Black communities asked to join Southampton health research
UHS said the study was set up as historically, people from African and Caribbean heritage have been under-represented in health studies, meaning knowledge and treatments as a result of research have been predominantly based on white populations.Mr Stockley said the new initiative aimed to "close the gap"."The IBHO BioResource will help us better understand and address health conditions and their unique impacts on black people and their loved ones, ensuring everyone benefits from fair and inclusive research," he added.Participant Ardel Richardson, 38, from Southampton said he was encouraged to join the research when his daughter first saw a brown bandage as "skin-coloured"."Her joy was a profound moment – it made me realise how often our needs are overlooked," he explained.After completing a diabetes risk survey, he discovered he had a two-in-five chance of developing the condition."I was shocked to learn that diabetes hits the black community in such a disproportionate way."If I don't do more to ensure our views and needs are considered, how can I expect change to happen?" he added.The researchers are looking for a range of adults to take part, with or without a health condition, as well as children under 15 with a confirmed diagnosis of sickle cell.Those taking part would be asked to give a saliva or blood sample and complete a health and lifestyle questionnaire.
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Discovery of 6,000-year-old underwater city prompts historical rethink
However, an even bigger mystery unfolded after the discovery: no one ever went back to examine the alleged lost city in more than two decades. One factor that has held back further research has been the fact that fellow scientists have continued to voice their skepticism about the sunken city, saying it would have taken up to 50,000 years for a city to sink that far underwater. Other critics have contended that the 'structures' are natural rock formations, arguing that an entire city wouldn't have been so well preserved if it sank during a catastrophic seismic disaster. The neglected underwater structures have recently resurfaced on social media, with many people claiming that the explorers found the ruins of Atlantis. However, Cuban geologist Manuel Iturralde-Vinent of Cuba's Natural History Museum was one of the skeptics who cautioned that the stone structures could be natural formations. 'It would be totally irresponsible to say what it was before we have evidence,' Zelitsky added in a 2001 interview with BBC. Unfortunately, more evidence was never gathered, as a follow-up expedition to Cuba's Guanahacabibes Peninsula never took place. Social media users have continued to question why the research into this mysterious site was abandoned, with some claiming the implications of a city predating the ancient Egyptians have triggered a cover-up. 'Civilizations that existed before the ice age, perhaps multiple civilizations that rose and fell... The historical knowledge that has been lost (or hidden),' one person on X said. 'There is so much hidden history. Finding it so fascinating. Everything we been taught is a lie,' another person claimed. Despite rampant speculation of an archeological conspiracy, scientists have argued that there are legitimate reasons why the lost city of Cuba isn't real. In 2002, Iturralde noted that the structures were so deep underwater, it would have taken much longer than 6,000 years for this area to sink nearly half a mile due to shifting tectonic plates. If this were a sunken city that took roughly 50,000 years to reach these depths, it would completely change our understanding of human evolution. Currently, scientists have concluded that modern humans (Homo sapiens) were hunter-gatherers 50,000 years ago, since there's no evidence they created urban societies or sophisticated buildings. 'It's strange, it's weird; we've never seen something like this before, and we don't have an explanation for it,' Iturralde told The Washington Post. Michael Faught, a specialist in underwater archaeology at Florida State University, also shared his doubts that these structures were man-made. 'It would be cool if Zelitsky and Weinzweig were right, but it would be really advanced for anything we would see in the New World for that time frame. The structures are out of time and out of place,' Faught told the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. The unexplored city isn't the first mysterious structure to potentially rewrite human history. Archeologists have actually found several allegedly man-made temples which significantly predate the Egyptians, including Göbekli Tepe in Turkey - a site believed to have been inhabited from around 9500 BC to at least 8000 BCE. That's over 5,000 years before the Egyptian pyramids were built and roughly 6,000 years before Stonehenge. Another underwater structure discovered near Japan, called the Yonaguni monument, features several sharp-angled steps that stand roughly 90 feet tall and appear to be made entirely of stone, leading many to believe it was man-made. Tests of the stone have shown it to be over 10,000 years old, meaning if a civilization built this pyramid by hand, it would have taken place before this region sank under water - more than 12,000 years ago. Along with scientists widely discounting the findings in Cuba as a natural phenomenon, its location so close to the socialist national have made returning to the site politically difficult. Advanced Digital Communications, the Canadian company that was mapping the ocean floor in Cuba's territorial waters, entered into a contract with the government of President Fidel Castro to conduct the original expedition.
