France latest country to vote on assisted dying measures with ‘lethal medication' bill
The vote, scheduled for Tuesday afternoon, marks a significant point in the debate over the sensitive issue. If a majority of lawmakers approve the bill, it will proceed to the Senate for further consideration.
The proposed law defines assisted dying as enabling individuals, under specific conditions, to use a lethal substance themselves. Assistance from a doctor or nurse would only be available to those physically unable to administer the medication themselves.
Eligibility for the measure would require patients to be over 18, and either French citizens or residents of France. A team of medical professionals would need to confirm that the patient has a severe and incurable condition in an advanced or terminal stage, is experiencing unbearable and untreatable pain, and is voluntarily seeking lethal medication.
Individuals with severe psychiatric conditions or neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, would not qualify under the proposed legislation.
The person would initiate the request for lethal medication and confirm the request after a period of reflection.
If approved, a doctor would then deliver a prescription for the lethal medication, which could be taken at home, at a nursing home or a health care facility.
In parallel, another bill on palliative care meant to reinforce measures to relieve pain and preserve patients' dignity will also be put to a vote Tuesday.
A 2023 report indicated that most French citizens back legalizing end-of-life options, and opinion polls show growing support over the past 20 years. Initial discussions in parliament last year were abruptly interrupted by President Emmanuel Macron 's decision to dissolve the National Assembly, plunging France into a months-long political crisis.
Months-long debate still ahead
A definitive vote on the measure could take months to be scheduled amid France's long and complex legislative process. The National Assembly has the final say over the Senate.
Earlier this month, Macron suggested he could ask for French voters to approve the measure via referendum if parliament discussions get off track.
Activists supporting the change have criticised the complexity and length of the parliamentary process that they say is penalising patients waiting for end-of-life options.
Many French people have traveled to neighbouring countries where medically assisted suicide or euthanasia are legal.
The Association for the Right to Die with Dignity (ADMD) has called on French lawmakers 'to respect the French who want the same right that our Dutch, Belgian, Luxembourgian, Swiss, Spanish, Portuguese neighbors have.'
French religious leaders issued this month a joint statement to denounce the bill, warning about the 'dangers' of an 'anthropological rupture.' The Conference of Religious Leaders in France (CRCF), which represents the Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist communities, said the proposed measures risk exerting pressure on older people and those with illnesses or disabilities.
Similar talks in the UK
The debate in France comes as similar talks are ongoing in the UK, where lawmakers are debating a bill to help terminally ill adults end their lives in England and Wales after giving it initial approval in November.
Medically assisted suicide involves patients taking, of their own free will, a lethal drink or medication that has been prescribed by a doctor to those who meet certain criteria. Euthanasia involves doctors or other health practitioners giving patients who meet certain criteria a lethal injection at their own request.
Assisted suicide is allowed in Switzerland and several US states. Euthanasia is currently legal in the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Canada, Australia, Colombia, Belgium and Luxembourg under certain conditions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
France's plan to cull public holidays may not help the economy
FRANKFURT, July 16 (Reuters) - The French government thinks the country has too many days off for its own good, but its proposal to cull some public holidays may not produce much of an economic benefit. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou has proposed scrapping two of the country's 11 public holidays as part of a deeply unpopular emergency plan to plug a budget hole. In his sights is Easter Monday and one of four bank holidays in May, a month Bayrou compared to Gruyère cheese for its many holes. Bayrou's idea is that working two extra days will generate more economic output and therefore revenues for the government. Recent experience from elsewhere and various economic studies suggest it won't be as simple as that. In 2023 Denmark abolished Great Prayer Day, a Christian holiday that fell on the fourth Friday after Easter and dated back to 1686, to great popular discontent. On the surface, the sacrifice paid off. The number of hours worked by the average Dane fell by less than in previous years, according to Danske Bank. Yet when it comes to economic output, which is what matters for public finances, the impact of the extra day was tiny at between 0.01% and 0.06%, according to IMF estimates. France's statistical agency INSEE put the boost to GDP of Bayrou's proposal at a similarly negligible 0.06%. This is because time off is not all bad. Of course it slows down production, particularly for manufacturing companies. But it is also considered key for mental and physical health, and typically proves a boost to sectors like tourism. In fact, economic studies find that output increases along with the number of national holidays - but only up to a point. One study of 101 countries by the Centre for Future Labour Market Studies in Malaysia put that sweet spot at nine or 10 public closures in a year. "As the number of public holidays increases, initially economic growth increases, but after some optimal point, when the number of public holidays increases further, economic growth starts to decline," the researchers said in the 2023 study. The exact number may depend on the make-up of a country's economy. A study of the Italian economy, which like the French is dominated by services and has on average 12 public holidays in a year, found that economic output did not vary or even slightly increased in years with more closures, indicating it was close to its own sweet spot. "Companies have fixed production targets and work around holidays," said author Francesco Maria Esposito, an assistant professor at the Birmingham Business School. The situation was similar in Germany, where the calendar is set by the 16 states and ranges from 10 to 13 holidays. The Dusseldorf-based Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK) found that German states that introduced a public holiday more often than not experienced stronger economic growth than those that cut one. "The equation 'fewer holidays equals more growth' simply does not hold up," said Sebastian Dullien, IMK's scientific director. Portugal scrapped four public holidays at the height of its debt crisis in 2012 -- only to reinstate them four years later.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Could axing two holidays save France from its mountain of debt?
