logo
Anthony Dolan, Speechwriter Who Gave Reagan ‘Evil Empire,' Dies at 76

Anthony Dolan, Speechwriter Who Gave Reagan ‘Evil Empire,' Dies at 76

New York Times18-03-2025
Anthony R. Dolan, who as Ronald Reagan's chief speechwriter deployed the phrase 'evil empire' in 1983 to describe the Soviet Union and in another address consigned Marxism and Leninism to 'the ash heap of history,' died on March 11 in Alexandria, Va. He was 76.
His death, in a hospital, was announced by Fred Ryan, the board chairman of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute, who said, 'Tony's ability to distill complex ideas into powerful, memorable speeches helped define the Reagan presidency and shaped the course of the Cold War.'
The cause was not specified.
Mr. Dolan was one of the youngest winners of a Pulitzer Prize in journalism. As a reporter for The Advocate in Stamford, Conn., he was 29 when he was awarded the prize in 1978 for local investigative specialized reporting, for a series of exposés of corruption in that city's municipal government and organized crime's infiltration of its police department.
After serving for eight years as a speechwriter in the Reagan White House, he was a special adviser to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and a senior adviser to Secretary of State Colin Powell during the administration of President George W. Bush. He was a White House special assistant during Donald J. Trump's first term, and in January was recruited as a special assistant by the president's Domestic Policy Council.
Mr. Dolan began his political career as a teenage volunteer in Barry Goldwater's 1964 presidential campaign. He went on to take jobs in three Republican administrations and was for a time a singer and lyricist of conservative folk songs. (His 'The New York Times Blues' parodies the paper as containing 'all the news that's fit to print, unless, of course, its anti-communist.')
In the White House, he was a dogged defender of President Reagan's blunt war of words against what Mr. Dolan saw as the ungodly Soviets. He resisted pressure from presidential advisers who, subscribing to realpolitik, wanted him to tone down his verbal assaults — including his hope that 'the march of freedom and democracy' would 'leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history.'
'Evil empire' and 'ash heap,' both derived from earlier iterations ('Star Wars' and Leon Trotsky among them) survived into final drafts thanks to Mr. Dolan. He also oversaw the speech his assistant, Peter Robinson, wrote in which Mr. Reagan, at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin in 1987, challenged the Soviet leader: 'Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.'
In a video tribute to Mr. Dolan, Mr. Robinson recalled a tug of war between 'the true believers vs. the pragmatists — and the true believers were the speechwriters and Ronald Reagan.'
Several mentions of 'evil' were deleted from drafts of the 'ash heap' speech that Mr. Dolan wrote for delivery to the British Parliament in 1982. But he persisted in using the word, and he triumphed the following year when, in March, Mr. Reagan addressed the National Association of Evangelicals, who were divided between antiwar Quakers and anti-communist conservatives.
Mr. Reagan urged his audience to 'beware the temptation of pride, the temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all,' which, he warned, would be 'to ignore the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire.'
'With some nifty footwork, Dolan finally managed to get Reagan to deliver the speech he wanted,' Simon Lancaster, a British speechwriter, recalled in 'You Are Not Human: How Words Kill' (2018), 'deploying that age-old speechwriter tactic of circulating the draft at the very last minute, so no one has any time to comment.'
