EU avoids US tariff letter, eyes concessions, EU sources say
U.S. President Donald Trump began informing, in a wave of letters, a range of trading partners from Japan to Myanmar of sharply higher tariffs on goods they sell into the United States starting August 1.
Some EU sources said the bloc was close to an agreement with the Trump administration.
This could involve limited concessions to U.S. baseline tariffs of 10% for aircraft and parts, some medical equipment and spirits in an eventual deal with the Trump administration, three sources familiar with the situation said on Monday.
Two sources also said that the EU was looking into an arrangement that would allow EU automakers that produce and export cars from the United States to import more EU vehicles at tariff rates below the current 25%.
Such an arrangement would benefit German carmakers that have large U.S. plants.
The European Commission, which had aimed for a balanced and broader trade agreement with the United States, briefed EU envoys late on Monday that EU countries faced a choice between accepting an unbalanced deal or facing more uncertainty.
The Commission also said that there were no guarantees that the Trump administration would not impose further tariffs or demand further concessions.
The EU currently faces 50% U.S. tariffs on its steel and aluminium exports, 25% on cars and car parts and 10% on most other products. The U.S. is also looking into further tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Russia has committed flagrant human rights abuses in Ukraine since 2014, rules ECHR
Russia has committed flagrant and unprecedented abuses of human rights since it invaded Ukraine in 2014, including extrajudicial killings, sexual violence and forced labour, the European court of human rights has found. The court's grand chamber unanimously held that between 11 May 2014 and 16 September 2022, when Russia ceased to be a party to the European convention on human rights it had committed 'manifestly unlawful conduct … on a massive scale'. Pro-Russia armed groups entered the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine in 2014 and Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. In its judgment, published on Wednesday, the court said there was evidence of widespread and systemic use of sexual violence, accompanied by acts of torture, such as beatings, strangling or electric shocks. Civilians and prisoners of war were subjected to mock executions, the severing of body parts and electric shocks, including to intimate areas of their bodies, the court said. Finding repeated violations of the convention, many of which had taken place over a period of more than eight years, the court said: 'These actions seek to undermine the very fabric of the democracy on which the Council of Europe and its member states are founded by their destruction of individual freedoms, their suppression of political liberties and their blatant disregard for the rule of law. 'In none of the conflicts previously before the court has there been such near universal condemnation of the 'flagrant' disregard by the respondent state for the foundations of the international legal order established after the second world war.' Ukraine hailed the judgment as 'historic and unprecedented', saying it was an 'undeniable victory'. Russia did not participate in the proceedings and said it would ignore the judgment. Violations identified by the court included: Indiscriminate military attacks. Summary executions of civilians and Ukrainian military personnel. Torture, including the use of rape as a weapon of war. Unlawful and arbitrary detention of civilians. Unjustified displacement and transfer of civilians. Intimidation, harassment and persecution of all religious groups other than adherents of the historically Moscow-aligned Ukrainian Orthodox church. Intimidation and violence against journalists and new laws prohibiting and penalising the dissemination of information in support of Ukraine. Forcible dispersal by the Russian military of peaceful protests in occupied towns and cities. Destruction, looting and expropriation of property. Suppression of the Ukrainian language in schools and indoctrination of Ukrainian schoolchildren. Transfer to Russia, and in many cases, the adoption there of Ukrainian children. The court said: 'The prevalence of sexual violence and rape by Russian soldiers in occupied territory is especially abhorrent. The evidence shows the extreme violence of the circumstances in which women were raped or sexually assaulted and the intent to terrorise, humiliate and debase them … In addition to the impact on the direct victims, the raping of women and girls in the context of an armed conflict has also been described as a means for the aggressor to symbolically and physically humiliate the defeated men. 'Rape or the threat of rape is also used to drive communities off lands or to heighten terror during attacks. The evidence also attests to the horrific sexual violence frequently perpetrated upon male detainees. The sexual abuse, torture and mutilation of male detainees is often carried out to attack and destroy their sense of masculinity or manhood.' Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion The judges said that sexual violence and rape were deployed in Ukraine after the February 2022 invasion 'as part of a military strategy to dehumanise, humiliate and break the morale of the Ukrainian population, as individuals and as a community, and to assert dominance over Ukrainian sovereign territory'. The court will decide on whether to order compensation at a later date. However, Russia has previously told the court of its intention not to enforce judgments or pay damages. A total of 26 signatory states to the convention intervened as third parties in the case and expressed their support for making Russia accountable for violations of human rights arising from its invasion of Ukraine. The court also found that the shooting down of flight MH17 using a missile supplied and transported to eastern Ukraine by the Russian Federation, resulting in the deaths of all 298 civilians onboard, was in breach of the convention.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ex-Tory minister breached post-government jobs rules, watchdog says
