logo
‘One-stop Shop': How RMA Reforms Could Shake Up Local Government

‘One-stop Shop': How RMA Reforms Could Shake Up Local Government

Scoop22-05-2025
Proposed legislation to replace the Resource Management Act (RMA) could bring sweeping changes for local councils.
Amid speculation the Government is looking at local government amalgamation as part of the legislation, some believe many council functions could be stripped from them leaving them wondering what functions would be left at a local level.
But Environment Canterbury chairperson Craig Pauling firmly believes there is a future for separate district and regional councils.
''There needs to be a partnership between local, regional and central government and we (ECan) are good at bringing people together.
''If you are in Kaikōura, your main focus is Kaikōura, but at a regional level my focus is Canterbury.''
Among the proposed changes is compliance, monitoring and enforcement (CME) functions to go to ''an Environment Protection Authority-type regulator''.
A single regional plan is proposed, which would bring together ECan's seven regional plans, four river plans, the 10 District Plans and the various spatial plans developed by local councils.
Mr Pauling believes there needs to be something at a regional level for planning and consenting, ''but you can still have delivery of services done at a local level''.
He says the proposed changes could lead to a ''one-stop shop'' for consents, instead of developers having to apply to ECan and local councils for different consents for the same development, but is not convinced a unitary authority is the answer.
''You shouldn't have a student marking their own exams.''
A single spatial plan chapter for the region is expected to have legislative clout.
But whether this will prevent housing developments, such as the proposed Ohoka sub-division, near Kaiapoi, appearing outside of a designated urban area remains uncertain.
''I suspect not because of the premise in the RMA reforms for private property rights,'' ECan deputy chairperson Deon Swiggs says.
ECan is continuing preparation work for a new Canterbury Regional Coastal Environment Plan and a single regional plan.
Former ECan chairperson Peter Scott blasted his colleagues last month for ''wasting money'' in allowing staff to continue planning work in the face of change.
But Mr Swiggs said staff were conducting research and analysis which will help to inform future plans, regardless of the planning framework.
''We still have work to do and we need to get on and do it,'' Mr Swiggs said.
''The work of our staff will endure regardless of what planning frameworks we have in place in the future.''
In November, ECan voted to delay notifying the Canterbury Regional Policy Statement until January 2026, while it awaits more certainty with RMA reform.
The council is also waiting for advice from the Environment Minister on whether it can notify a plan change to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan designed to resolve issues arising from a Supreme Court ruling in 2023.
Local Government Minister Simon Watts said amalgamation is a local decision and the Government will not force councils to amalgamate.
He said the RMA replacement legislation will include provisions relating to the roles, responsibilities and processes of local government.
"I have asked my officials to work with the sector on what that could mean for councils."
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop said the new legislation "will provide a radical transition to a far more liberal planning system with less red tape" and an emphasis on property rights.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Zealand reaches deal with Canada in long-running dairy trade dispute
New Zealand reaches deal with Canada in long-running dairy trade dispute

NZ Herald

time27 minutes ago

  • NZ Herald

New Zealand reaches deal with Canada in long-running dairy trade dispute

New Zealand initiated formal dispute settlement proceedings over restricted access to the Canadian market for dairy exports under the CPTPP in 2022. A dispute panel found in New Zealand's favour; however, Canada failed to fully comply with the panel's ruling. New Zealand threatened further action last year, including the imposition of retaliatory tariffs against Canadian exporters. 'The Government is pleased that this dispute has now been settled, and New Zealand exporters are guaranteed better access to the Canadian market,' McClay said. Under the agreement, Canada has committed to changing the way it administers its dairy quotas under CPTPP, including faster and more efficient access to quotas for New Zealand exporters, reallocation of underused quotas, and penalties for importers who misuse quotas. 'The CPTPP is a world-leading agreement that unlocks significant opportunities for all parties, but its obligations must be upheld. Today's agreement reinforces support for the rules-based trading system,' McClay said. He added that Canada was a long-standing friend and trading partner of this country and 'constructive engagement' had brought about a resolution. Last year, Act Party trade spokeswoman Dr Parmjeet Parmar called the dispute a 'betrayal of our friendship'. She said if Canada could not comply with the CPTPP, it should be 'booted out of the deal'. ExportNZ has welcomed the deal, saying it will unlock higher export value for Kiwi business. Executive director Josh Tan said the outcome was a win for New Zealand dairy exporters, and a win for the rules-based trading system. 'It's essential that our trade agreements function as they were agreed to – particularly in the current global trade context. Likewise, our trade partners should ensure they are playing by the rules.' Canada was a valuable trading partner for New Zealand, Tan said. -RNZ

FamilyBoost Or Fiscal Blowout? Taxpayer Handouts Shouldn't Go To The Top Earners
FamilyBoost Or Fiscal Blowout? Taxpayer Handouts Shouldn't Go To The Top Earners

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

FamilyBoost Or Fiscal Blowout? Taxpayer Handouts Shouldn't Go To The Top Earners

Responding to news that the Government is extending childcare subsidies to families earning up to $229,100 a year, the Taxpayers' Union is calling the move completely out of touch. Taxpayers' Union spokesperson Tory Relf said: 'If you're pulling in nearly double the average household income, you do not need a handout from other working taxpayers to help pay for daycare. The average household income is around $120,000.' 'It's not often we find ourselves agreeing with the CTU and Craig Renney, but they're absolutely right to call this out. The Government should be focusing support on families genuinely doing it tough, not those who are objectively well-off by any national measure.' 'The whole point of FamilyBoost was to ease pressure on low- and middle-income families. Creep the threshold high enough and suddenly it's just free cash for the comfortable.' 'If the Government thinks someone on $229,000 needs help with childcare, maybe they should spend a day living on the median household income instead. When you're earning more than $200k, taxpayers don't need to be picking up the bill.'

Greens Call For NZ Govt To Take UK's Lead And Lower Voting Age
Greens Call For NZ Govt To Take UK's Lead And Lower Voting Age

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Greens Call For NZ Govt To Take UK's Lead And Lower Voting Age

The Green Party is calling on the Government to follow the lead of the United Kingdom and lower the voting age to 16. 'We are calling on the New Zealand Government to follow in the footsteps of the United Kingdom and lower the voting age to 16,' says the Green Party's spokesperson for Democracy and Electoral Reform, Celia Wade Brown. 'Young people deserve to have a say in the decisions that affect their future. The choices we make today will determine the burden future generations carry. It is only fair that the voices of these generations have a say. 'Aotearoa was a world leader in being the first country in the world where women gained the vote, but we are falling behind the pack when it comes to giving this right to youth. 'The Supreme Court in Aotearoa has already ruled that denying 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote is a breach of their human rights. 'The Independent Electoral Review into the 2023 General Election recommended lowering the voting age and the Green Party agreed, but the coalition-dominated Select Committee rejected this sensible step. We heard that starting voting at 16 means a higher turnout continues. This is critical for our democracy, for both central and local government elections. 'Just this month, we heard loud and clear from youth MPs that it's time to lower the voting age to 16. Our youth care about our future, they care about this country, and they want to be involved in making New Zealand a better place. 'Christopher Luxon can begin to show he cares about democracy by demonstrating some leadership and lowering the voting age. This is a decision in his Government's hands and one we can make now,' says Celia Wade Brown.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store