Wife of North Korea's Kim Jong Un Reemerges With Luxury Handbag
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's wife, Ri Sol Ju, reemerged in public Tuesday after a year and a half out of the spotlight, joining him and their daughter, Ju Ae, at a lavish completion ceremony for a beach resort on the poverty-stricken nation's east coast.
Ri, who was last seen in state media photos on January 1, 2024, was pictured carrying what appears to be a handbag made by Italian luxury brand Gucci.
Why It Matters
Luxury good exports to North Korea are banned under United Nations sanctions targeting Pyongyang's nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Nonetheless, such items reportedly make their way into the country via diplomatic pouches, which are exempt from customs inspection under international law.
Kim Jong Un's taste for luxury is well documented, from expensive watches and cars to private jets. His close ally, Russian President Vladimir Putin, even gifted him a Russian-made limousine after Kim took a liking to the vehicle during his 2023 visit to the country.
Newsweek reached out to the North Korean embassy in China via emailed request for comment.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, center, daughter Ju Ae, left, and wife Ri Sol Ju, far left, are seen during the completion ceremony for the Wonsan Kalma beach resort in North Korea on June...
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, center, daughter Ju Ae, left, and wife Ri Sol Ju, far left, are seen during the completion ceremony for the Wonsan Kalma beach resort in North Korea on June 24, 2025. More
Korean Central News Agency
What To Know
Ri's handbag appeared to be a Gucci GG Marmont shoulder bag, which retails for over $2,000.
After the regime's move in late 2023 to raise official wages tenfold, the average worker now earns about 30,000 North Korean won—less than $4—per month, analysts say.
Retail prices in North Korea are low but analysts say most citizens cannot survive on state salaries alone and must rely on informal or black market work to make ends meet.
1 of 2
While Ju Ae—widely believed to be Kim's chosen successor—now frequently appears alongside her father, Ri's reemergence may be part of efforts to showcase the new Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Area on the Kalma Peninsula.
Kim declared that Wonsan Kalma would "shine as a world-level tourist resort," the first of several "paradises" planned around the country, according to the Korean Central News Agency.
State media called the ceremony a "great auspicious event" in a press release.
The tourist zone's hotels can accommodate nearly 20,000 guests and it boasts a range of facilities, restaurants and sea bathing. These features, KCNA said, "offer all year round the real taste of the east coast, presenting a wonderful picture of a 4 kilometer (2.5-mile)-long stretch of beach to be crowded with people every year."
Moscow's ambassador and other officials from the Russian mission in the country attended the ceremony as special guests, per the outlet.
What People Are Saying
Rachel Minyoung Lee, a non-resident fellow with the 38 North program at the Stimson Center, told CNN: "Wonsan-Kalma is open to just North Koreans for now, but we should not be surprised to see Russians at the resort in the not-too-distant future.
"More broadly, the opening of a major beach resort like Wonsan-Kalma helps to reinforce the state media narrative of Kim's people-first policy and helps to balance out his greater focus on building up national defense,"
What's Next
The resort will open to domestic tourists on July 1, according to KCNA. However, tour operators cited by the BBC believe Wonsan Kalma is primarily geared toward visitors from Russia.
Russians are currently the only foreign nationals permitted in certain areas of North Korea, as the two countries continue to deepen their ties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
10 minutes ago
- UPI
G-7 agrees to exclude U.S. companies from 15% minimum tax
Leaders of the G-7 nations pose for a photo in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, on Monday: (from left) Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, U.S. President Donald Trump, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The G-7 announced the U.S. would be excluded from the 15% minimum tax on American companies. Photo via G7/UPI | License Photo June 29 (UPI) -- Group of Seven nations agreed to exempt U.S. companies from a 15% minimum corporate tax rate, the countries said in a joint statement. The nonbinding deal was announced Saturday but still requires approval from the 38-member Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development that established the 2021 agreement on taxing companies. G-7 nations are part of the OECED. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had proposed a "side-by-side solution" for American-headquartered companies that would be exempt from the Income Inclusion Rule and Undertaxed Profits Rule "in recognition of the existing U.S. minimum tax rules to which they are subject." The massive spending bill now being considered in Congress originally included a "revenge tax" that would have imposed a levy of up to 20% on investments from countries that taxed U.S. companies. "I have asked the Senate and House to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill," Bessent wrote in a multi-post thread on X on Thursday. The House has approved the massive legislation and the Senate is considering it. "It is an honorable compromise as it spares us from the automatic retaliations of Section 899 of the Big, Beautiful Bill," Italian Finance Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti told local media. "We are not claiming victory, but we obtained some concessions as the U.S. pledged to engage in OECD negotiations on fair taxation," an unnamed French official told Politico Europe. The official called the "revenge tax" a potentially "huge burden for French companies." Trump has criticized this provision because he said it would limit sovereignty and send U.S. tax revenues to other countries. "The Trump administration remains vigilant against all discriminatory and extraterritorial foreign taxes applied against Americans," Bessent wrote Thursday. Trump has imposed a July 9 deadline for U.S. trading partners to lower taxes on foreign goods, threatening high duties on the worst offenders, including 50% on goods from the 27 European Union members. In April, a baseline tariff was imposed on most U.S. trading partners, with higher rates on certain companies and products. In 2021, nearly 140 countries agreed to tax multinational companies at the 15% minimum, regardless of where they were headquartered. In late April, the European Union, Britain, Japan and Canada agreed to exempt the United States from the 15% minimum tax on companies. "Delivery of a side-by-side system will facilitate