Jeffries breaks McCarthy's House floor speech record in bid to delay GOP megabill vote
The previous record was set in 1957, when then-Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina held the floor for over 24 hours to condemn the Civil Rights Act of 1957. But on April 1, Booker relegated the segregationist to second place in the history books.
Three months later, as July gets underway, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries didn't manage to speak for 25 hours, but the New York Democrat, like Booker, broke his own institution's record.
As of 1:30 p.m. ET on Thursday, Jeffries was continuing to deliver remarks after speaking for more than eight hours and 35 minutes.
During congressional debates, the vast majority of members are only allowed to deliver brief, minute-long remarks. But three members — the House speaker, majority leader and minority leader — can exploit what are known as 'magic minutes,' allowing them to speak as long as they wish.
In 2018, for example, Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the House minority leader at the time, stood on the House floor for over eight hours, seeking a vote on protections for Dreamers. It broke the institution's record for the longest speech ever delivered on the House floor.
Three years later, then-Republican Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California broke Pelosi's record, holding the floor to condemn the Democrats' Build Back Better legislation.
Now, it's Jeffries, who made a devastating case against the inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act, who holds the top slot.
The New York Democrat began his remarks just before 5 a.m. ET, though if he intended to break the House record, Jeffries and his office kept this plan to themselves.
As NBC News noted, the House minority leader used the opportunity to reference a series of binders as he read notes from Americans who would be harmed by Medicaid and SNAP benefit cuts.
'What is contemplated in this one big, ugly bill is wrong. It's dangerous, and it's cruel, and cruelty should not be either the objective or the outcome of legislation that we consider here in the United States House of Representatives,' Jeffries argued.
The Democratic leader might not have changed any GOP minds, but his record-breaking presentation brought some much-needed attention to the case against the most regressive legislative package in at least a generation.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Andy Beshear's Chances of Winning 2028 Primary as He Gives Campaign Update
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear declined to rule out running for president in a new Vanity Fair interview—here's what polls say about a potential Beshear candidacy. Newsweek reached out to Beshear's political team for comment via email. Why It Matters The 2028 presidential race is still more than three years away, but candidates who could be interested are already making early moves in hopes of building their name recognition and winning support from primary voters ahead of the election. Beshear, a Democrat, is among those who have been floated as a potential presidential candidate. Proponents of a Beshear run point to his electoral success in Kentucky, a reliably Republican state, as proof he can win over Republican and independent voters. However, polls suggest he is less known than other Democrats who could run in 2028. What to Know Beshear, who was speculated to be a potential vice presidential candidate for Kamala Harris' presidential campaign, addressed speculation about a potential run in an interview with Vanity Fair published Friday. "Two years ago, I wouldn't have considered [running for president]," he told the magazine. "But if I'm somebody who could maybe heal and bring the country back together, I'll think about it after next year." Early polls suggest most Democrats favor candidates like former Vice President Kamala Harris, California Governor Gavin Newsom or former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. But the primary still years away, meaning a dark horse candidate like Beshear could still break through. The latest Emerson College poll showed Beshear with support from 2 percent of respondents. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear attends a White House meeting in Washington, D.C. on February 10, 2023. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear attends a White House meeting in Washington, D.C. on February 10, that poll, 16 percent of respondents backed Buttigieg, 13 percent supported Harris and 12 percent leaned toward Newsom. Seven percent supported both Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, while 5 percent said they would prefer to vote for Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. Three percent backed New Jersey Senator Cory Booker and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Maryland Governor Wes Moore also received the backing of 2 percent of respondents. The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters from June 24 to June 25 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. A Morning Consult poll from June found him similarly trailing other candidates with 1 percent support. That poll showed Harris leading with 36 percent of the vote. Buttigieg followed at 10 percent, and 5 percent backed Newsom and Ocasio-Cortez. It polled 1,000 Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents from June 13 to June 15, 2025. Beshear remains one of the most popular governors in the country. A Morning Consult survey found that he has a net approval rating of +43. Sixty-eight percent view him favorably, while only 25 percent give him negative marks. Supporters say that approval is especially impressive given President Donald Trump's 30-point victory in Kentucky. He won nearly 65 percent of the vote, compared to former Vice President Kamla Harris' 34 percent, in the 2024 election. What People Are Saying Beshear told Kentucky's WDRB in May: "But I don't want to leave a broken country to my kids. So, if I'm somebody who can bring this nation together, hopefully find some common ground, it's something I would consider." Ken Martin, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, said in June in remarks to WHAS: "If he wants to run, he should. He's a great guy. He's a wonderful governor. I've known him a long time." What Happens Next Candidates typically don't start making formal presidential runs until after the midterms, but other potential candidates are already laying the groundwork for 2028. Newsom, for instance, is heading to early-voting primary state South Carolina next week to tour several rural counties.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Carville: GOP megabill passage will be seen as ‘mass extinction event'
Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville said during a recent interview that the Republican tax and spending bill, which President Trump is expected to sign on Friday, will be seen as a 'mass extinction event,' predicting that the Democratic Party will pick up more than 40 House seats in the 2026 midterms. 'And I like with the unified party, every Democrat voted against this. Every Democrat, regardless of the ideology, their ethnicity…we can all rally around this, and we can run on this single issue all the way to 2026. And Paul is right, we're going to pick up more than 40 House seats,' Carville, the former strategist for ex-President Clinton's campaign, said during a Thursday appearance on CNN's 'Anderson Cooper 360.' 'I can tell you what the poll says today, the Democrat in New Jersey is up 20 points. That's in a state that we won by two and a half or two in 2021. I mean, you know, political anthropologists are going to look back at this and it's going to be called a mass extinction event because there are a lot of them are going to be extinct,' Carville told host Anderson Cooper. The House GOP passed President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' on Thursday, sending it to the president who is expected to sign it on Friday evening. The package, which was adopted with a 218-214 vote, contains the president's major spending priorities, extending the 2017 tax cuts and also cuts to Medicaid, which some Republican members of both chambers have expressed concerns about. All but two House Republicans – Reps. Thomas Massie (Ky.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.) – voted for the package on Thursday. All Democrats voted against the bill. Trump hammered Democrats late Thursday during his rally in Des Moines, Iowa, saying he hates them for not supporting the massive package and that Republicans will be able to benefit from it politically when midterm elections come around. 'All of the things we did with the tax cuts and rebuilding our military, not one Democrat voted for us. And I think we use it in the campaign that's coming up, the midterms,' Trump told the crowd. 'But all of the things that we've given, and they wouldn't vote. Only because they hate Trump. But I hate them, too. You know that? I really do, I hate them,' the president added. 'I cannot stand them, because I really believe they hate our country, you want to know the truth.' Carville said Thursday that 'when people go to the polls voting for this, I promise you, I promise you, this thing is really, it's like 25, 26 points underwater already.' 'And we haven't even started our education program,' the longtime operative added.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans give Trump a ‘Big Beautiful' July 4 by passing Medicaid-slashing megabill despite GOP rift
The House of Representatives on Thursday passed President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which features sweeping cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance programs, after a whirlwind 24 hours of last-minute arm twisting of holdout Republicans — and a record-breaking floor speech from Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. The final vote was a narrow margin of 218-214, with every Democrat and two Republicans —Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie and Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick — voting against the measure. After Jeffries wrapped his eight-hour and 44-minute delaying tactic — which surpassed former GOP Speaker Kevin McCarthy's 'magic minute' speech record of eight hours and 32 minutes, set in 2021 when the House passed President Joe Biden's 'Build Back Better Act' — the House finally commenced its vote on Trump's bill. The "magic minute" procedure grants members unlimited time to speak after debate on a bill has concluded. 'We have a big job to finish,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana. 'With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before.' The bill will now be sent to Trump by the July 4 deadline he'd insisted upon with congressional Republicans in the House and Senate. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters after its passage that Trump would be signing the legislation at 5 pm on Friday in what she described as 'a big, beautiful signing ceremony' at the White House.' Leavitt said the bill's passage marked a 'victorious day for the American people' and predicted that the legislation would 'create an economic boom for the United States of America.' 'We're going to continue to bring in revenue, drive down our deficit, and we'll have more money back into the pockets of the American people. And this bill is an encapsulation of all of the policies that the president campaigned on and the American people voted on on Nov. 5 and entrusted the president, and Republicans, to enact. She called it 'a great day for our country and for the American people.' A senior White House official who worked on pushing the bill through Congress called the tax cut and spending package 'a historic achievement for the Republican Party and for President Trump' because the voluminous bill 'satisfies virtually every major campaign promise that President Trump made' during his 2024 campaign. 