Back the Blue? Lawmakers remain divided on bill regarding anonymous complaints about law enforcement
Police squad car lights. (Stock photo by)
A proposal that would lift the anonymity of people filing complaints against a law enforcement officers advanced in a Florida House committee on Thursday, even though key players in Florida law enforcement are divided about whether the legislation is truly 'Backing the Blue.'
The proposal sponsored by Miami-Dade Republican Tom Fabricio (HB 317) would require a person who initially files an anonymous complaint about a law or corrections officer in the state to have to give up his or her anonymity before any interrogation of that officer can commence.
Both the Florida Sheriffs Association and the Florida Police Chiefs Association oppose the bill.
'It will not increase accountability,' said Tampa International Airport Police Department Chief Charlie Vasquez, who is serving as president of the Florida Police Chiefs Association. 'It will make it more difficult to hold officers accountable when they have serious misconduct.'
But other parts of the law enforcement community do support the measure, such as the Florida Fraternal Order of Police.
A member of that organization, Miami Police officer Felix Del Rosario, said the proposal is about fairness, integrity, 'and the protection of those who dedicate their lives to public service.'
Del Rosario added that, for too long, police officers in Florida have been subjected to 'prolonged and ambiguous investigations.'
'This legislation helps address those inequities,' he said, 'by ensuring that officers have timely access to their complete investigative file, providing safeguards against unfounded and malicious allegations that can have long lasting affects on an officers' reputation, career, and upholding the principals of.due process and equal treatment under the law.'
Orange County Democratic Rep. LaVon Bracy Davis noted how the Legislature last year effectively eliminated civilian review boards designed to oversee certain local law enforcement, which was supported by the sheriffs and police chiefs, so why wouldn't they support those agencies on this piece of legislation?
'I feel like I'm in an alternate universe right now because I hear from this chamber, from this committee, often times that we need to 'Back the Blue.' And the Blue just spoke. What I wrote down from the police chief is that this bill will make it more difficult to hold officers accountable when they participate in misconduct,' she said.
And Bracy Davis, who is Black, said she was speaking as a representative of a minority-majority district with constituents who in some cases 'have apprehension when it comes to dealing with police officers.'
'So, not only do I 'Back the Blue', but I also back the Black, and I back the Brown.'
Rep. Bruce Antone, who also is Black, said he opposed the bill which, ultimately would repeal anonymity for a complainant once law enforcement begins interrogating the accused officer. Antone listed three separate occasions when he was harassed by law enforcement.
South Florida Democratic Rep. Mike Gottlieb said he disagreed with the notion that if he opposed the bill he somehow was not 'Backing the Blue.'
'We have many masters, and in a bill like this we have the administration, we have the rank and file, the law enforcement officers who are on the street fighting day and day out to protect the society, and we have the citizens, and each one of us represents approximately 175,000 individuals,' he said. 'And to come here and tell us that if we vote no on this product we don't 'Back the Blue?' That's just not true.'
But Republicans on the committee said that while the administrators and lobbyists for Florida's top law enforcement agencies oppose the bill, actual cops on the street support it, and that should be good enough.
'All we're saying is, if you have a complaint against someone, just like if you're going to accuse someone in a court of law, put your face on it,' said Hillsborough County GOP Rep. Danny Alvarez, whose job outside of the Legislature is general counsel for the Tampa Police Benevolent Association. 'And if you can't put your face and name on it, then it's not worthy of going forward and smearing this person for the rest of their career.'
Alvarez added that the bill was 'for the cop, not the sergeant, not the captain, and not the chief.'
Last week, when the bill was heard in the House Government Operations Subcommittee, Jennifer 'Cookie' Pritt, executive director of Florida Police Chiefs Association, gave highly personal testimony regarding an incident involving a herself and a high-ranking command officer as a real life example of why she opposed the bill. She chose not to comment publicly on the measure on Thursday.
Ultimately, the House Judiciary Committee voted 16-4 to advance the bill, and it now moves to the full House for consideration. But it may not end up becoming law this year, as its Senate companion (SB 516) has yet to be heard in any committee in that chamber.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
18 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Republican Senate tax bill would add $3.3 trillion to the US debt load, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The changes made to President Donald Trump's big tax bill in the Senate would pile trillions onto the nation's debt load while resulting in even steeper losses in health care coverage, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a new analysis, adding to the challenges for Republicans as they try to muscle the bill to passage. The CBO estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill, which CBO has projected would add $2.4 to the debt over a decade. The analysis also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, an increase over the scoring for the House-passed version of the bill, which predicts 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage. The stark numbers are yet another obstacle for Republican leaders as they labor to pass Trump's bill by his self-imposed July 4th deadline. Even before the CBO's estimate, Republicans were at odds over the contours of the legislation, with some resisting the cost-saving proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid and food aid programs even as other Republicans say those proposals don't go far enough. Republicans are slashing the programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks put in place during his first term. The push-pull was on vivid display Saturday night as a routine procedural vote to take up the legislation in the Senate was held open for hours as Vice President JD Vance and Republican leaders met with several holdouts. The bill ultimately advanced in a 51-49 vote, but the path ahead is fraught, with voting on amendments still to come. Still, many Republicans are disputing the CBO estimates and the reliability of the office's work. To hoist the bill to passage, they are using a different budget baseline that assumes the Trump tax cuts expiring in December have already been extended, essentially making them cost-free in the budget. The CBO on Saturday released a separate analysis of the GOP's preferred approach that found the Senate bill would reduce deficits by about $500 billion. Democrats and economists decry the GOP's approach as 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. In addition, Democrats note that under the traditional scoring system, the Republican bill bill would violate the Senate's 'Byrd Rule' that forbids the legislation from increasing deficits after 10 years. In a Sunday letter to Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, CBO Director Phillip Swagel said the office estimates that the Finance Committee's portion of the bill, also known as Title VII, 'increases the deficits in years after 2034' under traditional scoring.
