logo
Seven books by Ugandan scholar Mahmood Mamdani, father of NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani

Seven books by Ugandan scholar Mahmood Mamdani, father of NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani

Scroll.in5 days ago

Zohran Mamdani is all set to win the New York Democratic mayoral primary polls. The 33-year-old soared to popularity with his social media campaigns that were earnest and spoke directly to New Yorkers about what he intended to do if he were to be elected as the mayor. Mamdani has promised to control rents, make New York's buses free, carry out energy reforms, and increase taxes on the city's wealthiest persons. In addition to these, he has also been a vocal supporter of the Palestinian cause.
How might being the son of filmmaker Mira Nair and Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani have shaped his views? Many of us are already familiar with Mira Nair's filmography. What about the mayoral candidate's father's works?
Born on April 23, 1946, Mahmood Mamdani is an Ugandan academic and author. He specialises in the study of African and international politics, colonialism and post‐colonialism, and the politics of knowledge production. Here are seven books by the scholar that explore the intersection between politics and culture, the history of civil war and genocide in Africa, the Cold War and the War on Terror, and the history and theory of human rights. (All information sourced from publishers.)
Neither Settler Nor Native: The Making and Unmaking of Permanent Minorities
In this genealogy of political modernity, Mamdani argues that the nation-state and the colonial state created each other. In case after case around the globe – from the New World to South Africa, Israel to Germany to Sudan – the colonial state and the nation-state have been mutually constructed through the politicisation of a religious or ethnic majority at the expense of an equally manufactured minority.
The model emerged in North America, where genocide and internment on reservations created both a permanent native underclass and the physical and ideological spaces in which new immigrant identities crystallised as a settler nation. In Europe, this template would be used by the Nazis to address the Jewish Question, and after the fall of the Third Reich, by the Allies to redraw the boundaries of Eastern Europe's nation-states, cleansing them of their minorities. After Nuremberg, the template was used to preserve the idea of the Jews as a separate nation. By establishing Israel through the minoritisation of Palestinian Arabs, Zionist settlers followed the North American example. The result has been another cycle of violence.
Neither Settler nor Native offers a vision for arresting this historical process. Mamdani rejects the 'criminal' solution attempted at Nuremberg, which held individual perpetrators responsible without questioning Nazism as a political project and thus the violence of the nation-state itself. Instead, political violence demands political solutions: not criminal justice for perpetrators but a rethinking of the political community for all survivors – victims, perpetrators, bystanders, beneficiaries – based on common residence and the commitment to build a common future without the permanent political identities of settler and native. Mamdani points to the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa as an unfinished project, seeking a state without a nation.
When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda
'When we captured Kigali, we thought we would face criminals in the state; instead, we faced a criminal population.' So a political commissar in the Rwanda Patriotic Front reflected after the 1994 massacre of as many as one million Tutsis in Rwanda. Underlying his statement was the realisation that, though ordered by a minority of state functionaries, the slaughter was performed by hundreds of thousands of ordinary citizens, including judges, doctors, priests, and friends. Rejecting easy explanations of the Rwandan genocide as a mysterious evil force that was bizarrely unleashed, When Victims Become Killers situates the tragedy in its proper context. Mamdani coaxes to the surface the historical, geographical, and political forces that made it possible for so many Hutus to turn so brutally on their neighbors. In so doing, Mamdani usefully broadens understandings of citizenship and political identity in postcolonial Africa and provides a direction for preventing similar future tragedies.
Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism
In analysing the obstacles to democratisation in post-independence Africa, Mamdani offers a bold, insightful account of colonialism's legacy – a bifurcated power that mediated racial domination through tribally organised local authorities, reproducing racial identity in citizens and ethnic identity in subjects. Many writers have understood colonial rule as either 'direct' (French) or 'indirect' (British), with a third variant – apartheid – as exceptional. This benign terminology, Mamdani shows, masks the fact that these were actually variants of a despotism. While direct rule denied rights to subjects on racial grounds, indirect rule incorporated them into a 'customary' mode of rule, with state-appointed Native Authorities defining custom. By tapping authoritarian possibilities in culture, and by giving culture an authoritarian bent, indirect rule (decentralised despotism) set the pace for Africa; the French followed suit by changing from direct to indirect administration, while apartheid emerged relatively later. Apartheid, Mamdani shows, was actually the generic form of the colonial state in Africa.
Through case studies of rural (Uganda) and urban (South Africa) resistance movements, we learn how these institutional features fragment resistance and how states tend to play off reform in one sector against repression in the other. The result is a reassessment of colonial rule in Africa and its enduring aftereffects. Reforming a power that institutionally enforces tension between town and country, and between ethnicities, is the key challenge for anyone interested in democratic reform in Africa.
From Citizen to Refugee: Uganda Asians Come to Britain
Mamdani reflects on the lessons since the expulsion of Asians from Uganda. How come, he asks, over 90 per cent of residents of the country, brown or black, would not want to return to the days and years before the 1972 expulsion? The expulsion cannot just be understood as an event that occurred in 1972. He concludes, there is no one Asian legacy. There are several, and they are contradictory. Not all are legacies we would like to wipe out from our collective memories. Some we would like to build on; others we would like to reform. Uganda Asians are a poor fit as victims. In a land known for sporadic massacres, there were no massacres of Asians. When massacres happened, they were of 'indigenous' people.
Mamdani begins to explore the theme of political identity – the colonial politicisation of racial identity and its reproduction after independence – which has been the concern of much of his subsequent work, notably in Citizen and Subject. This gripping story of the Asians' last days in Uganda interweaves the stories of Mamdani's friends and family with an examination of Uganda's colonial history and the subsequent evolution of post-independence politics.
Good Muslim, Bad Muslim
Mamdani brings his expertise and insight to bear on a question many Americans have been asking since 9/11: how did this happen? Good Muslim, Bad Muslim is a provocative book that examines our understanding both of Islamist politics and the way America is perceived in the world today.
Saviours and Survivors: Darfur, Politics and the War on Terror
Saviours and Survivors is the first account of the Darfur crisis to consider recent events within the broad context of Sudan's history, and to examine the efficacy of the world's response to the ongoing violence. Illuminating the deeply rooted causes of the current conflict, Mamdani works from its colonial and Cold War origins to the war's intensification from the 1990s to the present day. Examining how the conflict has drawn in national, regional, and global forces, Mamdani deconstructs the powerful Western lobby's persistent calls for a military response dressed up as 'humanitarian intervention'.
Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity
Define and Rule focuses on the turn in late 19th-century colonial statecraft when Britain abandoned the attempt to eradicate the difference between conqueror and conquered and introduced a new idea of governance, as the definition and management of difference. Mamdani explores how lines were drawn between settler and native as distinct political identities, and between natives according to tribe. Out of that colonial experience issued a modern language of pluralism and difference.
A mid-19th-century crisis of empire attracted the attention of British intellectuals and led to a reconception of the colonial mission and to reforms in India, British Malaya, and the Dutch East Indies. The new politics, inspired by Sir Henry Maine, established that natives were bound by geography and custom, rather than history and law, and made this the basis of administrative practice.
Maine's theories were later translated into 'native administration' in the African colonies. Mamdani takes the case of Sudan to demonstrate how colonial law established tribal identity as the basis for determining access to land and political power, and follows this law's legacy to contemporary Darfur. He considers the intellectual and political dimensions of African movements toward decolonisation by focusing on two key figures: the Nigerian historian Yusuf Bala Usman, who argued for an alternative to colonial historiography, and Tanzania's first president, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, who realized that colonialism's political logic was legal and administrative, not military, and could be dismantled through nonviolent reforms.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zohran Mamdani, New York's Democratic Mayoral Pick, Says Billionaires Shouldn't Exist
Zohran Mamdani, New York's Democratic Mayoral Pick, Says Billionaires Shouldn't Exist

