
Scientists develop plastic that dissolves in seawater
What have scientists developed?
The new plastic was co-developed by the University of Tokyo in Japan and the country's RIKEN Centre for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS). Researchers say it is made by combining two small molecules which form a strong bond that allows the new material to stay tough and flexible.While scientists have long experimented with biodegradable plastics, the team say their invention breaks down much more quickly and leaves no trace.When placed in a mixture which had the same amount of salt as seawater, they found the new plastic dissolved "quickly in about two to three hours, depending on its thickness and size."And it's not just in water where the new plastic can dissolve. Takuzo Aida, lead researcher at CEMS, explained: "Similarly, when tested in soil..a piece of plastic about 5 centimetres in size, it completely disappears after a little over 200 hours."
Plastic pollution is a big global problem, with experts at the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) saying the amount of waste is set to triple in the next 15 years.Recent studies have shown the damage microplastics cause as they pollute the environment and create health problems for animals, because they can be easily eaten.The new plastic is still in the early phase of development but Mr Aida said their research has attracted a lot of interest, including from those in the packaging sector.He added: "In Japan, almost all packaging is made of plastic, and if we can really manage to reduce that, we can expect less environmental damage." Currently, less than 9% of global plastic waste is successfully recycled.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
18 hours ago
- The Guardian
James Cameron calls Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer a ‘moral cop-out'
James Cameron has described Oppenheimer, Christopher Nolan's multi-Oscar-winning 2023 biopic about the atomic scientist Robert Oppenheimer, a 'moral cop-out'. Speaking to Deadline about his forthcoming project Ghosts of Hiroshima, about the effects of the bomb in that city, Cameron said he disagreed with Nolan's narrative choices. 'It's interesting what he stayed away from,' said Cameron. 'Look, I love the film-making, but I did feel that it was a bit of a moral cop-out.' In Oppenheimer, Cillian Murphy stars as the scientist who led the development and design of the atomic bomb during the second world war. The film covers its inception, testing and deployment in Japan in 1945, when the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki led to the deaths of as many as a quarter of a million people by the end of that year – as well as hastening the end of the conflict. The film depicts Oppenheimer after the war as increasingly wracked by the legacy of his invention, and haunted by images of suffering. However, Cameron said he was among those viewers who felt the film did not go far enough in depicting the immediate aftermath of the attacks. 'It's not like Oppenheimer didn't know the effects,' he said. 'I don't like to criticise another film-maker's film, but there's only one brief moment where he sees some charred bodies in the audience, and then the film goes on to show how it deeply moved him. 'But I felt that it dodged the subject. I don't know whether the studio or Chris felt that that was a third rail that they didn't want to touch, but I want to go straight at the third rail. I'm just stupid that way.' Oppenheimer was released in 2023 and won Oscars for best picture, director, leading actor (for Murphy), supporting actor (for Robert Downey Jr), and three others. It also made $975m (£720m) at the box office. At the time of its release, Nolan responded to criticism similar to that put forward by Cameron by explaining he wanted to represent Oppenheimer's subjective experience. 'It was always my intention to rigidly stick to that,' he told Variety. 'Oppenheimer heard about the bombing at the same time that the rest of the world did. 'I wanted to show somebody who is starting to gain a clearer picture of the unintended consequences of his actions. It was as much about what I don't show as what I show.' Sign up to Film Weekly Take a front seat at the cinema with our weekly email filled with all the latest news and all the movie action that matters after newsletter promotion Deadline's Mike Fleming put a rhetorical rebuttal to Cameron, saying Nolan may have reasoned a different film-maker would tell the story of the victims of the bombings in Japan. 'Okay, I'll put up my hand,' said Cameron. 'I'll do it, Chris. No problem. You come to my premiere and say nice things.' Cameron's film, which has not yet begun formal production, will be an adaptation of Charles Pellegrino's forthcoming nonfiction book Ghosts of Hiroshima, which brings together testimonies from victims and survivors of the attacks. Before then he will release the latest Avatar film, Fire and Ash. His first entry in that franchise is the highest-grossing film of all time, while the sequel is the third. Avengers: Endgame is the second highest-grossing film, but Cameron's 1997 disaster movie Titanic is the fourth.