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Cuomo's election loss reveals onetime kingmaker NYC unions now toothless ‘paper tigers'
The biggest loser in the Democratic primary race for mayor besides Andrew Cuomo is New York's weakened labor movement. Cuomo's Big Labor muscles were exposed as nothing but 'paper tigers' without bite, according to longtime political strategists and even people active in the union movement. 'Clearly, the support of some of the largest NYC unions for Cuomo, which he very prominently showcased in the debates and elsewhere, did not do much for the former governor (nor for the unions themselves),' Johsua Freeman, a labor historian and professor at the CUNY Graduate Center, wrote to The Post. Advertisement 9 Andrew Cuomo's Big Labor muscles were exposed as nothing but 'paper tigers' without bite. Getty Images 'Also, the membership in some unions is less mobilized and engaged in political action than in earlier years. 'In some respects, the impressive DSA field operation has moved into the void,' Freeman said, referring to the Democratic Socialists of America party that includes primary-race winner Zohran Mamdani. Advertisement Mamdani and his army of thousands of passionate volunteers — including many DSA members — outworked the network of unions that Cuomo relied upon to get out the vote. 9 'The membership in some unions is less mobilized and engaged in political action than in earlier years,' Freeman said. Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock It turned out Mamdani didn't need the unions, and it's clear from the results that at least some rank-and-file union members defied their leadership and voted for the two-term Queens state assemblyman — just as many union households voted for Republican President Trump last year. The city's 8-1 matching funds for small donations also make candidates less reliant on union cash, Freeman noted, while others pointed to large funding from 'independent' Super PACs backing candidates as making labor unions less relevant. Advertisement 'The unions were paper tigers,' a veteran labor associate said. 'Their get-out-the-vote operations are diminished. They've been living off past success.' 9 Mamdani and his army of thousands of passionate volunteers outworked the network of unions that Cuomo relied upon to get out the vote. Getty Images Cuomo was endorsed by the heart of Big Labor — Service Employees International Union Local 1199 representing health care workers, Local 32 BJ for building workers, the Hotel Trades and Gaming Council, the firefighter unions, Teamsters Local 237 and the entire network of the hardhat construction trade unions. 'Big Labor endorsed Cuomo but did not seem particularly enthusiastic about him, certainly compared to Mamdani's supporters' enthusiasm level,' said CUNY political science professor John Mollenkopf. Advertisement 'They also did not seem to mount a particularly strong canvassing and GOTV [Get Out The Vote], which they are capable of doing under the right circumstances,' he said of the unions. 9 The city's 8-1 matching funds for small donations also make candidates less reliant on union cash, Freeman noted. Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock Meanwhile, Big Labor's membership rolls are shrinking. Union membership in New York City has fallen in recent years: In 2024, only about 20% of all wage and salary workers in the city were union members, down from around nearly one quarter a decade ago. Another challenge in terms of GOTV efforts is the fact that many more union members don't reside in the city as they did decades ago — particularly in the construction trades, among uniformed officers and even in the unions with lower-paid workers, sources said. 9 In 2024, only about 20% of all wage and salary workers in the city were union members, down from around nearly one quarter a decade ago. New York Post 'If you have less and less members and more and more of them live outside New York City, their ability to mobilize large groups of their members has dramatically cratered and shows no sign of slowing down,' a veteran labor insider said. Former Gov. David Paterson, a Cuomo supporter, said, 'The unions don't work like they did years ago for a candidate. Advertisement 'There was not a lot of street activity.' 9 Many more union members don't reside in the city as they did decades ago — particularly in the construction trades. AFP via Getty Images It wasn't just Cuomo who was hurt by the unions' dwindling influence. District Council 37, the union representing the largest number of city municipal workers, backed losing Council Speaker Adrienne Adams for mayor, though they ranked Mamdani second. Advertisement The United Federation of Teachers, whose membership was divided, sat out the race. 9 Former Gov. David Paterson, a Cuomo supporter, said, 'The unions don't work like they did years ago for a candidate.' AP Transport Workers Union President John Samuelsen — who appeared at a pro-Mamdani campaign rally touting the candidate's free-bus-fare plan days before the primary — said many labor leaders, along with the city Democratic Party establishment, made a calculated decision that Cuomo would win. 'The Democratic Party establishment got demolished,' Samuelsen said. Advertisement Unions that backed Cuomo or were neutral in the primary are now shifting to Mamdani while others are considering backing incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for re-election as an independent. 9 'The Democratic Party establishment got demolished,' Samuelsen said. Getty Images Local 32 BJ, the Hotel Trades and Gaming Council and the state Nurses' Association have already joined Mamdani. Some labor sources whose unions backed Cuomo took issue with criticism that they didn't work hard and instead blamed the candidate for running a lackluster campaign. Advertisement 'You need a general in charge to win,' a pro-Cuomo union insider said. 'You can't win with a ghost.' 9 'You need a general in charge to win,' a pro-Cuomo union insider said. 'You can't win with a ghost.' Erik Pendzich/Shutterstock Austin Shafran, a spokesman for HTC and 32 BJ, said unions assist but don't run a candidate's campaign. 'The best unions provide high-quality, supplemental support that help push good campaigns over the finish line. But core field infrastructure for citywide campaigns needs to be owned by campaigns themselves,' he said. He said the unions did a good job in pulling out the Cuomo vote in The Bronx and southeast Queens, areas they focused on and where the ex-governor performed well. .
