
Suspect sought after Pride flag stolen three times
Windsor police have confirmed a Pride flag has been stolen from a Moy Avenue home three times. CTV Windsor's Chris Campbell has more.
Windsor police are asking for the public's help identifying a suspect after three separate thefts of a Pride flag at the same home — incidents the victim said have left her family feeling unsafe and targeted.
Officers were first called to a residence in the 200 block of Moy Avenue on May 2 after an unknown male approached the front porch and tore down the home's Pride flag, breaking the flagpole in the process.
A similar theft occurred on June 13, when police said a second flag was stolen from the same property.
The resident, who asked to remain anonymous out of fear for her family's safety, told CTV News the repeated incidents are 'devastating' noting it happened another time within the last year in July 2024.
'I was just devastated. I don't understand. I don't understand how us doing something as simple as flying a flag can interfere with somebody else's life to the point that they need to damage our property and make a mockery of it,' she said.
The woman, who identifies as queer, said at least two of her five children also identify within the 2SLGBTQIA+ community and that the flag was meant to be a symbol of pride and acceptance for her household.
'The number one reason to fly the Pride flag for me is because I identify as a queer individual. I, like I said, have five children, and at least two of them identify in some way. The others are maybe a little too young to identify at this point. It's important to me because I see every single day the hate and the ugliness that people all over the world deal with,' she said.
The repeated thefts have caused the family to question their safety and whether they're being watched.
'They already face bullying in the public school. My concern is did somebody follow them home? Did somebody follow my teenager to school? They're showing us that we're not welcome, that we're not equal. It's ugly. It's unnecessary,' she said.
'And I can't imagine raising my children to think that they're better than anybody else for something that they believe or don't believe.'
The woman explained Windsor police have cautioned her against hanging the flag again, citing a risk of escalation.
'The overwhelming urge to kind of hang it and give the proverbial 'F.U.', it's strong. But Windsor police, my mom, everybody is telling me the window is going to get broken next, and then what? After that it gets more and more violent each time, right?' she said.
'We don't really know where we're at with hanging it. I would fly the flag year-round if it would be left up on my porch. It's not just a June thing, you know? But it is what it is. I don't know yet if we're going to put up another flag.'
She said police acknowledged the issue is ongoing in the city, though it's not always reported.
'The police have shared that with me that it's an ongoing problem. Whether other people are really reporting it or pushing for investigations or showing camera footage like I have, I'm not sure. But we're certainly not the only family being targeted. It just happens to be reported because I'm pushing for it,' she said.
Despite the situation, the woman said her message remains the same.
'You can take the flag, but you can't take the pride. I'm here. I'm loud. I teach my kids to be loud. That doesn't change anything about who we are and where we are in this world,' she said.
'And what do I hope for the young man who thought that this was funny or whatever his idea about it was? I hope that he grows. I hope that he grows and that his life changes in a good way, in a way that allows him to see the bigger picture. It's shocking in 2025, in progressive Canada that we're here.'
Wendi Nicholson, president of Windsor-Essex Pride Fest, said hearing about incidents like these is discouraging.
'It's just, it's disheartening,' Nicholson said.
'We're not doing anything. Just wanting to be equal and showing that, hey, we're here and that we're proud of who we are. Same as anybody with any nationality they are. They fly their national flag. They're proud of who they are. So are we. Tearing down people's flags, taking people's stuff. It's got to stop. It's just ridiculous.'
Nicholson said education is the most powerful tool the community has in fighting back.
'The only thing we can do is just educate people. If you see someone, just educate them,' she said.
'Like, why? Why? When I grew up, I was taught, if it ain't yours, don't touch it.'
The suspect in the May 2 incident is described as a Middle Eastern male with black afro-style hair and a short black beard and moustache. At the time of the incident, he wore a grey hoodie and black track pants with white stripes.
Investigators are asking residents and business owners in the area to check their surveillance or dashcam footage from May 2 and June 13 between 8 p.m. and 10 p.m. for anything that may help the investigation.