'It represents his keeping of his commitments to the American people, everything that we talked about, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime pay, no tax on seniors' Social Security, to securing the border, rebuilding our military. It's all in this bill,' said the official, who added that the stock markets appeared to be 'loving' the legislation because they were closing at all-time highs ahead of the July 4 holiday. It all came to a head after a day of grumbling from a handful of conservative Republicans who criticized the Senate version of the bill that was handed back to the House for passage just in time to meet Trump's July 4 deadline. But after meeting with the president and receiving promises from the White House — and an all-caps threat from Trump on Truth Social overnight — members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, voted to push the bill through. Throughout the process, the group of rabble-rousers has often held out their votes, only to fold after speaking with Trump. Still, Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, a member of the Freedom Caucus, insisted this was not a concession. 'The reason we have credibility, they know we'll vote 'no,'' Norman told The Independent. Norman said that he was disappointed that wind and solar tax credits or the $7,5000 tax credit for electric vehicles from the Inflation Reduction Act, the signature climate law signed by Joe Biden, were not completely phased out in the legislation. 'With that being said, we had enough assurance that the president was going to deal with them in his own way,' Norman said. 'I feel perfectly comfortable with that, which I wasn't before.' House members scrambled to make it to Washington after severe thunderstorms and inclement weather delayed travel for many from both parties. Some members drove to D.C. while Democrats held digital town halls to criticize the legislation. The vote came after the Senate spent a marathon 27 hours in the two days beforehand voting on amendments before the measure was tied at 50-50. Vice President JD Vance came in to cast the deciding tie-breaker. House Speaker Mike Johnson limited the number of amendments to get the bill to the president's desk. The bill's passage did not come easy, though. In the afternoon, the House held a vote to amend the rules for passage of the bill, which turned out to be the longest in the chamber's history. But Republicans soldiered on. Speaker Johnson called into Fox News in between whipping votes to reassure people the bill could pass by the July 4 deadline imposed by Trump. The rule vote finally passed at around 3.30am on Wednesday morning 219-213, with Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick the only member of the GOP to break ranks as the rest of the party's holdouts were persuaded to fall in line to set up a final floor vote. 'The bill is going to pass, they're going to vote for it, they're not opposed to the bill,' House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith told The Independent. 'Don't allow perfection to get in the way of greatness,' he said. 'And that is why they will vote for this bill, and that is why the president will be signed into law on July 4 and record that. See if I'm right.' The bill is one of the most sweeping pieces of Republican domestic policy legislation in history. Not only does it extend the 2017 tax cuts that Trump signed in his first presidency; it also includes money to hire 10,000 new agents for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and 3,000 Border Patrol agents, a core tenet of Trump's promise to conduct 'mass deportations' of undocumented immigrants. It also includes money to construct the barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border. The legislation further allows for more oil exploration and a massive increase in military spending. At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. The bill would require able-bodied adults without dependent children to work for Medicaid benefits and, in the coming years, would cap the level at which states can tax medical providers such as hospitals and nursing homes. The American Hospital Association warned it could lead to the closing of rural hospitals, which serve many Republican congressional districts. The act also imposes work requirements for SNAP recipients for able-bodied adults without dependent children. But it lowers the age at which children are considered dependent to 14 years old and would require states with high rates of overpayment or underpayment to shoulder part of the cost of administering SNAP. The legislation remains wildly unpopular, with polling showing a large amount of Americans disapprove of it. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez Jr., a Democrat who represents a district that also voted for Trump in 2024, said his district would be hit hard by the legislation. 'But I still feel, unfortunately, that people don't react until they feel the pain, and they're going to feel it pretty quick for this with this bill,' he told The Independent. Democrats will likely campaign against the bill in the coming months ahead of the midterm election, hoping to criticize the GOP for taking away healthcare benefits as a way to extend tax cuts. Republicans for their part already do not want to talk about the unpopular parts of the bill. When The Independent asked Rep. Nick Begich of Alaska about the side deal brokered by his Sen. Lisa Murkowski to shield the state from many of the provisions for SNAP and Medicaid during the rule vote, he did not speak and bolted onto the House floor. A second White House official credited Trump with being 'deeply involved' in both crafting the bill and helping move it through a narrowly-divided House and Senate along with help from his economic team. The official called Trump 'the motive force behind this legislation' based on his 'unique and powerful relationship with lawmakers' going back to the transition period after he won last year's election, during which he spent 'dinner after dinner' engaging with members. 'The President's focus on relationships carried us through in kind of a cascade here, when it came to be crunch time and the President was asking people to take tough votes, to come together, to unify, and ultimately, through late night phone calls,' they said. 'He is the omnipresent force behind this legislation, obviously.' The official added that Vice President JD Vance had been a 'key player' as well, including by 'working behind the scenes constantly in the Senate, hearing from senators, understanding their concerns, [and] making sure that the White House was responsive to them.'
