Starmer, Cooper and King Charles mark 20th anniversary of 7/7 attacks
The prime minister said: 'Today the whole country will unite to remember the lives lost in the 7/7 attacks, and all those whose lives were changed for ever. We honour the courage shown that day – the bravery of the emergency services, the strength of survivors and the unity of Londoners in the face of terror.
'Those who tried to divide us failed. We stood together then and we stand together now – against hate and for the values that define us of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.'
The king said people should remember those who were killed in attacks on three London Underground trains and a bus, but also the stories of courage and compassion that day.
'Today, as we mark 20 years since the tragic events of 7th July 2005, my heartfelt thoughts and special prayers remain with all those whose lives were for ever changed on that terrible summer's day,' he said.
'We remember with profound sadness the 52 innocent people who were killed in senseless acts of evil – and the enduring grief of their loved ones. We recall, too, the hundreds more who carry physical and psychological scars, and pray that their suffering may ease as the years pass.
'In doing so, we should also remember the countless stories of extraordinary courage and compassion that emerged from the darkness of that day. The selfless bravery of our emergency services, transport workers and fellow citizens who rushed towards danger to help strangers reminds us of the very best of humanity in the face of the very worst.'
Cooper said: 'Twenty years have passed since 7/7 but the passage of time makes what happened that day no less shocking. It was an appalling attack on our capital city and on democracy itself.
'As we come together to mark this anniversary, my thoughts remain with the victims, survivors and all who loved them. Amid the horror of that day, we saw the best of people, our emergency services, first responders and ordinary Londoners who bravely acted to help one another. Their courage continues to inspire us.'
Two weeks after the attacks, five other would-be suicide bombers tried to detonate similar devices on tube carriages and a bus, but one terrorist dumped his device and the four other bombs failed to properly detonate, causing no injuries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
27 minutes ago
- Leader Live
China and US ‘should be in toughest tier' of foreign influence scheme
The UK must also engage with Beijing economically 'even if this prompts retaliation' from the White House, the paper published by the Chatham House foreign affairs think tank concludes. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has sought to balance a revival of Chinese relations in its pursuit of growth with matters of national security amid concerns about Chinese interference in Britain. However, Beijing has been spared from the most stringent requirements of the UK's new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs), which would see anyone working for the state to declare influence activities in Britain. Under existing rules, China is in the lower tier of the scheme which requires the declaration of 'political' activity alone, while Iran and Russia have been placed in the higher 'enhanced' tier covering a wider range of activities. In its report, Chatham House called for both the US and Beijing to be placed in the enhanced tier 'as part of a wider move to build UK resilience to great power influence'. Report author William Matthews said: 'Including both China and the US on the enhanced tier of Firs need not entail casting them as threats, and should be considered in terms of a policy of adapting the UK to a world of great power competition. 'Inclusion of the US could offset the risk of antagonising China, though China would still likely respond angrily, and would almost certainly provoke an angry response from the US. 'However, in the long-term it would be better for this to happen now if the UK seeks to maintain an autonomous foreign policy in its own interests, rather than at a future point when… risks are amplified due to intensifying US-China competition, which would make it harder to diverge from Washington where interests do not align.' Among the risks posed by great power rivalry are the likelihood that America will show more 'transactional' behaviour as its 'relative power' declines, and the potential for the UK to be 'targeted coercively' by Beijing if it is seen to act as a proxy for US interests, he said. Chinese dominance of supply chains for critical raw minerals, electric vehicles and green power means the UK cannot avoid economic engagement with the country, the report warns. In its recommendations, it urges against the UK taking sides in the rivalry between the US and China and calls on the Government to be prepared to diverge significantly from Washington in its approach to Beijing. 'The UK cannot afford to lock in dependence on the US at the expense of supply chains and technologies essential for economic prosperity,' it says. However, alongside maintaining economic ties it urges the Government to introduce key protections to guard against 'the risks of Chinese political interference'. Among its recommendations is a call to carry out safety checks on Chinese digital components entering UK markets, to be modelled on the previous Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre – nicknamed the Cell. Where the risks can be mitigated, Chinese technology investments should be considered – outside of projects involving Government procurement and critical national infrastructure, it says. The Government should also formally make permission for entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) to operate in Britain conditional on their adherence to UK democratic norms and civil liberties, the report recommends. A 'coordination centre' bringing together policy-makers, business chiefs, academic experts and civil society should be established and meet regularly to share approaches to China-related issues, it says. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'This Government is taking a consistent, long-term and strategic approach to managing the UK's relations with China, rooted in UK and global interests. We will cooperate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must. 'This includes supporting UK business to engage with the second largest economy in the world – one of our largest trading partners – while being open-eyed to any risks and ensuring security and resilience.'
