New Zealand climate report: Home owners face risks as buy-outs phase out, expert warns
The Government should only invest in adaptation if it would protect Crown assets 'or where broader national benefits can be realised'.
'Central Government investment or other financing strategies may be appropriate to help overcome challenges in particularly vulnerable areas, where there is less ability to pay.'
Victoria University emeritus professor Jonathan Boston, who was part of a previous expert working group on climate adaptation, said the message from the latest report to New Zealanders was clear: 'You are on your own.'
The report rightly recognised the need for urgent action on climate adaptation, and to make consistent, reliable information about climate hazards available, Boston said.
However, the recommendations to withdraw financial assistance for both property buy-outs and adaptation measures, and to leave decision-making up to individuals, were 'fundamentally flawed'.
'One of the core responsibilities of any Government is to protect its citizens and to deal with natural disasters and so on. That is above almost anything else.'
To put an end-date on that was 'morally bankrupt and highly undesirable', he said.
The report wrongly assumed that people would act rationally if they were properly informed of the risks, he said.
'We know from vast amounts of literature that people suffer from all kinds of cognitive biases ... and that these have a profound influence on whether people make sensible decisions or not.
'And quite apart from cognitive bias, lots of people lack choices. They lack the [financial] resources to make good decisions.'
Thousands of New Zealand homes could become uninsurable by private companies in the face of climate change, researchers say.
Boston also criticised the recommendation of a transitional period, saying the risks from climate change would continue to evolve well past 2045 or another hard end-date.
He and others had previously warned against the 'moral hazard' of creating expectations of generous property buy-outs every time there was a severe weather event.
'We certainly need to be ensuring that we don't create incentives for people to stay in risky areas or indeed to build in areas that are going to become risky because of climate change,' he said.
'But the idea that you can just sort of leave it to individuals to decide what's going to happen and have no oversight or involvement in helping people to make good decisions and helping people to move where they have to move, I just think it's bizarre.'
Managed or unmanaged retreat?
Environmental Defence Society policy director Raewyn Peart said the report seemed to be moving away from the concept of 'managed retreat', where communities moved out of harm's way in a co-ordinated fashion.
'The approach seems to be unmanaged retreat, where we'll give people information and a transition period – they're on notice – and at that point, people can make their own decisions about whether to move or not.'
That would be unworkable, Peart said.
'Some people will move, some won't, councils [will have] to provide services to a community that's gradually emptying out, people there who can't afford to move will be trapped into a risky situation – they may be facing regular floods of their properties.
'I just don't think it's in the best interests of the country to essentially leave it to the market and people's individual decisions.'
The report recommended handing over responsibility for adaptation planning to local councils, but it was unclear whether central Government would provide any financial or administrative support, she said.
'Some councils are really on to it and are already doing it – they have the resources. It's the small councils who may only have one planner, who [may] have no expertise in adaptation planning.'
Flooded communities like this could face a future without buy-outs or national aid. Photo / RNZ
The latest report echoes previous warnings that insurers could increase premiums to unaffordable levels, and even withdraw from some areas, as the risk from climate change hazards continued to increase.
Insurance Council chief executive Kris Faafoi – whose organisation has long called for greater national direction from central Government on climate adaptation – said it was good to see the report authors recommending urgent action.
'There's still some very difficult issues to work through – but these extreme weather events are going to happen, and being able to protect communities and to keep insurance affordable and available is really important in the long term,' Faafoi said.
There was little appetite anywhere on the political spectrum for expensive buy-outs of properties to continue, he said.
The question of who would actually pay for adaptation measures still needed to be answered, Faafoi said.
'In the report itself, there was an expectation that councils will do a lot of the heavy lifting and where some communities might find it a challenge to be able to pay for some of the protections ... then investment from the Crown might be necessary.'
But following a 'beneficiary pays' approach could see the costs of adaptation fall heavily on some communities,Faafoi said.
'I think reading between the lines, there could be the likes of targeted rates in some areas.
'Again, that has to be floated with communities and as to whether or not people who benefit from that might be able to pay for that.'
The report noted the financial difficulties many councils faced.
'Funding will be a challenging proposition if councils' ability to increase rates is constrained,' the authors wrote.
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts told RNZ the Government welcomes the independent recommendations for how New Zealand can adapt to the impacts of climate change.
'We will now take the time to review recommendations and announce decisions in due course,' Watts said.
'The report is not Government policy, however the Government is considering the group's recommendations, alongside the findings of last year's cross-party climate adaptation inquiry and other advice, as it works to put in place the building blocks for a national adaptation framework.'
– RNZ
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Buyouts to end in 20 years, panel recommends
business money 41 minutes ago Homeowners whose houses are flooded or damaged by weather events should not expect buy-outs in the future, a panel of experts has recommended to the government. An independent reference group set up by the Ministry for the Environment released a suite of recommendations on Wednesday to help the government shape climate adaptation legislation. The group recommended a 20-year transition period, after which homeowners whose houses are flooded or damaged by weather events should not expect buy-outs. Emile Donovan speaks to Victoria University's chair of the school of government Professor Jonathan Boston about the consequences of any policy change.

NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Gisborne seeks Government backing for long-term projects with Regional Deal
Mayor Rehette Stoltz say Gisborne District Council will continue to talk to the Government about its Regional Deal and possible investment. Gisborne District Council has submitted a Tairāwhiti Regional Deal proposal to the Government under a new initiative setting project priorities over 10 years. Regional and City Deals are a central government initiative to establish long-term agreements between central and local government. Earlier this week the Government announced the signing of


Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Latest poll good news for Peters and party
NZ First leader Winston Peters. Photo: ODT files Coalition parties are reasserting their lead, driven by a surge in support for NZ First - now the third most popular party, the latest political poll shows. The latest Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll, published today, shows NZ First leapfrogging the Greens and ACT for the first time since the poll began in 2021. NZ First registered 9.8%, up 3.2 points compared to the last poll in June. Just behind, the Greens received 9.4%, up 1.2 points, while ACT came in at 9.1%, unchanged. The poll also puts National back in the top spot, up 0.4 points to 33.9%, with Labour faltering on 31.6%, down 3.2 points. Te Pāti Māori had a 0.2-point increase to 3.5%. On those numbers, the coalition parties would secure 65 seats - up three from last month - compared to 57 seats for the opposition. The surge in popularity for NZ First comes after leader Winston Peters handed over the deputy prime ministership to ACT's David Seymour at the end of May. Voters' enthusiasm for both prime ministerial contenders remained muted with just 19.7% naming National's Christopher Luxon as their preference and 19.6% naming Labour's Chris Hipkins. In third spot was Peters, on 9.3%, then Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick on 7%. Seymour was in fifth on 5.7%. Asked for their top issues, respondents overall gave the cost-of-living top billing at 21.6%. The economy registered at 19.1%, with health in third place on 13.3%. The poll was conducted by Curia Market Research for the New Zealand Taxpayers' Union and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1%. It surveyed 1000 adult New Zealanders - 780 by phone and 220 by online panel - from Wednesday, July 2 through to Sunday, July 6. The results are weighted to reflect the overall voting adult population in terms of gender, age and area. Some 7.9% were undecided on the party vote question. Curia is a long-running and established pollster in New Zealand, which has resigned its membership from the Research Association New Zealand (RANZ) industry body.