Prime Minister François Bayrou has put the cat among the pigeons in promising to cut two of France's national holidays in order to rescue the country's enough, his proposal on Tuesday to axe the Easter Monday and 8 May holidays triggered howls of protest from the left and the populist right – with his own centrists and the conservative right expressing at best guarded a country with such a strong tradition of worker protest, the sudden removal of two statutory days off was never going to be an easy men and women would be made to work two extra days a year for no increase in salary. The gain in productivity would help pull the country put of its ever-deepening hole of debt. The French are indeed very attached to their jours fériés. The month of May is awaited with glee every year, not just because it heralds spring – but also because of the succession of long weekends that regularly 1 May (Workers' Day) and 8 May, marking the end of World War Two, fall on a Tuesday or Thursday, then the weekends become four-day treats because the Monday and the Friday will automatically be taken as holiday top of that there is Ascension (always a Thursday) plus Easter Monday and Whit Monday (or Pentecost). If the Church calendar obliges, an early Easter can combine with 1 or 8 May to provide not just a pont or bridge - meaning a four-day weekend spanning a Monday or Friday, but a veritable five or six-day viaduc (viaduct).November is another feast of feasts, with All Saints' on the first of the month and Armistice on the 11th offering relief from autumn blues. And on top of that, there are the famous "RTT" days, which many get in return for working more than the legal 35 hours a before we lapse into humorous self-satisfaction about "those incredibly lazy French and their God-given right to endless downtime", we need to bear in mind a couple of other far from the popular image, the French actually have fewer national holidays than the European average. France has 11, like Germany, the Netherlands and US. Slovakia has the most, with 15, and England, Wales, and the Netherlands have the fewest, with 8. Ireland and Denmark have according to the UK's Office for National Statistics, French productivity (output per worker) is 18% higher than the UK's, So any gloating about holidays from across the Channel is this is not the first time in recent years that France has proposed to axe national holidays. It has happened before – and worked (kind of).In 2003, the conservative government under President Jacques Chirac wanted to do something radical after the deadly heatwave of that summer which killed 15,000 Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin decided to turn Whit Monday into a Day of Solidarity. People would work instead of taking the day off, and the money gained by employers would be paid to the government for a fund to help the elderly and was an outcry, and a few years later the change was watered down so that now the Day of Solidarity is voluntary. It is all highly confusing, and no-one really understands how it functions, but non-Whit Monday still generates €3bn (£2.6bn; $3.5bn) every year in precedent goes back to the 1950s and Charles de Gaulle. Newly appointed as president, in 1959 he axed the 8 May Victory in Europe holiday, saying the country could not afford it. It was reinstated in 1981 by the Socialist François looks to scrap two holidays in bold bid to cut debtSo when on Tuesday the Greens accused Bayrou of trying to "wipe from the collective memory the eradication of Nazism", it was quite easy for minister Benjamin Haddad to retort: "Actually, it was De Gaulle who first did this, and I seem to recall he played a certain role in eradicating Nazism."None of this means that Bayrou is any the more likely to see his proposals become truth is that the prime minister is in a position of almost total impotence – running a government with no majority in parliament, which could fall at any minute if the opposition groups so in an odd way, this very powerlessness has given Bayrou the freedom to say what he thinks. If there is little likelihood of his budget proposals getting voted through the Assembly - and the chances are virtually zero - then he might as well give the French the unsugared economic situation is dire, he said. Every second that passes, France has €5,000 more debt. Today it stands at €3.3tn. In these circumstances, Bayrou believes maybe we need to re-think the way we live. And work.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
France and Italy refuse to join Trump's Ukraine weapons fund
France and Italy have refused to participate in Donald Trump's plan to send US-made weapons to Ukraine. Governments across Europe are pondering whether to take part in the $10bn initiative. It will involve Ukraine's allies on the continent, along with Canada, buying 'top of the range' weapons – including Patriot air defence systems – from Washington before giving them to Kyiv. But without the release of key details, some countries have yet to make a decision on whether to join the scheme, which was presented by Mr Trump and Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, in the Oval Office on Monday. France has told allies it will not join the initiative, according to officials briefed on the discussions. Paris is currently wrangling over its domestic budget and demands to boost its defence spending while navigating concerns over the country's growing debt pile. Emmanuel Macron has always favoured arming Ukraine with locally produced weapons to boost the EU's own industrial base and make the bloc less reliant on Washington for its defence. The Italian government has said it will not purchase weapons but could help with the logistics of transporting them to Ukraine, Italian media reported. 'Here there has never been talk of buying American weapons,' the source quoted by the La Stampa newspaper said. While the Czech Republic has not officially ruled itself out of the US initiative, its foreign minister told The Telegraph that 'no decisions' had been taken on whether to join. Jan Lipavský said: 'We are already participating in so many mechanisms that there is currently no discussion of new resources. But I cannot say it won't change because it's really too soon.' Prague already manages a coalition of 12 countries that contribute money to a pot to buy artillery shells for Ukraine. Last year, it donated around 1.5 million rounds to Kyiv's troops and it is planned to deliver more in 2025. There are dozens of similar programmes delivering everything from drones to fighter jets, which could make participation in a new scheme difficult for some countries. But Nato officials say at least eight countries have shown interest in joining the Trump-led pipeline. They will either contribute cash or donate their existing US-made equipment to Ukraine before being fast-tracked replacements by Washington. Germany is believed to be the nation most invested in the scheme. Friedrich Merz, its chancellor, proposed buying Patriot air defence batteries for Ukraine in a deal with the US president. Mr Rutte said the scheme would also involve missiles and other forms of ammunition being purchased from the Americans. British sources have told The Telegraph that they support the programme, but have not taken a decision on how to contribute with details yet to be shared with allies. Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Canada, and the Netherlands were also named as possible participants. Each of the countries' armed forces already operate US-manufactured equipment, from Patriots to fighter jets. It is understood that any money poured into the scheme will count towards Nato allies' new defence spending goal of 3.5 per cent, making it an attractive proposition for governments struggling to find money to reach the target.