The Sun
3 days ago
- The Sun
Inside ‘lost' 6,000-year-old underwater city on coast of Cuba with stone structures 2,000ft below sea's surface
A MYSTERIOUS 'lost city' lying 2,000 feet beneath the waves off Cuba has baffled scientists for more than two decades — with claims it could rewrite the history of human civilisation. Marine engineer Paulina Zelitsky and her husband, Paul Weinzweig, stunned the world in 2001 when sonar scans revealed huge stone formations on the seabed near the Guanahacabibes Peninsula. 5 5 5 The images showed what looked like pyramids, circular structures, and massive blocks 'reminiscent of an urban development,' according to BBC News. Some of the stones measured up to 10 feet and appeared deliberately stacked. 'It's a really wonderful structure which really looks like it could have been a large urban center,' Zelitsky said at the time. The Canadian team, from Advanced Digital Communications (ADC), estimated the ruins could be more than 6,000 years old — making them older than the Egyptian pyramids. But despite the jaw-dropping find, no follow-up expedition has ever been carried out. While social media users today speculate the ruins are proof of Atlantis, experts remain cautious. 'It would be totally irresponsible to say what it was before we have evidence,' Zelitsky warned back in 2001. Cuban geologist Manuel Iturralde-Vinent, from the Natural History Museum, admitted the structures were 'extremely peculiar' but stressed the depth posed a major problem. 'It's strange, it's weird; we've never seen something like this before, and we don't have an explanation for it,' he told The Washington Post. Iturralde estimated it would take up to 50,000 years for the seabed to sink that far, far earlier than any known advanced civilization. Michael Faught, an underwater archaeology expert at Florida State University, agreed. He said: 'It would be cool if Zelitsky and Weinzweig were right, but it would be really advanced for anything we would see in the New World for that time frame. 'The structures are out of time and out of place.' Other scientists have argued the formations are likely natural rock structures. Despite skepticism, the discovery continues to fuel conspiracy theories online. 'Civilizations that existed before the ice age, perhaps multiple civilizations that rose and fell... The historical knowledge that has been lost (or hidden),' one person posted on X. Another claimed: 'There is so much hidden history. Finding it so fascinating. Everything we been taught is a lie.' Funding problems and Cuba's strict control over foreign expeditions have also been blamed for the lack of further investigation. A planned dive in 2002 was scrapped, according to US oceanographer Sylvia Earle. Weinzweig himself once insisted: 'The structures we found on the side scan sonar simply are not explicable from a geological point of view. 'There is too much organisation, too much symmetry, too much repetition of form.' Another underwater enigma often compared to Cuba's 'lost city' is the Yonaguni monument off Japan's coast. Discovered in the 1980s, the massive stone formation sits around 90 feet underwater and features sharp-angled steps and terraces that appear man-made. Tests of the rock show it could be more than 10,000 years old. If carved by humans, it would date back to a time before the last ice age — a theory that, like the Cuban ruins, continues to divide experts over whether it's a natural formation or evidence of a vanished civilisation. 5 5
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Mysterious underwater 'lost city' believed to be 6,000 years old reshapes human history
A team of explorers believed they discovered an ancient sunken city that would rewrite human history, but the ruins have mysteriously been ignored for 25 years. In 2001, marine engineer Paulina Zelitsky and her husband, Paul Weinzweig, from Advanced Digital Communications (ADC), revealed that they had stumbled upon a collection of stone structures over 2,000 feet underwater near Cuba. Sonar scans of the area showed what looked like multiple pyramids, circular structures, and other buildings that seemed to belong to a lost city in the Caribbean. 