. And now the number of HIV infections will grow. Medication is more difficult to obtain. At least 8,000 health workers in South Africa's HIV program have already been laid off, the government has said. Also gone are the data collectors who tracked patients and their care, as well as HIV counselors who could reach vulnerable patients in rural communities. For researchers, Universities South Africa, an umbrella body, has applied to the national treasury for over $110 million for projects at some of the largest schools. During a visit to South Africa in June, UNAIDS executive director Winnie Byanyima was well aware of the stakes, and the lives at risk, as research and health care struggle in South Africa and across Africa at large. Other countries that were highly dependent on U.S. funding including Zambia, Nigeria, Burundi and Ivory Coast are already increasing their own resources, she said. "But let's be clear, what they are putting down will not be funding in the same way that the American resources were funding," Byanyima said. ___
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
Gaza truce talks faltering over withdrawal; 17 reported killed in latest shooting near aid
Progress is stalling at talks aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza, with the sides divided over the extent of Israeli forces' withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources familiar with the negotiations in Doha said on Saturday. The indirect talks over a U.S. proposal for a 60-day ceasefire continued throughout Saturday, an Israeli official said, seven days since talks began. U.S. President Donald Trump has said he hoped for a breakthrough soon based on a new U.S.-backed ceasefire proposal. In Gaza, medics said 17 people trying to get food aid were killed on Saturday when Israeli troops opened fire, the latest mass shooting around a U.S.-backed aid distribution system that the U.N. says has resulted in 800 people killed in six weeks. Witnesses described people being shot in the head and torso. Reporters saw several bodies of victims wrapped in white shrouds as family members wept at Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots, but that its review of the incident had found no evidence of anyone hurt by its soldiers' fire. Delegations from Israel and Hamas have been in Qatar pushing for an agreement which envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals and discussions on ending the war. The Israeli official blamed the impasse on Hamas, which he said "remains stubborn, sticking to positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement." Hamas has previously blamed Israeli demands for blocking a deal. A Palestinian source said that Hamas had rejected withdrawal maps which Israel had proposed that would leave around 40% of Gaza under Israeli control, including all of the southern area of Rafah and further territories in northern and eastern Gaza. Two Israeli sources said Hamas wanted Israel to retreat to lines it held in a previous ceasefire before it renewed its offensive in March. The Palestinian source said aid issues and guarantees on an end to the war were also presenting a challenge. The crisis could be resolved with more U.S. intervention, the source said. Hamas has long demanded an agreement to end the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would end the fighting only when all hostages are released and Hamas is dismantled as a fighting force and administration in Gaza. Saturday's reported mass shooting near an aid distribution point in Rafah was the latest in a series of such incidents that the United Nations rights office said on Friday had seen at least 798 people killed trying to get food in six weeks. "We were sitting there, and suddenly there was shooting towards us. For five minutes we were trapped under fire. The shooting was targeted. It was not random. Some people were shot in the head, some in the torso, one guy next to me was shot directly in the heart," eyewitness Mahmoud Makram said. "There is no mercy there, no mercy. People go because they are hungry but they die and come back in body bags." After partially lifting a total blockade of all goods into Gaza in late May, Israel launched a new aid distribution system, relying on a group backed by the United States to distribute food under the protection of Israeli troops. The United Nations has rejected the system as inherently dangerous and a violation of humanitarian neutrality principles. Israel says it is necessary to keep militants from diverting aid. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive. Israel's campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, displaced almost the entire population of more than 2 million people, sparked a humanitarian crisis and left much of the territory in ruins. Thousands of Israelis rallied in central Tel Aviv on Saturday demanding a deal that would release all remaining hostages being held by Hamas. Protester Boaz Levi said here was there to pressure the government, "to get to a hostage deal as soon as possible because our friends, brothers, are in Gaza and it's about the time to end this war. That is why we are here."
