logo
Wimbledon Tech Glitch Sparks Line-Call Controversy

Wimbledon Tech Glitch Sparks Line-Call Controversy

The Sun10 hours ago
WIMBLEDON'S automated line-calling technology came under fire on Sunday after an embarrassing malfunction robbed Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova of a point during her last-16 victory over Britain's Sonay Kartal on Centre Court.
Russian Pavlyuchenkova had reached game point at 4-4 in the opening set when Kartal hit a shot that looked clearly long but there was no call and Pavlyuchenkova stopped play.
An automated voice call of 'STOP STOP' rang out and confusion reigned as umpire Nico Helwerth sought advice from tournament organisers via telephone.
Television replays showed that Kartal's shot was clearly out, yet Helwerth ruled that because the Hawk-Eye technology had not tracked the ball, the point needed to be replayed.
Pavlyuchenkova went on to drop serve and was fuming at the changeover, telling the umpire: 'Because she is local, they can say whatever. You took the game away from me. They stole the game from me. You stole the game from me'.
The 34-year-old quickly recovered and showed the resilience that has marked her long career by reaching the quarter-finals with a 7-6(3) 6-4 win.
But the main talking point was Wimbledon's automated line-calling system that has replaced human judges this year.
Operator error
Tournament officials later said the problem had been caused by operator error and that the umpire had followed the correct protocols, although Pavlyuchenkova felt that he should have intervened to correct an obvious mistake.
'We were waiting for a decision as the system was down, but I was expecting to hear if they said the ball was in or out,' Pavlyuchenkova said.
'Instead they just said, replay the point. It was tricky especially as it was a very crucial moment in the match.
'I expected a different decision. I just thought also the chair umpire could take the initiative. That's why he's there sitting on the chair. He also saw it (was) out, he told me after the match. I thought he would do that, but he didn't.
'I think it's also difficult for him. He probably was scared to take such a big decision.'
Asked how she would have felt if the point had cost her the match, Pavlyuchenkova raised a smile: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back here.'
Kartal unsighted
Kartal said she had been unsighted as to whether her shot was out.
'That situation is a rarity. I don't think it's really ever happened,' she said. 'It's tough luck. What can you do? The umpire is trying his best. I think he handled it fine.'
Pavlyuchenkova, who felt a back-up system needed to be in place, is not the first person this week to question the Electronic Line Calling (ELC) system. Britain's Emma Raducanu said there had been wrong calls during her loss to Aryna Sabalenka.
'No, I don't (trust the system) -- I think the other players would say the same thing, there were some pretty dodgy ones but what can you do?,' she said after her defeat.
Britain's Jack Draper also believed it was not 100% accurate while Swiss player Belinda Bencic said it was a hot topic in the locker rooms. Pavlyuchenkova said it was something that needed to be addressed.
'I think since we have already automatic line-calling and so much invested into this, we should probably look into something else to have better decisions on it,' she said.
In a later statement, organisers said they had apologised to both of the players, saying an investigation found that the ELC system had been deactivated for one game, with three calls not picked up, two of which had been called by the umpire.
'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology,' the statement said. 'The live ELC system relies on the Hawk-Eye operators, the Review Official and the technology to work in harmony.
'This did not happen. In this instance there was a human error and as a consequence we have fully reviewed our processes and made the appropriate changes.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hulkenberg rids himself of unwanted record at the 239th attempt
Hulkenberg rids himself of unwanted record at the 239th attempt

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Hulkenberg rids himself of unwanted record at the 239th attempt

