Financial distress no excuse for not paying over pension fund contributions
A company's financial distress is not an excuse not to pay over employees' pension fund contributions and directors are personally liable for unpaid pension contributions deducted from employees' salaries, according to a judgment of the Western Cape High Court.
The Engineering Industries Pension Fund took a company, Installair, to court to recover outstanding pension and provident fund contributions from May to July 2020 and hold the company's directors personally liable for the unpaid contributions.
According to Nicolette van Vuuren, partner and Tshepiso Tshshonga, trainee attorney at Webber Wentzel, the fund relied on these provisions of the Pension Funds Act:
section 13A(1), which mandates employers pay employee and employer contributions to the retirement fund in full and on time
section 13A(7), which provides for the personal liability of individuals responsible for ensuring the employer's compliance with its obligations
section 13A(8), which imposes personal liability on directors who are regularly involved in the management of the employer's financial affairs and
section 13A(9), which requires retirement funds to notify employers in writing of individuals who may be held personally liable, read with Regulation 33, promulgated under the Pension Funds Act but which was since repealed.
The aim of the Pension Funds Act is to protect the retirement savings and financial security of members by ensuring that contributions are properly deducted, managed and paid over to the pension fund.
ALSO READ: Councils take pension billions
Pension fund went after directors as company was in liquidation
Installair was in liquidation and therefore the fund did not ask for any relief against the company, but instead against the company's directors. Van Vuuren and Tshshonga say the directors acknowledged that the company deducted pension and provident fund contributions from employees' salaries but failed to pay them over to the fund.
The directors used the deducted amounts to subsidise employee salaries due to the company's financial distress and the directors argued that the failure to pay was due to circumstances beyond their control. They contended that they did not act recklessly or negligently.
Van Vuuren and Tshshonga say one of the directors also claimed that section 13A(8) of the Pension Fund Act should not apply to her, as she was not involved in the financial affairs of the company. The directors also argued that liability under section 13(8) arises only where directors are unable to meet statutory obligations due to circumstances within their control and where there has been reckless or negligent conduct, which they denied.
ALSO READ: Pension fund contribution arrears 'serious crime against humanity'
Court finds directors clearly failed to meet their statutory obligations
However, the High Court found that the directors were actively involved in managing the company's financial affairs and clearly failed to meet their statutory obligations under the Pension Fund Act. The court described the directors' defences as 'far-fetched' and 'untenable' and rejected them summarily.
The court accordingly held the directors personally liable for the unpaid contributions, ordering them to pay the outstanding amounts, together with accrued interest. In addition, the court dismissed the argument that the Covid-19 pandemic justified the company's failure to pay over contributions.
Van Vuuren and Tshshonga note that the period in question (January to March 2020) preceded the national lockdown, which was only imposed on 26 March 2020. They say that as the company was fully operational during this time, the pandemic could not be used as an excuse for non-compliance.
ALSO READ: Only two employers convicted since 2019 for not paying their workers' pension fund contributions
Directors had no viable defence and must pay up themselves
With no valid defence presented, the court held the directors liable for the outstanding pension fund contributions. The court also emphasised that a failure to issue an order in favour of vulnerable groups would constitute a dereliction of its constitutional duty.
In addition, the court noted that the increase in withdrawal claims under the two-pot retirement system highlighted persistent non-compliance with pension contribution obligations, a trend that threatens the financial security of retirees.
Van Vuuren and Tshshonga say this case serves as a strong reminder that enforcement of pension fund compliance is not only a legal obligation but a moral imperative to protect employee's long-term financial interests.
'We urge employers and particularly retirement funds to implement robust financial controls and regularly review compliance policies to ensure that all pension contributions are paid promptly and accurately, in accordance with the Pension Fund Act and the rules of the relevant fund.
'This will go a long way to shield directors and companies from severe legal penalties and reputational harm. Even in the face of financial difficulty, diverting retirement fund contributions for other uses is strictly prohibited. Directors cannot rely on financial distress as a defence to escape personal liability for unpaid contributions.'
ALSO READ: Two-pot retirement system: Nothing for thousands of pension fund members
Case underscores there is no way out of paying over pension contributions
This case underscores a crucial legal principle that employers cannot avoid their pension obligations through delay tactics or legal posturing, Van Vuuren and Tshshonga say. 'The courts have made it clear that accountability in fulfilling statutory duties is non-negotiable. Companies that ignore these obligations do so at their peril.
'In today's challenging economic climate, many companies face financial distress and even insolvency. However, recent legal developments make it clear that financial hardship is no excuse for failing to meet statutory obligations, particularly the obligation to pay over retirement fund contributions deducted from employees' salaries.'
