Kate Middleton quietly holds meeting with A-lister after pulling out of Royal Ascot
The Princess of Wales has quietly returned to work after she pulled out of Royal Ascot last week.
Kate, 43, had been expected to attend the Berkshire racing festival with her husband Prince William - and was even announced in the official carriage procession - before Kensington Palace confirmed she would not be attending after all.
MailOnline understands that the Princess was 'disappointed' not to be in attendance 'but she has to find the right balance as she fully returns to public facing engagements'.
On Wednesday this week, the Princess privately received Melinda Gates - the former wife of Microsoft Founder Bill - at Windsor Castle, marking her return to official duties.
Kate was joined by her husband for her first engagement back in their role as patrons of the Royal Foundation, according to the Court Circular - which officially lists the royal family 's engagements.
The Royal Foundation is Kate and William's primary philanthropic and charitable vehicle, and focuses on areas such as the early years and mental health.
American philanthropist Melinda is also the founder of Pivotal Ventures, which aims to advance equality among women in the US - though the purpose of their meeting is as of yet unclear.
It's not known whether the Princess and Melinda have previously joined forces in the past - but she crossed paths with William in 2014 when he presented her with the Chatham House prize.
Earlier on Wednesday, Prince William also held an investiture at the castle and granted former England manager Gareth Southgate a knighthood.
Last week, the Princess of Wales pulled out of attending Royal Ascot at the last minute as she continues to 'find the right balance' following her battle with cancer.
Racegoers had been hoping to see the Princess after the Prince of Wales was named as one of the figures awarding race prizes during the second day of the meet.
Ascot officials had confirmed at 12pm that the Princess was due to be in the second carriage in the royal procession with William, in a published carriage list.
But less than half an hour later, Kensington Palace confirmed just before 12.30pm that Kate would not be attending - and a revised carriage list was published by Ascot.
Royal aides insisted the original list had issued in 'error', according to the Daily Mail's Rebecca English.
'On some levels I actually think this is a good reminder that she was really seriously ill last year and underwent a significant period of chemo. As anyone who has been through that experience will tell you, you can feel very unwell for a long time afterwards. It can take years [to recover],' one source said.
'She wants to find the right balance and work with a greater degree of flexibility than before.
'This is a woman who plays a very important role in the monarchy [as Princess of Wales and future Queen], but in order for her to do it, both now and in the future, she needs to get this right,' they said.
The Royal Ascot carriage list was published at 12pm with Kate included (left), then a revised version was issued just after 12.30pm (right) when it was announced she would not attend
However, it is 'very likely' that Kate will be seen at Wimbledon, which starts Monday 30 June, in her role as royal patron of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club.
She is also expected to play a 'significant' part in next month's French State Visit at Windsor Castle.
Despite her daughter's absence, Kate's mother Carole Middleton did attend Ascot, wearing a dress from luxury women's designer ME+EM - alongside her daughter-in-law Alizee Thevenet, the wife of Kate's brother James Middleton.
Last Friday, Kate broke her silence after her absence as she released a personal message about a cause close to her heart - for Children's Hospice Week.
The highly emotional note, which was signed by the princess, was shared on social media by Tŷ Hafan and children's hospice charity Together for Short Lives, the charity for children's palliative care.
Kate said: 'No parent expects to hear that their child has a serious health condition that could shorten their life.
'Sadly, this is the reality faced by thousands of families across the country, leaving them heart-broken, fearful of the future and often desperately isolated.
'Being able to access the support of one of the UK's 54 children's hospices means they don't have to face that future alone.'
Last Friday, the Princess released a personal message to mark Children's Hospice Week
The Princess on a tour of the V&A East Storehouse in Hackney Wick, London, on June 11, led by the director of the Victoria & Albert Museum, Tristram Hunt
The mother-of-three had visited Tŷ Hafan hospice in January - marking her first royal 'away day' since 2023 as part of her slow and steady return to royal duties following her treatment for cancer.
The 43-year-old Princess has been making a gradual return to public duties since it was announced in January that she was in remission from cancer.
Prior to Ascot, she had attended three high-profile event in just a week - Trooping the Colour, the annual Order of the Garter service and a visit to a V&A storage facility in London.
The Princess revealed in January she was in remission from cancer after making an emotional return to the specialist cancer institution, the Royal Marsden Hospital in Chelsea, London, where she was treated to comfort fellow patients.
