
To that Miami-Dade College teacher, thank you. Too all educators, we got you
I still vividly remember my high school journalism teacher trying to find the right room one weekday evening at Miami-Dade College. She had driven all the way from her classroom in North Miami-Dade to Downtown Miami to take a weekly Dreamweaver class with me — this, after a full day of teaching, lesson plans, talking to students and never having a real lunch break.
At the time, I was trying to create a website — from scratch — for our school newspaper. She had no prior website design experience, but wanted to aid in my pursuit. Mrs. Sullivan shaped the trajectory of my (still young and kicking) professional career.
Educators today are often at the brunt of every social, political, economic and mental health crisis. There is no handbook for why a student's domestic trauma causes them to act up in class. Or, why a district muzzles certain teaching topics. Or, even the rightfully concerned, but sometimes overzealous, parents seemingly shouting into an echo chamber of empty, revolving rhetoric at school board meetings.
Teachers just want to teach, free from bureaucratic red tape and whether they need to buy a bulletproof vest on top of the classroom materials they are already underpaid to provide for students.
When I think about that MDC classroom, I think about a teacher who literally went the extra mile in providing me with a quality education. So, Mrs. Sullivan, thank you.
And, to educators everywhere, the work you do behind-the-scenes does not go unnoticed.
Anthony Cave,
graduate assistant,
Hank Greenspun School of Journalism
and Media Studies,
University of Nevada,
Las Vegas, NV
Showing patriotism
Re: Mary Anna Mancuso's May 25 op-ed, 'Florida ranks low on patriotism? I don't believe it.' Democrats may be less jingoistic and not as 'rah-rah' as Republicans. We just show our patriotism more subtly and, perhaps, more sincerely.
Carrie Hunter,
Miami
Rich get richer
I appreciate the Miami Herald's May 27 editorial, 'Is a designer purse worth stealing from the indigent?' However, there is a much more important question to ask the Trump administration and its Republican backers.
Their 'Big Beautiful Bill' gives billionaires, millionaires and corporations trillion dollar tax cuts while slashing funding for healthcare for almost 15 million people, the elimination of SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) to 42 million people, ending school lunches for poor children during the summer, funding of rural hospitals and all aid for pregnant women and infants.
Are more private planes, yachts, limousines and designer purses worth stealing from the indigent?
Doug Mayer,
Coral Gables
Healthy license
The May 25 letter, 'Medical advice,' regarding Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, was excellent. Kennedy not giving medical advice is an understatement — on steroids. He is not a doctor, has no formal medical training and obviously lacks a medical degree and license.
As a lawyer, he is aware that a license is required to practice medicine. He should secure a medical degree, take a four-year residency in internal medicine and two-year fellowships in virology and infectious disease before giving opinions on medical subjects.
Mark Wickman,
North Miami
Venezuelan oil
The United States is the largest producer of oil liquids in the world, surpassing Saudi Arabia and Russia at 21 million barrels per day, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Our largest source of imported crude oil is our 'next door' neighbor Canada, supplying more than 63% of our imports via the dependable and secure Keystone pipeline, per EIA.
We do not need Venezuelan crude oil imports to safeguard our national security or maintain our market dominance of the world's hydrocarbon supply demand balance.
As a former oil executive, I clearly understand the strategic advantage of Chevron Corporation maintaining competitive control over its Venezuelan minority owned (40% Chevron, 60% PDVSA) crude oil production assets, particularly within a post-Maduro scenario. Long term, this is good for Chevron and good for the United States.
However, let us be aware that Chevron, by continuing its presence in Venezuela, also supports the continuation of Maduro's dictatorial government and its support of Cuba's tyrannical regime.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's position is very well focused; he understands the short-term political risks associated with Chevron's continuous presence in Venezuela.
Jorge R. Piñon,
former president,
Amoco Oil Latin America,
Visiting research fellow,
The Energy Institute,
University of Texas,
Austin, TX
Unhappy hunting
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) decision to reinstate a black bear hunt is as reckless as it is cruel. Although public polling showed 81% of Floridians opposed a bear hunt, the Commission sided with the tiny, but vocal minority pushing for trophy hunting.
Even worse, they bought into the hunting lobby's false narrative that hounding bears is 'humane.' There's nothing humane about unleashing packs of dogs to chase terrified bears for miles, often separating mothers from cubs. It's not uncommon for hounds to get into fights with the bears, leading to serious injuries — and sometimes death — to both species.