SILVERSTONE: Nico Hulkenberg provided Formula One's feel-good story of the day, and possibly the season, at the British Grand Prix and nobody was more surprised and delighted than the 37-year-old German. After 15 years, and at the 239th attempt, the Sauber driver finally shrugged off the unwanted record of the most race starts without ever standing on the podium – and replaced it with the most starts until a first podium. "I don't think I can comprehend what we've just done," he said over the team radio after taking third place. Hulkenberg did it in fairytale fashion, following a script that even the producers of the recently-released Brad Pitt blockbuster F1 movie would probably have rejected as too implausible. He started last on the grid, in 19th place with Alpine's Franco Colapinto lining up in the pitlane, for Swiss-based Sauber. Thanks to clever strategy and pitting at absolutely the right time, Hulkenberg took Sauber to their first podium in 13 years and also became the team's all-time lowest-starting top-three finisher. "It feels good. It's been a long time coming, hasn't it?" said Hulkenberg, rather stating the obvious, after tumultuous pitlane celebrations. "I always knew we have it in us, I had it in me somewhere... it's pretty surreal, to be honest. Not sure how it all happened, but obviously crazy conditions, mixed conditions. It was a survival fight for a lot of the race. "I think we just were really on it. The right calls, the right tyres, at the right moment. Made no mistakes and, yeah, quite incredible." With nine-times British GP winner Lewis Hamilton in fourth place for Ferrari, it had seemed inevitable that Hulkenberg would be reeled in and his day would end yet again as a story of what might have been. Instead it became a tale of triumph against the odds for a future works Audi team on the up and now riding high in sixth place overall. "I think I was in denial until probably the last pit stop, you know, and then when I heard we gapped Lewis quite a bit with the one extra lap, I was like, 'Okay, this is good, this is some breathing space'," said Hulkenberg. "It was an intense race but like I said, we didn't crack. No mistakes. And obviously really, really happy with that." Team boss Jonathan Wheatley, an F1 veteran who joined from Red Bull this season, piled on the superlatives. "I think he was almost in a state of shock when I saw him under the podium," he said. "Nico drove an outstanding race today. One of the best I've seen at Silverstone and one of the best I've seen of any driver ever.

Wimbledon Expansion Faces Legal Battle in London Court
Wimbledon Expansion Faces Legal Battle in London Court

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

Wimbledon Expansion Faces Legal Battle in London Court

WIMBLEDON fans will have eyes only for the tennis this week but for those who run the world's oldest and most prestigious Grand Slam, the real high-stakes contest will unfold not on their grass, but in London's Royal Courts of Justice. On one side of the legal net is the campaign group Save Wimbledon Park, while facing them in a judicial review of their ambitious expansion plan on Tuesday and Wednesday will be the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club (AELTC). It is the latest stage of a long-running fight that has split the south-west London 'village', which has been home to the Championships since 1877. Last September the AELTC secured planning permission from the Greater London Authority (GLA) to treble the size of the main site to include 39 new courts including an 8,000-seat show court by redeveloping a former golf course on parkland land it already owns. The 200-million-pound ($272.92-million) expansion aims to increase daily capacity to 50,000 people from the current 42,000, upgrade facilities and move the qualifying rounds on site to mirror the Australian, French, and U.S. Opens. The plans have the backing of several leading players, including Novak Djokovic, and 62% of 10,000 residents in Merton and Wandsworth, the London boroughs that share the new site, also support the scheme, according to the AELTC. 'Our confidence in the development and the proposals that we've been working on for many years is as strong as it ever has been,' Wimbledon tournament director Jamie Baker told Reuters. 'For the championships to continue to be in the position that it is and to deliver all the benefits to stakeholders including the local community it is vital that we are able to stage the tournament on one site and bring all the grounds together.' However, this week's judicial review will decide whether the GLA's decision to grant planning permission was unlawful. Opponents of the development, including Thelma Ruby, a 100-year-old former actress who lives in a flat overlooking the park, and West Hill Ward Councillor Malcolm Grimston, say the club's plans will cause environmental damage and major disruption to the area. 'It's terribly important that it does not go ahead not just for myself but for the whole planet and future generations,' Ruby told Reuters. 'I overlook this beautiful landscape and there are all sorts of covenants that say you mustn't build on it, and yet the tennis people have this unnecessary plan they admit will cut down all these glorious trees, which will harm wildlife. 'They're using concrete, building roads, they're going to have lorries polluting and passing my window every 10 minutes. The whole area will be in chaos as they're closing off roads,' she said. Save Wimbledon Park says the GLA failed to consider covenants that were agreed by the AELTC, including restrictions on redeveloping the land, when it bought the Wimbledon Park golf course freehold from Merton council in 1993 for 5.2 million pounds. The AELTC paid a reported 63.5 million pounds to buy the Golf Club's lease, which was due to run until 2041. The campaign group also believes the GLA failed to consider the land's statutory Public Recreation Trust status which means it should be held as 'public walks or pleasure grounds'. 'It is not antipathy towards the AELTC that's driving this, as some of the benefits are real, such as the extension of lake,' councillor Grimston told Reuters. 'The problem is that it will treble the footprint of the current Championship and turn what currently has very much a feel of being rural England and a gentle pace of life into an industrial complex that would dominate the views of the lake. 'That's why it's classified as Metropolitan Open Land, which is the urban equivalent of the green belt that has been protected for many decades in planning law in the UK and rightly so,' he said. The AELTC say the plans will improve the biodiversity of the park, as well as bringing parts of it back into public use. 'The London Wildlife trust have endorsed the plans, they've spent many hours scrutinising our analysis and our expert views,' the AELTC's head of corporate affairs Dominic Foster said. 'We know that this expansion will deliver a very significant benefit to biodiversity, whereas golf courses are not good for biodiversity.' ($1 = 0.7328 pounds)