A member of the House of Lords and former Tory minister has breached the rules ex-government figures should follow when taking jobs after leaving office, a watchdog has said. Lord Harrington, a non-affiliated peer who was a Conservative minister under Boris Johnson, failed to tell the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) about two roles he took after leaving government in 2022. Acoba said the peer's failure to notify it of roles with Stephenson Harwood LLP and Regal Holdco Limited showed an 'unambiguous breach and clear disregard' of the rules governing ex-ministers. He apologised, telling the committee he miscalculated the period within which he had to give notice, while Acoba has written to the current Government complaining there is a 'general lack of understanding' of the rules it enforces. On leaving Government, all ministers must notify Acoba for the next two years of any jobs they go on to hold, to ensure they do not use their influence or knowledge of government improperly. Lord Harrington left his role as a refugees minister, working across the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and the Home Office, in September 2022. In the role, he spearheaded co-ordination of the UK's efforts to house Ukrainian refugees in the early days of the war, as well as working to accommodate Afghan refugees fleeing the resurgent Taliban. Acoba said it found out he had taken up a role with law firm Stephenson Harwood, which he began in March 2024, when a member of the public made a freedom of information request about it. The committee also became aware of an appointment with Cluster Partners Limited in December 2023, and another with Regal Holdco Limited in July 2024. It wrote to Lord Harrington asking why he had failed to give notice of the jobs, describing his actions as 'surprising', as he had sought advice for past roles after serving in David Cameron's government, and 'within the first few months of leaving office in 2022'. In correspondence with the watchdog from April, which has now been published on Acoba's website, Lord Harrington apologised to the committee. He said: 'I apologise for miscalculating the period in which I was required to notify Acoba of such appointments. The ministerial role I undertook in 2022 was a strictly limited project, concerning a subject on which I have had no professional interaction with prior or since that period. 'No paid employment I have commenced within two years of leaving ministerial office has been related to that role nor to Government.' While he said Cluster Partners was established in 2023, Lord Harrington said the company did not 'commence any activity until much later on', until after the deadline by which he had to notify Acoba. The watchdog accepted his explanation, but said of the other two appointments: 'The purpose of the rules is to protect the integrity of Government by considering the real and perceived risks associated with former ministers joining outside organisations. 'Protecting the integrity of the Government has not been possible here. Failing to await advice before taking up roles with Stephenson Harwood LLP and Regal Holdco Limited is an unambiguous breach and clear disregard of the Government's rules and the requirements of the ministerial code.' Acoba also wrote to Pat McFadden, the most senior minister of the Cabinet Office, notifying him of the breach. In its letter to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the watchdog complained that the rules governing ex-ministers jobs are inadequate. It said: 'These breaches, alongside those of others, raise the wider issue around the general lack of understanding of the rules and the inadequacies of the framework in which the rules operate. 'As it stands, the process relies entirely on the co-operation of applicants in the absence of any sanctions or incentives to maintain compliance. This has risked undermining the integrity of the committee and the rules.'
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump threatens Brazil with 50% tariff over Bolsonaro trial
US President Donald Trump said he was planning to impose a 50% tax on goods made in Brazil, escalating his fight with the South American announced the plan in his latest tariff letter, shared on social media, accusing Brazil of "attacks" on US tech companies and conducting a "witch hunt" against former far-right president Jair Bolsonaro over his role trying to overturn the 2022 had already sparred with Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva over Bolsonaro's trial earlier this week. At the time, President Lula said Brazil would not accept "interference" from anyone and added: "No one is above the law."