further progress to stabilize the international tax system, including a constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy and on preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries," the joint statement read. The agreement, according to the statement, would ensure that any substantial risks identified "with respect to the level playing field, or risks of base erosion and profit shifting, are addressed to preserve the common policy objectives of the side-by-side system." The G-7 includes Britain, France, Germany, Italy in Europe, as well as Canada, Japan and U.S. Before 2014, the group was known as the G-8 until Russia was expelled after annexing the Crimea region of Ukraine. The chairs of the House and Senate committees responsible for tax policy cheered the agreement. "We applaud President Trump and his team for protecting the interests of American workers and businesses after years of congressional Republicans sounding the alarm on the Biden Administration's unilateral global tax surrender under Pillar 2," Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, and Missouri Rep. Jason Smith, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a press release. The agreement also, however, has its critics. "The U.S. is trying to exempt itself by arm-twisting others, which would make the tax deal entirely useless," Markus Meinzer, director of policy at the Tax Justice Network, told Politico Europe. "A ship with a U.S.-sized hole in its hull won't float."
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Children of Deportees Should 'Go With the Parents'—Senator Mullin
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Markwayne Mullin, an Oklahoma Republican, said on Sunday during an interview appearance on NBC News' Meet the Press that children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants should "go where their parents are" if those parents are deported. Why It Matters President Donald Trump has pledged to carry out the largest mass deportation effort in U.S. history as part of his aggressive immigration agenda. On Friday, a 6-3 ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court ended the use of nationwide injunctions by federal judges, clearing the way for President Trump's restrictions on automatic U.S. citizenship to take effect in some states while remaining blocked in others, as injunctions issued by more than 20 states remain in place. In states without active injunctions, Trump's policy could take effect 30 days after the Court's ruling. The ruling did not decide whether an executive order from Trump—which seeks to deny U.S. citizenship to children born on American soil to illegal immigrants—is constitutional. What To Know During an interview appearance on Sunday, Meet the Press' host Kristen Welker asked Mullin if he thought babies who are born in the U.S. to undocumented parents should be deported in light of the recent Court ruling. The Republican responded that there's "a whole industry" dedicated to having undocumented mothers gain birthright citizenship for their children. "There's a whole industry that stood up to bring people here in their last month of pregnancy to have a child here, and they come here on a vacation visa, and they have a child so their child will be able to be U.S. citizens," Mullin said. "It's a whole industry. You know it, and I know it. What we're trying to do is end those that are gaming the system. That's exactly what's happening." Welker then asked, "Should those babies be deported with their parents, senator? Are you saying those babies should be deported with their parents?" Mullin defended his position by saying, "They should go where their parents are. Why wouldn't you send a child with their parents? Why would you want to separate them? I wouldn't want to be separated from my kid. And no parent should want to be separated from their kids. So, when their parents are deported, though, then the child should most definitely go with the parents." The uncertain legal status of Trump's executive order has left immigrants, advocacy groups, and lawmakers questioning how new policies will be enforced and what the consequences will be for U.S.-born children of undocumented parents. Birthright citizenship, guaranteed by the 14th Amendment since the post-Civil War era, remains a central issue in America's ongoing debate over immigration and national identity. The law has been interpreted since 1898 to guarantee U.S. citizenship to nearly all individuals born within the country's territory, except for very specific exceptions such as children of diplomats. The Trump administration has argued that children of those in the country illegally are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. and therefore should not be entitled to citizenship. Opponents and legal scholars maintain that the plain meaning and historical intent of the 14th Amendment protect those children's citizenship, and federal courts have repeatedly ruled against the Trump administration's interpretation. Senator Markwayne Mullin, an Oklahoma Republican, speaks with reporters following a vote in the U.S. Capitol on June 27 in Washington, D.C. Senator Markwayne Mullin, an Oklahoma Republican, speaks with reporters following a vote in the U.S. Capitol on June 27 in Washington, D.C. Photo byWhat People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday: "GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard. It had to do with the babies of slaves (same year!), not the SCAMMING of our Immigration process." Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Immigrants' Rights Project, in a press release: "The executive order is blatantly illegal and cruel. It should never be applied to anyone. The court's decision to potentially open the door to enforcement is disappointing, but we will do everything in our power to ensure no child is ever subjected to the executive order." U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, writing on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday: "Today, the Supreme Court instructed district courts to STOP the endless barrage of nationwide injunctions against President Trump. This would not have been possible without tireless work from our excellent lawyers @TheJusticeDept and our Solicitor General John Sauer." Professor Samuel Bray previously told Newsweek in a statement: "Given that the birthright-citizenship executive order is unconstitutional, I expect courts will grant those preliminary injunctions, and they will be affirmed on appeal. I do not expect the President's executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect. Today's decision is a vindication and reassertion of the proper role of the federal courts in our constitutional system." What Happens Next? As of this ruling, the fate of birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants remains unresolved, with further legal proceedings expected.