She had been receiving chemotherapy for an undisclosed form of cancer since late February last year with the King beginning his cancer care earlier that month following his diagnosis after treatment for an enlarged prostate.
Announcing in September her treatment had ended, Kate described in an emotional video message how the previous nine months had been 'incredibly tough for us as a family' and 'doing what I can to stay cancer free is now my focus'.
William later said in a separate interview how 2024 had been 'brutal'.
Last weekend, Kate shared a sweet birthday tribute to her husband Prince William for his 43rd birthday.
The adorable image showed the heir sitting in a field, while playing with a group of small puppies, whose mother is believed to be Orla, the Wales' family dog.
In the image, the father-of-three is dressed casually, wearing jeans paired with a long-sleeved green button down shirt, as the puppies crawl over him sweetly.
The photograph is accompanied by a caption from the Princess of Wales and other members of their family.
It says: 'Happy birthday! Love C, G, C, L, Orla and the puppies!'
In the somewhat casual photograph, the Prince of Wales is seen looking pensive as he sits outside in a rural setting.
He is dressed in a button down pale blue shirt, as well as navy slacks - and in what may be a controversial move for some, he wears a very light beard.
The image was accompanied by a simple caption which read: 'Happy Birthday to The Prince of Wales!'.
Earlier in the day, a tribute to William was shared by his father King Charles, in which the monarch shared an unseen image of the heir as well as a sweet message via the Royal Family 's official X (formerly Twitter) account.
But just days later, the royals were targeted by animal rights activists People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), who branded them 'staggeringly out of touch' for breeding their cocker spaniels during a so-called 'animal homelessness crisis'.
They said nobody should be 'churning out a litter' when animal shelters were full of dogs needing homes.
Elisa Allen, vice president of programmes for US organisation Peta, said: 'The Prince and Princess of Wales should know that shelters here and worldwide are overflowing with puppies desperate for a second chance at a loving home.'
She told MailOnline that 'churning out a litter in the midst of this animal homelessness crisis is staggeringly out of touch'.
Ms Allen - who once sent Meghan Markle a vegan leather handbag as a birthday gift in 2018 - added: 'If William is going to lead, he might well take a lesson from King Charles and Queen Camilla, who have chosen to adopt from a shelter rather than contribute to the problem.'
The Prince and Princess have had Orla since 2020, after their first dog together Lupo, also a cocker spaniel – which they were given as a wedding present from Kate's brother James Middleton – died unexpectedly.
James is an experienced breeder and has owned three generations of cocker spaniels.
Orla gave birth to four puppies last month and the photograph was taken in Windsor on a sunny day earlier in June.
The royal couple are understood to be planning to keep one of the new puppies.
In February, Camilla told how she had adopted a rescue puppy after she was left heartbroken by the death of her beloved dog Beth.
The Queen revealed the addition to her canine family called Moley – because, in her words, the dog 'looks just like a mole' - when she met a fellow dog lover at an event in Canterbury, Kent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
6 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Check your meter before Energy Price Cap changes on Monday
Consumers should submit readings before midnight on June 30 to avoid being overcharged, and to ensure that smart meters are working properly. Accurate readings prevent suppliers from estimating usage and applying previously higher prices to energy used after June 30, as Ofgem resets the cap on what suppliers can charge every three months. The latest change from £1,849 to a lower rate of £1,720 on July 1 represents a 7% drop, with average annual bills falling by around £122. Bad news! Ofgem's energy Price Cap that dictates the rate 2/3 homes in Eng, Scot & Wales pay, is now predicted to rise even more than before. I've knocked up this table showing today's new average predictions (from 3 big firms) for the Cap for someone on supposed 'typical use';… However, this is still £582 more than households were paying before the energy crisis began in autumn 2021. Advice Direct Scotland, a charity which runs the national energy advice service is among charities calling for a 'longer-term solution to the scourge of fuel poverty' with a UK-wide social energy tariff, to support low-income households which would automatically place the most vulnerable people on cheaper deals. It said that anyone unable to submit readings by June 30 should do so as close to the date as possible and advised taking a photo of the meter in case of disputes, and suggested checking for more favourable tariffs. The next price cap update will be announced by Ofgem in August, and many people are still struggling with record levels of debt. More on energy bills Conor Forbes, policy director at Advice Direct Scotland, says: 'Lower gas and electricity prices will come as a relief for households, but bills remain significantly higher than they were before the energy crisis began. 