Thousands denied pensions as employers fail to pay
A large number of municipalities and private employers who did not pay employees' contributions over to pension funds may face investigations.
Their non-payments have tipped the new two-pot retirement system into turmoil.
The employers are facing imminent investigation by the department of employment and labour, which is planning to flood them with labour inspectors to check their compliance status.
Long list of companies, municipalities that violated pension fund
They will also be sanctioned by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) which has a long list of private companies and municipalities that violated the pension fund rules and the law.
An FSCA report showed municipalities and firms, mainly in the security and cleaning sectors, owe their employees approximately R5.2 billion in outstanding pension fund contributions impacting 31 000 people, with some cases dating back to the 2000s.
Of the outstanding contributions, some R1.4 billion is owed by municipalities, affecting pension fund members' savings.
ALSO READ: Industry leaders launch market surveillance code as Steinhoff fallout lingers
The FSCA identified around 7 770 noncompliant employers, with 2 330 of them being publicly listed for violating Section 13A of the Pension Funds Act.
Many employees, who were hoping to claim from their pension funds under the two-pot scheme, are crying foul after hitting a brick wall when they attempted to claim the 30% due to them under the two-pot system, which came into effect last year.
The system has two pots – one is for savings and constitutes one third which goes into a savings pot and is accessible for withdrawal since September last year. The other two-thirds goes into the retirement pot to be kept in the fund until the pensioner's retirement age.
Employees found their monies had been withheld
The distraught employees found that their monies had been withheld by employers, particularly municipalities and the security and cleaning sector, that were all blacklisted by the FSCA.
This means the contributors cannot claim the saving portion of their contributions.
The Congress of SA Trade Unions (Cosatu) has taken up the matter on behalf of the affected workers, who inundated their various unions with complaints about how their employers had inconvenienced and prejudiced them due to nonpayment of their pension fund contributions.
ALSO READ: Missing broker, missing money
Cosatu parliamentary coordinator Matthew Parks said Cosatu has established a task force with the FSCA, National Treasury and the Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (Asisa) at the National Economic Development and Labour Council to deal with this crisis.
Asisa represents the collective interests of asset managers, collective investment scheme management companies, linked investment service providers, multi-managers and life insurance companies.
Parks said: 'It has the potential to get out of control. We're engaging the different sectors. Engagements have taken place with the SA Local Government Association and more are planned.'
Potential to get out of control
The department agreed to issue a ministerial directive to labour inspectors to check pension fund compliance by employers.
The department also increased the number of labour inspectors from 2 000 by 10 000 this year and 10 000 to be hired next year.
The FSCA is working with the National Prosecuting Authority to pursue criminal sanctions against offenders.
NOW READ: FSCA juggling high-profile cases with limited resources
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Insurance in Crisis: Lessons from the Eastern Cape Floods
Reflecting on the devastating floods in the Eastern Cape, this article explores the critical issue of underinsurance in South Africa and the urgent need for public trust in the insurance sector. Image: Pedro Mapelo / I'solezwe lesiXhosa By Dr Darlene Kalonji Mbukula As we celebrated International Insurance day on June 28, it's a time to reflect on how we safeguard our future. But this year, reflection is overshadowed by tragedy. The Eastern Cape has been devastated by floods that have claimed over 90 lives and displaced thousands. These events have exposed a critical vulnerability of underinsurance. As we mourn and rebuild, it's clear that restoring public trust in insurance is not just an industry concern—it's a national imperative. These crises, be it climate-driven or socially triggered reveal a shared vulnerability of underinsurance. The Financial Sector Conduct Authority's (FSCA) 2023 Retail Financial Customer Behaviour and Sentiment Study paints a stark picture. It reveals that over 40% of South Africans lack confidence in understanding insurance products, and a third believe insurers deliberately avoid paying claims. Thirty-five percent let policies lapse, citing not only cost but uncertainty about value that policies add to their lives. This trust deficit that is rooted in complex policies, unpaid claims, and historical exclusion, keeps insurance out of reach for millions, particularly in rural and peri-urban areas. Underinsurance is not just a personal risk; it's a societal one. When disaster strikes, uninsured households often resort to selling assets, taking high-interest loans, or relying on overstretched community networks. This perpetuates cycles of poverty and financial exclusion, undermining South Africa's broader economic resilience. The Eastern Cape and KZN crises show how climate and social risks amplify these vulnerabilities, hitting underinsured communities the hardest. Many affected businesses and households cited that they were under insured or not insured at all due to the misconception that insurance is for big businesses or households in elite areas. A clear indication that the public does not fully trust the insurance sector nor are they informed. The insurance sector must confront its shortcomings. For too long, providers have focused on urban elites, offering solutions that are inaccessible to low-income households. Jargon-filled policies, unresponsive call centres, and opaque claims processes erode confidence. The FSCA's 2023 study confirms this. Nedbank Insurance is taking steps to lead this transformation. Through its bancassurance model, it integrates insurance into clients' financial lives with four key pillars: Trust: As a licensed insurer, Nedbank Insurance adheres to strict compliance and fairness standards, giving clients confidence that their claims will be honoured. Accessibility: Insurance is available across multiple channels—mobile apps, ATMs, branches, and call centres—making it easy for clients to engage wherever they bank. Integration: Clients can seamlessly add insurance to financial products like home loans, ensuring coverage for buildings, contents, and natural disasters. Simplicity: By using plain language and intuitive digital tools, Nedbank reduces the cognitive burden of choosing insurance, making it feel natural rather than intimidating The Eastern Cape floods and KZN riots are not isolated tragedies in thiscountry. They are warnings of a future where climate and social risks converge. Without trusted insurance, vulnerable communities face cascading and insurmountable losses. South Africans therefore must seek insurers that place trust at the centre of their operations. Insurance month should serve as a conversation starter and through the Money Matters Series that Nedbank Insurance has launched, they are committed to bringing the conversations exactly where South Africans are. From the streets of Jozi, the villages in the Eastern Cape or the townships of KZN, everybody must participate and get the correct coverage for their life stage. Climate change and social tragedies have proven that insurance is more than just funeral policies. People should not wait for the next crisis to consider insurance. At Nedbank Insurance, we believe insurance should not be a privilege—it should be a promise. A promise of protection, peace of mind, and recovery when the unexpected happens. So let's start the conversation. Let's talk about insurance—the kind you can trust. * Dr Darlene Kalonji Mbukula is the Executive Head of Client Experience at Nedbank Insurance ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Minister Malatsi's policy direction on EEIPs faces backlash from Cosatu
Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction on the role of EEIPs in the ICT sector, aiming to provide policy certainty and attract investment. Image: X/IOLGraphics Cosatu has expressed concerns over the proposed policy direction on equity equivalent investment programmes (EEIPs) in the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector. Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction on the role of EEIPs in the ICT sector, aiming to provide policy certainty and attract investment. The policy direction allows companies to meet empowerment obligations through alternatives to 30% ownership, such as investing in local suppliers, enterprise development, and job creation according to Malatsi. However, Cosatu spokesperson Matthew Parks, said the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) Act provides two options for investors that include a 30% shareholder option or an equity equivalent option. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The trade federation giant believes that the BBBEE Act is inclusive and provides accommodating options for all investors and not only for the wealthy. The federation is concerned that the proposed policy direction might allow companies like Starlink to bypass BBBEE requirements. "It's critical that Starlink, like all other investors, comply with the BBBEE Act, whether it is the shareholder or equity equivalent option," Parks emphasised. Parks cited examples of companies like IBM and Microsoft that have utilised the equity equivalent option. Cosatu argues that exempting one company from BBBEE requirements would be unfair. The Black Business Council's (BBC) spokesperson Masedi Sesele also shut down the idea saying it would be 'bending of legislation' to accommodate an individual or company. 'Legislation is there for all to comply with, no exception. Otherwise, the country will become lawless…The BBBEE legislation together with the Codes of Good Practice prescribes that any company wanting to do business in South Africa should implement all the elements of the BBBEE codes being ownership, management control, skills development, enterprise and supplier development, and socio-economic development. We don't know how the rumoured R2 billion is going to implement those important elements." Malatsi, through his spokesperson Kwena Moloto, said the policy direction sought to provide the 'much-needed' policy certainty to attract investment into the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) sector, and specifically with regards to licensing for broadcasters, internet service providers, mobile networks, or fixed and mobile networks.
The Citizen
11 hours ago
- The Citizen
Thousands denied pensions as employers fail to pay
R5.2bn in pension debt owed by employers, mainly municipalities and security firms, leaves thousands of workers in limbo. A large number of municipalities and private employers who did not pay employees' contributions over to pension funds may face investigations. Their non-payments have tipped the new two-pot retirement system into turmoil. The employers are facing imminent investigation by the department of employment and labour, which is planning to flood them with labour inspectors to check their compliance status. Long list of companies, municipalities that violated pension fund They will also be sanctioned by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) which has a long list of private companies and municipalities that violated the pension fund rules and the law. An FSCA report showed municipalities and firms, mainly in the security and cleaning sectors, owe their employees approximately R5.2 billion in outstanding pension fund contributions impacting 31 000 people, with some cases dating back to the 2000s. Of the outstanding contributions, some R1.4 billion is owed by municipalities, affecting pension fund members' savings. ALSO READ: Industry leaders launch market surveillance code as Steinhoff fallout lingers The FSCA identified around 7 770 noncompliant employers, with 2 330 of them being publicly listed for violating Section 13A of the Pension Funds Act. Many employees, who were hoping to claim from their pension funds under the two-pot scheme, are crying foul after hitting a brick wall when they attempted to claim the 30% due to them under the two-pot system, which came into effect last year. The system has two pots – one is for savings and constitutes one third which goes into a savings pot and is accessible for withdrawal since September last year. The other two-thirds goes into the retirement pot to be kept in the fund until the pensioner's retirement age. Employees found their monies had been withheld The distraught employees found that their monies had been withheld by employers, particularly municipalities and the security and cleaning sector, that were all blacklisted by the FSCA. This means the contributors cannot claim the saving portion of their contributions. The Congress of SA Trade Unions (Cosatu) has taken up the matter on behalf of the affected workers, who inundated their various unions with complaints about how their employers had inconvenienced and prejudiced them due to nonpayment of their pension fund contributions. ALSO READ: Missing broker, missing money Cosatu parliamentary coordinator Matthew Parks said Cosatu has established a task force with the FSCA, National Treasury and the Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (Asisa) at the National Economic Development and Labour Council to deal with this crisis. Asisa represents the collective interests of asset managers, collective investment scheme management companies, linked investment service providers, multi-managers and life insurance companies. Parks said: 'It has the potential to get out of control. We're engaging the different sectors. Engagements have taken place with the SA Local Government Association and more are planned.' Potential to get out of control The department agreed to issue a ministerial directive to labour inspectors to check pension fund compliance by employers. The department also increased the number of labour inspectors from 2 000 by 10 000 this year and 10 000 to be hired next year. The FSCA is working with the National Prosecuting Authority to pursue criminal sanctions against offenders. NOW READ: FSCA juggling high-profile cases with limited resources
