Key House GOP moderate Don Bacon won't seek re-election
"After 30 years in the Air Force and 10 years in Congress, it's time to spend my future with the love of my life, our four kids, and our wonderful grandchildren. Thank you, Nebraska!" Bacon said Monday.
Bacon's announcement comes as Congress works overtime to pass President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" by their self-imposed July 4 deadline. Through the reconciliation process, the megabill seeks to deliver on the president's key campaign promises, including tax cuts, immigration reform and energy production.
The moderate Republican has built a reputation for bucking Trump's agenda in the House. While Bacon ultimately voted with his Republican colleagues to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last month, the Nebraska Republican had concerns about the impact of proposed Medicaid cuts.
Thom Tillis Announces Retirement From Senate After Clash With Trump
Bacon indicated earlier this month that he would vote against the White House's rescission proposal if it cuts an AIDS relief program. Last month, he was the only Republican who voted against a House bill to make Trump's name change for the Gulf of America permanent. Bacon, a loyal Ukraine supporter, has also criticized Trump's position on its war with Russia.
Read On The Fox News App
Republican Rep Indicates He's 'A No' On Trump-backed Rescissions Measure
Surrounded by his family in Omaha on Monday morning, Bacon thanked his constituents and his family for their support throughout his political career. When asked how he plans to vote on Trump's megabill this week, Bacon said he will have to weigh his decision once the Senate version is finalized this week.
"I think the Senate has done some new provisions in there that are concerning… But there's a lot of amendments being voted out today. So I'm going to keep my powder dry, see how it turns out," Bacon told reporters.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., announced Sunday he would also not seek re-election next year. Like Bacon, Tillis has been willing to buck Trump and the Republican Party on key issues, including the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Tillis was one of just two Republicans who voted against a procedural vote on the bill in the Senate this weekend.
Bacon has represented Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District since 2017. He won re-election in 2024 by less than two percentage points.
Former Vice President Kamala Harris won his district by almost five percentage points in 2024. Nebraska is one of just two states that splits its Electoral College votes in presidential elections by congressional district.
Bacon's congressional district was already a high-target House seat for Democrats ahead of the competitive 2026 midterm elections.
"The writing has been on the wall for months," Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) spokesperson Madison Andrus said on Friday.
"Nebraskans are tired of the false promises that Republicans are trying to sell, and they want real results. Don Bacon's decision to not seek re-election in 2026 is the latest vote of no-confidence for House Republicans and their electoral prospects. Next November, Nebraskans are going to elect a Democrat who will actually deliver for them," Andrus added.
In a statement released Monday, Bacon said, "I'd like to dedicate more time to my family, my church, and the Omaha community."
Bacon, a veteran of the U.S. Air Force, chairs the House Armed Services Committee's (HASC) Cyber, Information Technologies and Innovation Subcommittee (CITI) for the 119th Congress. He vowed to continue delivering for Nebraskans "until the lights in the office are turned off for the last time."
"Legislatively, I aim to work to get five agricultural bills passed that were included as part of the Farm Bill, including the increase of defenses for our nation's food supply chain and removing barriers for the next generation of farmers seeking to establish their operations. I will continue my work on the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and lay the groundwork for a new VA hospital in Omaha."