'It's important to submit meter readings before the new price cap comes into force, to prevent being overcharged. 'For extra peace of mind, take a dated photo of the meter. If you have a smart meter, make sure it's working. 'People can also take practical action by examining their bills, finding out how much they are paying, and checking if there are cheaper options available with other suppliers. 'Struggling customers should know they do not have to suffer in silence. Our expert team is on hand for anyone who needs help, no matter their circumstances. 'However, a longer-term solution to the scourge of fuel poverty is a UK-wide social energy tariff, which would automatically put vulnerable people on the cheapest deals.' Household energy debt has reached alarming levels, underscoring just how much pressure both consumers and suppliers are under. Overall arrears remain alarmingly high, with 75% of the total debt having no repayment plan in place. The average debt per customer is £1,200, exacerbating an already pressurised market and making it increasingly difficult for both customers and suppliers to manage rising costs. 'Today's figures from Ofgem show that household energy debt has continued to rise, with an increase of £300m in Q1 of 2025, having now grown for ten consecutive quarters," says Matt Turner-Tait, Senior Manager at specialist Energy & Utilities consultancy, BFY Group. "There have been some well-intended attempts by the government and regulatory bodies to relieve the issue – such as the Warm Home Discount becoming accessible to double the number of households previously, or Ofgem's prepayment meter review prompting suppliers to return £18.6m to customers through compensation and debt write offs. "However, these measures don't provide the much-needed long term relief that customers need. "Since the covid crisis, the UK retains the most expensive electricity bills out of 25 other European countries – which highlights the need for urgent, sustainable action at policy level. Suppliers can provide some relief to customers through early engagement, accessible advice, and smarter tools for managing bills - this will help customers retain some financial stability.'
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prepare for economic collapse: last week the 2026 British financial crisis became inevitable
Make a note of last Friday's date: June 27 2025. It was the day that Britain's coming financial crisis became inescapable. In backing away from his attempt to slow, however feebly, the rise in benefits spending, Sir Keir Starmer was signalling to the world that Labour would never bring Britain's budget back into balance. The storm might break in 2026 or 2027 or even later. Labour politicians will do everything in their power to postpone the reckoning. But debts are not just paper liabilities; they end up being recovered. We have all just watched a hopeless and hapless PM throw away his majority and, with it, any hope of reform. And the bond vigilantes saw what we saw. What were Labour's rebels thinking? Their constituents will be hammered when the money runs out, when salaries and savings lose their value and imports become luxuries. They will be swept from office just as surely as were Greece's socialist MPs after the euro crisis. Do they even believe their own claims? Do they truly imagine that they are shielding the vulnerable? Do they picture themselves posed heroically over some wheelchair-bound child, fending off the ghost of Margaret Thatcher? I doubt it. They have, after all, seen the numbers. They know that one working-age adult in ten is now on benefits. They know that the number is rising, with a thousand people a day applying for Personal Independence Payments (PIP) – a rise which, tellingly, is not mirrored in any indices of sickness. They understand how PIP works. They know it can be accessed on grounds of, for example, anxiety, alcoholism, or ADHD (there are 50,000 claimants in this last category). They are aware that most new claims are for mental health conditions that are hard to verify. They will have seen the online videos explaining how to make a successful claim – you get this many points for saying that you have trouble getting dressed, this many for saying that you can't sit still, and so on. They might even be dimly acquainted with the age breakdown of the claimants. The fastest rise is among 25- to 34-year-olds, an incredible increase of 69 per cent in just five years. Incredible in every sense. Such a sudden and cataclysmic rise in disability would be visible on every street. Do you think Labour MPs, who meet PIP claimants in their surgeries, genuinely suppose that they are all incapacitated to the point of being unable to earn a living? No, this was never about justice for people with disabilities – still less about justice for taxpayers. Indeed, the most immediate consequence of guaranteeing existing but not future claims is to deter people from coming off benefits, knowing that there will be a lower rate if they go back. What we are seeing is the lowest and most cynical short-termism from MPs who want to keep their seats. In parts of urban Britain, Labour's election strategy involves distributing postal votes to welfare claimants along with the warnings that the Tories are coming for their benefits. From a purely partisan point of view, it suits