
Jerome Powell, Donald Trump argue at Federal Reserve building site over cost blow-outs, feud continues
The awkward clash happened as Mr Trump took a tour of the under-construction Federal Reserve building.
The two men have been at loggerheads for months, with the US President repeatedly taking issue with Mr Powell for not lowering interest rates for Americans.
Mr Powell has resisted intense pressure from Mr Trump and his administration to do so, instead adopting a steady approach, remaining reluctant to slash rates while the President's new tariffs disrupt the US economy.
Under the US system, the President has little control over the independent Federal Reserve, including limitations on removing the chair. However, Mr Trump has applied public pressure where he can to force Mr Powell's hand, or push him out.
On Thursday, Mr Trump arrived at the new Federal Reserve building site in Washington DC, saying he wanted to come down to check what was going on, taking with him a piece of paper with a new sky-high figure for total costs of the build.
'We're just taking a look at what's happening,' Mr Trump said.
'It's a tough construction job. A lot of expensive work.'
Mr Trump was accompanied by Republican Senator Tim Scott, from South Carolina, who is also the chair of the Senate Banking Committee.
'One of the reasons we wanted to see it was the overruns of the expenses,' Senator Scott said.
'We wanted to figure out why.'
Mr Trump said he was 'taking a look' because of new figures, which Mr Powell appeared unaware of at first.
'It looks like it's about $US3.1 billion,' Mr Trump said, as Mr Powell began shaking his head.
'It's went up a little bit, or a lot. So the $2.7 is now $3.1,' Mr Trump added.
Mr Powell quickly responded, 'I'm not aware of that, Mr President. I haven't heard that from anyone at the Fed.'
Mr Trump then handed Mr Powell a folded-up piece of paper, something he claimed was from the Fed.
'This came from us?' Mr Powell asked.
'Yes,' Mr Trump said, adding 'I don't know who does that'.
It took Mr Powell around five seconds to quickly scan a document he had not seen before he fact-checked the US President in front of the media, pointing out the error in his calculations.
'You're including the Martin renovation. You just added in a third building,' Mr Powell said.
'I know, it's a building that's being built,' Mr Trump responded.
However, Mr Powell refused to accept the President's narrative that costs had blown out by an additional $US400m.
'No, it (the Martin renovation) was built five years ago. We finished Martin five years ago,' Mr Powell said.
'It's part of the overall...' Mr Trump began, dismissing Mr Powell's explanation.
'It's not new,' Mr Powell reasserted.
Mr Trump attempted to take a new course with Mr Powell over the costs, cornering him on possible future cost blow-outs.
'We're going to take a look, we're going to see what's happening,' Mr Trump said.
'Do you expect any more additional cost overruns?' he asked the Fed chair.
Mr Powell said the Fed didn't 'expect' cost overruns, but was 'ready' if they arose. 'We have a little bit of a reserve that we may use. But, no,' he added.
In classic Trump-style, the US President then retook control of the media event, taking off his white hard hat, saying it was nice to take it off when 'we're not under too much danger'.
The US President said that as a real estate developer, if he had a project manager who was operating over budget, he would 'fire them'.
'I'd like to see it get finished. In many ways, it's too bad it started, but it did start and it's been under construction for a long time,' Mr Trump said.
Asked by a journalist what Mr Powell could say to the US President to get him to 'back off' from criticism, Mr Trump was clear.
'Well, I'd love him to lower interest rates, other than that, what can I tell you?'
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which created the central bank, says that members of the Board of Governors, including the Fed chief, can be 'removed for cause by the president'.
But the law does not define 'cause' or lay out any standard or procedures for removal.
No president has ever removed a Fed board member, and the law has never been tested in court.
- With Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
6 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australia warned of looming ‘danger' from America amid social media ban
Sky News host Rowan Dean has warned of 'danger' Australia is currently facing amid a looming social media ban. 'As soon as we do come on to the radar around December ... the Americans will be looking at us and looking at how we are blocking access to YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, all these major American platforms,' he said. 'And the wrath of the Americans will come down, and it will see those tariffs go up, and it'll be the fault of the Albanese government and the Coalition.'

Sky News AU
36 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Lefties Losing It: Aussie Insta influencer encourages ‘incels' to kill Trump
Sky News host Rita Panahi slams Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's 'lack of judgment' for his 90-minute interview with Instagram influencer Abbie Chatfield earlier this year. Ms Panahi claims Ms Chatfield's latest encouragement to Americans to assassinate US President Donald Trump was 'not just deranged, it's evil'. 'The PM should disavow those comments, you can be sure that the Canberra press gallery would've demanded an explanation if a conservative politician had granted a lengthy interview to a podcaster who made vile comments like that,' Ms Panahi said. 'Anthony Albanese, he can't claim ignorance as a defence because Abbie Chatfield's extreme positions have long been clear, including her attitude towards the Jewish community. 'The prime minister should reflect on why he thought it was a good idea to bolster such a character, particularly at a time when the Jewish community is facing an unprecedented wave of antisemitism and anti-Israel hostility.'


Perth Now
6 hours ago
- Perth Now
Ex-Trump prosecutor Jack Smith under investigation
US officials have opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who investigated then-candidate Donald Trump before his re-election, for alleged illegal political activity. The Office of Special Counsel, an independent federal agency, on Saturday confirmed the investigation after reporting by other news organisations. Smith was named special counsel to investigate Trump by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022. Trump and his Republican allies, including Senator Tom Cotton, have — without offering evidence of wrongdoing— accused Smith of violating the Hatch Act, a federal law that bans certain public officials from engaging in political activity. Smith prosecuted two federal cases against Republican candidate Trump in the lead-up to the November 2024 presidential election. Smith ultimately dropped the cases — neither one had gone to trial — after Trump was re-elected, which would have shielded him from prosecution according to longstanding Justice Department practice. Smith then subsequently resigned as special counsel. Cotton, on Wednesday asked the Office of Special Counsel to investigate Smith, alleging that his conduct was designed to help then-President Joe Biden and his vice president, Kamala Harris, both Democrats. Biden had dropped his own bid for re-election following his disastrous performance in a campaign debate against Trump and tapped Harris to succeed him on the ticket. Trump won the election. The White House had no immediate comment on the investigation. The New York Post was first to report on the investigation into Smith.