Glasgow Times
28 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
China and US ‘should be in toughest tier' of foreign influence scheme
The UK must also engage with Beijing economically 'even if this prompts retaliation' from the White House, the paper published by the Chatham House foreign affairs think tank concludes. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has sought to balance a revival of Chinese relations in its pursuit of growth with matters of national security amid concerns about Chinese interference in Britain. However, Beijing has been spared from the most stringent requirements of the UK's new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs), which would see anyone working for the state to declare influence activities in Britain. Under existing rules, China is in the lower tier of the scheme which requires the declaration of 'political' activity alone, while Iran and Russia have been placed in the higher 'enhanced' tier covering a wider range of activities. In its report, Chatham House called for both the US and Beijing to be placed in the enhanced tier 'as part of a wider move to build UK resilience to great power influence'. Report author William Matthews said: 'Including both China and the US on the enhanced tier of Firs need not entail casting them as threats, and should be considered in terms of a policy of adapting the UK to a world of great power competition. 'Inclusion of the US could offset the risk of antagonising China, though China would still likely respond angrily, and would almost certainly provoke an angry response from the US. 'However, in the long-term it would be better for this to happen now if the UK seeks to maintain an autonomous foreign policy in its own interests, rather than at a future point when… risks are amplified due to intensifying US-China competition, which would make it harder to diverge from Washington where interests do not align.' Foreign Secretary David Lammy welcomes China's foreign affairs minister Wang Yi ahead of a meeting at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (James Manning/PA) Among the risks posed by great power rivalry are the likelihood that America will show more 'transactional' behaviour as its 'relative power' declines, and the potential for the UK to be 'targeted coercively' by Beijing if it is seen to act as a proxy for US interests, he said. Chinese dominance of supply chains for critical raw minerals, electric vehicles and green power means the UK cannot avoid economic engagement with the country, the report warns. In its recommendations, it urges against the UK taking sides in the rivalry between the US and China and calls on the Government to be prepared to diverge significantly from Washington in its approach to Beijing. 'The UK cannot afford to lock in dependence on the US at the expense of supply chains and technologies essential for economic prosperity,' it says. However, alongside maintaining economic ties it urges the Government to introduce key protections to guard against 'the risks of Chinese political interference'. Among its recommendations is a call to carry out safety checks on Chinese digital components entering UK markets, to be modelled on the previous Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre – nicknamed the Cell. Where the risks can be mitigated, Chinese technology investments should be considered – outside of projects involving Government procurement and critical national infrastructure, it says. The Government should also formally make permission for entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) to operate in Britain conditional on their adherence to UK democratic norms and civil liberties, the report recommends. A 'coordination centre' bringing together policy-makers, business chiefs, academic experts and civil society should be established and meet regularly to share approaches to China-related issues, it says. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'This Government is taking a consistent, long-term and strategic approach to managing the UK's relations with China, rooted in UK and global interests. We will cooperate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must. 'This includes supporting UK business to engage with the second largest economy in the world – one of our largest trading partners – while being open-eyed to any risks and ensuring security and resilience.'
Rhyl Journal
28 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
China and US ‘should be in toughest tier' of foreign influence scheme
The UK must also engage with Beijing economically 'even if this prompts retaliation' from the White House, the paper published by the Chatham House foreign affairs think tank concludes. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has sought to balance a revival of Chinese relations in its pursuit of growth with matters of national security amid concerns about Chinese interference in Britain. However, Beijing has been spared from the most stringent requirements of the UK's new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs), which would see anyone working for the state to declare influence activities in Britain. Under existing rules, China is in the lower tier of the scheme which requires the declaration of 'political' activity alone, while Iran and Russia have been placed in the higher 'enhanced' tier covering a wider range of activities. In its report, Chatham House called for both the US and Beijing to be placed in the enhanced tier 'as part of a wider move to build UK resilience to great power influence'. Report author William Matthews said: 'Including both China and the US on the enhanced tier of Firs need not entail casting them as threats, and should be considered in terms of a policy of adapting the UK to a world of great power competition. 'Inclusion of the US could offset the risk of antagonising China, though China would still likely respond angrily, and would almost certainly provoke an angry response from the US. 'However, in the long-term it would be better for this to happen now if the UK seeks to maintain an autonomous foreign policy in its own interests, rather than at a future point when… risks are amplified due to intensifying US-China competition, which would make it harder to diverge from Washington where interests do not align.' Among the risks posed by great power rivalry are the likelihood that America will show more 'transactional' behaviour as its 'relative power' declines, and the potential for the UK to be 'targeted coercively' by Beijing if it is seen to act as a proxy for US interests, he said. Chinese dominance of supply chains for critical raw minerals, electric vehicles and green power means the UK cannot avoid economic engagement with the country, the report warns. In its recommendations, it urges against the UK taking sides in the rivalry between the US and China and calls on the Government to be prepared to diverge significantly from Washington in its approach to Beijing. 'The UK cannot afford to lock in dependence on the US at the expense of supply chains and technologies essential for economic prosperity,' it says. However, alongside maintaining economic ties it urges the Government to introduce key protections to guard against 'the risks of Chinese political interference'. Among its recommendations is a call to carry out safety checks on Chinese digital components entering UK markets, to be modelled on the previous Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre – nicknamed the Cell. Where the risks can be mitigated, Chinese technology investments should be considered – outside of projects involving Government procurement and critical national infrastructure, it says. The Government should also formally make permission for entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) to operate in Britain conditional on their adherence to UK democratic norms and civil liberties, the report recommends. A 'coordination centre' bringing together policy-makers, business chiefs, academic experts and civil society should be established and meet regularly to share approaches to China-related issues, it says. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'This Government is taking a consistent, long-term and strategic approach to managing the UK's relations with China, rooted in UK and global interests. We will cooperate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must. 'This includes supporting UK business to engage with the second largest economy in the world – one of our largest trading partners – while being open-eyed to any risks and ensuring security and resilience.'