Labour MPs to have constituents who claim state handouts. Sure, handouts are debilitating for the recipients and burdensome for the contributors; but the politicians who arrange the transfer often get an electoral reward. Labour MPs' WhatsApp groups have been pulsing with links to a study by the Disability Poverty Campaign Group which shows that, in nearly 200 Labour constituencies, the number of people claiming PIP is higher than the parliamentary majority. Among the MPs who are, so to speak, dependent on dependents, are Shabana Mahmood, Wes Streeting and Jess Phillips. You have to spend time around politicians to understand the extent to which such surveys strike icy daggers into their hearts. Never mind the moral case for self-reliance; never mind the debts we are loading onto our children. What looms in the feverish fears of MPs is having to mount the stage in their local sports centre and make a concession speech. Yet, paradoxically, they are making their defeat almost certain. The British state spends an unbelievable £52 billion a year on disability and incapacity benefits. According to the DWP, that figure will rise to £70 billion at today's prices by the end of the present Parliament. The changes that were first proposed would not have reversed that rise. They would not even meaningfully have slowed it. They would have shaved only £5 billion from the scheduled increase. In the event, that tiny dent was unacceptable to Labour MPs, fresh from running charities and NGOs, unused to hard decisions, unprepared for unpopularity, uninterested in economic reality. Asked in a BBC interview how she would make up the shortfall, one of the rebel leaders, Meg Hillier, replied airily that that was up to the Chancellor. In truth, the Chancellor's decision has been made for her. Labour backbenchers would rather pull the sky down on our heads than risk a bad local headline. Labour Whips, knowing that the only thing they have going for them is the split between the two Right-wing parties, will do anything to avoid a similar split on the Left. Labour is thus incapable of reducing expenditure. If it could not stick to its commitments on reducing the winter fuel allowance, capping child benefit or slowing the rise in PIP, it is plainly not going to attempt a radical overhaul of benefits. Without spending cuts, two options remain: yet higher taxes or yet more borrowing. Both damage growth – or at least they would if there were any growth to damage. In an economy that is flatlining (at least when we strip out the impact of immigration and consider GDP per head) they will topple us into recession. Which brings us back to the coming gilt strike. Who knows what the trigger will be? It might occur overseas. When bond markets turn, they are not interested in geography, justice or moral hazard. Rather, they look coldly for the weakest wildebeest in the herd, the spavined, limping laggard. And among major economies, that is Britain. Our politicians are shockingly complacent when it comes to the possibility of a full-scale financial crisis. We haven't had a proper one since 1976 and, frankly, even that was tame by global standards. Yes, the markets stepped in to punish Labour's profligacy, short-termism and cowardice. But our national debt back then was 47 per cent of GDP and falling; now it is 96 per cent and rising. Spending a chunk of my teenage years in South America in the 1980s, I am perhaps more alive than some of my countrymen to what a debt crisis looks like. I have seen, not just the inflation, the unemployment, the poverty – but the consequent lurch into authoritarianism. If twentieth-century South America seems too exotic, cast your mind back instead to the euro crisis. Ireland took it best, gulping down its medicine and making serious economies. Public sector salaries were reduced in real terms and there were rounds of redundancies. From cabinet ministers to claimants of child benefit, everyone had to take a cut. I suspect that, under Labour, our crisis will be more Greek than Irish. In other words, we will continue to vote 'against the cuts'. Our politicians will raise taxes in ways that would have made Charles I blush. We will elect parties that promise to 'end austerity'. And, as a result, we will end up having to make deeper cuts. And Labour? Labour will go the way of Greece's PASOK, as voters blame it for having failed to make softer savings while there was still time. It is true that voters themselves are in no mood for such savings yet; but good luck with using that as an excuse. Starmer might manage to limp on until the next election, a prisoner of the 400 standard-issue big-government Labour MPs who want him to stick to the Corbynite policies on which he was elected party leader. Either way, Labour itself is finished. Last week will be remembered as the moment when its MPs took the decision to check out.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Western Force 7-54 British & Irish Lions PLAYER RATINGS: Who was imperious in Perth? Which star made a case to partner Maro Itoje and who had an ill-fated audtion?
The 2025 British & Irish Lions bounced back from their tour's false start against Argentina last week to claim a 54-7 over Western Force in Perth. But given that warm-up matches are judged by performances rather than results, Andy Farrell still has much to ponder after a solid, if unimpressive, first-half display.
