Canada's gas market 'about to turn the corner,' say analysts eyeing up to 7 years of excess demand
He and his peers see new LNG export projects spurring higher prices for Canadian producers for years to come as demand outstrips supply.
The first delivery of liquefied natural gas (LNG) produced at the LNG Canada terminal near Kitimat, B.C. left port for a storage and regasification terminal in Incheon, South Korea last week. Prior to this, Canada's only export market has been the United States via pipeline.
The Shell PLC-led (SHEL) joint venture provides long-awaited access to higher prices for Canadian gas in Asia.
'Long-suffering Canadian gas companies (and investors) are poised to benefit from several structural changes, including: the start-up of LNG Canada, declining production in several major U.S. basins, and growing demand from AI and data centres,' Ollenberger wrote in a recent note to clients.
'[The] Canadian gas market [is] about to turn the corner.'
The first phase of LNG Canada will export from two processing units with a total capacity of 14 million tonnes per annum (mtpa). A second phase under consideration would double that. Meanwhile, two additional projects in Canada have reached their final investment decision: Cedar LNG and Woodfibre LNG.
A new analysis by Deloitte Canada published on Monday estimates Canada will not fill the demand created by current LNG export projects for four to seven years.
'This likely will mean the strengthening of the AECO benchmark, enabling Canadian producers to achieve more favourable value for their gas,' Deloitte Canada researchers led by energy, resources and industrials partner Andrew Botterill wrote in the report.
'In this period where production is growing to meet demand, natural gas prices should see a narrowing of the differential relative to Henry Hub that lasts for multiple years once exports ramp up from LNG Canada.'
Canada is the world's fifth-largest producer of natural gas, and the fourth-largest global exporter.
Producers faced tough times in 2024 as prices fell to their lowest levels in more than 40 years. According to Statistics Canada, higher production and storage, coupled with weaker-than-expected winter demand, caused prices to plummet in the second half of the year.
Deloitte Canada sees AECO prices averaging $2.20 per million BTUs in 2025, up from $1.39 in 2024. In 2026, the firm says AECO prices are expected to average $3.45, before plateauing at $3.50 until 2032.
'We're bullish on natural gas,' Bay Street fund manager Eric Nuttall wrote in his firm's recently released 2025 mid-year outlook. The partner and senior portfolio manager at Toronto-based Nine Point Partners says 75 per cent of his firm's oil and gas fund has been allocated to natural gas investments since the end of May.
'We expect natural gas prices to strengthen to between $4 and $5 over the coming year, and as Canada increases its LNG capacity, we think the current discount on Canadian natural gas should fall from about $2 today to between $1.10 and $1.30,' Nuttall added. 'This poses a big opportunity for Canadian companies.'
LNG has been touted as a 'bridge' or 'transition' fuel to replace coal power in emerging economies. With new export-focused capacity ramping up around the world from the United States to Qatar, observers including the International Energy Agency have raised concerns about a glut of supply hitting the market.
While Deloitte Canada estimates four to seven years of excess demand when LNG Canada is fully operational, other analysts have floated shorter timeframes.
'We believe this will significantly impact the current Western Canadian gas balance, and estimate it will take around two years for supply to catch up with demand,' Ollenberger wrote.
Last month, TD Cowen analyst Tristan Margot called for the global LNG market to flip to oversupplied conditions after winter 2026.
'Our analysts see the incremental demand for WCSB natural gas from LNG Canada Phase 1 to be largely filled in real time,' he wrote in a June 12 research report.
'This dynamic is likely to result in continued weakness in natural gas prices through year-end,' Margot added. 'This is likely to dampen the optimism that LNG Canada Phase 1 startup is the inflection point to historically weak WCSB gas pricing. However, with producer supply-restraint in 2026+, we see a path to continued basin growth and stronger WCSB natural gas pricing.'
Jeff Lagerquist is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on X @jefflagerquist.
Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canadian government needs to stand up for lumber workers, says United Steelworkers union
BURNABY, British Columbia, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The United Steelworkers union (USW) District 3 and the USW Wood Council are calling on the federal government to take urgent action in response to the latest escalation in the softwood lumber trade dispute. Following the U.S. Department of Commerce's decision to increase anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber exports to 20.56%, the USW is demanding immediate support for forestry workers and communities across the country. 'This latest increase, along with other threatened tariffs, is yet another blow to workers, communities and the long-term sustainability of our industry,' said Scott Lunny, USW Western Canada Director. 'We represent thousands of loggers and mill workers across British Columbia and Western Canada and our members, and their families, are at risk – governments need to act now.' The combined total of anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Canadian lumber now exceeds 35%. This threat of further tariffs comes after President Donald Trump announced a potential Section 232 'national security' investigation. 'It's a constant attack on our industry and our workforce from the U.S. administration. Our prime minister stood up for the steel sector and says softwood lumber is a priority in trade talks, but what forest workers need now is action, not just words. They need to know Canada has their backs,' said Lunny. In addition to calling for a deal on softwood lumber to be a priority for Canada in trade talks with the U.S., the USW is calling for a comprehensive support package for forest workers, including wage subsidies, loan guarantees for affected businesses and other targeted resources to support provinces, regional and local communities to sustain critical infrastructure and services through this unprecedented uncertainty. The USW warns that the increased tariffs and potential Section 232 tariff implementation, in addition to duties, will cost American consumers and Canadian jobs. 'These duties are unfair and will only drive up housing costs for U.S. consumers, while putting thousands of Canadian jobs at risk,' said Jeff Bromley, USW Wood Council Chair. 'The American market needs Canadian lumber. The U.S. cannot meet its domestic demand, no matter what President Trump says.' The union also pushed back against claims made by the U.S. Softwood Lumber Coalition. 'Canadian producers operate under different conditions. Our harvesting costs are higher, our wages and benefits are better and our lumber is top-quality. This isn't unfair trade. It's a better product from a better system,' said Bromley. USW emphasized that securing a lasting resolution to the softwood lumber dispute must remain a top priority in Canada-U.S. trade negotiations and in the meantime, governments must step in to stabilize the sector. About the United Steelworkers The USW represents 225,000 members in nearly every economic sector across Canada and is the largest private-sector union in North America, with 850,000 members in Canada, the United States and the Caribbean. Each year, thousands of workers choose to join the USW because of the union's strong track record in creating healthier, safer and more respectful workplaces and negotiating better working conditions and fairer compensation – including good wages, benefits and pensions. For more information: Scott Lunny, USW Western Canada Director, slunny@ , 604-329-5308 Jeff Bromley, USW Wood Council Chair, jbromley@ , 250-426-9870 Brett Barden, USW Communications, bbarden@ , 604-445-6956
Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
‘Equal funding is the answer': Eby says Ottawa must lift subsidy for B.C. ferry users
VICTORIA - Premier David Eby has called for the federal government to float more money for ferry users in British Columbia, adding that equal funding 'is the answer,' after Ottawa cut ferry rates in Atlantic Canada. Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that starting Aug. 1, there will be a 50 per cent fare cut for passenger, vehicle and commercial users of Marine Atlantic — a constitutionally mandated ferry service connecting Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. Eby said now is the time for the federal government to have a 'serious look' at the current funding formula for B.C. ferry users, which has come under scrutiny in the wake of federal criticism of a BC Ferries contract with a Chinese ship builder. 'The ask is very straightforward,' Eby said. 'We need the same per-capita funding that any other province gets through any other announcements that (are) made across the country.' He added that 'fairness, equality, and access' to programs from the federal government is 'mission-critical.' The premier acknowledged that Carney's announcement was an election promise, but said Ottawa must 'up the federal subsidy' for B.C. ferry users, which has not changed for almost two decades. Eby has noted previously that the federal government subsidizes ferry users in Atlantic Canada by about $300 per person, while ferry users in B.C. receive $1 per person. He said Monday that provinces must receive the same per-capita funding, regardless of the program, renewing a familiar complaint about B.C. being treated unfairly under Canada's system of equalization payments. 'Doesn't matter, if it is an economic program, a subsidy for ferries, subsidies for road building, subsidies for immigration, health care funding, child care funding — you name it,' he said. 'Equal funding is the answer.' Carney's announcement comes after the federal government condemned the BC Ferries contract with a Chinese state-owned company to build four vessels, even as the Canada Infrastructure Bank lent the company money for the ferries. That same Chinese shipyard, Chinese Merchants Industry Weihai, also built one of Atlantic Canada's newest vessels through an agreement with Stena RoRo. No Canadian companies bid for the BC Ferries contract, and the company, which is solely owned by the provincial government, has repeatedly said the Chinese shipyard had 'the strongest bid by a significant margin.' BC Ferries said in a statement that it recognized the federal government's decision to reduce ferry and bridge prices in Atlantic Canada. 'Ferry service is just as essential in British Columbia,' it added. 'It's a vital part of our transportation network, connecting people, goods and services across coastal communities every day.' The total value of the federal contribution to BC Ferries is $37.8 million in 2025-26. According to BC Ferry and Marine Workers' Union, federal support for Marine Atlantic is almost $130 million. BC Ferries said it uses a different funding model to deliver services. Partial funding comes from the province, with some money coming from the federal government, under an arrangement negotiated in 1977. 'But we also operate one of the largest and most complex ferry systems in the world, and unlike many other jurisdictions, the vast majority of system costs are paid directly by ferry users,' the statement said. 'Without additional support, fares would need to increase by more than 30 per cent in 2028 alone, just to keep up with operating and capital pressures,' it added. The statement went on to say that 'continued collaboration' across all levels of government will be necessary to keep ferry travel 'reliable, affordable and sustainable' for coastal British Columbians. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025.
Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Stephen Harper slams Donald Trump's ‘comprehensive protectionism' as trade deal deadline approaches
OTTAWA — With trade talks lumbering on, and questions about what type of deal Canada might get with Donald Trump after the European Union agreed to keep American tariffs, Stephen Harper believes an attitude is taking root in the United States. And he thinks it's wrong. On stage at a Canada-U.S. relations conference in Saskatoon on Monday, the former Conservative leader described himself as possibly the most pro-American prime minister in Canadian history. But even he believes the breach of trust that comes from Trump's pursuit of 'comprehensive protectionism' — which Harper defined as a 'failed economic policy' designed to wrest economic prowess from other countries through tariffs — means Canada must stop relying so heavily on the U.S., in both commercial and military terms. It's the opposite advice he would have given the federal government a year ago, Harper said, but true to what he told Prime Minister Mark Carney's administration when it asked for his views in recent weeks. And part of it has to do with this new American attitude, as exemplified in Trump's declaration of trade war against essentially the entire world, Canada included, Harper said. 'There is a view taking hold in the present American administration that … sort of sees the world as everybody needs America but America doesn't need anybody, and I've got to tell you that isn't true,' Harper said. 'The reality now that we have not faced as a country in 100 years, of seeing the United States flex its muscles in a way that has nothing to do with values or ideals, that is something we can't forget, and we cannot make ourselves entirely dependent on that relationship.' Harper's comments come as Canada's trade war with the U.S. approaches its latest date of potential consequence. Trump has threatened to increase tariffs on at least some Canadian imports from 25 per cent to 35 per cent on Aug. 1 — this coming Friday — if the ongoing negotiations with Canada fail to result in a new deal. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal cabinet minister leading trade talks with the U.S., is set to return to Washington before the deadline, after he went there for the latest round of talks last week, his office confirmed. Speaking Monday in Prince Edward Island, Carney said negotiations with the U.S. are 'at an intense phase,' but repeated that his government won't agree to anything that's not a 'good deal' for Canada. 'There is a landing zone that's possible, but we have to get there, and we'll see,' Carney said. He added in French that Canada is not likely to land a deal that removes all American tariffs, noting in particular those that the U.S. justifies for national security reasons. He said it's now a question of the level and breadth of such tariffs that might remain under any deal. The question of which tariffs might remain was fresh in the minds of many observers Monday, after the European Union struck a deal with the Trump administration over the weekend. That deal, announced at a meeting in Scotland, saw the EU agree to a 15-per-cent tariff in a deal that kept import duties of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum. Days earlier, Japan also agreed to a 15-per-cent tariff on most exports into the U.S., and similarly kept the steel and aluminum duty at 50 per cent. That steeper tariff is among those — alongside tariffs on lumber and threatened duties on copper, pharmaceuticals and some other goods — that the U.S. has argued are necessary for its national security. And it's nightmare fuel for Catherine Cobden, president and chief executive officer of the Canadian Steel Producers Association. Canadian steel and aluminum producers are already hobbling under the impact of their own 50-per-cent American tariff, which Cobden said has decreased production of steel in this country by 30 per cent and caused at least 1,000 layoffs. Cobden said her sector will see any Canada-U.S. deal that lands this week as a failure if it leaves the 50-per-cent tariff in place. 'We can't settle for a 50-per-cent tariff — full stop,' she said. 'That will be an unacceptable outcome for us.' Codben said that if a deal is not struck this week, the federal government should revert to slapping counter-tariffs on American imports to match those on steel and aluminum. So far, Carney's government has refrained from doing so after Trump raised the steel and aluminum tariff last month , as Ottawa pursues a deal to reduce the layers of tariffs that Trump has imposed since returning to office in January, including on goods that don't comply with 2018's Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), and on auto exports to the U.S. For some, the Japan and EU deals shouldn't be taken as a sure indication of what is to come in any U.S. trade deal with Canada. Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association, said Europe and Japan are the U.S.'s competition on auto manufacturing, while Canada's automotive sector is deeply integrated with production south of the border. Arguing any auto tariff higher than zero is unacceptable for Canada, Volpe noted that the federal government has matched American policies to tariff Chinese-made electric vehicles, and taken measures alongside Washington to address concerns about the dumping of cheap steel in North America. 'We are not in any way the same as the EU and Japan. We are a partner, and we also show that partnership by sticking our chins out on China,' Volpe said. Goldy Hyder, president of the Business Council of Canada, agreed the situations are different. The EU, for instance, had to 'buy down' the tariff by agreeing to purchase more American energy and direct investment there, while Canada already has broad access to the U.S. market through CUSMA, Hyder said. With the Trump administration insisting on keeping some tariffs, Hyder said the goal should be to strike a deal with duties as low as possible, while preserving the remaining free trade for billions of dollars of goods that flow tariff-free under CUSMA. 'We're no longer in a world where free trade means no tariffs,' Hyder said. Matthew Holmes, chief of public policy at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, added that Canada has some advantages in trade talks that other countries don't, including the fact that Canada is 'the largest buyer' of American exports, with almost $480 million worth in 2024, according to U.S. trade data . Combined with integrated supply chains for manufacturing cars, producing beef, and ties in other sectors, the access through CUSMA means Canada would remain in a good position even if overall tariffs go up between the U.S. and other countries — and especially if any tariffs that remain on Canadian goods are lower. 'In the short term, the disruption is real, the cost is real,' he said. 'But in the longer term, this really becomes about preserving and protecting as much of the CUSMA relationship as we can, because that will be the difference-maker for us.'
