'Keir's second year can be better - but when he U-turns he needs to finish it'
But on the other, it's a hell of way for your political party to mark the one-year anniversary of a landslide election victory. And to double the fun, the two Labour MPs who are setting up a new left wing party appear to have an internal split already, because one reportedly announced it without telling the other. Oh, Jeremy Corbyn!
If that wasn't enough to make you pull a face about the general state of the Labour government, the chancellor was in tears this week, the PM admitted he doesn't read his speeches before he delivers them, and the parliamentary party just gave them both a £5bn headache that has rendered half their policies unreachable.
Every columnist in the country is picking through the Downing Street bins to assess what sort of a year it's been, but you already know that, because they've told you at least once already. So let's step back, and take a peer at the second year of Keir.
There will be no new donated suits, no Jeremy Corbyn (except on Question Time), and no money tree.
There will, judging from recent history, be an over-abundance of air miles, Nigel Farage, and lawsuits for the Ministry of Defence which will suck up all the pennies earmarked for tanks, drones and submarines.
We also won't be short of soundbites about "working people", despite the fact that children, pensioners, the chronically-ill, and the simply unemployed are full citizens deserving of their government's consideration and policy-making. There might even be tax rises. In fact, no, that one's nailed on.
But if I'm any judge, the main thing Labour will be doing next year is training the entire nation to enter the 2027 Forehead Smacking World Championships, a contest we haven't won since Brexit, and a title more often than not taken home by the idiot powerhouse of America.
What Keir needs to do is reshuffle his Cabinet, and clear out the top layer of Whitehall that instinctively blocks change. He needs to stop jetting around like the head of International Rescue, and get his head under the bonnet of the civil service to winkle out all the wingnuts.
He needs some hope, and more than anything he needs some achievements that sound and look and feel like the radical change he never promised, but everybody wants.
When he u-turns, he needs to finish it, not stop halfway and wriggle about a bit until the party or Reform give him a shove and he gets in a spin. More than anything he needs a bit of salesmanship. So when he raises taxes he previously promised he wouldn't, do it with a bit of zing. Sell it - 10% more from the 1% who have it all, talk about taxes as a patriotic investment in your own home. Strip every fleeing millionaire of their citizenship, and they'll soon stop whining.
And for all that he needs a storyteller, because he isn't one. Unless it's about tool-making, and as fairytales go that one's a bit short and he never gets past the first line before everyone's asleep. Whoever that job belongs to in Downing Street right now, they need to be kicked awake, bawled out, and sent to bed without any supper. And then someone with some zip needs to get the job.
Stop fleecing the sick, old, and disabled. Stop stalling on the Hillsborough Law. Stop delegating stuff that matters most to the country while trying to collect a complete set of summit tote bags. Stop delaying the inevitable, create a National Care Service NOW, and ditch all the reviews.
But above everything else, what Starmer really needs to do is stop letting the Downing Street machine filter everything out so that the bad news doesn't land on his desk until after it's become a catastrophe. That's the main reason he looks like he's lurching between disasters all the time. Foresight and forewarning are the key to a smooth run, and he is in dire need of both.
He can't carry on like this, because eventually the nation's hand, forehead or patience will simply erode. If that happens, Keir 2.0 will involve votes of no confidence, economic turmoil every time a female in his Cabinet looks less than chirpy, and Angela Rayner headlining at Glastonbury. Sometimes, a landslide turns out to be nothing more than sand: but mix it with cement, and you have the foundation for something better.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
41 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes
Rachel Reeves refused to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget, as she admitted the fallout over the Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging'. The Chancellor warned there would be 'costs to what happened', as she faced questions about how she would cover a shortfall left by the Downing Street climbdown on planned cuts to disability benefits. The Government saw off the threat of a major Commons defeat over the legislation on Tuesday, after shelving plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, with economists warning that tax rises are now likely to plug a gap left by the concessions to rebels. The fallout threatens to cause lasting damage to morale in Labour ranks, with some MPs calling for a reset in relations between the parliamentary party and the leadership before fractures widen. Images of the Chancellor crying in the Commons on Wednesday also spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, though a Treasury spokesman said the tears were the result of a personal matter and Downing Street said she would remain in post. In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Ms Reeves said she had never considered resigning, adding: 'I didn't work that hard to then quit.' She said she had gone to Prime Minister's Questions because she 'thought that was the right thing to do' but that 'in retrospect, I probably wished I hadn't gone in… (on) a tough day in the office'. Ms Reeves added: 'It's been damaging. 'I'm not going to deny that, but I think where we are now, with a review led by (disability minister) Stephen Timms, who is obviously incredibly respected and has a huge amount of experience, that's the route we're taking now.' Asked whether she would rule out tax rises now, she said to do so would be 'irresponsible' but warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Bill. Ms Reeves is said to have already told ministers that the decision to water down the welfare package means taxes will rise in the autumn. The Times reported she had warned Cabinet on Tuesday that the increases in her first budget, which included a £24 billion hike to employer national insurance, were 'painful' but 'the low-hanging fruit'.
