US city sheds light on the cost benefits of municipal mood lighting
Compared with the old orange lights, the new lights appear brighter when fully turned up, but shields can be added to the fixtures to curb what is known as 'light trespass'.
Robinson said he also plans to dim the new lights between 11pm and 4am, which will save energy and money, and, according to the city, cause less harm to migratory birds, urban wildlife, and humans.
Thanks to urbanisation and electrification, light pollution is growing globally by nearly 10% a year, according to a 2023 study.
Many areas are over-lit, which wastes energy, obfuscates starry skies and messes with the circadian rhythms of plants, wildlife, and people.
Pittsburgh officials had long planned to swap out the city's old streetlights, but for years they didn't have the budget to adopt the types of LED streetlights that other cities were beginning to install.
That turned out to be a good thing. The first generation of LED streetlights led to lower costs and energy savings but also heightened exposure to glare and harmful blue light.
In 2016, the American Medical Association warned that blue-rich LED streetlights suppressed melatonin and contributed to sleeplessness, poor daytime functioning and obesity, while also disorienting birds, insects, turtles and fish species that need darkness at night.
Some research suggests that bright city lights worsen air pollution by hindering night-time chemical reactions that clean the air.
The city of Pittsburgh included new streetlights in its 2021 budget and not long afterwards passed an ordinance that follows guidelines from DarkSky International, a non-profit organisation focused on fighting light pollution.
One feature of the new lights that complies with DarkSky International's recommendations is a relatively warmer hue.
Night-time LED lighting around warehouses and in prison yards often emits bright, cold blue-rich light that can have a colour temperature of 5500 kelvins and up.
DarkSky International recommends streetlights with warmer tones and a maximum colour temperature of 3000 kelvins. Pittsburgh's new lights are 2700 on the Kelvin scale.
'We leapfrogged the LED blue-light phase,' Marion said.
According to the city, the new lights will last at least four times longer than the ones they're replacing, saving the city nearly US$500,000 in maintenance costs annually.
Because it's using less electricity to run the lights, the city estimates it will prevent 12,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions each year.
'It's practical and pragmatic because of its simplicity and its impact,' said Grant Ervin, Pittsburgh's former chief resilience officer.
One of the biggest proponents of Pittsburgh's dark-sky lighting ordinance is Diane Turnshek, who teaches astronomy at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh.
Turnshek, 70, who grew up in New England, remembers easily seeing the Milky Way as a child.
The city skyline in Pittsburgh. Photo / Danielle Amy, the New York Times
Over time, she grew dismayed by the fact that her astronomy students couldn't readily see dazzling starry skies and that light pollution often wasn't considered an environmental concern.
She was determined to raise awareness about the problem and ways to address it and worked with the city of Pittsburgh to pass the ordinance.
'It's such an easy fix,' Turnshek said. 'You turn them off. You use them appropriately. You don't use them when you don't need them. Change is instantaneous and saves you money.'
The prospect of dimmer streetlights is often met with public resistance because of the belief that artificial lights increase night-time safety.
While people may feel safer with more light at night, that doesn't necessarily correlate with crime statistics, said John Barentine, a consultant and former director of public policy for DarkSky International.
US cities and towns often vastly exceed recommended levels of illumination, creating glare that can be blinding, he said.
Lower-income neighbourhoods with more people of colour often had brighter lights than more affluent, white neighbourhoods, he said.
'We're arguing in favour of public safety by preserving and enhancing night-time visibility through better lighting design,' Barentine said.
'We're actually doing people a favour by bringing the light levels down, because we're helping the eye to operate most efficiently under night-time conditions. We're aiding vision, rather than taking something away.'
Still, there are limits to the benefits.
Avalon Owens, a research fellow at the Rowland Institute at Harvard University, said that even warm, dim artificial light is usually too bright for most nocturnal insects, which have eyes that are thousands of times more sensitive than those of humans and are most active a few hours after dusk. Motion-activated lighting is also preferable, she said.
But shielding lights from natural areas does reduce some negative impacts on insects and the species that rely on them, Owens said. LEDs also use less power, generating fewer greenhouse-gas emissions, and climate change is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity.
'It's a matter of minimising harm,' Owens said.