Fox News' Matt Reidy contributed to this report. Original article source: Key House GOP moderate Don Bacon won't seek re-election
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Rules Committee advances Trump megabill as potential GOP revolt looms
The House Rules Committee advanced the GOP's sweeping tax and spending bill early Wednesday morning after an hours-long meeting, sending the legislation to the floor for consideration as its fate in the chamber remains unclear. The panel adopted the procedural rule in a 7-6 vote, with two Republicans — Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) — siding with Democrats against the measure, showcasing their opposition to the underlying legislation over deficit concerns. The hearing ran for nearly 12 hours, with Democrats needling Republicans about the bill, GOP lawmakers largely praising the measure and some hard-line conservatives criticizing its contents. The panel convened at 1:30 p.m. EDT on Tuesday and gaveled out just after 1 a.m. EDT on Wednesday. Despite the successful vote, the legislation is far from being out of the woods. The full chamber must now debate and vote to adopt the procedural rule, which could get dicey as a handful of hard-line conservatives vow to oppose the effort. If the rule fails, legislative business in the House would be brought to a standstill, threatening to thwart leadership's goal of sending President Trump the package by Friday. Republicans can afford to lose three votes and still clear the procedural hurdle, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. The House is scheduled to convene on Wednesday at 9 a.m. EDT, with debate first, then a vote. Two of those defectors, however, are already called for: Norman and Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), the chair of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, say they will vote against the rule on the floor — and Harris said others will join them. 'That's exactly why a group of us are not going to vote to advance the bill until we iron out some of the deficit problems with the bills,' Harris said on Fox News when asked about Elon Musk's criticism of the bill. 'Look, Mr. Musk is right, we cannot sustain these deficits, he understands finances, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress. And I believe the Freedom Caucus will take the lead in making that further progress.' 'I don't think the votes are there, just like they weren't for the Senate initially until some concessions were made,' he added. 'I believe that the rule vote will not pass tomorrow morning, and then the Speaker's going to have to decide how he gets this back into the House framework.' Rule votes have historically been routine, mundane occurrences, with the majority party voting in favor of the effort and the minority party voting against it. In recent years, however, those on the right-flank have used the procedure to express displeasure with specific legislation or leadership. Despite those threats, attendance issues may scuttle the right-flank's plans. A number of members from both parties are having trouble returning to Washington amid inclement weather in the D.C.-Maryland-Virginia area. Several lawmakers have said their flights back to the city were canceled. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Tuesday night said those conditions could influence when the bill comes up for a vote. 'We're having weather delays getting everybody back right now, but assuming we have a full House, we'll get it through the Rules Committee in the morning, we'll move that forward to the floor and hopefully we're voting on this by tomorrow or Thursday at latest, depending on the weather and delays and all the rest; that's the wildfire that we can't control,' Johnson said on Fox News's 'Hannity' when asked about timing for the legislation. Regardless, the megabill's future in the House is on thin ice as a number of Republicans — from hard-line conservatives to moderates — stake opposition to the legislation, threatening leadership's goal of enacting the bill by Friday. Conservatives are upset with the amount of money the bill would add to the deficit, while moderates are concerned about Medicaid cuts and the rollback of green-energy tax credits. The lawmakers prefer the original House bill, which they passed in May, over the Senate bill, which included a number of changes to their initial legislation. Despite the lingering qualms, Johnson is showing no interest in changing the bill — which would require it to head back to the Senate for a final stamp of approval, a reality that most members have little appetite for. 'We knew we would come to this moment. We knew the Senate would amend the House product. I encouraged them to amend it as lightly as possible. They went a little further than many of us would have preferred, but we have the product now,' Johnson told reporters in the Capitol. 'As the President said, it's his bill. It's not a House bill, it's not a Senate bill, it's the American people's bill. And my objective and my responsibility is to get that bill over the line. So we will do everything possible to do that, and I will work with all of our colleagues.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House GOP leaders scrambling to rally holdouts behind Trump megabill
