Tiny beach hut in popular staycation hotspot on the market for £120,000 - but there's a catch
The blue and white striped chalet, known as Hut 319, is located on Thorpe Bay beach in Southend-on-Sea.
Propped up on stilts on the sandy beach, it also has a balcony for enjoying the views of the Thames estuary.
The is a maximum capacity for ten people, with pictures showing a small padded bench as a rustic sofa, a small kitchen with cupboards, a sink and a hob.
The listing reads: 'As the hut sits opposite the Yacht Club and is east of the slipway, access to the beach is not obvious, so this part of the beach is normally much quieter than the main beach.
'Thorpe Bay Yacht Club is 100 yards away and membership would give you free parking, a bar with food and toilet and shower facilities.
'Or [a] five minute walk to Uncle Toms Cabin for food, drink, ice cream and toilets.
'Public seafront parking 100 yards. Stunning walks on the sand flats out to the Mulberry harbour at low tide to see seals, this stretch of the beach is the closest access to the Mulberry.'
The is a maximum capacity for ten people, with pictures showing a small padded bench as a rustic sofa, a small kitchen with cupboards, a sink and a hob
However, there is one catch for the person who decides to pay the six-figure sum - there is no toilet or bed with the nearest facilities 399 metres away.
As the beach hut is located opposite the yacht club and is east of the slipway, the listing says access to the part of the beach it is on is 'not obvious' - meaning it usually remains quieter than the main part.
Hut 319 is currently on the market with Beachhuts.com, and is one of two beach huts currently being sold at £120,000.
Owners of huts are currently blaming hikes in rates and taxes for a slump in the market.
Last December, a wooden beach hut on a pristine Dorset sandbank was bought for £485,000 - making it one of Britain's most expensive.
Local Jamie Smith, who has been documenting the huts, said at the time that prices had skyrocketed since he moved to the area five years ago.
He added: 'They are just sheds, let's be honest!
'The reason they are so popular is because of their location.
'Since I've lived here the first sale was around 300k which I thought was ludicrous and they've just shot up.
'This recent one apparently sold in less than 24 hours.
'They're probably a good investment long-term but as for living you're not allowed to live in them for half the year.'
The comments come after two other beach huts have been sold over the past year for £480,000 and £415,000 - both without a toilet, running water or gas.
Over the past 20 years prices for beach huts at Mudeford have shot up from £80,000 to almost £500,000.
Beach hut values have soared in value in the last few decades, thanks in no small part to the rise in staycationers since the Covid pandemic.
The record price paid for one was £575,000 in September 2021.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tourists are already turning their backs on Britain. The last thing we need is another tax
If Angela Rayner really is urging Rachel Reeves to allow the roll out of county-wide tourist taxes, she will burn any remaining bridges to peace with Britain's hospitality sector. Consider the firefights hotels, pubs, restaurants and visitor attractions are already confronting. The pandemic gutted the industry. At one stage 1,650,000 employees in the sector were on furlough as businesses ceased trading. Staff left the sector and the country; Brexit had already reduced the availability of skilled workers. Businesses closed – and keep on closing. In 2024 alone, 4,078 hospitality venues shut across the UK – averaging 11 closures a day, according to the latest Hospitality Market Monitor report. The pub sector has been particularly hard hit, with 412 pubs shutting their doors in 2024, bringing the total number of pubs in England and Wales below 39,000 for the first time on record. Nearly a third of all nightclubs have closed since 2020, driven by soaring costs, shifting consumer habits and restrictive licensing policies. VAT on hospitality, which stands at 20 per cent – is higher than almost anywhere in Europe. Germany, for example, still has a special post-Covid rate of 7 per cent. A study by YouGov, commissioned by UKHospitality – which represents 700 companies that operate approximately 130,000 venues across the country – found that 79 per cent of the public were in favour of a reduced rate of VAT for hospitality and tourism. Just 17 per cent supported keeping VAT at current levels. Lower VAT, campaigners claim, keeps prices low, widens choice, supports venues and encourages investment.
The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
Huge UK car dealership in £2million debt after sudden collapse as administrators swoop in
A MAJOR car dealership has fallen into £2million debt after the business fell into administration. Administrators for cash-strapped Marsh Holdings Limited, based in Exeter, Devon, said the firm cannot pay back its unsecured creditors. 2 2 The firm held franchises for the likes of Harley Davidson in Plymouth and Southampton, Triumph in Plymouth and Yamaha in Exeter. The dealership was forced to shut down all five showrooms last December - just months after it sold its Kia franchise to another group. Administrators at Westcotts Business Recovery are currently selling the Triumph and Harley-Davison showrooms at Plymouth for £1.55million which is less than £1.9million estimated market value. A huge portion of the firm's debt will be paid off with that money but the sum will not cover compensation to unsecured creditors. Unpaid debt The dealership's three subsidiaries have a combined debt of £2.3million which will likely go unpaid, according to Car Dealer Magazine. The administrators said: "It is not anticipated that a dividend will be paid to unsecured creditors." The firm owes ££1.161million to NatWest bank which holds security over the Plympton premises. In addition, the business has preferred claims for unpaid salaries and holiday pay totalling an estimated £69,385. Lastly, HM Revenue and Customs is expecting payment of £360,000 for VAT, PAYE and workers' National Insurance. However, an offer of £1.55million has been accepted which will pay in full the outstanding balance at the bank, HMRC and the salaries. Edinburgh Cybersecurity Giant Adarma Collapses with 173 Jobs Lost 'Period of uncertainty in the economy' Just three months prior to the closure, the company reported "strong cash reserves". However, accounts for the group, which were filed at the end of last September, show it made an operating loss of £852,399. Taking into account the £1.2m second payment for the sale of Kia Taunton, it clocked up a profit of just £27,526 for the year, according to Car Dealer Magazine The firm blamed their recent issues on a 'period of uncertainty in the economy' along with continued poor weather, excessive supply and stock from their manufacturer partners, as well as recent budget announcements. A notice on the company's used car website said at the time: 'Sadly, we are devastated to announce that we have had to cease trading with immediate effect. We want to assure you that every possible effort was made to try and avoid this decision, but making it now is the only way we can minimise the impact on all those affected. 'We recognise there will be those of you that have concerns and matters outstanding and we want to assure you we are doing everything we possibly can to resolve these. 'We kindly ask that you are patient whilst we work to ensure these are dealt with quickly.' Company Rescue claims the firm employed 62 people at its showrooms and had a turnover of £30million. The Sun has reached out to Westcotts Business Recovery for a comment.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's pensions nightmare is putting the economy on the road to ruin
