logo
A Private Investigator Who Specializes In Cheating Just Spilled All The Unknown Details About The Job, And I Can't Stop Reading

A Private Investigator Who Specializes In Cheating Just Spilled All The Unknown Details About The Job, And I Can't Stop Reading

Yahoo18-06-2025
Recently, a pretty interesting post on the subreddit "Ask Me Anything" caught my eye. "I'm a private investigator specializing in catching cheaters," Reddit user Visible-Novel-6409 — or Novel, for short —titled his post. "Ask me anything."
"I'm a [27-year-old man]," Novel wrote, and said that he's "been in the PI business for about a year. I mainly go after unfaithful spouses (per title)," he explained, but "also handle parental negligence and the occasional employment fraud."
People did not hold back about "asking him anything," and like any great PI, Novel delivered the answers. Here are some of the best from his fascinating Q&A:
1."What was the craziest location you found a cheater?" asked user saygoodnightsoftly. "What was the longest distance you've seen one travel to cheat?"
ABC, Fox / Via giphy.com
"There've not really been any insane locations for me so far," Novel wrote. "Mostly the usual stuff: restaurants, bars, hotels, outdoor attractions depending on the season.
The farthest I've seen someone travel was a lawyer who lived four hours away who'd come to my city for a business conference.
Her husband back home hired us because he didn't believe she really had a conference and that she was running around with a coworker (who she swore to him wouldn't be there). The conference was real, but I nailed them down together immediately."
2.Saygoodnightsoftly had another question: "Does being in this field of work make you feel depressed about romantic relationships?"
Novel wrote back: "I wouldn't say it makes me feel depressed individually, but for society in general.
I personally just got engaged to someone amazing who I trust 100%. If anything it makes me grateful for how lucky I got, but a bit melancholy realizing how rare that really is for others."
3."How often do you run across people who are convinced their spouses are cheating but they're truly innocent?" asked another redditor. "My ex-wife probably would've bet her soul I was cheating on her for years. I was constantly accused, but I had never once been unfaithful. It's a harder cross to carry than most people would think."
Novel had a surprising answer: "A good majority of the time, our client is incorrect. And that's even after we filter out truly wild cases by refusing to take them. It's pretty rare but it feels amazing when you actually get one."
4.User alwayssalty_ asked, "Have you ever been in a dangerous situation during an investigation?"
Novel simply said, "There are some people I've followed who I would NOT want to be caught by."
Related: 23 Cute, Happy, And Wholesome Posts I Saw On The Internet This Week That You Absolutely Need To See
5.Another user, Ok_Lavishness_4561, asked, "How many of the cheaters were nervous/wary whilst in public with their affair partner? Or were they just totally chill?"
"Most people are oblivious of their surroundings, which makes my life easy," Novel said. "The average person does not have their head on a swivel.
Most of the time they're acting pretty relaxed and at ease; but sometimes they take cartoonishly stupid precautions like parking super far away from each other before meeting up."
6.One devilish rake, styled paragonx29, no doubt with the purest of intentions, asked, "What combination of factors could a really stealthy cheater use to avoid your capture?"
"Literally just don't go in public," said Novel. "I can't do surveillance anywhere with a 'reasonable expectation of privacy.' Other than that, you're fair game."
7."So have you ever found someone who wasn't cheating, but they were doing something weird or wacky and keeping it from their significant other?" jackdupp27 asked.
NBC / Via giphy.com
"Ooh I like this question," said Novel. "Unfortunately nothing too crazy, just out drinking with their friends is a common one though." But...
"There have been a few that I've been sure were up to something but could never nail down. For instance, a guy said to his wife he had a doctor's appointment at 5 a.m. and I followed him thinking it was a lie, but he actually went to the doctor's office and then went to work."
8."What's the quickest turnaround you've had for receiving a job and collecting enough evidence to prove the cheat?" asked user twopeasandapear. "And then, what's been your longest (so far)? How long will you commit to a case before deciding it's not going anywhere?"
"It's been same-day before," wrote Novel. "I usually get hired for 10-20 hours of surveillance split up over one to two weeks. We get paid in advance so we use all our time regardless, even if it looks like it's not going anywhere.
Sometimes people want peace of mind anyway, and the longer we document their activity the better they'll feel that they're not cheating."
Related: Holy Crap, I Can't Stop Laughing At These 28 Painfully Awkward And Embarrassing Conversations
9.A question I, personally, would be worried about: "Have you ever been caught or suspected by the target you're trailing?" asked masterdebater117.
"I've never been caught, but that's also because I'm cautious," explained Novel.
"Following someone in their car is the hardest part. Depending on traffic it's very easy to get burned on the road. If I think they may notice me I peel off and try again another day. But if you get caught it's all over. Patience is key."