Anyone with information is asked to contact the Major Crimes Unit at 519-255-6700 ext. 4830 or submit a tip anonymously through Windsor & Essex County Crime Stoppers at 519-258-8477 (TIPS) or online.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Montreal police recover unidentifiable body from Prairies River
Montreal police pulled a body out of the Prairies River, north of the Island of Montreal near the Ahuntsic-Cartierville borough, Saturday afternoon. Police received a 911 call just before 3:20 p.m. after a person spotted the body in the water near the intersection of Gouin Boulevard and Martin Avenue. The body is unidentifiable, according to police spokesperson Julien Lévesque. Investigators with the Service de police de la Ville de Montréal analyzed the scene and the investigation is being transferred to the Quebec coroner's office.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Liberals taking ‘fresh' look at online harms bill, justice minister says
Minister of Justice Sean Fraser arrives for a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the federal government plans to take a 'fresh' look at its online harms legislation over the summer but it's not clear yet exactly what the bill will look like when it is reintroduced. It would be the Liberals third attempt to pass legislation to address harmful behaviour online. Fraser told The Canadian Press in an interview that the government hasn't decided whether to rewrite or simply reintroduce the Online Harms Act, which was introduced in 2024 but did not pass. He said Canadians can expect measures addressing deepfakes and child exploitation 'to be included in legislative reforms coming up in the near future.' In their election platform, the Liberals promised to make the distribution of non-consensual sexual deepfakes a criminal offence. They also pledged to introduce a bill to protect children from online sexploitation and extortion, and to give law enforcement and prosecutors additional tools to pursue those crimes. Fraser said the growth of artificial intelligence is influencing the discussions. The spread of generative AI has changed both the online space and everyday life since the federal government first introduced the legislation. 'We will have that in mind as we revisit the specifics of online harms legislation,' he added. 'The world changes and governments would be remiss if they didn't recognize that policy needs to shift.' Online harms legislation was first proposed by then-heritage minister Steven Guilbeault in 2021, but after widespread criticism, the government pivoted and shifted the file to the justice minister. Guilbeault is now back in his old ministry, which has been renamed Canadian identity and culture. Prime Minister Mark Carney has also created an artificial intelligence ministry, headed up by rookie MP Evan Solomon. Fraser said he expects 'significant engagement' with Guilbeault and Solomon but it will be determined later which minister will take the lead on it. The first version of the bill alarmed critics who warned that the provision requiring platforms to take down offending content within 24 hours would undermine free expression. When Fraser's predecessor, Arif Virani, introduced the Online Harms Act in 2024, the bill restricted that 24-hour takedown provision to content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor, or intimate content shared without consent, including deepfakes. It also required social media companies to explain how they plan to reduce the risks their platforms pose to users, and imposed on them a duty to protect children. But the government also included Criminal Code and Canadian Human Rights Act amendments targeting hate in the same legislation — which some said risked chilling free speech. In late 2024, Virani said he would split those controversial provisions off into a separate bill, but that didn't happen before this spring's federal election was called and the bill died on the order paper. Fraser said no decision has been made yet on whether to bring back online harms legislation in one bill or two. 'That is precisely the kind of thing that I want to have an opportunity to discuss with stakeholders, to ensure we're moving forward in a way that will create a broad base of public support,' he said. Fraser said the government could 'modify existing versions that we may have on the shelf from the previous Parliament as may be needed, or to accept the form in which we had the legislation.' He added he wants to have a 'fresh consideration of the path forward, where I personally can benefit from the advice of those closest to the file who know best how to keep kids safe online.' While the government hasn't set a date to introduce legislation, it could include some online harms measures in a crime bill Fraser plans to table in the fall. Fraser said online harms provisions that 'touch more specifically on criminal activity' could be 'included in one piece of legislation, with a broader set of reforms on online harms at a different time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 29, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press

CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Pharmacist convicted, suspended for stealing drugs due to addiction