Natan Sharansky, who was imprisoned at the time, later wrote that he and fellow Soviet dissidents were ecstatic. 'Finally,' he wrote in The Washington Post in 2000, 'the leader of the free world had spoken the truth — a truth that burned inside the heart of each and every one of us.'
David Gergen, who was Mr. Reagan's communications director, wrote in his book 'Eyewitness to Power': 'I hate to admit it, but it's true: History has shown that Tony Dolan was right and I was wrong. That phrase, the evil empire, allowed Reagan to speak truth to totalitarianism.'
And Vince Haley, the director of Mr. Trump's Domestic Policy Council, and several other speechwriters wrote in Real Clear Politics this week, 'Dolan channeled Reagan's moral and intellectual arguments that framed the U.S.S.R. not simply as a competitor but as an aggressive force of evil in the world.'
Anthony Rossi Dolan was born on July 7, 1948, in Norwalk, Conn., to Joseph and Margaret (Kelley) Dolan. His father was a store manager.
Mr. Dolan was a Roman Catholic who attended Mass daily and a fierce anti-communist. In a eulogy for his sister, Maiselle Shortley, last year, he told a story from when he was 6 years old:
'My mother took a course on communism downtown at St Mary's Church from Louis Budenz, former Soviet operative and editor of The Daily Worker, who had become a Catholic and Fordham professor. She took Budenz's talks to heart about communism's global menace. 'I used to wonder if you kids would even have a country to grow up in,' she would say.'
Mr. Dolan kept a book that Mr. Budenz had inscribed to his mother.
Mr. Haley said in an interview, 'Tony didn't just condemn communism in the speeches he helped craft; he rallied souls to a positive conception of freedom of God with man.'
After graduating from Fairfield College Preparatory School in Connecticut, where he was class president, Mr. Dolan majored in philosophy and history at Yale University and graduated with a bachelor's degree in 1970. He served in the U.S. Army as a specialist 4.
Mr. Dolan was the deputy press secretary in James L. Buckley's 1970 campaign for the United States Senate in New York, worked for F. Clifton White & Associates as a political consultant and was a reporter for The Advocate from 1974 to 1980.
He was a protégé of William F. Buckley Jr., the founder and editor in chief of The National Review, who importuned William J. Casey, manager of the Reagan-Bush campaign in 1980, to hire Mr. Dolan as a speechwriter and a research director. He joined the White House staff in March 1981, becoming chief speechwriter and an assistant to the president.
He played a role in drafting the administration's crackdown on organized crime and was an adviser to U.S. delegations to UNESCO in 1984 and the United Nations disarmament conference in 1988.
Mr. Dolan advised the campaigns of Fred Thompson, Newt Gingrich and Ted Cruz for the Republican presidential nominations of 2008, 2012 and 2016. He had a communications strategy firm and was an essayist on political affairs. In Washington, he was a frequent customer of Cafe Milano and Martin's Tavern, favorite political hangouts.
His closest survivor is a nephew, Robert A. Shortley. In addition to his sister, Ms. Shortley, a brother, John Terrence Dolan, known as Terry, a founder and chairman of the National Conservative Political Action Committee, died in 1986.
Mr. Dolan paid tribute to Mr. Reagan long after his presidency ended and well after his death in 2004. In 2023, speaking at the Victims of Communism Museum in Washington on the 40th anniversary of the 'evil empire' speech, Mr. Dolan said, 'Freedom had triumphed over tyranny due in large measure to President Ronald Reagan, who summed up his strategy with four simple words: 'We win, they lose.''
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Before the attacks, Senate candidates seek to define themselves in Kentucky
Before the attacks, Senate candidates seek to define themselves in Kentucky