10."Could you share the not-so-obvious red flags of a cheater, or things people miss?" asked BeautifulTerm3753.
Pop TV / CBC Television / Via giphy.com
"They'll usually take overly paranoid steps to keep the affair secret, but it ends up just making them look stupid," Novel wrote back. "A dude was at a restaurant with a mistress once, and from the parking lot I watched them immediately split off into opposite directions. Neither of them parked at the place itself, but in adjacent lots on opposite sides. I'm sure his wife will be entertained by the video I got of that."
11."Have you encountered situations where you needed to make some purchase to not come off as suspicious?" asked matroosoft. "Something like getting a drink, booking a hotel room, or getting a taxi? If so, is that covered by your boss?"
Novel responded, "Usually I get a drink or app at a restaurant. Had to buy tickets to get in an event before. I'm compensated if I keep the receipt."
12.A question 12-year-old me would have loved: "What's your standard 'spy kit,'" asked user Schickie, "and how much of your time is spent sitting in your car, vs. being in public looking inconspicuous?"
"Very basic stuff," said Novel. "Digital camera, binoculars, a few different outfits, timestamp camera app on my phone for close-quarters.
"I always start every case in my car and then it just depends on where they go. If they enter an establishment, I'll have to find my way in."
"That's pretty dope," wrote Schickie. "Do you have to carry a lot of cash around, for slipping to front-of-house staff, informants, etc.? Or has the trade upgraded to Venmo? Are you packing?"
"Cash is king; in case you need to get out of somewhere quickly, you can just leave it on the table," Novel explained. "I don't slip anything to anyone, and I'm not packing. I shouldn't put myself in a situation where I'd need to be."
13.A crucial question, from slevenznero: "What are the pieces of evidence you gather to be sure to win a case for your client?"
Novel replied, "It's pretty simple, I take photos of whatever they're doing without the client's knowledge, and if those photos show them engaged in behavior they shouldn't be, the client is satisfied. I am not involved in the legal proceedings, just the collection aspect."
14."Hands down, most hilarious experience?" asked QuarantineCouchSurf.
"One lady hired us because her husband was a bum and she wanted to kick him out of the house," said Novel. "The day of the case he said he got a new job and was on his way to work. I followed him to the liquor store and weed dispensary as soon as they opened."
15."How do you feel about the ethics of your work?" asked richweinb. "Do you feel it's okay to track people?"
"Everything I collect is in public view and therefore fair game," Novel said. "I will say I'm glad I do this as a private individual and not for the government."
"How would it differ if it was for the government?" asked RefrigeratorOptimal3.
"I am not a fan of state surveillance for the same reasons most other people aren't," said Novel.
16.Another user, parallaxog, asked, "What's the most wholesome story you have about someone whose spouse thought he/she was cheating but in reality, they weren't?"
"I guess there was this dude who went to an overnight spa resort and turned out to be by himself," wrote Novel. "Man just wanted some alone time."
17."Am I right in assuming that almost everyone who suspects a spouse of cheating is correct," asked Downtown_Baby_8005, "or do you often investigate only to discover that, in fact, you can't find any evidence of infidelity?"
"Way off," said Novel. "Probably in only 25% of cases do I actually find something. The majority of the time I follow someone around for days and they're not up to anything suspicious at all. Client still pays."
18."Do you have any special equipment, so it's not obvious you're taking photos?" asked user blinkomatic. "Hidden cameras, long-distance cameras, remote cameras?"
"I use a telescopic lens digital camera for long-distance," Novel explained. "If I'm in a restaurant or something I'll usually turn my phone video camera on and either act like I'm on a call or put it in my shirt pocket with the camera just barely sticking out."
19.And finally, a question I wouldn't have thought about, that user CrazyEights916 asked: "How do you stay cool when it's 100 degrees outside and you're conducting surveillance from your car for an extended period?"
"Extreme heat and extreme cold are the worst," Novel wrote back. "Usually in the span of an hour I'll turn my car on for five minutes to either run the A/C or heat and have to live off of it. I worked a full day in -20°F earlier this year."
Absolutely fascinating. So, what do you think? Surprising? Old hat? Let me know in the comments!
Note: Q&A has been edited for length/clarity.
Also in Internet Finds: Lawyers Are Sharing Their Juiciest "Can You Believe It?!" Stories From The Courtroom, And They're As Surprising As You'd Expect
Also in Internet Finds: 51 People Who Quickly Discovered Why Their Hilariously Clueless Partner Was Single Before Meeting Them
Also in Internet Finds: People Are Sharing "The Most Believable Conspiracy Theories," And Now I'm Questioning Everything I Thought I Knew
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Evening Edition: The Search For James R. Hoffa 50 Years Later
Evening Edition: The Search For James R. Hoffa 50 Years Later

