Z Energy looks to ‘top up' the supermarket conversation
The station's operator Wayne Kennerley suspects the latter is not selling as well because it doesn't have a pull tab like the spaghetti, and needs a can opener.
'Suddenly it means that it's actually not that convenient. Whereas Watties' spaghetti, I can open it, heat it up in the microwave and I've got a cheap lunch, a snack or even dinner.
'What we've learned is we've got to fail fast. Because you're tying up product, which does date.'
Kennerley, who operates 17 Z sites in south and east Auckland, is at the sharp end of Z's move to diversify its business by expanding its presence in the 'top-up' grocery market.
Wayne Kennerley says we've learned we've got to fail fast. Photo: Eugene Bingham
Z isn't going to rival the likes of Woolworths or New World but it's keen to see more competition in the grocery sector.
'We think we've got an opportunity to bring consistency for those 'top-up' shops, which is largely made up of small independents such as dairies,' Z CEO Lindis Jones says.
Z believes moves by governments to increase competition in fuel retailing have worked well and could be applied to the grocery market.
In March the Government launched a request for information to hear from investors and prospective grocery market competitors about possible barriers to entry, along with obstacles to growing at scale in the market.
Submissions will inform policy decisions on potential regulatory changes and support for new entrants or those looking to expand their current offering.
The request followed a 2022 market study by the Commerce Commission into New Zealand's retail grocery sector, which found the market is dominated by Foodstuffs North Island, Foodstuffs South Island and Woolworths New Zealand.
Nicola Willis, Finance Minister, said in March that she had sought external advice on a possible break-up of the main players to help accelerate competition. The Government is open to a range of 'interventions' in the sector to make it easier for a third national competitor, she said.
'Competition between these players is muted, and if competition in the market was stronger, consumers would benefit from better pricing, quality and range of grocery products,' the Government's request reads.
'New Zealand grocery prices appear high by international standards and the scale and pace of innovation is lower than would be expected from a more competitive market.'
Jones says visibility in wholesale pricing increases compatibility and drives competition. The Fuel Industry Act 2020 is an example of this working in practice and is a piece of legislation Jones says the grocery sector can learn from.
'I think the first thing is clear and transparent wholesale pricing. How that actually works will vary from industry to industry, but we know that it has made a material difference to competition in the fuel industry.'
Z Energy is already a major player in the 'top-up' grocery market, with 80 retail sites already offering a top-up grocery range and plans to roll this offering out more Z sites over the course of the year.
Jones says the service stations are 'not there to compete with the role of supermarkets' but rather to offer an alternative to the local dairy for motorists in need of breakfast cereal to take to the office, or a missing ingredient for their dinner recipe.
Jones says with around 180 locations, Z competes more with independent dairies and convenience store chains such as Night 'n Day than supermarkets.
It isn't the third player being sought by the Government in its bid to enhance competition in the grocery market, however, with 180 well-located sites around the country and around a million transactions a week, Jones says Z can play a role in improving the choices for consumers.
The company is targeting customers looking for convenience in between their large weekly shops.
'It could be when you run out of something and we're the closest place to go … That could be something for your dog, your cat, your child, or it could be a treat like chocolate or coffee. Another occasion could be on the way home where you know you've forgotten something, whether that's something you need for your meal or something you need for your family.'
Z's strategy is stocking one of each type of good, rather than stocking multiple brands. Stock differs store to store based on the area and customer demand – inner-city stations may sell more snacks or personal hygiene goods while those in residential areas, particularly those with a dearth of supermarkets, would sell more pantry top-ups such as sugar, or milk.
Around one in four Z stations have electric car chargers, which works hand in hand with a grocery offering. Customers are on the forecourt and the wider site for longer, so have time to look around the store.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Surcharge ban a win for consumers but will it save them money?
