Gov. Greg Abbott signs 'DOGE Bill' into law: 'Texas is getting too burdensome'
"Business could not be doing better, with one exception," Abbott said as he affixed his signature to Senate Bill 14. "Among the CEOs that I talk to every single week, there were growing concerns, and concerns that were repeated time and again, that the regulatory environment in Texas is getting too burdensome."
SB 14 has been dubbed the "DOGE bill," taking its cue from Elon Musk's federal cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency. The legislation is something of an homage to the Trump administration's effort to downsize the federal government, and it establishes the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office "to provide critical assistance and direction in identifying rules that are no longer necessary or useful," according to the Legislature's bill analysis.
Despite holding the state's highest government office for 10 years, and with Republicans having control of both chambers of the Legislature and all the statewide elective offices since 2003, Abbott said he was "shocked" to learn that Texas has the fifth-highest regulatory burden for business in the nation.
Abbott said that before President Donald Trump and Musk, the billionaire owner of Tesla, Space X and X (formerly Twitter), had enshrined the term "DOGE" into the political vernacular, his administration began working to reduce red tape at the state level to promote business startups and relocations.
He used Musk — Trump's point person for DOGE — as an example, saying the founder of electric vehicle maker Tesla approached him in 2020 about the prospect of building an assembly plant in Texas. Abbott said that he swiftly got behind the proposal and that the sprawling Tesla Gigafactory along the Texas 130 toll road in Travis County was operational within 18 months of its ground-breaking.
More: Elon Musk to take step back from DOGE as Tesla profit sinks 71%
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the state Senate's president who fast-tracked SB 14 through the upper chamber, said government bureaucracy must always be closely monitored.
House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Lubbock Republican in his first session at the helm of the lower chamber, said that, though the proposal seeks to put business development on a glide path, it will not replace oversight with a blind eye.
"Texas businesses, Texas citizens, they deserve regulations that are (in) plain English," Burrows said. "What this bill is going to do is provide an efficient regulatory framework. And what I believe is, the fewer regulations we have, the more efficient they are, the easier they are to understand, it is going to help Texas' business and economy continue to boom.
"We want to have a clear review of all of our agencies, where we can trim and how we can save taxpayers money so that they will continue to come here and create jobs and to our economic viability and competitiveness."
More: Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check in the near future? Here's when dividends could be sent
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Gov. Abbott signs Texas DOGE Bill, says it will streamline bureaucracy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Starlink Down—What Caused The Outage And Is It Back Up Yet?
Reports that Starlink was down started flooding in on Down Detector at about 15:00 EST, numbering ... More about 55,000 reports. Elon Musk's Starlink went down on Thursday afternoon, causing chaos across the globe. Reports that Starlink was down started flooding in on Down Detector at about 15:00 EST, numbering about 55,000 reports. Of the reported issues with Starlink, 68% said there was a 'total blackout.' Starlink's official account posted on X, formerly Twitter, to acknowledge the outage and reassure users it was working on a solution. Elon Musk apologised for the outage of his Starlink network, on X. 'SpaceX will remedy the root cause to ensure it doesn't happen again,' he wrote. Satellite internet constellation Starlink provides network coverage for around 130 countries and territories, with the aim of offering global mobile broadband. Part of Elon Musk's SpaceX, the company is growing quickly, Over the past year, Starlink expanded to 42 new countries, territories and other markets around the world, according to a recent press release. Elon Musk apologised for the outage of his Starlink network, on X formerly Twitter. 'SpaceX will ... More remedy root cause to ensure it doesn't happen again,' he wrote. How Long Was Starlink Down And Is It Back Up Yet? The outage lasted around two hours. Now, Starlink seems to be mostly back up and running, but there are still reports of issues at the time of writing. 'Still down here in the Philippines north Cotabato,' one user wrote on Down Detector. 'East Texas still down,' another user added. However, users in Nesbit Mississippi and central California said they could now access Starlink services. 'Starlink has now mostly recovered from the network outage, which lasted approximately 2.5 hours,' Michael Nicolls, VP of Starlink engineering at SpaceX wrote on X. What Caused The Starlink Outage? Nicolls says the outage was due to 'failure of key internal software services that operate the core network.' 'We apologize for the temporary disruption in our service; we are deeply committed to providing a highly reliable network, and will fully root cause this issue and ensure it does not occur again, Nicolls wrote. I have contacted Starlink owner SpaceX for a comment and will update this article if the firm responds. It sounds like the outage was caused by a technical issue, what, specifically that was is difficult to say without more information. However, Starlink users aren't used to seeing outages of this size and the tens of thousands or more people who were affected will not be impressed by the service going down.
15 minutes ago
Trump signs bill to cancel $9 billion in foreign aid, public broadcasting funding
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump signed a bill Thursday canceling about $9 billion that had been approved for public broadcasting and foreign aid as Republicans look to lock in cuts to programs targeted by the White House's Department of Government Efficiency. The bulk of the spending being clawed back is for foreign assistance programs. About $1.1 billion was destined for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which finances NPR and PBS, though most of that money is distributed to more than 1,500 local public radio and television stations around the country. The White House had billed the legislation as a test case for Congress and said more such rescission packages would be on the way. Some Republicans were uncomfortable with the cuts, yet supported them anyway, wary of crossing Trump or upsetting his agenda. Democrats unanimously rejected the cuts but were powerless to stop them. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. Conservatives particularly directed their ire at NPR and PBS. Lawmakers with large rural constituencies voiced grave concern about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in their state. Some stations will have to close, they warned. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said the stations are 'not just your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your volcano alert.' On the foreign aid cuts, the White House argued that they would incentivize other nations to step up and do more to respond to humanitarian crises and that the rescissions best served the American taxpayer. Democrats argued that the Republican administration's animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill. They also expressed concerns that the cuts would have deadly consequences for many of the world's most impoverished people. 'With these cuts, we will cause death, spread disease and deepen starvation across the planet,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii.