So the Government has announced another pensions commission. It's 20 years since the last one, and a lot has changed since then. But don't worry. As on much else, nothing of significance is going to happen in this parliament. The commission won't report for 18 months, and Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, has already ruled out any increase in mandated pension contributions for at least the duration of the current parliament. And please don't mention the triple lock, which, whatever the Commission says, is non-negotiable. Or for that matter, the age of entitlement to the state pension, which is the subject of another review that won't report until safely beyond the next election. The commitment on contributions will come as a relief to employers already clobbered by increases in National Insurance and a much higher minimum wage. But it all makes you wonder why ministers want to be in government at all. After 14 long years in the political wilderness, Labour is back in office – yet it seems to have not a clue what to do with it. Like rabbits frozen in the headlights, ministers appear incapable of serious reform. Everything is either shelved altogether or, as in this case, played off into the long grass of interminable review and government introspection. Bell insists that the purpose of the commission is not to prevaricate but to build a political consensus on pensions reform so we don't end up with things being reversed by the next government. It's also the case that the last pensions commission, chaired by Lord Turner, was by general agreement a rare success amid the general ruin of what today counts as public policy. The Government would dearly like to repeat the achievement. We'll ignore for now the fact that successive governments had in part created the problem Lord Turner was asked to address by undermining the pre-existing and remarkably effective system of final salary private pension provision. Gordon Brown's abolition of the tax credit on dividends, a measure that raised £5bn a year for the Exchequer and was slipped through with barely a murmur of dissent in his first Budget, was the final nail in its coffin. In any case, inadequate pension provision is again a burning issue. Many of us are not saving enough for a decent private pension, and nearly half of the working-age population is saving nothing at all. The main recommendation of the last pensions commission – auto-enrolment, where the employer is obliged to contribute to some form of pension unless the employee deliberately opts out – has been remarkably successful at improving things, but it didn't go far enough. This is in part because of the growth in self-employment and gig-economy jobs, where there is no full-time employer to match employee contributions and the incentives to save are therefore limited. Pension saving is particularly poor among low-wage and part-time workers, among those who dip in and out of employment, and among some ethnic minorities. By international standards, moreover, Britain has a generally low overall savings rate, a phenomenon that helps explain equally deficient levels of business and public sector investment in the wider economy. But that's not the main reason for wanting better private pension arrangements. The low savings rate disguises big differences where some save a lot, and can therefore look forward to a comfortable retirement of travel and indulgence, but others make little or no provision for their old age. Use of the triple lock to increase the relative value of the state pension has helped improve things a bit for those without private provision, but there is only so much the tax system will support, and we may already be close to the limit. Cue Labour's announcement that it is bringing forward the statutory review of the age of entitlement. This is already going up to 67 between 2026 and 2028, and then again to 68 between 2044 and 2046. But the further increase probably needs to happen sooner to mitigate the fiscal ruin Britain is falling into. A penny to a pound, Labour ducks that one too. In any event, the state pension alone doesn't buy you much of a life. The problem of both affordability and generosity in the state pension could theoretically be addressed by means-testing, allowing fewer to be paid more, but even if that were thought politically acceptable, by doing so the Government would only further undermine the incentives to save. This is what typically occurred in the old days before the advent of the triple lock. The state pension was so miserly that for those with no other source of income it had to be topped up with other entitlements under the so-called 'minimum income guarantee'. If you'd saved for a private pension you would lose those benefits, so for many it made no sense to do so. Today's more generous, flat-rate state pension has made the situation somewhat better than it was, partially removing the disincentives to save. Means-testing also tends to undermine wider support for the welfare state. Higher earners acquiesce to progressive taxation in part because they think they will get something back. The universal state pension is fundamental to this contract. If those paying the bulk of the tax get nothing out of it, then the system quickly loses legitimacy. There are some problems for which there are no solutions. How on earth you persuade the self-employed to save for a pension may be one of them. It may take some form of supercharged tax relief. But for the rest, the Australian model is plainly worth considering. In Australia, employers are obliged to contribute a minimum of 12pc of earnings to the employee's pension pot regardless of whether the employee is also paying in or not. This compares to just 3pc of qualifying earnings in the UK, with the employee obliged to pay a further minimum of 5pc. Although still well worth it for the employee, you'd be amazed at how many prefer to opt out and take the cash. The point is, however, that the amounts are too small to buy you much of a pension in retirement, and are nowhere near the level of contributions that used to go into defined benefit occupational pension schemes. If the relatively high level of compulsory contributions they have in Australia were introduced overnight to the UK, it would cripple many companies and lead to a big increase in unemployment. But if phased in, say in lieu of pay increases over a number of years, it might be made to work. After all, pension contributions are only a form of deferred pay. But first it would require something of a change in culture. Saving for tomorrow, rather than living for today in the expectation that the state will eventually provide, requires a big change in mentality. Persuading the voters, and their employers, won't be easy.
