'Georgians deserve secure elections': Trump Administration to drop suit over election law
On Monday, the Department of Justice issued a news release detailing how they had been directed to dismiss a lawsuit from last year about a 2021 Georgia elections law. Here's what we know:
SB 202 a.k.a. the "Election Integrity Act of 2021" was signed into law following the 2020 presidential election which many Republicans have called into question. The law placed new restrictions on early and absentee voting, imposed stricter ID verification requirements on mail-in ballots, and shortened the window of time in which voters could request absentee ballots be sent to them.
Free tax services: Still need to file your tax return? University of Georgia will do it for free. Here's how
The law also capped the number of absentee ballot drop boxes to one per 100,000 residents, and removed a pandemic-era provision that allowed voters to access drop boxes outside of regular business hours. It also restricts third-party organizations from distributing absentee ballot applications and imposes a $100 penalty for each duplicate absentee ballot application sent to voters in Georgia.
The chief sponsor of the Election Integrity Act was Georgia Sen. Max Burns with its sponsor in the Georgia House being Barry Fleming. The law also had more than 20 other sponsors.
On Jan. 31, 2024, the DOJ, under President Joe Biden, filed a consolidated lawsuit called "In Re Georgia SB 202." The argument was that it intended to disenfranchise Black voters and failed to provide people with disabilities an equal opportunity to vote.
"Rather than celebrating Georgians' record-breaking turnout and success in conducting two secure elections in a span of two months, the Georgia General Assembly instead enacted Senate Bill 202 ... through a secretive and extremely accelerated legislative process, with little to no opportunity for public input or review," the lawsuit noted. "SB 202 directly and severely burdens Plaintiffs' core political speech, which includes communications and expressive activities aimed at encouraging voters to participate in the political process through absentee voting."
In the news release, Trump Administration officials said the Biden administration "fabricated an untrue narrative" around Georgia's election law and said officials at the time were "demonizing Georgians for political gain and triggering boycotts."
"Georgians deserve secure elections, not fabricated claims of false voter suppression meant to divide us," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. "Americans can be confident that this Department of Justice will protect their vote and never play politics with election integrity."
Gov. Brian Kemp said via X, "Despite the lies and misinformation from Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Stacey Abrams, and their allies, Georgia is one of the top states in the country for early voting and experienced record voter turnout in multiple elections since the passage of the Elections Integrity Act. I am grateful that under the leadership of [Attorney General Pamela Bondi] and [President Donald Trump], the DOJ has followed the truth: in Georgia, it is easy to vote and hard to cheat."
Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda Executive Director Helen Butler expressed her disappointment, saying the law does suppress votes and plans to pursue their own legal challenge.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said "This reaffirms that the Election Integrity Act stands on solid legal ground....Our commitment has always been to ensure fair and secure elections for every Georgian, despite losing an All-Star game and the left's boycott of Georgia as a result of commonsense election law."
April England-Albright, national legal director for Black Voters Matter, said "Just as Black people have historically stood firm against a weaponized and radicalized Department of Justice and continued to fight back to increase political and economic rights in this country....Our response to this and other harmful and egregious decisions from Trump's DOJ will be no different, and we will win."