an hour ago
The White House wants more states to redraw House maps to help GOP. Democrats are readying a fight
WASHINGTON -- The White House is eyeing redistricting efforts beyond Texas to help Republicans hold the U.S. House in 2026 — and Democrats are preparing to escalate in response, with one senator vowing to go 'nuclear' if needed. What's shaping up to be a multistate redistricting battle could mark the opening round for House control ahead of next year's midterms, when Democrats see retaking the House as the party's best chance to break Republicans' hold on Congress and President Donald Trump is determined to keep the GOP's majority. Democrats, under pressure from their base to match GOP tactics, have grown more forceful in their messaging and are taking concrete steps to push back, even as the party enters at a disadvantage. 'If they're going to go nuclear, then so am I,' said Sen. Elissa Slotkin. 'They're forcing us into this position because they're trying to pick their voters.' At Trump's urging, Texas Republicans are looking to redraw congressional maps to favor GOP candidates during a 30-day special legislative session that started this week. Trump has said he wants to carve out five new winnable GOP seats. But Trump officials are now going beyond just Texas, looking to redraw lines in other states such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them. Democrats have fewer options. More of the states the party controls do not allow elected partisans to draw maps, instead entrusting groups such as independent commissions to draw fair lines. Still, party leaders are exploring their legal options and shifting their posture. A party long known for believing it's on the moral high ground is signaling it's ready to fight dirty. 'We can't fight with one hand behind our backs,' Rep. Pete Aguilar, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, told reporters Tuesday. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries may have fewer options to match Republicans, but it hasn't stopped him from exploring them. Earlier this month, Jeffries' team spoke with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's office about redistricting after the news in Texas, according to a person familiar with the conversations. Drawing new congressional lines now could run afoul of the state constitution and undoubtedly draw legal challenges — but it doesn't appear to be off the table. 'What I'm going to say is, all is fair in love and war,' Hochul said Thursday, adding that she's 'going to see what our options are.' 'If there's other states that are violating the rules that are going to try and give themselves an advantage, all I'll say is I'm going to look at it closely with Hakeem Jeffries.' Jeffries and his advisers have also examined legal strategies in other states with Democratic trifectas, including California, where he recently met with the state's congressional delegation. On Wednesday, the California delegation's Democrats discussed the redistricting issue during a private meeting on Capitol Hill. And on Thursday, Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi joined an emergency call with others in the state about the effort. In an interview with The Associated Press, Pelosi said that she is not a fan of using redistricting outside of the 10-year window, but if that's what the party needs 'to win, we will do that.' 'Everything is on the table,' Pelosi told AP. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, a potential Democratic contender for president in 2028, has taken a similar approach. He said on social media in response to Trump's redistricting push that 'two can play this game.' An independent commission handles redistricting in his state. Newsom has floated the notion of California's Democratic-controlled legislature doing a mid-decade redistricting, arguing it wouldn't be expressly forbidden by the 2008 ballot initiative that created the commission. He's also mentioned the possibility of squeezing in a special election to repeal the popular commission system before the 2026 elections get underway, either of which would be a long shot. Beyond the behind-the-scenes maneuvering, Democrats see the redistricting fight as an opportunity to meet the moment politically — delivering the kind of aggressive pushback their voters have demanded. Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, in a series of social media posts, pushed Democrats to fight back, saying the party should 'gerrymander to help Democrats' and arguing they should dilute heavily Democratic districts to secure more seats 'everywhere.' 'It's time for Democrats to understand the existential threat. Republicans aren't playing around and they will do this as long as it takes to keep power,' he warned. Gallego later told The Associated Press it's simply about ensuring 'that we're also fighting back.' That sentiment has gained traction beyond Congress. Former Texas congressman Beto O'Rourke said Sunday on CNN that Democrats need to be 'to be absolutely ruthless about getting back in power.' Next month, former President Barack Obama is heading to Martha's Vineyard for a fundraiser benefiting the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, a group whose nonprofit affiliate has filed and supported litigation in several states over GOP-drawn districts. Eric Holder, Obama's former attorney general who chairs the outfit, is expected to attend, along with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, according to a copy of the invitation first reported by Politico. In a statement to AP, Marina Jenkins, executive director of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, called Republicans' moves 'cheating,' adding that the group would be 'using every single tool at our disposal to fight back and stop Donald Trump's scheme to steal the 2026 midterm elections from voters.' In addition to fundraisers like the one featuring Obama next month, that tool kit includes the group and its affiliates focusing on organizing volunteers and donors around the special Texas session. They also make media appearances and craft digital campaigns to highlight their arguments. Redrawing of congressional maps holds risks. During the 2010s, Texas' GOP-controlled Legislature redrew the congressional map to bolster the party's majority. But the advantage proved short-lived: in 2018, a backlash to Trump's presidency helped Democrats flip two seats that Republicans had assumed were safely red. 'There had to be folks that drew these lines and everything that had a very strong opinion of exactly where they ought to be,' said West Virginia Sen. Jim Justice, a Republican. 'Now just to say, 'OK, we're going to redraw this, we're going to redraw that. And by god, if you're going to redraw, we're going to redraw.' I don't like that.' Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley said Thursday that he has not yet spoken to any Republicans in his state about redistricting but that it's up to the Missouri legislature and governor to make the call. 'I'd love to have more Republicans,' Hawley said.
