UK: Non-food remains in deflation as prices rise elsewhere
Food inflation drove the increase, rising 3.7 percent YoY. This contrasted non-food prices, which remained in deflation at -1.2 percent, reflecting a marginal increase on May's -1.5 percent. The figure came above the three-month average of -1.4 percent.
In a statement, Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, said non-food goods 'remained in deflation as retailers cut prices across product categories, especially DIY and gardening, so customers could make the most of the sunshine.'
Dickinson added: 'Retailers have warned of higher prices for consumers since last year's Autumn Budget and the huge rises to Employer National Insurance costs and the National Living Wage.
'We predicted a significant rise in food inflation by the end of this year, and this has been accelerated by geopolitical tensions and impacts of climate change. To limit further rises, the government must find ways to alleviate the cost pressures bearing down on retailers. The upcoming business rates reform offers such an opportunity, and the government must ensure no shop pays more as a result of the changes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Tusla warns it will blow its budget by nearly €68m this year
Tusla has warned it will blow its budget by nearly €68 million this year as it struggles to deal with huge demand for its services. The child and family agency warned in an update in May that it had already overspent by €8.9 million, but this figure was likely to multiply by the end of the year. Advertisement Tusla said its expected overspend for 2025 was €67.8 million, which included €7.6 million for kids in the international protection process and refugees from Ukraine. In a monthly briefing, the agency said demand for its service was growing especially for residential care, fostering, legal bills, and separated children seeking asylum. It said they were trying to cut costs by expanding residential provision to replace special emergency arrangements that were a 'significant cost driver.' Tusla said some savings had been made in this area in 2024 through a 'strict pricing arrangement' and that this would continue this year. Advertisement However, the agency warned that costs remained 'unpredictable' due to the inflated cost of placements. The briefing explained: 'As the majority of Tusla's expenditure is on demand-led arrangements, it is not possible to reduce expenditure materially to meet the budget allocated, without adversely impacting on services for vulnerable children and families.' It said there was likely to be an overspend of €38.8 million on placements for special care, fostering, and private residential arrangements. Tusla also detailed the high cost of 'out-of-state placements' which involves a small number of children brought to the U.K. when services are not available in Ireland. Advertisement The briefing said: 'If the agency cannot place children into special care in the existing facilities in 2025, this has the potential to impact on this year's overspend.' It said costs for staff travel were also likely to be up by as much as €2.2 million despite on expenses being introduced. Tusla also detailed a sharp rise in the number of placements for separated children who had applied for international protection in Ireland. The overspend here was predicted to be around €6.1 million to offer 343 residential placements for vulnerable asylum seekers without parents. Advertisement Other areas of concern for Tusla were 'Guardian ad Litem' (GAL] arrangements where a person was appointed to represent the interests of a child in court. 'There is continued increased usage of GALs by the courts,' the document said, 'and this also has an increased legal cost.' The child and family agency also predicted an overspend for child refugees fleeing the war in Ukraine, according to records released under FOI. Asked about the budget difficulties, a spokesman said: 'Throughout 2025, the agency has experienced unprecedented demand for services, which was unpredictable in nature, and we have worked to prioritise cost saving initiatives around these contributing factors. 'Tusla has strong budget controls in place, however the projected overspend for 2025 is the result of demand-led pressures in the agency for the accommodation of children in the care of the state as well as costs for accommodating unaccompanied minors and associated legal and Guardian ad Litem (GAL) costs.'
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Truss accuses Badenoch of not telling truth about Tory failures
The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, is not telling the truth about the 'real failures of 14 years of Conservative government', the former Conservative prime minister Liz Truss has said. Writing in the Telegraph Truss said: 'In a recent speech Kemi said: 'From now on, we are going to be telling the British people the truth even when it is difficult to hear.' If she's not willing to tell the truth to her own supporters, the Conservative party is in serious trouble.' Truss's comments cameafter Badenoch's own Telegraph article in which she claimed the current Labour government was failing to heed the warnings of the disastrous mini-budget that defined Truss' short-lived premiership. The former prime minister has been fighting a desperate battle to rewrite the narrative around her 45 days in office in 2022. She released a memoir and embarked on a campaign tour that allowed her to talk up her record and offer her views on the political landscape in the UK and US. In her Telegraph article, she claimed her mini-budget would have helped the UK escape a 'doom-loop' of low growth and high taxes. 'Yet, it was sabotaged by the Bank of England and the Treasury – which didn't want to be challenged and wanted to cover up their failings – and Conservative MPs who either didn't believe in supply-side economics or cravenly wanted preferment under a Sunak premiership.' But Truss has faced an uphill battle – not least when she was mocked by the campaign group Led By Donkeys, which unfurled a banner during one of her appearances bearing the phrase: 'I crashed the economy.' It also included a picture of a lettuce – a reference to a Daily Star livestream stunt that sought to determine whether Truss's battle to survive in No 10 could last longer than a 60p iceberg lettuce from Tesco. Illustrating her criticism of the current Labour government, Badenoch invoked Truss's failures in No 10. 'Picture the scene: a new prime minister and chancellor spending billions without also making the necessary savings to offset their splurge and balance the books. The markets react adversely, interest rates spike and the cost of living gets worse with prices soaring. 'For all their mocking of Liz Truss, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have not learnt the lessons of the mini-budget and are making even bigger mistakes,' she wrote in the Telegraph on Saturday. Hitting back, Truss wrote: 'She is wrong. Labour is doing the opposite of the mini-budget, which is why the country is headed for disaster.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion And listing several policy recommendations that place her close to the US president, Donald Trump, politically, Truss added: 'It is disappointing that, instead of serious thinking like this, Kemi Badenoch is instead repeating spurious narratives. I suspect she is doing this to divert from the real failures of 14 years of Conservative government in which her supporters are particularly implicated.'