Wimbledon expansion plan goes into legal tie-break
Wimbledon expansion plan goes into legal tie-break

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

Wimbledon expansion plan goes into legal tie-break

WIMBLEDON fans will have eyes only for the tennis this week but for those who run the world's oldest and most prestigious Grand Slam, the real high-stakes contest will unfold not on their grass, but in London's Royal Courts of Justice. On one side of the legal net is the campaign group Save Wimbledon Park, while facing them in a judicial review of their ambitious expansion plan on Tuesday and Wednesday will be the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club (AELTC). It is the latest stage of a long-running fight that has split the south-west London 'village', which has been home to the Championships since 1877. Last September the AELTC secured planning permission from the Greater London Authority (GLA) to treble the size of the main site to include 39 new courts including an 8,000-seat show court by redeveloping a former golf course on parkland land it already owns. The 200-million-pound ($272.92-million) expansion aims to increase daily capacity to 50,000 people from the current 42,000, upgrade facilities and move the qualifying rounds on site to mirror the Australian, French, and U.S. Opens. The plans have the backing of several leading players, including Novak Djokovic, and 62% of 10,000 residents in Merton and Wandsworth, the London boroughs that share the new site, also support the scheme, according to the AELTC. 'Our confidence in the development and the proposals that we've been working on for many years is as strong as it ever has been,' Wimbledon tournament director Jamie Baker told Reuters. 'For the championships to continue to be in the position that it is and to deliver all the benefits to stakeholders including the local community it is vital that we are able to stage the tournament on one site and bring all the grounds together.' However, this week's judicial review will decide whether the GLA's decision to grant planning permission was unlawful. Opponents of the development, including Thelma Ruby, a 100-year-old former actress who lives in a flat overlooking the park, and West Hill Ward Councillor Malcolm Grimston, say the club's plans will cause environmental damage and major disruption to the area. 'It's terribly important that it does not go ahead not just for myself but for the whole planet and future generations,' Ruby told Reuters. 'I overlook this beautiful landscape and there are all sorts of covenants that say you mustn't build on it, and yet the tennis people have this unnecessary plan they admit will cut down all these glorious trees, which will harm wildlife. 'They're using concrete, building roads, they're going to have lorries polluting and passing my window every 10 minutes. The whole area will be in chaos as they're closing off roads,' she said. Save Wimbledon Park says the GLA failed to consider covenants that were agreed by the AELTC, including restrictions on redeveloping the land, when it bought the Wimbledon Park golf course freehold from Merton council in 1993 for 5.2 million pounds. The AELTC paid a reported 63.5 million pounds to buy the Golf Club's lease, which was due to run until 2041. The campaign group also believes the GLA failed to consider the land's statutory Public Recreation Trust status which means it should be held as 'public walks or pleasure grounds'. 'It is not antipathy towards the AELTC that's driving this, as some of the benefits are real, such as the extension of lake,' councillor Grimston told Reuters. 'The problem is that it will treble the footprint of the current Championship and turn what currently has very much a feel of being rural England and a gentle pace of life into an industrial complex that would dominate the views of the lake. 'That's why it's classified as Metropolitan Open Land, which is the urban equivalent of the green belt that has been protected for many decades in planning law in the UK and rightly so,' he said. The AELTC say the plans will improve the biodiversity of the park, as well as bringing parts of it back into public use. 'The London Wildlife trust have endorsed the plans, they've spent many hours scrutinising our analysis and our expert views,' the AELTC's head of corporate affairs Dominic Foster said. 'We know that this expansion will deliver a very significant benefit to biodiversity, whereas golf courses are not good for biodiversity.' ($1 = 0.7328 pounds)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store