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Republicans defend cuts to Medicaid and renewable energy in Big Beautiful Bill: ‘absolutely out of control'
Key Republican senators pushed back Sunday against criticism of cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill, including Medicaid work restrictions and the elimination of many green energy subsidies. The Senate version of President Trump's signature tax and spending legislation imposes 80 hours a month work requirements on able-bodied adults, including those with children ages 15 and up. It also reduces the health care provider tax, which helps fund state Medicaid plans. Critics argue that those changes could result in millions of people losing access to Medicaid, which provides health care to over 70 million low-income Americans. 'There's 35 million people under the poverty line inside the United States, and there's 70 million people that are signed up for Medicaid,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) told NBC's 'Meet the Press' Sunday. 'What we are focused on is making sure that Medicaid is there for people in the future that need it and get rid of the fraud, waste and abuse.' 5 Progressive activists have protested against the Medicaid reform provisions in the megabill. Getty Images 5 President Trump has lashed out at senators who have opposed advancing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Getty Images Medicaid reform is the largest source of savings in the megabill, with the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimating the legislative bundle would reduce Medicaid costs by about $930 billion over the next decade. Several senators have been uneasy about the Medicaid reform in the Senate bill, which goes further than the House version of the megabill. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), for example, voted against proceeding with the bill Saturday, citing Medicaid as his top concern. 'I cannot support this bill in its current form. It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities,' Tillis said in a statement Saturday. 'This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population.' 5 Sen. Markwayne Mullin defended the Medicaid reforms as reasonable. REUTERS Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) had raged against the Medicaid provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but stopped short of opposing the measure. 'We can't be cutting health care for working people and for poor people in order to constantly give special tax treatment to corporations and other entities,' Hawley told NBC News last week. The Senate bill includes bigger cuts to business taxes, including a permanent deductions for R&D spending. Despite those concerns, key senators defended the Medicaid reforms on the Sunday shows as the Senate forges ahead with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'The entitlement spending in this nation is absolutely out of control. You can rewind back to the 1960s, when actual mandatory spending, which is what these entitlements are, only made up about a third of federal spending,' Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) told CNN's 'State of the Union' Sunday. 'Now, if you take that, plus the interest on our debt, it's about 73 percent of what we spend.' 5 Sen. Katie Britt called the reforms reminiscent of Clinton-era policies. Bloomberg via Getty Images Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) also touted plans to consider an amendment that would ensure illegal immigrants don't get access to Medicaid. 'Remember, the Medicaid reforms in this bill are about work requirements and taking illegals off of Medicaid,' Banks told 'Fox News Sunday.' Another closely watched amendment from Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) would lower the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), which determines the percentage of Medicaid costs covered by Uncle Sam. Scott's amendment would lower FMAP for able-bodied, childless adults. The amendment has been used to win over fiscal hawks such as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who had threatened to vote against the megabill due to concerns about the deficit. 5 Sen. Jim Banks hailed the legislative bundle for slashing green energy subsidies. Getty Images In addition to the Medicaid reform, senators also defended the cuts to Biden-era renewable energy subsidies, something that has infuriated tech mogul and one-time Trump 'first buddy' Elon Musk. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Musk fumed on X Saturday. 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' The Senate version of the megabill significantly rolls back tax credits for green energy in the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act and requires key projects to go into service by the conclusion of 2027 to qualify. It also features an excise tax that takes aim at solar and wind projects. 'Again, $1.6 trillion in spending cuts by eliminating the Green New Deal tax credits. Those scams that were passed during the Biden administration,' Banks added. 'Much of it is phased out in a quick period of time over the next two or three years.'