Pittsburgh also has about 3450 LED streetlights with colour temperatures of 4000 kelvins that will be swapped out for the new, warmer versions. The US$15 million project is expected to be completed in 2027.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Cara Buckley
Photographs by: Danielle Amy
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Antarctic leopard seals perform unique songs for hours, study finds
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Male leopard seals sing songs structured like nursery rhymes. Photo / Jamie Quirk When male leopard seals dive down into icy Antarctic waters, they sing songs structured like nursery rhymes in performances that can last up to 13 hours, scientists say. An Australian-led team of researchers compared the complexity of the songs composed by the aquatic mammals to those of other animals – as well as human musicians like the Beatles and Mozart. Lucinda Chambers, a bioacoustics PhD student at Australia's University of New South Wales, told AFP that people are often surprised when they hear the 'otherworldly' hoots and trills sung by leopard seals. 'It kind of sounds like sound effects from an 80s sci-fi movie,' said the lead author of a new study in the journal Scientific Reports. During the spring breeding season, male leopard seals dive underwater and perform their songs for two minutes before returning to the surface for air. They then repeat this performance for up to 13 hours a day, according to the study.
NZ Herald
7 days ago
- NZ Herald
Study may undercut idea that cash payments to poor families help with child development
They were no more likely to develop language skills, avoid behavioural problems or developmental delays, demonstrate executive function, or exhibit brain activity associated with cognitive development. 'I was very surprised — we were all very surprised,' said Greg Duncan, an economist at the University of California, Irvine, and one of six researchers who led the study, called Baby's First Years. 'The money did not make a difference.' The findings could weaken the case for turning the United States child tax credit into an income guarantee, as Democrats did briefly four years ago in a pandemic-era effort to fight child poverty. That effort, in 2021, provided most families with children monthly cheques of up to US$300 per child and helped push child poverty to a record low, though it did not receive the kind of rigorous evaluation of its developmental impacts the new study offers. It lapsed after a year, and Democratic efforts to extend it failed amid unified Republican opposition. Many Democrats are pushing to bring it back. While the new research may shape the debate over income guarantees, the leaders of the new study disagree among themselves about the relevance of the experiment's results. Some think the pandemic, which erupted soon after the research began, may have skewed outcomes, both because it disrupted lives and triggered large government aid programmes that diluted the impact of the stipends provided by the study. The payments from Baby's First Years were also much smaller, on a per-family basis, than those the Democrats propose. Larger payments might have beneficial effects. Since the test was unusual in targeting children in their earliest years, it is also possible that benefits will appear later, after they start school. Still, the test was unusually comprehensive, and the lack of results provides conservative critics of cash guarantees an empirical talking point. 'It shows that money alone won't lead to better outcomes for children,' said Robert Doar, president of the conservative American Enterprise Institute, who supports imposing work rules on aid on the theory that working parents offer children role models. The study did not test non-cash programmes such as food stamps or Medicaid, or subsidies tied to work. The results were reported earlier by NPR. It has long been clear that children from affluent families exhibit stronger cognitive development and fewer behavioural problems, on average, than their low-income counterparts. The question is whether their advantage comes from money itself or from related forces including parental health and education, neighbourhood influences or the likelihood of having two parents in the home. A landmark study in 2019 from the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine found that 'poverty itself causes negative child outcomes' and aid programmes often help. Most of the evidence came from studies of non-cash benefits, such as food stamps or Medicaid, or the earned-income tax credit, a subsidy for parents with jobs. Some of the studies were decades old, when the safety net was smaller and expansions might have had larger effects. For a more precise test of cash guarantees, Baby's First Years raised about US$22 million from the National Institutes of Health and private foundations and recruited 1000 poor mothers with newborns in New York, New Orleans, greater Omaha, Nebraska, and Minneapolis-St. Paul. More than 80% were black or Latino, and most were unmarried. After randomly dividing the parents, researchers gave one group $333 a month while the other got a nominal $20. Random-control testing is considered an especially rigorous form of evaluation. The researchers specified in advance seven measures on which they thought children in high-cash families would outperform the others. After four years they found no group differences on any of the yardsticks, which aimed for a comprehensive look at child development. Children in the families getting the higher cash payments did no better on tests of vocabulary, executive function, preliteracy skills or spatial perception. Their mothers did not rank them