GOP leaders are scrambling to unite their conference behind the massive Senate bill that would enact President Trump's domestic agenda and get it to the president's desk before the holiday weekend. They have their work cut out for them. Not only are moderate Republicans balking at cuts to Medicaid, which were made larger by the Senate, but conservatives are also up in arms over the massive increase in deficit spending, also increased by the upper chamber. The combination is raising questions about whether GOP leaders can rally enough support to pass the bill, given a slim House majority that allows for only a small handful of defections. 'If you look at the totality of this, I don't believe this delivers what the president, what the administration, were working to deliver on,' said Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a vocal member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, which is fighting to rein in deficit spending. 'I know why they're going to lobby for it, I know why the president's going to push for it. They want to see it get done, and I get it,' he continued. 'But I think we have more work to do.' The resistance poses a huge challenge for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and other GOP leaders, who are racing to bring the holdouts on board for the sake of enacting the core of Trump's second-term agenda, including sweeping tax cuts, a crackdown on immigration, a shift away from green energy and huge cuts in federal health and nutrition programs. Some of those House GOP critics — moderates and conservatives alike — had warned in no uncertain terms that they were ready to oppose the bill if it were made 'worse' by the Senate. Now they face the dilemma of either abandoning that position, to give Trump a win, or standing by it to vote 'no' — even if it means sinking the bill. Centrists and hard-liners are now weighing those two forces, and some were quick to acknowledge the pickle they're in. 'Maybe I'll get lucky and have a rough enough landing or something that I'm unable to make [it] to D.C. for a few weeks,' one moderate House Republican told The Hill, underscoring the corner they find themselves in. Hanging over their decision is the president himself, who is pressing hard on Republicans of all stripes to back the legislation — and might encourage primary challenges against recalcitrant lawmakers who oppose the 'big, beautiful bill.' That scenario is not just a hypothetical. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — who voted against the House version of the legislation in May and is expected to oppose the Senate bill this week — has been the target of a MAGA-backed super PAC fighting to get someone more loyal to Trump into his seat. Across the Capitol, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) also faced the president's wrath after announcing he would oppose the package. A day later, Tillis announced that he will retire at the end of this term. Democrats aren't making it any easier. While they're powerless to block the legislation, they're highlighting the most controversial provisions of the package, which include steep cuts to low-income health and nutrition programs — money Republicans are using to help pay for their tax cuts. Democrats are already honing their attacks on battleground Republicans who might support the bill. 'Republicans claim to be the party of working-class Americans — you are not. You are hurting working-class Americans. This bill won't make life more affordable for the American people. It will make life more expensive,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) told reporters Tuesday in the Capitol. 'Why would any so-called traditional Republican, particularly those who are in swing seats all across America, vote for a bill that will aggressively and actively hurt their constituents?' Adding to the pressure, Johnson and GOP leadership are trying to pass the bill by their self-imposed July 4 deadline, which is Friday, a timeline that will require a herculean effort to meet. In a statement right after the Senate vote, the top four House GOP leaders said they would finish their work 'in time for Independence Day.' But later in the day, when talking to reporters in the hallway, Johnson was less sure. 'We'll see what happens in the next 24 hours,' he said. While coy on the timeline, he was clear that he was not thrilled with the Senate's changes — but he suggested the House would not make changes of their own, which would require another vote in the Senate. 'I'm not happy with what the Senate did to our product, but we understand this is the process, it goes back and forth, and we'll be working to get all of our members to 'yes,'' the Speaker said. 'So high stakes, aggressive schedule, and we knew it would come to this moment.' Some lawmakers are skeptical they can get it done in time. 'The changes the Senate made to the House passed Beautiful Bill, including unacceptable increases to the national debt and the deficit, are going to make passage in the House difficult,' Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Ind.), a Freedom Caucus member, wrote on the social platform X. 'I am willing to work through the 4th to make sure this bill is better for America's children tomorrow by spending less today.' The sprint, nonetheless, is already underway. The House Rules Committee convened for a meeting about the bill Tuesday afternoon, marking the first step in the consideration process in the lower chamber. Once the panel adopts a procedural rule, House GOP leaders want to convene the chamber at 9 a.m. Wednesday to begin debating the rule, then hold a vote to adopt the procedural rule, followed by a vote on the underlying legislation. But the first step is already on thin ice. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), the chair of the Freedom Caucus, said Tuesday on Fox News that he will vote against the procedural rule on Wednesday, warning that it will be stopped in its tracks — a reality that would bring legislative business to a halt. Republicans can only lose three of their own and still advance the rule, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. Two of those defectors are already claimed with Harris and Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.). 'That's exactly why a group of us are not going to vote to advance the bill until we iron out some of the deficit problems with the bills,' Harris said when asked about Elon Musk's criticism of the bill. 'Look, Mr. Musk is right, we cannot sustain these deficits; he understands finances, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress. And I believe the Freedom Caucus will take the lead in making that further progress.' Trump weighed in on Tuesday afternoon, praising the Senate for passing his agenda and urging House Republicans to follow suit. 'I thought the Senate was going to be tougher than the House. We got there. We got pretty much what we wanted,' Trump said. 