The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
James Cameron calls Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer a ‘moral cop-out'
James Cameron has described Oppenheimer, Christopher Nolan's multi-Oscar-winning 2023 biopic about the atomic scientist Robert Oppenheimer, a 'moral cop-out'. Speaking to Deadline about his forthcoming project Ghosts of Hiroshima, about the effects of the bomb in that city, Cameron said he disagreed with Nolan's narrative choices. 'It's interesting what he stayed away from,' said Cameron. 'Look, I love the film-making, but I did feel that it was a bit of a moral cop-out.' In Oppenheimer, Cillian Murphy stars as the scientist who led the development and design of the atomic bomb during the second world war. The film covers its inception, testing and deployment in Japan in 1945, when the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki led to the deaths of as many as a quarter of a million people by the end of that year – as well as hastening the end of the conflict. The film depicts Oppenheimer after the war as increasingly wracked by the legacy of his invention, and haunted by images of suffering. However, Cameron said he was among those viewers who felt the film did not go far enough in depicting the immediate aftermath of the attacks. 'It's not like Oppenheimer didn't know the effects,' he said. 'I don't like to criticise another film-maker's film, but there's only one brief moment where he sees some charred bodies in the audience, and then the film goes on to show how it deeply moved him. 'But I felt that it dodged the subject. I don't know whether the studio or Chris felt that that was a third rail that they didn't want to touch, but I want to go straight at the third rail. I'm just stupid that way.' Oppenheimer was released in 2023 and won Oscars for best picture, director, leading actor (for Murphy), supporting actor (for Robert Downey Jr), and three others. It also made $975m (£720m) at the box office. At the time of its release, Nolan responded to criticism similar to that put forward by Cameron by explaining he wanted to represent Oppenheimer's subjective experience. 'It was always my intention to rigidly stick to that,' he told Variety. 'Oppenheimer heard about the bombing at the same time that the rest of the world did. 'I wanted to show somebody who is starting to gain a clearer picture of the unintended consequences of his actions. It was as much about what I don't show as what I show.' Sign up to Film Weekly Take a front seat at the cinema with our weekly email filled with all the latest news and all the movie action that matters after newsletter promotion Deadline's Mike Fleming put a rhetorical rebuttal to Cameron, saying Nolan may have reasoned a different film-maker would tell the story of the victims of the bombings in Japan. 'Okay, I'll put up my hand,' said Cameron. 'I'll do it, Chris. No problem. You come to my premiere and say nice things.' Cameron's film, which has not yet begun formal production, will be an adaptation of Charles Pellegrino's forthcoming nonfiction book Ghosts of Hiroshima, which brings together testimonies from victims and survivors of the attacks. Before then he will release the latest Avatar film, Fire and Ash. His first entry in that franchise is the highest-grossing film of all time, while the sequel is the third. Avengers: Endgame is the second highest-grossing film, but Cameron's 1997 disaster movie Titanic is the fourth.


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Squid dominated oceans millions of years ago scientists say
When did squid first appear in our oceans and how did the evolve? That's a question that has puzzled scientists for many a team of researchers in Japan think they might have discovered the developed a new technique to scan fossils, allowing them to look at rocks in 3D their surprise, this helped them find more than 1,000 beaks of ancient cephalopods, suggesting that the animals dominated oceans millions of years ago. What are Cephalopods? Cephalopods - a group of marine animals which include squid - have been swimming in our oceans for millions of years. However, not much is known about ancient squid, as they are rarely preserved. This is because they are soft-bodied and don't have hard shells, meaning they rarely turn into fossils.A team of international scientists, led by experts at Hokkaido University in Japan, developed a new advanced technique to scan allowed them identify one thousand fossilised cephalopod beaks hidden inside rocks, which dated back to the late Cretaceous these small beaks were 263 squid specimens, including about 40 different types that had never been seen surprised scientists was how common squids were in ancient oceans. The team found that squid fossils were far greater in number than those of other bony fish and ammonites. Author of the study, Dr Shin Ikegami, from Hokkaido University explained: "In both number and size, these ancient squids clearly prevailed the seas."Their body sizes were as large as fish and even bigger than the ammonites we found alongside them. "This shows us that squids were thriving as the most abundant swimmers in the ancient ocean," he team hope that their new technique could help us better understand ancient marine ecosystems.