logo
MPs back plans for ministers to ease pub last orders without Parliament debate

MPs back plans for ministers to ease pub last orders without Parliament debate

Glasgow Times4 days ago
Under existing rules, Parliament must sign off on plans to ease licensing restrictions at a national level and extend last orders beyond the usual 11pm.
But the Licensing Hours Extensions Bill, which has cleared the Commons at third reading, would let ministers effectively bypass a parliamentary debate.
MPs could still 'pray against' the Government's decision-making, if they would like a debate or vote.
Matt Turmaine said the move would allow ministers to process orders 'without using up valuable parliamentary time'.
The Watford MP, speaking in place of Labour MP for Wrexham Andrew Ranger who tabled the Bill, said the move was 'about cutting red tape, red tape that produces unnecessary and time-consuming bureaucracy for the hospitality industry and local authorities for the simple matter of wanting to be able to open earlier or stay open later when occasions of special importance emerge, as they surely do'.
Mr Turmaine, a Labour MP, said the Bill would make a 'very simple alteration' to the Licensing Act 2003.
'It is also extremely welcome that there has been broad support and consensus across the House regarding this,' he added.
'Whether that says something about parliamentarians and pints, I could not possibly say.'
Mr Turmaine said the existing process, known as the affirmative procedure, 'is problematic when an order needs to be made at short notice'.
The Home Office successfully used this procedure last month, when MPs agreed without opposition to let pubs and bars temporarily sell alcohol until 1am, if England or Wales – or both – reach the Uefa Women's Euros semi-finals or finals.
Lionesses Ella Toone (left) and Alessia Russo (Bradley Collyer/PA)
Both teams begin their Championship campaign on Saturday when the Lionesses face France and Wales will play the Netherlands.
The semi-finals take place on July 22 and 23, with the final on July 27.
Mr Turmaine had earlier told MPs: 'The negative procedure has the benefit of allowing licensing extensions to be made in the rare event that they are needed during parliamentary recess or at short notice.'
He said: 'Special occasions such as World Cups, European Championships and royal weddings are times that live long in the memory of us all, even if we are enjoying the hospitality so enabled.
'And it is only right that our pubs and hospitality venues are given the opportunity to be a part of that experience when they do occur.'
Home Office minister Seema Malhotra described a 'high degree of consensus' across the House, and added: 'I'm pleased to say that the Government fully supports it.'
Mr Ranger's Bill was one of five to clear the Commons on Friday, alongside the Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill which would pave the way for a ban on imports of puppies and kittens under six months old, dogs and cats which are more than 42 days pregnant, and dogs and cats which have been mutilated.
The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill would add llamas and alpacas to the list of farm animals which, if attacked by a dog in England and Wales, would see pet owners fined. It would also extend dog attack protections beyond agricultural land to roads and paths, where animals might be herded.
Voters in Scotland and Wales edged closer to being able to apply for a proxy or postal vote online for devolved elections, bringing them in line with English electors, after MPs agreed to back the Absent Voting (Elections in Scotland and Wales) Bill.
The Space Industry (Indemnities) Bill also cleared the Commons, which would see liability caps in the licences granted by the Civil Aviation Authority for spaceflight.
They each face scrutiny in the Lords on later dates.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government ‘sympathetic' to Post Office inquiry's 19 recommendations
Government ‘sympathetic' to Post Office inquiry's 19 recommendations

Western Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Government ‘sympathetic' to Post Office inquiry's 19 recommendations

The Government will respond 'properly' to Sir Wyn's recommendations by the inquiry's October 10 deadline, Gareth Thomas pledged at the despatch box. 'I cannot assuage the anger of the victims, nor will the anger I feel on their behalf ever be assuaged,' business minister Mr Thomas told the Commons. 'But we are determined to do more on redress and beyond, and to do it quickly, to give more of the victims of this appalling scandal, at least, a measure of the peace they so rightly deserve.' Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry chairman Sir Wyn published the first volume of his final report on Tuesday. He found a 'number of senior people' at the Post Office were aware the Legacy Horizon system was capable of error up until it was changed in 2010, with several employees also aware the updated system, Horizon Online, also had bugs and defects. Among his 19 recommendations in the report was that the Government and Post Office should make a public announcement about what they mean by 'full and fair redress'. Mr Thomas told MPs: 'Blameless people were impoverished, bankrupted, stressed beyond belief, lost their jobs, their marriages, their reputations, their mental health, in some cases lost their lives.' He added: 'To be clear, I am very sympathetic to Sir Wyn's 19 recommendations today. 'Clearly, a number of them require careful consideration.' Mr Thomas said the Government already accepts a recommendation that the 'best offer principle' should apply where claimants can receive money through the High Court Group Litigation Order (GLO) scheme. Claimants 'should be able to bank the best offer they get', Mr Thomas said, including if they disagree with their award and lodge an appeal with an independent panel. 'We will provide redress for family members of postmasters who suffered because of the scandal,' the minister continued. He said: 'Sir Wyn rightly recognises that designing a suitable compensation scheme for family members raises some very difficult issues. 'Nonetheless, we want to look after those family members who suffered most, meeting Sir Wyn's recommendation that we should give, and I quote, 'redress to close family members of the most adversely affected by Horizon'.' Mr Thomas later said: 'Sir Wyn argues that there should be a standing public body to deliver redress in any further scandal. I have a considerable amount of sympathy with that argument, but clearly we shall need to analyse the options fully before we commit to it. 'We will reflect on how to address those twin challenges, and will bring our conclusions back to the House.' Ian Byrne pressed the Government on Labour's manifesto pledge to bring forward a Hillsborough law, named after the 1989 stadium crush in Sheffield, which would place a legal duty of candour on public servants and authorities and provide legal aid for victims of disasters or state-related deaths. The Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby said: 'The publication of the report confirms the scale – the heartbreaking scale – of the human impact of this shocking miscarriage of justice.' He warned that the Post Office scandal 'follows a familiar pattern, where institutions deceive and distort because they put their reputations before truth and justice'. Mr Byrne, who has proposed his own Hillsborough law, having tabled the Public Authority (Accountability) Bill, asked: 'Does the minister agree that this report again shows why the Government must honour its pledge and promise to enact the Hillsborough law in full, and end this culture of cover-ups which does so much damage to the innocent victims' families and this country's reputation?' Mr Thomas replied: 'We need to see in full who was responsible for this disaster and why. 'Sir Wyn Williams's work in this regard is critical. We are awaiting his final report which will look at what happened and why it happened, and who was responsible, and that transparency will be hugely important in terms of helping the Post Office to learn the lessons from this appalling scandal, but for also the country as a whole to learn the lessons from the scandal. 'And if there are measures that we need to bring forward to make sure the Post Office is never in a position like this again, then we will certainly look to bring those forwards.' Conservative former minister Sir Andrew Mitchell said 'many' of his colleagues had raised Horizon redress 'for years' and added: 'It took the ITV drama of January 1 2024 (Mr Bates vs The Post Office) for the earth to move, which rather begs the question, what is the point of Parliament and its elected representatives?' He also asked: 'Isn't it about time that the institutions of the state got out the handcuffs and held the tax-funded villains who perpetrated this monstrous injustice to full and total account?' Mr Thomas said: 'Sir Wyn's further report will lay bare who is responsible, that and the work of the police. 'Their work is ongoing. There are 100 police officers working on this case. They are in touch with subpostmaster representatives and they have identified a series of people who are of interest to their inquiry.'