News18

time42 minutes ago

  • News18

Zohran Mamdani, New York's Democratic Mayoral Pick, Says Billionaires Shouldn't Exist

Last Updated: Despite this strong view, Mamdani stated that he is willing to work with everyone, including billionaires, to build a fairer New York Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor, has said he does not believe billionaires should exist, explaining that extreme wealth in times of growing inequality is simply unfair. Speaking on NBC's Meet the Press, host Kristen Welker asked the 33-year-old politician whether he thought billionaires had a right to exist, pointing out his democratic socialist beliefs. In response, Mamdani made clear that, in his view, the problem lies in how much money is concentrated in so few hands. 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality. And ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country," Mamdani said. Despite this strong view, Mamdani also stated that he is willing to work with everyone, including billionaires, to build a fairer New York. 'And I look forward to working with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them," he said. Mamdani's remarks come just days after his surprise victory in the Democratic primary, where he defeated former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. His win shocked many in the political world, especially given Cuomo's long-standing presence in New York politics. The victory was seen by some as a major shift in the party's direction, while critics, including US President Donald Trump, accused Mamdani of being a radical. The candidate defended his views, saying he is a democratic socialist—not a communist, as Trump claimed. Salaam Bombay!'. First Published: June 30, 2025, 16:24 IST

Judges rule against human rights groups claim that the UK is illegally arming Israel
Judges rule against human rights groups claim that the UK is illegally arming Israel

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Judges rule against human rights groups claim that the UK is illegally arming Israel