But will it ultimately save shoppers money? This is the question, after the Government revealed its proposed surcharge ban this week. The Retail Payment System (Ban on Surcharges) Amendment Bill is expected to be introduced by the year's end, and the change made by May. The proposed ban follows the Commerce Commission's decision to reduce bank interchange fees that businesses pay to accept credit card payments. This change is expected to save businesses about $90 million a year. Surcharges at the till allow businesses to recoup additional costs associated with providing certain payment methods, such as credit cards and contactless. New Zealanders are paying up to $150m in surcharges every year. The Government says this includes excessive surcharges of up to $65m. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson describes them as 'a hassle and an unwelcome surprise' for shoppers at the till, and says consumers will be able to 'shop with confidence knowing how much they will pay for their purchases'. The Commerce Commission will oversee enforcement. Consumers will be entitled to a refund if a business applies a surcharge. Consumer NZ welcomes the change, describing it as 'a no-brainer'. Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young is pleased changes are being made but warns that retailers will continue to face costs to accept debit and credit card payments and 'these costs will likely be added to product prices in future'. Hospitality New Zealand agrees, saying the move could result in higher prices because margins are tight. There was strong criticism from Dairy and Business Owners Group chair Ankit Bansal, who argues the proposed changes unfairly target small retailers instead of fixing the real problem – the banks. 'The reality is that large retailers enjoy significantly lower banking fees, while small businesses – with no power to negotiate – are left paying inflated rates.' The Government deserves praise for tackling the wider issue of costs associated with people using certain credit cards and contactless cards in shops. The reduction in interchange fees will help businesses. The surcharge ban will be positive for consumers and mean a more transparent process. But it's a fair bet that most businesses, especially those under pressure, will be unable to absorb any extra cost. Some consumers may well ultimately end up paying higher product prices at the till to compensate. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
NZ Reopens For Petroleum Exploration
Operators will be able to apply for new petroleum exploration permits as early as September following the third reading of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Bill removes the ban on oil and gas exploration beyond onshore Taranaki, better aligns decommissioning settings with international practice, establishes a new tier of permit to undertake small-scale non-commercial gold mining, and signals the Coalition Government's intent to reinvigorate investment in Crown-owned minerals. 'This Government is pragmatic about the vital role natural gas will play in our energy mix in the decades ahead and we have set a course for greater energy security backed by our own indigenous reserves,' Mr Jones says. 'The ill-fated exploration ban in 2018 has exacerbated shortages in our domestic gas supply by obliterating new investment in the exploration and development needed to meet our future gas needs. Reserves are also falling faster than anticipated. 'New Zealanders are bearing the brunt of this constrained gas supply, and energy security concerns are impacting investor sentiment. These factors are taking a toll on our economic growth and prosperity. 'We are seeing businesses in the regions closing as a result with Kiwis losing their jobs, and we're importing hundreds of tonnes of Indonesian coal to meet peak energy demand. 'This legislation is just one of many actions we are taking to get the right settings in place to resuscitate sector confidence, shore up energy supply and protect electricity affordability.' During the progression of the Bill, a gap was identified in the existing Crown Minerals Act that relates to liability for the costs of decommissioning petroleum infrastructure. In certain circumstances, parent companies of permit-holders could sell their shares without remaining responsible for the costs of decommissioning old petroleum infrastructure, exposing the Crown to fiscal risk. 'Together with changes to the decommissioning regime that better balance regulatory burden and risk to give operators the clarity they need to invest in exploration and development wells, we have introduced ministerial discretion to assign liability for decommissioning costs to former permit-holders and others who have held interests in a permit,' Mr Jones says. 'We recognise that a one-size-fits-all approach for every scenario not only erodes investor confidence, it also doesn't allow us to best manage risk. 'I want those who benefited from having an interest in a petroleum permit to pay for decommissioning the relevant infrastructure. While financial securities remain at the core, the new approach to assigning liability will ensure the most appropriate person will remain responsible for costs if the current permit-holder cannot meet their obligations and financial securities are insufficient.' Most of the changes through the Bill will take effect immediately, while others will require staged implementation and secondary legislation. All changes will be operational by the end of September 2025.
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Attempts To Fix Broken Remuneration Disclosure Bill
'Last night ACT proposed a series of common-sense amendments to Labour MP Camilla Belich's broken Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill, to make it more workable for businesses and employees entering into voluntary agreements with one another,' says ACT's Small Business spokesperson Laura McClure. 'The Bill, without clear rationale, inserts the Government into every employment agreement in the country – telling workers and employers that they are unable to freely come to mutually beneficial agreements that work for them. 'This raises serious privacy concerns, diminishes workplace flexibility, and poses a real risk to harmony in the workplace by encouraging resentment and comparison between colleagues. It also threatens commercially sensitive information and creates legal uncertainty for employers trying to do the right thing. 'ACT did not support the Bill, which undermines the freedom of consenting adults to form contracts, but my colleague Dr Parmjeet Parmar and I proposed practical amendments to minimise the harm it would cause.' The changes ACT proposed included: Restricting disclosure rights to within the same workplace – so employees could only disclose their own remuneration to colleagues who work for the same organisation, not to competitors, journalists, or the wider public. Protecting employee privacy – by prohibiting an employee from disclosing another employee's pay without that person's express consent. Preventing bad-faith disclosures – by ensuring only disclosures made in good faith are protected, so that attempts to weaponise pay information to harm employers or other staff aren't shielded by law. Excluding performance-based pay – such as bonuses and commissions from the definition of 'remuneration', recognising that these are often highly individualised, sensitive, and commercially confidential. Delaying the Bill's commencement by 12 months – to give businesses and industry bodies time to understand the law, adapt policies, and educate their members. 'These amendments would have preserved a worker's ability to disclose their own pay while protecting the privacy of others and the ability of businesses to operate fairly and competitively. Labour, National and the Greens refused to support any of them," says McClure. 'ACT believes in freedom of contract, the right to privacy, and the value of trusting people to make their own arrangements. This Bill tramples on all three. New Zealanders deserve better than another law that treats adults like children and businesses like villains.'