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea minute ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Before the attacks, Senate candidates seek to define themselves in Kentucky

CALVERT CITY, Ky. (AP) — Three Republicans competing to succeed longtime Sen. Mitch McConnell tried to define themselves before the political attacks that could come Saturday when they share the spotlight at the Fancy Farm picnic, a daunting rite of passage for candidates seeking statewide office in Kentucky. 'You're going to hear some barbs tomorrow, but what I want to focus on is my vision for serving in the United States Senate,' Daniel Cameron, one of the candidates, told a GOP crowd Friday evening. Cameron's rivals in next year's Senate primary — U.S. Rep. Andy Barr and businessman Nate Morris — used their speeches at the event to introduce themselves to Republican voters in western Kentucky. All three could shift into attack mode against each other Saturday afternoon at the Fancy Farm picnic — the Bluegrass State's premier political event. Politicians compete to land the sharpest — and sometimes most outlandish — barbs, and have to endure shouting and heckling from their rivals' supporters. The picnic could turn into a Republican skirmish since Democratic politicians are mostly skipping the event. McConnell, the longest-serving Senate party leader in U.S. history, revealed in February, on his 83rd birthday, that he won't seek another term in Kentucky and will retire when his current term ends. His pending retirement has set up a fierce competition for his seat. Warming up for their appearance that will air on statewide TV at Fancy Farm, the three GOP rivals kept to one script they've all shared — lavishing praise on Republican President Donald Trump. Barr portrayed his congressional experience as an advantage that sets him apart. He represents a district stretching from central Kentucky's bluegrass region to the Appalachian foothills. 'I'm an 'America First' fighter in the United States Congress," Barr said Friday night. 'Other people like to talk about being a Trump guy or being with Trump. I've been with President Trump from day one. I'm not just talking about supporting President Trump. I've done it. I'm continuing to do it.' Giving voters a glimpse into his political philosophy, Barr said: 'I'm a guy who was raised in the era of Ronald Reagan. I believe in limited government, free enterprise and a strong national defense.' Morris, a tech entrepreneur, portrayed himself as a populist and a political outsider while trying to attach himself to Trump's popularity in Kentucky. 'What we've seen with this president is that he has put emphasis back on the American worker," Morris said Friday night. "And the people that have been in Washington for all this time -- the elites – they sold out the American worker.' Morris also touted his hardline stance on immigration. He said he supports a moratorium on immigration into the United States until every immigrant currently in the country illegally is deported. Cameron, who is Black, used his speech to rail against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. 'We don't need … an America built on DEI," Cameron said. "We need a country that's built on MEI – merit, excellence and intelligence.' Cameron entered the Senate campaign with one clear advantage — a higher statewide name recognition than his rivals. Cameron served one term as state attorney general and lost to Democrat Andy Beshear in the 2023 governor's race. 'You've been with us in the past," Cameron told the GOP group Friday night. "I hope that you'll be with us this time. We're going to get it done because we know that what happens in this seat will have reverberations across this country.'

Sliwa: ‘I'll let voters decide if NYC should be a sanctuary city' if elected mayor
Sliwa: ‘I'll let voters decide if NYC should be a sanctuary city' if elected mayor

New York Post

timea minute ago

  • New York Post

Sliwa: ‘I'll let voters decide if NYC should be a sanctuary city' if elected mayor

Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa will have voters decide whether the Big Apple should remain a sanctuary city if he's elected mayor. 'I'll put the issue where it belongs – in the hands of New Yorkers,' the Guardian Angels founder told The Post about the city's controversial designation that helps criminal migrants avoid deportation. Former Mayor de Blasio and his left-wing comrades on the City Council pushed through a series of policies in 2014 and 2018 that help criminal migrants avoid deportation by severely limiting the NYPD's and city Correction and Probation departments' ability to cooperate with the feds. Mayor Adams last week insisted he can't issue an executive order to roll back the law because he'd likely be overridden by state pols – even as the Trump administration amped up pressure with a new lawsuit targeting the pro-criminal migrant policies. 3 Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa is vowing have voters decide whether the Big Apple should remain a sanctuary city if he wins November's general election. Bruce Cotler/ZUMA / However, Adams has refused to direct two separate Charter Revision Commissions he appointed to put a referendum question on the ballot to determine whether the city should repeal or roll back the sanctuary policies or keep them as is. 'Eric Adams talks a big game . . . but twice he had the chance to let New Yorkers decide on sanctuary city laws through the ballot, and twice he refused. As mayor, I will convene a Charter Revision Commission and put real issues like sanctuary city laws and whether Rikers should be closed before the people.' 3 A migrant is detained by federal immigration officers last week at U.S. immigration court in Manhattan. REUTERS Sliwa is ranked either third or fourth in most recent mayoral polls, behind Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Adams and Cuomo, both Dems, are running as independents because Mamdani is the Democratic nominee. 3 Adams has refused to direct two separate Charter Revision Commissions he appointed to put a referendum question on the ballot to determine whether to repeal or roll back the sanctuary policies or keep them as is. Michael Nigro Adams' campaign didn't return messages.

