Karnataka High Court directs State government to submit Commission report on Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede
A Division Bench comprising Justice Jayant Banerji and Justice Umesh M. Adiga issued the direction on a petition filed by DNA Entertainment Networks Pvt. Ltd., which has challenged the legality of the procedure adopted by the Commission in conducting the inquiry.
Request by government
Meanwhile, Senior Advocate B.K. Sampath Kumar, appearing for DNA Networks, told the bench that the function to facilitate the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) team on the steps of Vidhana Soudha on June 4 was also arranged by DNA Networks on the request made by the State government.
It may be noted that DNA is the event manager for the Royal Challengers Sports Pvt. Ltd., which owns RCB cricket team.
The petitioner-company has questioned the legality of the Commission's report while alleging that the Commission had violated the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry (COI), 1952, as no opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses was given to DNA Networks.
Reputation impacted
Mr. Kumar also contended that the reputation of the company has been severely affected due to the continued publication of the Commission's report in all forms of media, as it appears that the media has all the details of the Commission's report, even though the petitioner-company was not given a copy despite multiple requests.
Meanwhile, the State Advocate-General Shashi Kiran Shetty argued that DNA Network will have to approach the civil court against the media publications on the commission's report, while stating that the Government has nothing to do with publications in the media citing the Commission's report.
DNA Network, in its petition, has claimed that the report of the Commission was leaked to the media but not given to the company, while pointing out that even the applications filed by it under the RTI Act have also been rejected.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka HC asks govt to submit stampede report in sealed cover
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court on Tuesday directed the state govt to submit the inquiry report concerning the Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede incident in a sealed cover. The directive came during Tuesday's hearing of a petition by DNA Entertainment Private Limited, Bengaluru, which sought to quash the report prepared by the one-man Commission of Inquiry headed by Justice John Michael Cunha regarding the June 4 RCB victory celebrations when 11 lives were lost in the stampede. The division bench, led by Justice Jayant Banerji, stated: "Arguments have been advanced at length. After hearing for some time, we deem it fit to direct that the report of the commission be placed for perusal in a sealed cover. On the request of the advocate general, list this matter on Aug 7." You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru The petitioner's counsel highlighted that while the commission was to submit its report in a month, it was presented to the state chief minister much later on July 11, as reported by media outlets. Counsel noted that despite media coverage suggesting recommended actions against RCSPL (Royal Challengers Sports Pvt. Ltd), KSCA (the Karnataka State Cricket Association), the petitioner, and police officers, the petitioner never received a copy of the report. Additionally, counsel argued that the notification's terms did not authorise the commission to recommend actions. The petitioner's counsel also cited the LK Advani case ruling from the Supreme Court, emphasising that affected parties must receive proper hearing opportunities, which the petitioner did not receive. Advocate general Shashikiran Shetty contested the petition's validity, noting it sought to challenge the commission's report based solely on newspaper articles. The division bench expressed that it is necessary to examine the report regarding compliance with sections 8a and 8b of the Commission of Inquiry Act, particularly regarding the petitioner's claims about denial of cross-examination opportunities and access to deposition copies. The bench concluded that they would review the report concerning both procedural aspects, directing the state govt to submit it in a sealed envelope.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Man held for marrying, sexually assaulting minor girl in Raichur
Raichur: The women police apprehended an individual on Aug 3, concerning the sexual assault of a minor girl whom he married. According to SP G Puttamadaiah, the police took Tatappa, 22, son of Narasayya from Shaktinagar, into custody. The women police filed a case against 10 individuals, including Tatappa, on July 21, following a complaint from Ravikumar, the panchayat development officer of Devasugur, who verified the documents related to the girl's age. Taking the matter seriously, the Karnataka State Commission for Protection of Child Rights directed the Yadgir police to urgently detain the father-in-law who married the minor. The FIR indicates that accused No.2 to 10 — Gaddemma, Sumangala, Geetha, Anjaneyya, Gaddeppa, Renuka, Sadanand, Mahadevi, and Ramanagouda — conducted the marriage of Tatappa with the minor girl on April 18, at Shaktinagar, fully aware that she was underage. Additionally, the FIR noted, citing the victim's testimony, that Tatappa sexually assaulted her twice at his residence, despite being aware of her minor status. The police initiated a case under sections 9 and 10 of the Prevention of Child Marriages Act, Sections 64 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita 2023, and Sections 6 and 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (Pocso) 2012. In his comments on the arrest, Commission member Shashidhar Kosambe stated: "To promote the education of the minor, prompt action should be taken under the applicable schemes, and a report should be sent to the commission concerning this matter."
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
CIAL comes within the ambit RTI Act, says Kerala HC
The Kerala High Court held on Tuesday that Cochin International Airport Limited (CIAL) would come within the limits of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. Replying to a petition filed by M.R. Ajayan, editor of Green Kerala News, CIAL had contended that it would not come under the RTI Act since it was not a public property. Apart from maintaining that the body would come under the RTI Act, a Division Bench of Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. also ordered that a public information officer (PIO) be appointed at the airport. The court fixed a 15-day timeline for CIAL to take steps to become completely RTI compliant and said that no request for extension of the timeline would be entertained. After perusing a history of cases in this regard, the court said it appeared that the managing director of CIAL had filed writ petitions and appeals without the approval of the agency's board of directors and the Chief Minister, who chairs the board, for hiding many important actions/decisions from the public and shareholders of CIAL. 'We deprecate such practices and direct the Chief Secretary [CS], who too is a board member, to take measures to prevent such instances,' the court said and directed the CS to file an action taken report within 15 days. Fine imposed Maintaining that the writ appeals were filed without proper authority, the court also imposed a fine of ₹1 lakh on CIAL. The HC order came on appeals filed by CIAL against a single judge order in 2022 wherein the court had held that CIAL was a public authority within the confines of the RTI Act and was, therefore, amenable to obligations of disclosure of information to members of the public. The State Information Commission had in 2019 held that CIAL was bound to divulge necessary information and meet the statutory obligations under the RTI Act, including the appointment of a PIO.