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes
The Chancellor warned there would be 'costs to what happened', as she faced questions about how she would cover a shortfall left by the Downing Street climbdown on planned cuts to disability benefits. The Government saw off the threat of a major Commons defeat over the legislation on Tuesday, after shelving plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, with economists warning that tax rises are now likely to plug a gap left by the concessions to rebels. The fallout threatens to cause lasting damage to morale in Labour ranks, with some MPs calling for a reset in relations between the parliamentary party and the leadership before fractures widen. Images of the Chancellor crying in the Commons on Wednesday also spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, though a Treasury spokesman said the tears were the result of a personal matter and Downing Street said she would remain in post. In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Ms Reeves said she had never considered resigning, adding: 'I didn't work that hard to then quit.' She said she had gone to Prime Minister's Questions because she 'thought that was the right thing to do' but that 'in retrospect, I probably wished I hadn't gone in… (on) a tough day in the office'. Ms Reeves added: 'It's been damaging. 'I'm not going to deny that, but I think where we are now, with a review led by (disability minister) Stephen Timms, who is obviously incredibly respected and has a huge amount of experience, that's the route we're taking now.' Asked whether she would rule out tax rises now, she said to do so would be 'irresponsible' but warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Reeves is said to have already told ministers that the decision to water down the welfare package means taxes will rise in the autumn. The Times reported she had warned Cabinet on Tuesday that the increases in her first budget, which included a £24 billion hike to employer national insurance, were 'painful' but 'the low-hanging fruit'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the Government is still committed to welfare reform, but ministers will now wait for the conclusions of the Timms review before implementing changes to Pip.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
MPs back plans for ministers to ease pub last orders without Parliament debate
Under existing rules, Parliament must sign off on plans to ease licensing restrictions at a national level and extend last orders beyond the usual 11pm. But the Licensing Hours Extensions Bill, which has cleared the Commons at third reading, would let ministers effectively bypass a parliamentary debate. MPs could still 'pray against' the Government's decision-making, if they would like a debate or vote. Matt Turmaine said the move would allow ministers to process orders 'without using up valuable parliamentary time'. The Watford MP, speaking in place of Labour MP for Wrexham Andrew Ranger who tabled the Bill, said the move was 'about cutting red tape, red tape that produces unnecessary and time-consuming bureaucracy for the hospitality industry and local authorities for the simple matter of wanting to be able to open earlier or stay open later when occasions of special importance emerge, as they surely do'. Mr Turmaine, a Labour MP, said the Bill would make a 'very simple alteration' to the Licensing Act 2003. 'It is also extremely welcome that there has been broad support and consensus across the House regarding this,' he added. 'Whether that says something about parliamentarians and pints, I could not possibly say.' Mr Turmaine said the existing process, known as the affirmative procedure, 'is problematic when an order needs to be made at short notice'. The Home Office successfully used this procedure last month, when MPs agreed without opposition to let pubs and bars temporarily sell alcohol until 1am, if England or Wales – or both – reach the Uefa Women's Euros semi-finals or finals. Lionesses Ella Toone (left) and Alessia Russo (Bradley Collyer/PA) Both teams begin their Championship campaign on Saturday when the Lionesses face France and Wales will play the Netherlands. The semi-finals take place on July 22 and 23, with the final on July 27. Mr Turmaine had earlier told MPs: 'The negative procedure has the benefit of allowing licensing extensions to be made in the rare event that they are needed during parliamentary recess or at short notice.' He said: 'Special occasions such as World Cups, European Championships and royal weddings are times that live long in the memory of us all, even if we are enjoying the hospitality so enabled. 'And it is only right that our pubs and hospitality venues are given the opportunity to be a part of that experience when they do occur.' Home Office minister Seema Malhotra described a 'high degree of consensus' across the House, and added: 'I'm pleased to say that the Government fully supports it.' Mr Ranger's Bill was one of five to clear the Commons on Friday, alongside the Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill which would pave the way for a ban on imports of puppies and kittens under six months old, dogs and cats which are more than 42 days pregnant, and dogs and cats which have been mutilated. The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill would add llamas and alpacas to the list of farm animals which, if attacked by a dog in England and Wales, would see pet owners fined. It would also extend dog attack protections beyond agricultural land to roads and paths, where animals might be herded. Voters in Scotland and Wales edged closer to being able to apply for a proxy or postal vote online for devolved elections, bringing them in line with English electors, after MPs agreed to back the Absent Voting (Elections in Scotland and Wales) Bill. The Space Industry (Indemnities) Bill also cleared the Commons, which would see liability caps in the licences granted by the Civil Aviation Authority for spaceflight. They each face scrutiny in the Lords on later dates.