NOW READ: FSCA lists 2 330 employers with pension fund contributions in arrears
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
6 days ago
- The Citizen
Thousands denied pensions as employers fail to pay
R5.2bn in pension debt owed by employers, mainly municipalities and security firms, leaves thousands of workers in limbo. A large number of municipalities and private employers who did not pay employees' contributions over to pension funds may face investigations. Their non-payments have tipped the new two-pot retirement system into turmoil. The employers are facing imminent investigation by the department of employment and labour, which is planning to flood them with labour inspectors to check their compliance status. Long list of companies, municipalities that violated pension fund They will also be sanctioned by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) which has a long list of private companies and municipalities that violated the pension fund rules and the law. An FSCA report showed municipalities and firms, mainly in the security and cleaning sectors, owe their employees approximately R5.2 billion in outstanding pension fund contributions impacting 31 000 people, with some cases dating back to the 2000s. Of the outstanding contributions, some R1.4 billion is owed by municipalities, affecting pension fund members' savings. ALSO READ: Industry leaders launch market surveillance code as Steinhoff fallout lingers The FSCA identified around 7 770 noncompliant employers, with 2 330 of them being publicly listed for violating Section 13A of the Pension Funds Act. Many employees, who were hoping to claim from their pension funds under the two-pot scheme, are crying foul after hitting a brick wall when they attempted to claim the 30% due to them under the two-pot system, which came into effect last year. The system has two pots – one is for savings and constitutes one third which goes into a savings pot and is accessible for withdrawal since September last year. The other two-thirds goes into the retirement pot to be kept in the fund until the pensioner's retirement age. Employees found their monies had been withheld The distraught employees found that their monies had been withheld by employers, particularly municipalities and the security and cleaning sector, that were all blacklisted by the FSCA. This means the contributors cannot claim the saving portion of their contributions. The Congress of SA Trade Unions (Cosatu) has taken up the matter on behalf of the affected workers, who inundated their various unions with complaints about how their employers had inconvenienced and prejudiced them due to nonpayment of their pension fund contributions. ALSO READ: Missing broker, missing money Cosatu parliamentary coordinator Matthew Parks said Cosatu has established a task force with the FSCA, National Treasury and the Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (Asisa) at the National Economic Development and Labour Council to deal with this crisis. Asisa represents the collective interests of asset managers, collective investment scheme management companies, linked investment service providers, multi-managers and life insurance companies. Parks said: 'It has the potential to get out of control. We're engaging the different sectors. Engagements have taken place with the SA Local Government Association and more are planned.' Potential to get out of control The department agreed to issue a ministerial directive to labour inspectors to check pension fund compliance by employers. The department also increased the number of labour inspectors from 2 000 by 10 000 this year and 10 000 to be hired next year. The FSCA is working with the National Prosecuting Authority to pursue criminal sanctions against offenders. NOW READ: FSCA juggling high-profile cases with limited resources
IOL News
02-07-2025
- IOL News
City of Cape Town secures interim interdict to combat construction extortion in Philippi
The Western Cape High Court granted the order on Tuesday. Image: File The City of Cape Town has welcomed the decision by the Western Cape High Court to reinstate an interim interdict against extortionists and others who, it claims, are hell-bent on derailing its MyCiTi construction project along Govan Mbeki Road in Philippi. The interdict is effective until April 21, 2026, when the matter will be argued before the court. Any person threatening officials and contractors at the site or attempting to disrupt or delay the work will be arrested. The City obtained an interim order against the extortionists on June 3, 2025, after City officials and the contractor's staff received death threats and were verbally intimidated. Mayoral committee member for urban mobility, Councillor Rob Quintas, said the order was reinstituted after the respondents, among which were the Philippi Business Forum and Crossroads Business Forum, failed to present their answering affidavits to the Western Cape High Court on why the order should not be made permanent. 'I welcome this decision, and am relieved that the officials and contractor can continue their work at this site. The City will not give in to attempts by any individual or group to extort business and work opportunities, or to hijack our projects. There are lawful and transparent processes available to local businesses and residents from the affected wards to apply for the available opportunities that form part of this construction project,' Quintas said. He said those involved in the intimidation, death threats, and other disruptive tactics are well aware of the processes as they have been briefed at numerous public information days and during other engagements. 'There is only one way to benefit from the available opportunities at any City project – and that is by following the legal and transparent route. This route ensures equal access to all. We will not deviate from it. I have only one message to these business forums and other individuals who are known to us: We will not tolerate criminality and extortion, neither will we bend over backwards to accommodate those who do,' Quintas said. He said over the past weeks, self-proclaimed 'activists' within and other affiliated entities have engaged in intimidation, threats, and blatant misinformation campaigns in their efforts to dictate how and to whom employment opportunities are awarded. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'Their actions hold serious consequences and pose real threats to public safety and the delivery of essential services,' Quintas said. 'For clarity: All opportunities are allocated according to a rigorous and transparent process, which ensures equal access for all qualifying businesses and job seekers in the project footprint. Attempts to bypass or distort this process are not only unfair to others in the community, but also unlawful,' Quintas reiterated. He also reminded the broader community that: The interdict does not prevent anyone from participating in the project. It only stops those who are trying to hijack it through threats, violence and sabotage The City continues to encourage all eligible businesses to submit their profiles via the clearly marked boxes at the Subcouncil Offices. Those who choose to follow the process fairly will find the City ready and willing to support their participation. 'I call on the public and the media to remain vigilant against misinformation and disinformation. False claims designed to stoke division and derail progress do not serve the interests of the communities who will benefit from the roll-out of the MyCiTi bus service to these areas. Residents are encouraged to contact the City for more information about how to participate and get regular updates on the project,' Quintas said. IOL
IOL News
24-06-2025
- IOL News
Legal showdown looms as Cape Union Mart takes PSC to court over 'genocide funder' claims
Cape Union Mart has been called out by the PSC numerous times as 'supporting genocide', referring to the current ongoing genocide taking place in Gaza. International retailer Cape Union Mart has approached the Western Cape High Court to seek an interdict restraining the local organisation, Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), from labelling them as supporting genocide. The retailer has been called out by the PSC numerous times as "supporting genocide", referring to the current ongoing genocide taking place in Gaza as the Israelis continue to martyr the Palestinian people. In court papers, which IOL has seen, Cape Union Mart is cited as the first applicant, and the second applicant is owner and executive chairman Philip Krawits. The respondents are five activists from the PSC, and the sixth respondent is unidentified protesters, and the seventh respondent is the PSC. In its application, Cape Union Mart asked the court to interdict/restrain PSC from harassing and intimidating customers and staff.