A Winnipeg pharmacist has been convicted of fraud and reprimanded by his profession's regulatory body after years of taking drugs from his pharmacy to feed his own addiction. Manitoba's College of Pharmacists gave Scott Putz an 18-month suspension and ordered him to pay a $15,000 fine, plus $10,000 for costs of the investigation, for stealing stimulants for his own consumption. Details of the case were revealed in a spring edition of the regulator's newsletter. The regulator's decision came in 2025 because it was forced to pause its investigation while a police investigation took place. Winnipeg police charged Putz in 2021 with fraud over $5,000. In late 2023, he was given a suspended sentence after pleading guilty to the charge. Court documents say that in 2021, Putz met with College of Pharmacists of Manitoba staff and admitted he had taken controlled substances from the pharmacy for his own consumption. Putz told the college he had been doing that for about three or four years and "advised that he was suffering from substance abuse issues," the court documents say. The investigation found evidence that the medication Putz took included stimulants sometimes used to treat ADHD, such as amphetamine and dextroamphetamine. When that came to light, the college suspended Putz's pharmacist licence on an interim basis. After the criminal charge was dealt with, the college resumed its investigation in February 2024. The college's investigator found video footage from March 2021 showing Putz taking medication from the safe at the pharmacy where he worked, placing it into a paper bag and taking it to the front of the pharmacy, where he then counted out medication and placed it in his pocket, the college's disciplinary decision says. Putz was handed an 18-month suspension from practice but was credited for 17 months spent in an interim suspension from 2021-23. His pharmacist's licence was reinstated in April 2024 with additional conditions. They included submitting to regular drug and alcohol screening, working limited hours, being monitored by a pharmacy staff member and attending biweekly counselling sessions. When contacted by CBC News, he declined to comment on the case. The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba said it can't comment on cases beyond what's stated in published decisions. Neely Hammerberg, communications co-ordinator for the college, did say the case highlights addiction issues in the pharmacy profession. "We encourage any registrants who may be struggling with addiction to prioritize patient safety and to reach out to [the college] for support and guidance," Hammerberg wrote in an email to CBC. Fentanyl prescription mix-up Two other disciplinary cases were also posted in the college's spring 2025 newsletter. In one of the cases, a Manitoba pharmacist was disciplined over a prescription mix-up. Instead of a patient getting a fentanyl lollipop, as prescribed by a CancerCare doctor because it provides intermittent doses, the patient was given fentanyl patches, the decision says. The patches result in continuous delivery of fentanyl every hour, which can be dangerous in a patient who hasn't developed a tolerance for it. "Such a dose per hour can be dangerous or even fatal," the December 2024 decision says. The label for the prescription was prepared by a different pharmacist, but the decision says the disciplined pharmacist, who was on duty when the prescription was picked up, should have reviewed the prescription and provided counselling to the patient. If he'd done so, the errors could have been caught. The pharmacist was required to pay a fine of $1,500, plus $3,000 for investigative costs. Through his lawyer, he declined to comment on the case. Patient goes without medication In the third case in the college's most recent newsletter, a pharmacist was disciplined for an error that resulted in a patient going without necessary medication for more than two months. Because of that, the patient had to undergo a series of procedures to save their transplanted kidney from rejection, including an emergency kidney biopsy. In 2021, the pharmacist signed off on a kidney transplant patient's prescriptions for anti-rejection medications as having been from a prescriber at St. Boniface Hospital, when in fact the prescriber was at Health Sciences Centre. As a result of the error in location, when the patient needed a prescription refill a year later and the disciplined pharmacist no longer worked at the pharmacy, the pharmacy sent the request to the clinic at St. Boniface, the college disciplinary panel found. The person had never been a patient at St. Boniface. Jennifer Sokal, the pharmacist's lawyer, told CBC her client had entered the correct information for the prescriber, but the prescriber's profile showed an address for a hospital where the prescriber no longer worked. Sokal said it's not clear why the clinic didn't advise the pharmacy that the prescriber no longer worked there, which is what would normally happen. When the HSC clinic contacted the patient for a routine followup appointment, the patient had not taken the medication for more than two months, the decision says. At a January 2025 hearing, the pharmacist admitted to the allegations in the case, and admitted to other disciplinary charges, such as failing to take all reasonable steps to prevent loss or theft of narcotics and controlled drugs. He was fined $3,500, plus ordered to pay $4,000 for costs. The decision says he "showed great remorse for his involvement" in the kidney transplant patient's negative health outcome. The discipline panel recognized that the pharmacist was in a "very stressful situation," because the owner of the pharmacy was away on medical leave, putting the pharmacist into the role of pharmacy manager without enough training or guidance, the decision says. The COVID-19 pandemic also was raging in 2021 and 2022 when events in the case unfolded, resulting in the pharmacist losing a family member and being "unable to grieve properly," it says. The pharmacist responded to CBC's request for comment in an email from his lawyer to say he was a junior pharmacist at the time and new to pharmacy management. "There were immense pressures on pharmacists during this time at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and, after working as the pharmacy manager for three months, I made the decision to step back from the role," he said. "I was distressed when I learned of my errors. I am very sorry for the errors I made when I was a novice pharmacy manager and for the impact any of the errors may have had on any patients." Since the events in the case, the pharmacist has undergone significant training and has been a pharmacy manager since 2023 without incident, he said.