LONDON — Human rights groups lost their legal challenge Monday to the British government's decision to supply Israel with parts for F-35 fighter jets and other military equipment. The Palestinian group Al-Haq and the U.K.-based Global Legal Action Network alleged that the government broke domestic and international law and was complicit in atrocities against Palestinians by allowing essential components for the warplanes to be supplied to Israel. The government last year suspended about 30 of 350 existing export licenses for equipment deemed to be for use in the conflict in Gaza because of a 'clear risk' the items could be used to violate international humanitarian law. Equipment included parts for helicopters and drones. But an exemption was made for some licenses related to components of F-35 fighter jets, which are indirectly supplied to Israel through the global spare parts supply chain and have been linked to bombing the Gaza Strip. While rights groups argued the U.K. shouldn't continue to export parts through what they call a 'deliberate loophole' given the government's own assessment of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law, the government said the parts were distributed to a collaboration involving the U.S. and six other partners to produce the jets. Components manufactured in the U.K. are sent to assembly lines in the U.S., Italy and Japan that supply partners — including Israel — with jets and spare parts, the court said. Two High Court judges ruled that the issue was one of national security because the parts were considered vital to the defense collaboration and the U.K.'s security and international peace. They said it wasn't up to the courts to tell the government to withdraw from the group because of the possibility the parts would be supplied to Israel and used to violate international humanitarian law in Gaza. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts," Justices Stephen Males and Karen Steyn wrote in a 72-page judgment. Compared with major arms suppliers such as the U.S. and Germany, British firms sell a relatively small amount of weapons and components to Israel. The Campaign Against Arms Trade nonprofit group estimates that the U.K. supplies about 15% of the components in the F-35 stealth combat aircraft, including its laser targeting system.

Trump's Senate bill has a 'kill shot': The 'midnight dumping' provision could pinch your pocket
Trump's Senate bill has a 'kill shot': The 'midnight dumping' provision could pinch your pocket

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump's Senate bill has a 'kill shot': The 'midnight dumping' provision could pinch your pocket

Senate Republicans stunned the power industry over the weekend with a proposed new tax on wind and solar projects, part of a broader push to unravel incentives for renewable energy. Republicans added a new tax on future wind and solar projects that don't meet strict new restrictions on parts produced by any company that received 'material assistance' from certain U.S. adversaries like China. The projects will be taxed if a certain percentage of the value of their components come from China. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What is the surprise element in the bill? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What are the provisions? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Republicans in the US Senate have proposed a new tax on supply chain components sourced from China in a bill that could be voted on today (30 June). Senate Republicans have quietly added a provision to their megabill that would penalize future developments with a new updated draft of the Senate's megabill text slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy — and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. The tax provision, tucked inside the 940-page bill that the Senate made public just after midnight on Friday, stunned proposed tax would levy a first-of-its kind penalty on all solar and wind projects tied to the quantity of materials they source from companies with ties to China or other countries designated as adversaries by the US government.'This is how you kill an industry,' said Bob Keefe, executive director of E2, a nonpartisan group of business leaders and investors. 'And at a time when electricity prices and demand are soaring.''It's a kill shot. This new excise tax on wind and solar is designed to fully kill the industry,' said Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, who helped craft the climate law as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck at the Rhodium Group said in an email the new tax would push up the costs of wind and solar projects by 10 to 20 percent — on top of the cost increases from losing the credits, according to Politico.'Combined with the likely onerous administrative reporting burden this provision puts in place, these cost increases will lead to even lower wind and solar installations. The impacts of this tax would also flow through to consumers in the form of higher electricity rates,' Rhodium to a report in The Hill, the initial draft released by Senate Republicans slashed the credit for any wind and solar projects that did not 'begin construction' by certain dates. But the latest version bases incentives on when projects actually begin producing electricity — a much higher bar to first draft gave any project that began construction this year full credit, any project that began construction next year 60 percent credit and any project that began construction in 2027 20 percent of the credit, before phasing out the new legislation instead states that the credits will only apply to facilities that begin producing electricity before the end of 2027. In addition, it imposes a new tax on some wind and solar projects that are placed in service after projects will be taxed if a certain percentage of the value of their components come from China. The bill would rapidly phase out existing federal tax subsidies for wind and solar power by 2027. Doing so, many companies say, could derail hundreds of projects under development and could jeopardize billions of dollars in manufacturing facilities that had been planned around the country with the subsidies in mind."The renewables lobby slammed the changes as hampering the sector.'In what can only be described as 'midnight dumping,' the Senate has proposed a punitive tax hike targeting the fastest-growing sectors of our energy industry. It is astounding that the Senate would intentionally raise prices on consumers rather than encouraging economic growth and addressing the affordability crisis facing American households,' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, said in a written statement.'These new taxes will strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments, threaten energy security, and undermine growth in domestic manufacturing and land hardest on rural communities who would have been the greatest beneficiaries of clean energy investment,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store