'It's the biggest bill ever passed if we get this done.' A senior White House official was even more direct, all but demanding that the House pass the bill in its current form in time to grant Trump a symbolic signing on Independence Day. The official dismissed the idea that the House could make changes to the Senate bill and then have the chambers 'conference' the two versions into one. 'The end of the road is here. The bill is finished. The bill needs to be sent to the president's desk and it needs to be done … on or before July 4,' the official said. 'I don't think we view conference as a productive enterprise.' The White House is whipping hard ahead of the vote, the official added, with a number of top officials working the phones, including Trump; his budget director, Russell Vought; and the heads of the Energy and Treasury departments. Alex Gangitano contributed reporting. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Top White House official urges probe of Fed's Jerome Powell over deceptive' testimony on 'Palace of Versailles' $2.5B HQ revamp
A top White House official on Wednesday claimed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell could lose his job over his allegedly 'deceptive' testimony to Congress over the central bank's lavish $2.5 billion revamp of its DC headquarters. Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte, who is also chairman of the two US-backed mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, demanded that Powell be probed by lawmakers and suggested he could even be fired by President Trump. 4 FHDA director Bill Pulte, left, has called on Congress to investigate Jerome Powell, right, for his 'deceptive' testimony to the Senate Banking Committee last week over the 'Palace of Versailles' $2.5B revamp. Advertisement 'I am asking Congress to investigate Chairman Jerome Powell, his political bias, and his deceptive Senate testimony, which is enough to be removed 'for cause', Pulte said in a leaked statement obtained by The Post. 'Jerome Powell's $2.5B Building Renovation Scandal stinks to high heaven, and he lied when asked about the specifics before Congress. This is nothing short of malfeasance,' the 37-year-old former journalist and private equity titan added. Powell has already been heavily criticized by President Trump this week, who took the unusual step of sending him a handwritten note urging him to cut interest rates. Advertisement Pulte's call for the Congressional probe comes one week after the Fed chair's appearance before the Senate Banking Committee in which he denied The Post's exclusive reporting about the renovations that have been likened by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) to the 'Palace of Versailles.' 'There's no VIP dining room, there's no new marble. There are no special elevators,' Powell insisted under questioning from the powerful panel on Wednesday. 'There are no new water features, there's no beehives, and there's no roof terrace gardens,' Powell said during the grilling by lawmakers. 4 The Post's artwork from its story on Monday which broke the news about how lawmakers were concerend that he may have lied to Congress. Jack Forbes / Donald Pearsall / NY Post Design The 72-year-old's testimony sparked outrage because they directly contradicted the Fed's own planning documents that were signed off by US government pen pushers in 2021 and have not been revised since. Advertisement 'The private dining rooms on Level 4 (of the Fed's Eccles building) will be restored,' reads one excerpt from the filing with the National Capital Planning Commission. 'The Governors' private elevator will be extended to discharge at the dining suite level.' The documents also expressly mention 'vegetated roof terraces' that will welcome 'urban wildlife and pollinators' as well as new marble and water features. A Post editorial published on Tuesday hit out at Powell over 'his privileged arrogance' in the way he spoke to the committee. 4 The Fed's own filings with the National Capital Planning Commission tell a very different story from the one recounted by Jerome Powell to the Senate Banking Committee. NCPC Advertisement He also appeared to dismiss concerns that the revamp was being subsidized by American taxpayers in Wednesday's hearing, saying simply that 'the cost overruns are what they are.' The eye-watering price tag for the overhaul has already ballooned by 30% from an original estimate of $1.9 billion. After The Post broke the story in April about the Fed's reckless spending on the HQ upgrade, former Department of Government Efficiency chief Elon Musk called the news 'an eyebrow raiser.' The Tesla titan, who has since left government, said DOGE should 'definitely' investigate how so much money came to be blown on the glorified vanity project. By comparison, JPMorgan's new headquarters in Midtown Manhattan — a luxe, 60-story tower at 270 Park Ave. designed by star architect Norman Foster — is set to cost an estimated $3 billion. 4 Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) said the renovations with their lavish amenities look like they belong in the 'Palace of Versailles', the official residence of the long deposed French monarchy. AP The revelations are controversial at a time when the Fed is struggling with mounting losses, which stand at a total of $233 billion from the past three years. Its interest costs surged and outstripped its earnings on bonds it owns when Powell hiked rates in trying to tame rampant inflation during the Biden administration. Advertisement It sank into the red for the first time in its history, posting losses of $114.6 billion in 2023. Officials there insist that losing money in no way impacts their ability to operate and conduct monetary policy. When the Fed makes a profit, that money is passed on to the US Treasury to become part of the federal government's budget. The losses are bundled together in what is known as the Fed's 'deferred asset' that it must pay down before money can be spent on other things, such as defense, education and Medicare.