Newsweek
38 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ted Cruz Slams Glastonbury Festivalgoers Chanting 'Death to the IDF'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Ted Cruz has criticized crowds at Glastonbury Festival for chanting "Death to the IDF" during one of the performances. Festivalgoers at the British music event were led in the chant, referring to the Israel Defense Forces, during rap duo Bob Vylan's set. Cruz posted a segment of the set to X, formerly Twitter, saying: "This is the base of the Democrat Party." He said in a follow-up post that he realized the video was filmed in England, adding: "They are the very same antisemitic zealots as the American anti-Israel Left—to whom the Democrat Party is utterly beholden." Bob Vylan and the DNC have been contacted via email for comment. The flag of Palestine is waved at Glastonbury Festival in Worthy Farm on June 28, 2025, in Somerset, England. Inset: Ted Cruz during a Senate Committee on the Judiciary hearing on June 18, 2025, in... The flag of Palestine is waved at Glastonbury Festival in Worthy Farm on June 28, 2025, in Somerset, England. Inset: Ted Cruz during a Senate Committee on the Judiciary hearing on June 18, 2025, in Washington, D.C. More Main: Scott A Garfitt, Inset: Rod Lamkey, Jr/Main: Invision/AP, Inset: AP Photo Why It Matters Glastonbury Festival's organizers had already faced criticism for allowing Irish-language rap group Kneecap to perform, after one of its members was charged under the U.K.'s Terrorism Act with supporting a proscribed organization for allegedly waving a Hezbollah flag at a concert in London in November. Although the festival has said people are free to express their political beliefs at the event, organizer Emily Eavis spoke out against the "Death to the IDF" chant, saying it "very much crossed a line." It is unclear how many, if any, crowd members at the event in Somerset, South West England, are supporters of the Democratic Party. The party and its leadership have been supportive of Israel since the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023. What To Know A festivalgoer holds a newspaper that reads "Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! Palestine No Solution But Liberation" during Kneecap's set at Glastonbury Festival on June 28, 2025, in Somerset, England. A festivalgoer holds a newspaper that reads "Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! Palestine No Solution But Liberation" during Kneecap's set at Glastonbury Festival on June 28, 2025, in Somerset, England. Scott A Garfitt/Invision/AP Nearly 4,000 acts perform at Glastonbury to approximately 200,000 festivalgoers over a five-day stretch. Bob Vylan's set was not the only one to involve messaging around the war in Gaza. The BBC did not provide a livestream for Kneecap's performance as member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh is currently on bail under the terrorism charges. Eavis posted a statement to social media about the chants at the Bob Vylan set, saying: "As a festival, we stand against all forms of war and terrorism - we will always believe in - and actively campaign for - hope, unity, peace and love." Senator Cruz's comments about "antisemitic zealots" allegedly forming the base of the Democratic Party come just days after pro-Palestinian candidate Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic primary to be mayor of New York. Mamdani's advocacy for Palestinians has been labeled antisemitic by some, including Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the Anti-Defamation League. Other Jewish politicians and New Yorkers have pointed to Mamdani's pledge to increase anti-hate crime spending in the city, including funds to protect synagogues and Jewish schools. Brad Lander, a Jewish New Yorker and fellow candidate for mayor, cross-endorsed Mamdani, telling a crowd on primary night: "Our safety, our hopes and our freedoms are bound up together, don't get it twisted." Nationwide, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris received 79 percent of the Jewish vote in the 2024 election. What People Are Saying Senator Ted Cruz, on X: "Truly sick. Thousands of people screaming "Death to the IDF. This is the base of the Democrat Party." "Lots of comments saying this is in England. True. These are the looney British anti-Israel Left. They are the very same antisemitic zealots as the American anti-Israel Left—to whom the Democrat Party is utterly beholden." Glastonbury Festival organizer Emily Eavis on Instagram: "We are appalled by the statements made from the West Holts stage by Bob Vylan yesterday. Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence." What Happens Next Avon and Somerset police are investigating the Bob Vylan incident to see if a criminal offense was committed.