The Herald Scotland
15 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
BrewDog pub closures should act as a warning to Starmer
To cut their staff so ruthlessly reveals what most of us already knew about BrewDog. They're hardly punks with a purpose. Almost 100 jobs could go, with some already away despite the companies promise to focus on redeploying their workforce. Their bar in Leeds, for example, told workers that, in a mere 96 hours, they would be unemployed. This is precisely the type of conduct the Prime Minister promised to eliminate when launching his New Deal for Working People. The New Deal should be holding companies to account – pirate sailors like P&O, for example – who flout employment law with impunity and dismiss their staff with disregard. It can't be enacted quickly enough. A spokesperson for BrewDog said the 'difficult decision' had been taken as a result of 'ongoing industry challenges'. They added these included 'rising costs, increased regulation, and economic pressures'. Roz Foyer: 'We should all be concerned at the state of our universities' Roz Foyer: Good news on tips for workers, but workplace bullying remains an issue Roz Foyer: 'This is not a just war, it is terrorism and psychological warfare' Roz Foyer: Failure to devolve power to local communities casts a shadow over Holyrood The spokesperson said: 'Despite our best efforts, and the hard work of our teams, it has simply not been possible to make these bars commercially viable. 'This decision is not simply a response to the challenging UK hospitality market, but a proactive decision to redefine the bar division's focus for long-term and profitable growth.' The spokesperson acknowledged some of the locations chosen were 'woven into' the company's' history. But they said there was 'no realistic prospect of making these venues commercially viable'. We rightly hold BrewDog to account for their punkish exploitation of their employees. We do likewise for all other workplaces, including others in the hospitality business. That includes the historic strike action taken by the workers of the Village Hotel in Glasgow. These are predominantly young workers of the food and beverage workforce engaged in a dispute with management over their intransigence to negotiate over improved pay, contracts, and conditions. Why is it historic? This is the first strike action at a major hotel in the UK for more than 45 years. It's historic because the dispute is being galvanised and led by young people taking ownership of their working lives. It's historic because it can act as a catalyst for other young workers who, for too long, have had their labour devalued based on their age. While April's hike in the National Living Wage from £11.44 to £12.21 makes a real difference to hundreds of thousands of workers, it remains £760 a year below a real Living Wage (independently calculated at £12.60). A bar-shift worker pulling pints does the same level of effort whether they're 20 or 21 years old. The difference according to the UK Government, however, is £2.21 in their hourly wage, a more than £4,000 wage disparity for those working full time. That's enough to cork the wine or make the beer fall flat. Daniel Friel, national Unite the Union rep for Village Hotels said: 'Our members at Village Hotels are taking this landmark industrial action because they are sick and tired of unpaid breaks and poverty pay which discriminates based on age.' 'The owners of Village Hotels have more than enough money to pay these workers what they deserve. If they want to stop the first hotel strike at a major hotel in over 45 years, they should get round the table and negotiate with Unite and its members.' Daniel is right, of course. Why is it that those big companies that can afford to pay the living wage – the BrewDog's of this world – simply choose not to, in the quest for further profits? Village Hotels are just as culpable. Rent doesn't get cheaper based on age. Heating and electric doesn't offer an under 21 discount. Utilities and council tax hardly assess their costs based on the year you were born. Why then do we assume that younger workers deserve less money despite their output being exactly the same? It's an ancient, anachronistic mutation of our employment laws that has been allowed to fester too long. That's in addition to employers who designate their young workers as 'apprentices' just as an immoral loophole to get out of paying them more money. Whilst, of course, there are legitimate apprenticeship pathways that hone a craft or develop a skill, with wages rising to reflect different stages of their learning, that is not the same as paying poor wages to workers as a form of cheap labour. The UK Labour Government said they would abolish this. They promised an end to age wage discrimination. But young hotel workers are still waiting. Village Hotel workers have had enough of waiting. They're demanding paid breaks for all of their colleagues and backdated wages for those under 21 years at the same rate as colleagues at the Village's hotel in Edinburgh – who Unite says are paid significantly more for the same roles. It's important now more than ever. We recently surveyed young workers and found that almost two thirds – especially those who have experienced wage age discrimination – are finding themselves in debt as they seek to support themselves. Don't take my word for it, take the word of Niamh, who previously worked in retail: 'Previous to this job, I worked many roles whilst studying at university where age discrimination in pay was prevalent. "I was expected to do the exact same job and had the same responsibilities as other members of staff, but was paid less simply because of my age. I believe this is one of the reasons I landed myself in debt as I was working as many hours a week as I could around my studies, but was still unable to afford many things. 'I still had rent to pay, bills to be covered and food to put on the table like every other employee, but because of my age, I was paid less and likely then struggled more because of this.' Niamh and the others who responded to our survey are clear: they've had enough of being treated like second class workers. Both they and the workers at Village Hotels deserve the dignity, assurance and respect that a proper living wage can provide, irrespective of age. All our power to the Village Hotel workers – their fight is a seismic one – if we are to end wage discrimination against young workers and tackle the intergenerational inequality holding our country back. Roz Foyer is General Secretary of the STUC