Wealth tax will penalise savers, Labour warned
Wealth tax will penalise savers, Labour warned

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Wealth tax will penalise savers, Labour warned

A wealth tax would punish savers and hit the middle class, the Government has been warned by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). Introducing a levy on the assets of the rich would not be 'sensible', the IFS said, in a rebuff to Labour backbenchers. Taxing the same wealth each year would 'penalise' people for saving and making investments, leaving the country poorer in the long run. It would also likely hit the middle classes once property and pension wealth are factored in, the think tank warned. 'It is difficult to make the case that an annual tax on wealth would be a sensible part of the tax system even in principle,' said Stuart Adam, a senior economist at IFS. No 10 repeatedly refused to rule out introducing a new levy on wealthy taxpayers on Monday after Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said the party was 'willing to explore' the idea. Some of Labour's biggest union paymasters have also called for the Government to introduce a 2pc tax on people's assets above £10m. A YouGov poll published on Tuesday found 75pc of the public supported the idea of a tax of 2pc on wealth above £10m. But the IFS cautioned that a range of countries had previously introduced a wealth tax but ultimately abandoned the policy, including Sweden, Finland and Luxembourg. 'International experience of annual wealth taxes is not encouraging,' Mr Adam said. 'There are strong reasons to radically reform how we currently tax the sources and uses of wealth; this includes reforming capital income taxes in order to properly tax high returns. An annual wealth tax would be a poor substitute for doing that.' 'Less attractive place to live' In a 2021 paper, the IFS concluded there were 'economically superior' ways of targeting the assets of the wealthy, including reforming capital gains tax. A new wealth levy would lead to a raid on Britain's middle class, the IFS warned. Mr Adam said: 'An annual wealth tax would need to apply broadly to all assets to ensure that it was not easy to avoid. Such a tax could raise significant revenue if it applied to the bulk of the UK's wealth – that would include the homes and pensions of the middle class.' The influential think tank also cautioned that trying to raise large amounts of revenue from only the very wealthy would make the country 'a less attractive place for those people to live'. The comments add to warnings from business chiefs that a new levy would drive people abroad and trigger a fresh exodus of the rich from Britain. Many wealthy residents are already moving abroad after Rachel Reeves scrapped non-dom status and introduced inheritance tax on overseas trusts earlier this year. Hotelier Sir Rocco Forte told The Telegraph earlier this week: 'Labour has already seen a huge exodus of wealthy people which is ongoing, with many more due to leave before the Budget. A wealth tax will further exacerbate the problem.' Growing Labour unrest Pressure to consider a wealth tax has been mounting after a series of costly U-turns by the Government that have left the Chancellor scrambling to find billions of pounds. Cabinet ministers have been told that the Chancellor will have to raise taxes in her autumn Budget. Last week's rebellion over the welfare cuts package has forced the Treasury to find new savings and emboldened hard-Left Labour backbenchers to push for more policy changes. A Treasury spokesman said: 'Tax decisions are taken at the Budget and, as you would expect, we are not going to comment on tax speculation. 'We have made our manifesto promises to protect working people and we took the decision last autumn to deliver the change the British people voted for.'

Trump questions why people are talking about ‘creep' Epstein - despite his push to release the files
Trump questions why people are talking about ‘creep' Epstein - despite his push to release the files

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump questions why people are talking about ‘creep' Epstein - despite his push to release the files

President Donald Trump criticized a reporter who asked about the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, questioning why there was any buzz around the disgraced financier just one day after the Justice Department revealed there was no 'client list.' When confronted with a question about Epstein during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, the president paused, expressing disbelief that 'people are still talking about this creep.' 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years,' Trump began. 'Are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable.' Trump promised to release the highly anticipated Epstein Files, among a trove of other documents in high-profile government investigations, to increase transparency. 'I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this, when we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. It just seems like a desecration,' Trump added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store