Miguel Legoas is a Deep South Connect Team Reporter for Gannett/USA Today. Find him on X and Instagram @miguelegoas and email at mlegoas@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Athens Banner-Herald: DOJ to drop Biden-era lawsuit over Georgia election law
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's DoJ is demanding states hand over election information. Officials are wondering what they intend to do with it
The Department of Justice is on a mission to collect election information, including sensitive voter information, from states as part of President Donald Trump's executive order cracking down on voting accessibility – but it's left state officials concerned. Over the last three months, the DoJ's Voting Section has reached out to at least 15 states seeking their voter roll, information about individuals who may have violated federal voting laws, and questions about the state's process for identifying and removing ineligible voters, the Associated Press reported. Traditionally, the Voting Section's main focus is to protect citizens' right to vote, but under Trump's direction, it's cracking down on voter fraud – a rare occurrence that Trump has mischaracterized as a major problem in the United States. But some state officials have flagged concerns with the swath of information being requested, saying voter rolls contain private information about individuals and cannot be shared without congressional notification. Utah's Lieutenant Governor Deidre Henderson, the state's top election official, said she refused to provide expansive information on the state's 2.1 million voters to the DoJ. 'We've offered the public voter list. If they want protected data, there's a process for government entities to request it for lawful purposes,' Henderson told The Salt Lake Tribune. 'We'll address that if it comes,' she continued, 'but so far we haven't identified any federal or state statute that would justify handing over to the federal government the personal identifying information of 2.1 million Utah voters,' Henderson added. Officials in at least four California counties told the Associated Press that DoJ officials requested information about the number of people removed from rolls for being noncitizens, including their ID numbers, dates of birth, and voting records. Trump has sought to conduct the largest deportation of undocumented immigrants, in part by targeting individuals using government information. In Colorado, DoJ officials demanded the state hand over 'all records' pertaining to the 2024 election – a massive trove of documents that includes ballots and voting equipment information, as well as records retained from the 2020 election. Last year, the Colorado state Supreme Court tried to bar Trump from appearing on the presidential ballot, claiming he was ineligible because he violated the Fourteenth Amendment by inciting the January 6 attack on the Capitol. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of Trump, declaring that states did not have the authority to determine a federal candidate's eligibility. In Maine, Secretary of State Shenna Bellows said she was denying the DoJ's request for the state's voter registration list, the names of officials who maintain the list, and the number of ineligible voters due to noncitizenship status. Officials had sent multiple requests for information, one of which insinuated that Maine had an unusually high number of registered voters, the Maine Morning Star reported. 'The nature of these questions suggest that the DOJ is more interested in keeping people that they don't like from voting than promoting voter registration and participation,' Bellows told Maine Morning Star. Already, DoJ officials had spoken to Bellows about a potential 'information-sharing agreement' to provide the department with information on registered voters who are ineligible to vote. Similar requests were made to Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin. 'Why on Earth does the Department of Justice need the voter information from all 50 states?' Bellows asked. 'If Congress thought it was appropriate that there be a national voter file, Congress could have authorized the Department of Justice to do that, but they have not.' The DoJ's motivation in collecting such information appears to be to assist its efforts to identify and prosecute those who violate federal election laws. Trump has directed the attorney general and DoJ to collect election information from states to add extra safeguards to elections. Despite no evidence of mass voter fraud or noncitizen voting in the last several elections, Trump has continually claimed the 2020 election was rigged with mass voter fraud and that undocumented migrants voted in the 2024 election.
Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Texas Democrats Head to Chicago in Effort to Block Redistricting Map
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Democrats on Sunday departed from the Lone Star State and headed to Chicago in an effort to prevent their state legislature from holding a vote that would approve Republican-backed redistricting maps. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a Democrat, helped arrange for the trip during a meeting with the Texas caucus last month. He has directed his staff to assist the Texas lawmakers with any necessary support during their stay. Newsweek has reached out to Pritzker's office by email outside of normal business hours on Sunday. Why It Matters Historically, the party in the White House loses seats, and Republicans currently have a slim majority in both the U.S. House and Senate, giving Democrats hopes of retaking at least one of the houses of Congress in next year's midterms. Texas Republicans have sought to redraw the districting map in an effort to bolster nationwide party chances of retaining the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 midterm elections. Republicans in other states with significant battleground contests coming up have also looked to follow a similar path. What To Know More than 51 Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives departed the state on Sunday, aiming to deny the chamber a quorum and prevent passage of a proposed Republican map before a scheduled floor vote. The Texas House requires the presence of at least 100 of its 150 members to conduct business. With only 62 Democratic members in the chamber, their collective absence can halt legislative proceedings, according to the Associated Press. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, had called a special session to address the flooding that killed 135 people last month in Texas Hill Country and the redistricting plan, which would redraw congressional boundaries and could potentially increase Republican-held seats from 25 to as many as 30 out of Texas' 38 districts. The AP reported that Trump urged Texas Republicans to redraw the map. The map targets Democratic-leaning areas in cities such as Austin, Dallas, Houston, and regions in south Texas. Republican leaders advanced their proposal through committee on Saturday and scheduled a key floor vote for Monday, prompting the Democrats' walkout. Texas Democrats had pulled a similar move in 2021 in order to block new voting restrictions that the state legislature was trying to pass. However, Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows warned his colleagues across the aisle that should they deny his party a quorum, then "all options will be on the table." Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton echoed that sentiment, writing on X that the party should use "every tool at our disposal" to deal with the runaway Democrats. Existing House rules allow for the arrest and fining of members for breaking quorum, including proposed $500-per-day fines, although they may prove difficult to enforce while lawmakers remain outside Texas, where state jurisdiction does not apply, according to ABC News. Texas Representative Gene Wu speaks to border and immigrant advocates, community members, and civil rights organizations protesting against immigration bills outside of the John H. Reagan State Office Building in Austin on April 12, 2023. Texas Representative Gene Wu speaks to border and immigrant advocates, community members, and civil rights organizations protesting against immigration bills outside of the John H. Reagan State Office Building in Austin on April 12, 2023. Suzanne Cordeiro/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote on X on Sunday: "Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately. We should use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law." Texas state Representative Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, in a statement: "This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity. We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent." Democratic Party Chair Ken Martin in a statement said: "For weeks, we've been warning that if Republicans in Texas want a showdown—if they want to delay flood relief to cravenly protect Donald Trump from an inevitable midterm meltdown—then we'd give them that showdown. That's exactly what Texas Democrats did today: blowing up Republicans' sham special session that's virtually ignored the plight of flood victims in Kerr County." What Happens Next? Texas Republicans will attempt to find legal means of passing the proposed redistricting, though that may lead to a drawn-out legal battle. The U.S. Supreme Court is already reviewing a dispute over redistricting in Louisiana, and earlier this year overturned a lower court decision that ruled South Carolina's congressional map was unconstitutional. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
Chris Christie likens Trump to 'petulant child' over labor statistics chief's firing
Trump economic advisers defended the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the U.S. commissioner of Labor Statistics, elsewhere on television. WASHINGTON − Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called President Donald Trump's firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics chief "irresponsible" and likened his response to weaker-than-anticipated jobs numbers to "the action of a petulant child." The Trump ally turned critic said in an appearance on ABC News that the firing was classic Trump. "When he gets news he doesn't like, he needs someone to blame because he won't take the responsibility himself, and this is the action of a petulant child. Like, you give me bad news, I fire the messenger," Christie told "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos. Trump ordered the removal of Erika McEntarfer, the U.S. commissioner of Labor Statistics, on Aug. 1 after the Labor Department said the U.S. economy added a mere 73,000 jobs in July. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also revised down totals for May and June by a combined 258,000 jobs. The president accused McEntarfer, a 20-year veteran of the federal government appointed to the position by Biden, of politically driven data manipulation. He did not provide evidence for the charge. Trump said she would be replaced by "someone much more competent and qualified" in a Truth Social post announcing the firing. "Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes." President Trump orders firing: Labor statistics chief removed after weak jobs report He wrote in another post, 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' Christie invoked his eight years as New Jersey governor and said in his experience, "it would be almost impossible for anyone to try to rig these numbers because so many people are involved in putting them together." "All she's doing is being a conduit of the information," he said. "So it's irresponsible, from a position of facts, but it also shows you the way he manages." White House defends Labor Statistics chief's firing Trump economic advisers defended the president's decision elsewhere on television, with National Economic Council chair Kevin Hassett arguing on NBC News that the bureau needs a "fresh set of eyes." 'There have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder. And I think the most important thing for people to know is that it's the president's highest priority that the data be trusted and that people get to the bottom of why these revisions are so unreliable,' Hassett said on "Meet the Press." Trump also went on the attack, alleging in a post on Aug. 3 that McEntarfer "did the same thing just before" the 2024 presidential election − inflating and then revising down former President Joe Biden's jobs numbers. "I then won the Election, anyway, and she readjusted the numbers downward, calling it a mistake, of almost one million jobs. A SCAM!" he claimed. Revisions to monthly estimates are common, and in December 2024, the Labor Department said 15,000 fewer jobs were created in the month of November than its initial estimate. BLS said 7,000 more jobs than it projected were created in October. Trump appeared to be referencing an announcement BLS made in August 2024, three months before the election, when the agency reduced its estimate by 818,000 for jobs created between April 2023 and March 2024. It was the largest downgrade in 15 years. In an interview on CBS News' "Face the Nation," U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer did not repeat Trump's claim that the data was "rigged" but argued that "there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers" during last year's presidential campaign. "And so it sounds to me like the president has real concerns," he said in the interview that taped Aug. 1. "There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch." Contributing: Joey Garrison