Fox News

time28 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Evening Edition: The Search For James R. Hoffa 50 Years Later

The disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa remains one of the greatest mysteries in American history. The legendary labor leader, who had been president of the Teamsters Union, vanished this week in 1975. At the time of Hoffa's disappearance he was again running to be union president but this time he vowed to get the mafia out of the union. Fox's John Saucier speaks to Eric Shawn, FOX News Senior Correspondent and host of the FOX Nation Special: RIDDLE: The Search for James R. Hoffa and the companion podcast 'RIDDLE: The Search For James R. Hoffa 50 Years Later', who shares the latest conversations he has had with those with connections to Hoffa, what he has learned and what remains a mystery. Click here to listen to 'RIDDLE: The Search for James R. Hoffa 50 Years Later': Click Here⁠⁠⁠⁠ To Follow 'The FOX News Rundown: Evening Edition' Learn more about your ad choices. Visit

Today in Chicago History: ‘Black Sox' acquitted, but ultimately banned for life from baseball
Today in Chicago History: ‘Black Sox' acquitted, but ultimately banned for life from baseball

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Today in Chicago History: ‘Black Sox' acquitted, but ultimately banned for life from baseball

Here's a look back at what happened in the Chicago area on Aug. 2, according to the Tribune's archives. Is an important event missing from this date? Email us. Weather records (from the National Weather Service, Chicago) High temperature: 101 degrees (1991) Low temperature: 51 degrees (1985) Precipitation: 5.63 inches (1885) Snowfall: Trace (2015) 1921: Eight White Sox players had been charged with throwing the World Series. Despite earning the nickname the 'Black Sox,' the men were acquitted by a jury that deliberated just 2 hours and 47 minutes. Chicago White Sox players conspired to throw the 1919 World Series. Here's how the Tribune covered it. A day after their acquittal, however, baseball Commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis ruled that the players allegedly involved — Joe Jackson, Eddie Cicotte, Oscar Emil 'Happy' Felsch, Chick Gandil, Frederick William McMullin, Swede Risberg, Buck Weaver and Lefty Williams — would be banned for life from organized baseball. 1990: Chicago White Sox rookie Frank Thomas knocked in the winning run in his first major-league game. The Sox beat the Milwaukee Brewers 4-3 during the opener of a doubleheader at County Stadium. In addition to future Hall of Famer Thomas, the Sox's lineup also included two of their No. 1 draft picks: Alex Fernandez (1990) and Robin Ventura (1988). 2001: Chicago Public Library launched its 'One Book, One Chicago' initiative. The first book on the list: 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee — Mayor Richard M. Daley's favorite. Vintage Chicago Tribune: Pelé, Hamm, Beckham, Rapinoe, Messi and more. When soccer's big names came to play 2009: Brazilian soccer star Marta made her professional debut in the United States with her Los Angeles Sol team, which lost in a match against the Chicago Red Stars at Toyota Park in Bridgeview. Subscribe to the free Vintage Chicago Tribune newsletter, join our Chicagoland history Facebook group, stay current with Today in Chicago History and follow us on Instagram for more from Chicago's past. Have an idea for Vintage Chicago Tribune? Share it with Kori Rumore and Marianne Mather at krumore@ and mmather@ Solve the daily Crossword

Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess
Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess

CNN

time31 minutes ago

  • CNN

Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess

Congressional news Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow The Jeffrey Epstein files saga at times all but ground Capitol Hill to a halt last month — driving a wedge between Republicans in the House as Democrats went on offense to press President Donald Trump's Justice Department to release more investigative material. But since returning to their districts for summer recess, lawmakers aren't hearing much about Epstein at public town hall meetings they've hosted so far. The debate that's dominated Washington in recent weeks didn't come up at all in some town halls Republican and Democratic House members have held — including a raucous event Thursday hosted by Wisconsin GOP Rep. Bryan Steil and two more mild-mannered affairs held by Wyoming Republican Rep. Harriet Hageman. During others, it's been the topic of just one or two questions. In Wisconsin on Thursday, Rep. Mark Pocan — a Democrat who hosted a town hall in Prairie du Chien, in neighboring Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden's district — brought up Epstein himself, as part of a response to a question about whether Trump might declare martial law and cancel elections. 'It's a step too far to say you're going to release something and then say, 'No, there's nothing there to look at,'' he said. Only one questioner raised the topic of Epstein — and she did so to call it a distraction. Pocan kept his comments focused largely on the Republican tax and cuts spending bill that Trump signed into law on July Fourth — repeatedly warning that cuts to Medicaid could gut Wisconsin's public health insurance programs and force the state to spend tax dollars filling holes left by the federal government. The Democratic congressman said afterward that's why he mostly avoided talking about Epstein. 'I keep it to economics. I'm an economic, progressive populist. I think that's how most people make decisions when they go to elections. That's how Donald Trump won the election. That's why Donald Trump's doing poor in the polls,' he said. The woman who'd brought up Epstein, Krista Brown, a 38-year-old stay-at-home mother from Viroqua, said she has bigger concerns than Epstein — such as whether steep cuts in staffing at the Department of Education will delay action on a Title IX complaint she'd submitted on behalf of her children, or whether National Weather Service offices will be staffed. 'It has more to do with the things that people need as a foundation than it does about arguing over things that the administration wants us to spend our oxygen on. I'm just not interested in that,' Brown said. 'When you live rural, you care about who's going to plow your goddamn roads — when it's going to get plowed, if the buses can get through, how cold it is, if the weather's going to be reported,' she said. 'That's what matters. And the rest is just going to float away, because pretty soon it's going to get so hard in real life that there's not even going to be time to talk about that.' The relative lack of focus on Epstein at town halls reflects the broader priorities of Americans. A recent CNN poll conducted by SSRS found that the economy and immigration-related concerns are the issues Americans consider most important. The poll also found increased Democratic attention to government spending, concerns about separation of powers and the rule of law, and Trump himself. The amount of information the federal government has released on the Epstein case was an issue that didn't rise to prominence, with just one respondent mentioning it as the most important problem. Still, even if Epstein isn't Americans' top priority, half of respondents said they are dissatisfied with the amount of information released about the Epstein case after the Justice Department released a memo saying there is no evidence the convicted sex offender kept a so-called client list or was murdered. That includes 56% of Democrats, 52% of independents and 40% of Republicans. Democrats, in search of an advantage against Trump and administration officials who pledged prior to taking office to release Epstein-related files, have sought to force the issue. In the Senate this week, ahead of its own recess, Democrats are using an arcane procedural tool to try to force the Justice Department to release all of the files related to Epstein, including audio, video and any other relevant documents. Republican leadership, meanwhile, is eager to stay away from the topic of Epstein. House Speaker Mike Johnson cut legislative business short and sent members home early last week to avoid being forced to hold votes on releasing Epstein-related files. The National Republican Congressional Committee, the House GOP's campaign arm, encouraged House Republicans in a memo to use the August recess to focus on selling Trump's agenda. 'With the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law just a few weeks ago, this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering,' the NRCC memo said. Some House Republicans who have held town halls have been asked about the Epstein files. Utah GOP Rep. Mike Kennedy compared the unreleased Epstein files to 'a festering oil-infected wound with pus underneath' in response to a question about whether he would vote in favor of releasing the documents during a virtual town hall last week. Kennedy pledged to push for 'full transparency' in the matter and that he would 'vote immediately to get all that released,' permitted that the identities of victims are concealed. As Republican Rep. William Timmons of South Carolina fielded questions at a telephone town hall last week, one caller shared his 'outrage' over the Epstein files – asking why the House adjourned 'when this hasn't been dealt with.' 'If there's a group of pedophiles out there who are just getting away with it, this is an outrage, and I don't care who they are. I don't care if they're the president of the United States,' the caller said. Timmons responded that 'there is evil in this world, and we have to protect the innocent, so we need to get to the bottom of it.' 'The president and the attorney general are doing the work necessary to release all of the information,' he said. 'The Republican Congress should not be attacking the president,' the GOP lawmaker said. 'The president has earned our trust, has earned the right for us to defer to him on issues at the executive branch.' But other issues have dominated town halls so far this summer — including the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill,' border security and deportations and federal funding cuts. At a Hageman town hall earlier this week, Jane Sanderson, 75, of Worland, who voted for the congresswoman, asked her why the Department of Government Efficiency's spending cuts hadn't put a dent in the United States' national debt. Timmons, the South Carolina congressman, was asked about health care, tariffs and aviation safety. Trump's golf habits came up as often as Epstein. At the same time Pocan held court in Prairie du Chien, Steil, a three-hour drive away in Elkhorn, was accused of doing Trump's bidding too frequently. 'President Trump seems to run Southeast Wisconsin through you,' one audience member told him. Steil faced criticism over the Trump administration's treatment of undocumented immigrants. He was shouted down as he defended Trump's implementation of tariffs on imports from a host of trading partners. And the town hall ended amid shouting after he began to answer a question about starvation in Gaza — an issue that is splintering the right, as Trump pushes Israel to address the humanitarian crisis as its military actions there continue. 'To me, the easy answer to address this crisis is for Hamas to surrender and release the hostages. That ends the war tomorrow,' Steil said, in a comment that was met with a mix of cheers and shouts of disagreement. 'Israel was unfairly, unjustly attacked, their civilians were killed and kidnapped by Hamas terrorists.' CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi, Sarah Davis, Jenna Monnin and Betul Tuncer contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store