more highly on assessments of social and emotional behaviour. And they were no more likely than the children in the low-cash group to avoid chronic health conditions including asthma. Mothers in the high-cash group did spend about 5% more time on learning and enrichment activities, such as reading or playing with their children. They also spent about $68 a month more than the low-cash mothers on child-related goods, including toys, books, and clothing. At the same time, the study found no support for two main criticisms of unconditional payments. While critics have warned that parents might abuse the money, high-cash mothers spent negligible sums on alcohol and no more than low-cash mothers, according to self-reporting. They spent less on cigarettes. Nor did they work less. While opponents say income guarantees could erode the work ethic, mothers in the two groups showed no differences across four years in hours worked, wages earned or the likelihood of having jobs. The high-cash mothers did prove less likely to work fulltime during the pandemic, which researchers considered positive — evidence that aid helps parents manage emergencies. One puzzling outcome is that the payments failed to reduce mothers' stress, as researchers predicted. On the contrary, mothers in the high-cash group reported higher levels of anxiety than their low-cash counterparts. It is possible they felt more pressure to excel as parents. Contrary to predictions by researchers, children in both groups showed similar patterns of brain activity on the study's main neurological yardstick, an index of high-frequency brain activity, as measured by an electroencephalogram. High-frequency brain activity is often associated with cognitive development. Though an earlier paper showed promising activity on a related neurological measure in the high-cash infants, that trend did not endure. The new study detected 'some evidence' of other differences in neurological activity between the two groups of children, but its significance was unclear. While researchers publicised the earlier, more promising results, the follow-up study was released quietly and has received little attention. Several co-authors declined to comment on the results, saying that it was unclear why the payments had no effect and that the pattern could change as the children age. 'Anyone who tries to tell you they know what the data mean is just speculating,' Katherine Magnuson, a professor of social work at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, wrote in an email. The payments continued for more than six years, and future analyses will examine the longer-range effect. Arloc Sherman of the Centre on Budget and Policy Priorities, a supporter of income guarantees, said the results were affected by the pandemic and should be weighed against conflicting evidence. 'I don't think these results undermine the conclusion, from a large volume of studies, that income is important for children's health, education, and development,' he said. Jane Waldfogel, a professor at Columbia University whose book Child Benefits: The Smart Investment for America's Future supports child-rearing subsidies, said the experimental payments were too small to have the predicted effect. Because the aid was capped at $333 per family, not per child, she said, households received an average subsidy less than half of what Democrats offered in 2021 and typically propose. 'It just wasn't enough to reduce financial hardship and strain,' Waldfogel said. The payments initially increased household income by 18%, but high inflation eroded their value. Virtually all parents in both groups remained low-income throughout the four years, and they reported similar levels of hardships including evictions or utility cutoffs. Robert Rector, an opponent of income guarantees at the Heritage Foundation, praised the rigour of the study and said it 'blows the arguments for unconditional cash aid out of the water'. The results are unsurprising, he said, because the safety net already provides what he called large food, healthcare and wage subsidies, meaning few families face dire conditions and the extra stipends did little to differentiate the groups. While the aid did not boost child development in measurable ways, it may still have enriched family life. Some parents told researchers it let them buy children special gifts or share meaningful experiences, such as dining out or visiting a zoo. One proudly photographed the winter coat she bought her child. 'The mothers are certainly not saying this money doesn't matter,' said Sarah Halpern-Meekin, a sociologist at the University of Madison-Wisconsin, who oversaw parent interviews. Michael R. Strain of the American Enterprise Institute said the study reinforced his doubts about cash aid, but he encouraged fellow conservatives not to make too much of it. 'It seems completely plausible to me that the pandemic overwhelmed an effect from the income,' he said. Still, he noted that poor families faced problems as varied as bad schools, violent neighbourhoods, and a shortage of role models. 'Can US$300 a month address that?' he said. 'I don't know why it would.' A single study may alter few minds, but it has changed one expert's thinking. Duncan, a leading child poverty researcher, had been convinced by studies of Medicaid, food stamps and the earned-income tax credit that unconditional cash aid would improve children's outcomes. The uniform new results have made him reconsider. 'There is strong evidence that these other safety net programmes reduce intergenerational poverty,' Duncan said. 'Our cash payments appear unlikely to follow suit. We've got to come to grips with that.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Jason DeParle ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