This decision won't make anyone safer. Killing bears, especially by baiting them with food or chasing them with hounds, does nothing to reduce conflicts when humans and wildlife meet. If anything, it increases risk by disrupting bear behavior and drawing them closer to people.
Floridians want real solutions, such as better trash management, public education and non-lethal conflict prevention, not a slaughter disguised as conservation.
I'm dismayed by FWC's actions, but Floridians opposed to this hunt are not defeated. In August, we'll return to the Commission and demand a science-based, ethical approach to bear management, not one rooted in cruelty and misinformation.
Valerie Howell,
Coral Gables
Foreign students
Travel, especially for education, is the ultimate instrument to create tolerance. In singling Chinese students, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will hurl the United States back to a Cold War mentality of 'everyone is the enemy.'
Imagine the opposite: a welcoming embrace of Chinese — and indeed, all — foreign students in our great universities. Those students would see firsthand that Americans are not the devil, that we do not 'kill people in the streets' (as I've heard some express during my travels). On the contrary, admitting and welcoming foreign students has the immediate side effect of making us important allies everywhere.
Students who can afford full tuition at Harvard and similar universities come from important families. By creating a hostile environment for foreign students, especially those from China, Rubio has managed to transform a revenue-generating positive program into a costly, hate-mongering one that communicates an awful image of our country.
Marcelo Salup,
Coral Gables
Too weak notice
President Donald Trump says that in two weeks, we will know about a peace treaty between Russia and Ukraine.
Are these the same two weeks that would have given us an excellent healthcare plan, that we still don't have? And wasn't that eight years ago?
As Trump says, if he had been president in 2014, the war in Ukraine never would've happened. Well, he is president now and Russian President Vladimir Putin is thumbing his nose, telling the world that Trump's voice means absolutely nothing.
Priscilla Fregger Adler,
Cutler Bay
Danger zone
Re: the May 29 Miami Herald story, 'Miami International Airport announces plans for $600 million in improvements.'
Any chance we will get a designated pickup ride-share area at MIA anytime soon?
Maybe the folks who run the airport will get the message after some of us get hit by cars as we try to negotiate the exit gauntlet on our way to Uber and Lyft rides.
Leo Bueno,
Coral Gables
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US House clears procedural hurdle on cryptocurrency legislation
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives cleared a key procedural hurdle Wednesday, setting the stage for likely passage of several cryptocurrency bills a day after President Donald Trump intervened to save the initiative. The vote paves the way for House lawmakers to vote on passage of the several crypto bills, which would mark a huge victory for the digital assets sector. It came one day after conservative Republicans helped defeat a similar procedural measure amid a dispute over how to proceed with the bills. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's bid to claw back $9B in foreign aid and public broadcasting funds nears Senate vote
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's request to cancel about $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting spending is nearing passage in the Senate, an action that would have a tiny impact on the nation's rising debt but could have major ramifications for future spending fights in Congress. Spending bills generally need bipartisan support to advance in the Senate. But the legislation before the Senate gives Republicans the opportunity to undo some of the previously approved spending without Democratic support as they follow through on Trump's efforts to target the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and roll back help for nations suffering from conflict, drought and disease. The Trump administration is promising more rescission packages to come if the first effort is successful. Democrats say doing so jeopardizes a process that requires lawmakers from both parties to work together to fund the nation's priorities. The move to cut a sliver of previously approved spending comes after Republicans muscled Trump's big tax and spending cut bill to approval in both chambers without any Democratic support. The Congressional Budget Office has projected that measure will increase future federal deficits by about $3.3 trillion over the coming decade. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said Republicans were using the president's rescissions request to target 'wasteful spending.' 'It's a small but important step for fiscal sanity that we all should be able to agree is long overdue,' Thune said as the Senate opened on Wednesday. Lawmakers clash over cuts to public radio and TV stations In opposing the bill, Democrats said Congress was ceding its spending powers to the executive branch with little idea of how the White House Office of Management and Budget would apply the cuts. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York called the legislation a 'terrible bill that guts local news, defunds rural radio stations and makes America less safe on the world stage.' The legislation would claw back nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's due to receive during the next two budget years. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than 70% of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service to support national programming. Some Republicans had expressed worries about how local radio and televisions stations would be able to survive without federal assistance. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he secured a deal from the White House that some funding administered by the Department of the Interior would be repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in more than a dozen states. Democrats are not assured by the side agreements. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., said in some rural areas of his state pubic radio is the most reliable ways to get news and emergency alerts during wildfire season. 'These cuts will lead to rural public radio stations laying off staff, reducing programming, or even shutting down entirely,' Kelly said. Kate Riley, president and CEO of America's Public Television Stations, a network of locally owned and operated stations, said the side deal was 'at best a short-term, half-measure that will still result in cuts and reduced service at the stations it purports to save, while leaving behind all other stations, including many that serve Native populations.' 'Simply providing a one-time payment to Tribal stations will not ensure they can continue their current service or even survive," Riley said. Slashing billions of dollars from foreign aid The legislation would also claw back about $8 billion in foreign aid spending. Among the cuts are $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country and $496 million to provide humanitarian assistance such as food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. There's also a $4.15 billion cut for programs that aim to boost the economies and democratic institutions in developing and strategically important countries. Republicans said they winnowed down the president's request by taking out his proposed $400 million cut to a program known as PEPFAR. That change increased the prospects for the bill's passage. The politically popular program is credited with saving millions of lives since its creation under then-President George W. Bush, a Republican, to combat HIV/AIDS. Democrats said the changes Republicans made to save PEPFAR funding were not enough. They said that the Trump administration's animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill. Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said the amount of money it takes to save a starving child or prevent the transmission of disease is miniscule, even as the investments secure cooperation with the U.S. on other issues. But the cuts being made to foreign aid programs through Trump's Department of Government Efficiency were having life-and-death consequences around the world, he said. 'People are dying right now, not in spite of us but because of us,' Schatz said. 'We are causing death.' Republicans are facing a Friday deadline Republicans providing just enough votes to take up the bill, with Vice President JD Vance breaking a 50-50 tie on Tuesday night. Three Republicans joined with Democrats in voting against advancing the measure. That sets up on Wednesday what's known as a vote-a-rama, in which lawmakers will vote on scores of proposed amendments to the bill. Once the amendment process is over, the Senate will vote on final passage. The House has already shown its support for the president's request with a mostly party line 214-212 vote, but since the Senate is amending the bill, it will have to go back to the House for another vote. The bill must be signed into law by midnight Friday for the proposed rescissions to kick in. If Congress doesn't act by then, the spending stands. Kevin Freking, The Associated Press


Buzz Feed
26 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Speaker Mike Johnson Called Our Donald Trump Over The Epstein Files
Hot Topic 🔥 Full coverage and conversation on Politics After standing by President Donald Trump on everything from deploying Marines to quell protests to ramping up deportations, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is finally breaking with him... over the Jeffrey Epstein files. In an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson on Tuesday, the speaker called for 'transparency' regarding the Epstein investigation, adding that 'we should put everything out there and let the people decide it.' His statements come over a week after the Justice Department and FBI said they wouldn't be releasing any additional files about Epstein after concluding that there wasn't evidence the disgraced financier kept a so-called 'client list' to blackmail influential figures or that he had died by means other than suicide. In a post this past weekend, Trump doubled down on this stance, defending Attorney General Pam Bondi and calling for his followers to move on. On Tuesday, he softened his position somewhat, stating that Bondi should 'release whatever she thinks is credible.' Johnson, who also stated that he trusts Trump, has 'never broken so publicly with the president on an issue,' writes the Washington Post's Marianna Sotomayor. 'I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out here,' Johnson said, noting that Bondi should explain what she meant when she once referenced having the Epstein client list on her desk. 'She needs to come forward and explain that to everybody,' Johnson said. (White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that Bondi was referencing the 'entirety of all the paperwork' related to the Epstein case.) The speaker's position points to blowback Trump and his administration have received from his base over the handling of the Epstein files, and highlights how Republican lawmakers are trying to acknowledge the uproar while still backing the president. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) on Tuesday called for the appointment of a special counsel to uncover the 'truth about the Epstein Files,' tagging former Rep. Matt Gaetz, who previously resigned from Congress as the House was investigating allegations of sexual misconduct against him. Johnson and other House Republicans were also widely criticized Tuesday for claiming to want transparency about the Epstein files, but stymying a Democratic effort to push for their release. On Tuesday, Republicans blocked a vote on a measure from Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), which would have forced the release of documents related to the DOJ's Epstein investigation. 'Republicans spent years screaming for the Epstein Files to be released. Now Donald Trump wants to hide them. Today, every R can vote to release the files. Will they give the American people transparency or block the truth to protect Trump?' Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) wrote on X. — Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) July 15, 2025 @danielsgoldman/X / Via Twitter: @danielsgoldman