'It's a really wonderful structure which really looks like it could have been a large urban center,' Zelitsky said after the discovery. Researchers suggested that the mysterious city could be more than 6,000 years old, making it significantly older than the Egyptian pyramids and potentially upending the currently accepted timeline of human development. However, an even bigger mystery unfolded after the discovery: no one ever went back to examine the alleged lost city in more than two decades. One factor that has held back further research has been the fact that fellow scientists have continued to voice their skepticism about the sunken city, saying it would have taken up to 50,000 years for a city to sink that far underwater. Other critics have contended that the 'structures' are natural rock formations, arguing that an entire city wouldn't have been so well preserved if it sank during a catastrophic seismic disaster. The neglected underwater structures have recently resurfaced on social media, with many people claiming that the explorers found the ruins of Atlantis. However, Cuban geologist Manuel Iturralde-Vinent of Cuba's Natural History Museum was one of the skeptics who cautioned that the stone structures could be natural formations. 'It would be totally irresponsible to say what it was before we have evidence,' Zelitsky added in a 2001 interview with BBC. Unfortunately, more evidence was never gathered, as a follow-up expedition to Cuba's Guanahacabibes Peninsula never took place. Social media users have continued to question why the research into this mysterious site was abandoned, with some claiming the implications of a city predating the ancient Egyptians have triggered a cover-up. 'Civilizations that existed before the ice age, perhaps multiple civilizations that rose and fell... The historical knowledge that has been lost (or hidden),' one person on X said. 'There is so much hidden history. Finding it so fascinating. Everything we been taught is a lie,' another person claimed. Despite rampant speculation of an archeological conspiracy, scientists have argued that there are legitimate reasons why the lost city of Cuba isn't real. In 2002, Iturralde noted that the structures were so deep underwater, it would have taken much longer than 6,000 years for this area to sink nearly half a mile due to shifting tectonic plates. If this were a sunken city that took roughly 50,000 years to reach these depths, it would completely change our understanding of human evolution. Currently, scientists have concluded that modern humans (Homo sapiens) were hunter-gatherers 50,000 years ago, since there's no evidence they created urban societies or sophisticated buildings. 'It's strange, it's weird; we've never seen something like this before, and we don't have an explanation for it,' Iturralde told The Washington Post. Michael Faught, a specialist in underwater archaeology at Florida State University, also shared his doubts that these structures were man-made. 'It would be cool if Zelitsky and Weinzweig were right, but it would be really advanced for anything we would see in the New World for that time frame. The structures are out of time and out of place,' Faught told the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. The unexplored city isn't the first mysterious structure to potentially rewrite human history. Archeologists have actually found several allegedly man-made temples which significantly predate the Egyptians, including Göbekli Tepe in Turkey - a site believed to have been inhabited from around 9500 BC to at least 8000 BCE. That's over 5,000 years before the Egyptian pyramids were built and roughly 6,000 years before Stonehenge. Another underwater structure discovered near Japan, called the Yonaguni monument, features several sharp-angled steps that stand roughly 90 feet tall and appear to be made entirely of stone, leading many to believe it was man-made. Tests of the stone have shown it to be over 10,000 years old, meaning if a civilization built this pyramid by hand, it would have taken place before this region sank under water - more than 12,000 years ago. Along with scientists widely discounting the findings in Cuba as a natural phenomenon, its location so close to the socialist national have made returning to the site politically difficult. Advanced Digital Communications, the Canadian company that was mapping the ocean floor in Cuba's territorial waters, entered into a contract with the government of President Fidel Castro to conduct the original expedition. However, the Cuban government and institutions like the National Museum have not pursued further investigations in two decades. Sylvia Earl, an American oceanographer, also revealed in 2002 that a planned expedition to the lost city was canceled over funding problems.