24-07-2025
- NZ Herald
US city sheds light on the cost benefits of municipal mood lighting
The new lights are directed downward and emit warmer light than many LEDs. Compared with the old orange lights, the new lights appear brighter when fully turned up, but shields can be added to the fixtures to curb what is known as 'light trespass'. Robinson said he also plans to dim the new lights between 11pm and 4am, which will save energy and money, and, according to the city, cause less harm to migratory birds, urban wildlife, and humans. Thanks to urbanisation and electrification, light pollution is growing globally by nearly 10% a year, according to a 2023 study. Many areas are over-lit, which wastes energy, obfuscates starry skies and messes with the circadian rhythms of plants, wildlife, and people. Pittsburgh officials had long planned to swap out the city's old streetlights, but for years they didn't have the budget to adopt the types of LED streetlights that other cities were beginning to install. That turned out to be a good thing. The first generation of LED streetlights led to lower costs and energy savings but also heightened exposure to glare and harmful blue light. In 2016, the American Medical Association warned that blue-rich LED streetlights suppressed melatonin and contributed to sleeplessness, poor daytime functioning and obesity, while also disorienting birds, insects, turtles and fish species that need darkness at night. Some research suggests that bright city lights worsen air pollution by hindering night-time chemical reactions that clean the air. The city of Pittsburgh included new streetlights in its 2021 budget and not long afterwards passed an ordinance that follows guidelines from DarkSky International, a non-profit organisation focused on fighting light pollution. One feature of the new lights that complies with DarkSky International's recommendations is a relatively warmer hue. Night-time LED lighting around warehouses and in prison yards often emits bright, cold blue-rich light that can have a colour temperature of 5500 kelvins and up. DarkSky International recommends streetlights with warmer tones and a maximum colour temperature of 3000 kelvins. Pittsburgh's new lights are 2700 on the Kelvin scale. 'We leapfrogged the LED blue-light phase,' Marion said. According to the city, the new lights will last at least four times longer than the ones they're replacing, saving the city nearly US$500,000 in maintenance costs annually. Because it's using less electricity to run the lights, the city estimates it will prevent 12,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions each year. 'It's practical and pragmatic because of its simplicity and its impact,' said Grant Ervin, Pittsburgh's former chief resilience officer. One of the biggest proponents of Pittsburgh's dark-sky lighting ordinance is Diane Turnshek, who teaches astronomy at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh. Turnshek, 70, who grew up in New England, remembers easily seeing the Milky Way as a child. The city skyline in Pittsburgh. Photo / Danielle Amy, the New York Times Over time, she grew dismayed by the fact that her astronomy students couldn't readily see dazzling starry skies and that light pollution often wasn't considered an environmental concern. She was determined to raise awareness about the problem and ways to address it and worked with the city of Pittsburgh to pass the ordinance. 'It's such an easy fix,' Turnshek said. 'You turn them off. You use them appropriately. You don't use them when you don't need them. Change is instantaneous and saves you money.' The prospect of dimmer streetlights is often met with public resistance because of the belief that artificial lights increase night-time safety. While people may feel safer with more light at night, that doesn't necessarily correlate with crime statistics, said John Barentine, a consultant and former director of public policy for DarkSky International. US cities and towns often vastly exceed recommended levels of illumination, creating glare that can be blinding, he said. Lower-income neighbourhoods with more people of colour often had brighter lights than more affluent, white neighbourhoods, he said. 'We're arguing in favour of public safety by preserving and enhancing night-time visibility through better lighting design,' Barentine said. 'We're actually doing people a favour by bringing the light levels down, because we're helping the eye to operate most efficiently under night-time conditions. We're aiding vision, rather than taking something away.' Still, there are limits to the benefits. Avalon Owens, a research fellow at the Rowland Institute at Harvard University, said that even warm, dim artificial light is usually too bright for most nocturnal insects, which have eyes that are thousands of times more sensitive than those of humans and are most active a few hours after dusk. Motion-activated lighting is also preferable, she said. But shielding lights from natural areas does reduce some negative impacts on insects and the species that rely on them, Owens said. LEDs also use less power, generating fewer greenhouse-gas emissions, and climate change is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity. 'It's a matter of minimising harm,' Owens said. Pittsburgh also has about 3450 LED streetlights with colour temperatures of 4000 kelvins that will be swapped out for the new, warmer versions. The US$15 million project is expected to be completed in 2027. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Cara Buckley Photographs by: Danielle Amy ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