Republicans Might Regret Putting Emil Bove on the Bench
Republicans Might Regret Putting Emil Bove on the Bench

Atlantic

time2 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Republicans Might Regret Putting Emil Bove on the Bench

Donald Trump got his man. On Tuesday, the Senate voted to confirm Emil Bove, the president's former criminal-defense lawyer, to a lifetime appointment as a federal judge on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. During his brief tenure as a top Justice Department official, Bove behaved like someone who still believed that the president was his client: directing political purges, pushing out employees who refused to carry out unethical orders, and allegedly urging subordinates to defy court rulings that constrained Trump's agenda. But Trump and his allies might come to regret appointing such a transparent partisan to the federal bench. A few weeks ago, a group of former Justice Department lawyers, including me, asked to meet with Republican senators to discuss the Bove nomination. We all had worked on prosecutions related to January 6; several members of the group were among the roughly two dozen lawyers whom Bove had fired for precisely that reason. Our argument was that even Republican senators eager to push the judiciary to the right should, out of their own self-interest, vote against confirming Bove. Unfortunately, staff for just one senator, Chuck Grassley, agreed to meet with us. Most offices never even responded. Because they were unwilling to hear us in private, I will make our argument in public. Quinta Jurecic: Emil Bove is a sign of the times Since he first took office, in 2017, Trump has maintained the support of Senate Republicans in part through a simple bargain: They put up with his obvious unfitness for office, and in exchange, he appoints reliably conservative judges to the federal courts. But by appointing Bove—whose only apparent loyalty is to his own ambition, not to any particular legal philosophy—the GOP might have limited its own ability to appoint judges in the future. This is because the president typically gets to appoint new judges only when old ones die, retire, or move into the quasi-retirement position of 'senior status.' And some judges, even conservative ones who would otherwise be happy to let a Republican president pick their replacement, are likely to delay their retirement rather than hand Trump the opportunity to make more Bove-style appointments. The evidence suggests that this is already happening. Many federal judges time their retirement based on which party is in power: Democrat-appointed judges are likelier to retire when a Democrat is president, Republican-appointed judges when a Republican is. So far through Trump's second term, however, conservative judges aren't retiring at the pace they typically do. An analysis by Bloomberg Law found that 26 judicial seats opened up from the beginning of the year through the first five months of Trump's first term, as did 57 judicial seats during the same period of Joe Biden's presidency. By contrast, through June 1 of his second term, Trump gained just 16 vacancies to fill. Ursula Ungaro, a retired judge appointed by George W. Bush, told Bloomberg Law that she'd heard a 'hint or two' that her former peers 'would stay beyond their eligibility for senior status to see what happens toward the end of the Trump administration.' From the October 2024 issue: The judges who serve at Trump's pleasure Even before Bove's appointment, then, judges seem to have been worried about the type of person Trump would appoint to replace them. During Trump's first term, they had likely been assuaged by the fact that the president relied on leaders of the conservative legal movement, especially the Federalist Society's Leonard Leo, to help make his judicial picks. No longer. Frustrated that judges he appointed have occasionally ruled against his administration, Trump now calls Leo a 'real 'sleazebag'' who 'probably hates America.' The president evidently feels free to pick his own judges, and he is picking people like Bove. Bove is not the kind of lawyer that a traditionally conservative judge would want to be replaced by. He oversaw a purge of January 6 prosecutors despite the fact that he had once eagerly worked on January 6 cases himself. He pushed out career lawyers who refused to go along with an obviously unethical order to drop the corruption prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams. And, according to two whistleblowers, he urged government lawyers to ignore a federal court order halting deportation flights. Bove allegedly told subordinates that they would need to consider telling judges 'fuck you' if courts ordered the government to stop. As a practicing lawyer and former prosecutor, I find this astonishing. I have never heard a colleague or opposing counsel propose to ignore a court order; it runs counter to our entire profession. For judges who care about the rule of law, even very conservative ones, Bove's conduct offers a reason to reconsider retirement. Senate Republicans should keep that in mind the next time Trump nominates someone like him to the federal bench.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store